HomeMy WebLinkAbout091024 - 05.1 ATTACHMENT FISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
1 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Report Date: 4/9/2024, Revised 8/15/2024
Field Survey Date: 4/5/2024
Arborist Letter Report for One (1) California Valley Oak (Quercus lobata) Specimen Tagged “131”
2449 Tassajara Lane
Danville, California
Mr. Othmar Van Dam
c/o Kent Van Dam Properties
Dear Mr. Van Dam,
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist (WLCA) was retained by you to map, tag, photograph, and visually assess one
Quercus lobata specimen at the above noted property as shown on a preliminary site plan sheet A-1 (2023) provided by
you. WLCA visited the site on 4/5/2024 to perform a visual assessment of the tree using standard VTA (visual tree
assessment) protocols, which is a ground-based survey, and prepare written recommendations for the project team
which cover suggested optional plans of action that would optimize tree survival and tree structural stability over the
long term.
W LCA marked up revised plan sheets dated “August 2024” (sheet 7 of 21 overall site plan, and sheet 10 of 21 grading
and drainage plan) using Adobe Pro in order to show the tree’s approximate scale canopy dripline, chain link fence root
protection zone (aka “RPZ”), expected post-project stormwater drainage around tree root zone areas, etc.
Digital images of the tree archived in April, 2024 are also included as reference of existing pre-project conditions.
The site is currently undeveloped as a ranch field with existing older stable building. During WLCA’s site visit, the
ground was heavily flooded with rainwater runoff from recent rains, indicating that this area has drainage issues that will
affect future development on the site.
A tree tag “131” was affixed to the mainstem of the subject tree at eye level by WLCA to positively identify it in the field.
1.0 TREE DATA, SITE FINDINGS, DISCUSSION:
T ag: #131
Common: California valley oak (native).
Scientific: Quercus lobata.
Diameter at 4.5 feet: 58.2 inches.
Height (vertical feet): 40 feet.
Spread (horizontal feet): Roughly 70 to 90 feet total (50 feet north, 50 feet northwest with a 40” diameter stem, 40 feet
south, 35 feet east, and 45 feet west. A 50” diameter stem extends 40 feet southwest. Most of canopy live wood and
foliage extends down to within just a few vertical feet of existing soil grade elevation).
Health (vigor) (100% possible): 80%.
Structure (100% possible): 50%.
Overall condition rating (100% possible): 65% (“Good”), on a scale ranging from “dead” to “exceptional”.
ATTACHMENT F
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
2 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Live twig extension and live foliar density: Moderate to good.
Live crown ratio (LCR, Live Height / Total Height): 90 to 100%, which is excellent.
Historical pruning cut wound of 35 inches diameter noted at 13 to 16 feet elevation on north side of mainstem, which
likely resulted in extensive wood tissue decay progression inward and/or downward from the cut wound face.
Very little pruning has been performed on this tree in the past, which has resulted in a sprawling form that droops
severely downward to near-grade elevations on hillside side where the proposed soil repairs are proposed by the
project engineering team to address historical land movement issues.
Risk:
The existence of two very large diameter stems that extend northwestward (40” diameter) and southwestward (50”
diameter) is an issue that likely raises TRAQ risk ratings to above normal background “low” for all failure modes.
However, it is somewhat difficult to determine actual tree or tree part risk ratings in terms of failure and impact with
identified targets, given that there are currently no existing targets within the expected fail zone, and therefore use of
tree risk rating protocols is premature. There needs to be a known target or multiple expected targets with various
occupancy rates located within the expected fail zone of 1x or 1.5x the height of tree, for there to be a risk. Also note
that TRAQ risk rating determination is outside the scope of this initial assignment, and is therefore not applicable to this
letter report preparation assignment.
Buttress Roots:
Flares on uphill side of root crown (south) appear normal.
Flares on downhill side (north) appear somewhat obscured by years of slumped soil and are assumed to be “normal”.
However, this cannot be verified without expensive root crown excavation using hand tools to unbury the downhill side
of the root crown.
Critical Root Zone Calculations:
Per some of the most commonly used international and USA standards or recommendations, such as Best
Management Practices / Managing Trees During Construction / 2nd Edition (2016), a companion publication by
International Society of Arboriculture that is meant to provide guidance in relation to the USA ANSI A300 standards for
tree care operations, the offset distance suggested as a radial offset for construction related activity near a California
valley oak specimen (mature size) is roughly 12x to 15x the diameter of mainstem measured at 4.5 feet above grade,
which calculates out in our case to 58” x 12 = 58 feet radius offset from mainstem edge. This is a distance considered
optimal for health and structure maintenance when considering 360 degree impacts around a tree in all directions.
In the case of construction impacts occurring in only 1 or 4 or 2 of 4 quadrants of a tree’s root system, a much closer
distance inside the CRZ could be impacted by construction related work and still allow the tree to survive both
structurally and in terms of health (vigor).
For mature Quercus lobata, I typically recommend an offset distance of 25 to 30 feet radius offset for situations where
site work will occur in 1 or 2 quadrants of the tree root zone only.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
3 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Potential site work impacts from conceptual plan layout:
• SOIL STABILIZATION: Proposed soil stabilization work was originally indicated on proposed plan sheets for the
areas along the uphill side of tree canopy (south) and the east side of tree canopy. Both of these areas exhibit
extremely low canopy elevations which means that the work, depending on the height of machinery needed to
perform soil stabilization activities, would first require that airspace clearance pruning of some degree would be
performed to remove lower elevation live wood and foliage. In some cases, this pruning may not be possible to
achieve in terms of pruning to ANSI A300 United States standards for tree care operations, because the
pruning cuts would be made at random “internodal” locations along the tree stems (i.e. NOT at stem forks),
which would be non-compliant type pruning work considered to be of bad practice, resulting in short term and
long term severe damage to the tree’s health and structure. It is possible that this airspace clearance pruning
along the southeast side of tree to allow for soil stability work could in itself cause premature decline of the tree
in terms of decline of both health and structure.
Update: As of August, 2024, all of the originally proposed soil stabilization work for these south and east sides
of the tree root system and canopy have been deleted from the plans, except for a proposed drainage swale
(ditch) that is to skirt along the east edge of the existing tree canopy (see tree map markup attached to this
report). The distance from mainstem edge to drainage ditch is approximately 30+ linear feet east of mainstem
edge: an acceptable offset distance, which, although it is not technically the “Critical Root Zone” offset radius
distance of 58 feet, is still a considerable offset that is equivalent to roughly 6 times the diameter of the tree in
terms of offset from mainstem: a considerable feat, given the extremely large diameter mainstem of this tree
specimen.
It is expected that no clearance pruning will be required to be performed on tree #131 to build the drainage ditch
as currently shown on the revised August 2024 set of plans. Therefore, this potential negative impact to the tree
has been effectively eliminated or severely reduced in terms of pruning impacts to the canopy.
• RETAINING WALLS: The proposed set of new retaining walls and associated drainage curtains uphill from
each wall, have been modified in layout such that the closest retaining wall/drainage curtain will be built at least
45 to 50 feet west of the mainstem edge, skirting around the west edge of the canopy dripline (see attached
map markup). The work appears to clear the canopy and allow for fencing erection using chain link RPZ fencing
as a construction exclusion barrier at the canopy dripline.
At this distance, the closest wall to the tree mainstem edge will be located at approximately 9 to 10 times the
mainstem diameter as a linear offset radius from mainstem edge: an excellent distance at which to limit the
proposed grading work in terms of allowing for good preservation of both the lateral root system of the tree, and
its entire existing 50 foot radius canopy extension in the westward direction from mainstem base.
Author’s Side Note:
Most construction projects in the Bay Area never achieve anywhere near this offset radius distance from tree
mainstem edge, in terms of tree root and canopy preservation in relation to proposed new grading and drainage
plans.
• BUILDING PAD: The building pad has been moved from within the existing tree canopy dripline, to now 60+
linear feet west of the mainstem edge, which places the finish pad outside of the tree canopy dripline, thereby
allowing for the existing tree canopy to remain as-is as a “protected in place” massing of live wood and foliage.
It is expected that no clearance pruning will need to be performed for either vertical or horizontal clearance at
this west edge of the existing tree canopy (i.e. the “dripline”).
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
4 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & FINAL NOTES:
2.0(a). Fencing (Root Protection Zone Fence, aka “RPZ Fence”):
Prior to start of project (i.e. prior to demolition or grading), install either:
a. BEST: Robust chain link fencing material set on two inch diameter iron tube posts
pounded 24 inches into the ground at 8 to 10 feet on center, or
b. 2nd BEST: Prefabricated chain link fence panels set on moveable concrete block
footings, with layout stakes or rebar pounded into the ground 24 inches below grade
at both ends of each prefabricated chain link fencing panel and wired directly to the
fencing panels.
For this project, add the following redundancy items to the fence:
c. FENCE RIGIDITY & EFFECTIVENESS: Chain link fencing
material hung on 2 inch diameter iron tube posts per item
“a” above, combined with silt fencing and straw wattles.
Bury the bottom edge of the silt fencing in a trench on the
UPHILL SIDE OF THE CHAIN LINK FENCE, per package
directions (see sample image below right, from Youtube).
Pin down the straw wattle over the base of the buried silt
fence edge, on the UPHILL SIDE OF THE CHAIN LINK
FENCE, using wooden dowels provided by the straw
wattle manufacturer (see image at right).
The silt fence and straw wattle, both installed on the
UPHILL SIDE OF THE CHAIN LINK, act to prevent or slow
down stormwater silt migration and soil erosion (slumping)
into the tree root protection zone area, increasing fence
effectiveness and fence rigidity.
Typical fence alignment is at or beyond the tree canopy
dripline edge to prevent physical damage to the canopy
and root system within the canopy dripline. The author’s
tree map markup attached to the end of this report shows
fencing erection as a heavy red dashed line extending 360
degrees in a full perimeter along the existing edge of tree
#131 canopy (canopy dripline), all the way out to the
proposed grading daylights, proposed drainage ditch
construction route, and proposed retaining wall build route.
Above Right (Middle of Page):
A completed triple-redundancy RPZ tree barrier fence
system of silt fence hung on iron tube posts, plus silt
fence buried in a trench, and straw wattles pinned
down over the bottom edge of the silt fence, effectively slowing or stopping silt migration and soil
slumping downhill into the RPZ root zone protection area.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
5 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
2.0(b) Hydrology Changes as a Result of Project Buildout:
The true extent of hydrological changes expected to occur on site around tree #131 as a direct or indirect result of
proposed site work are not able to be verified at the time of writing, and are outside the purview of the author.
Speaking generally from an arboriculture perspective, reduction of tree #131’s access to natural subsurface soil
moisture from rainstorms may occur as a result of the construction of the drainage ditch along the southeast side of the
tree’s canopy, and as a result of the construction of an extensive series of graded swales, retaining walls and French
drain curtains behind the retaining walls, effectively creating a landscape “bowl” inside which the tree will remain. Again,
speaking generally, it is expected that a reduced volume of stormwater will reach the subject tree root system due to the
construction of the above noted various stormwater conveyance systems.
Note on WLCA’s tree map markup sheet 2 of 2 attached to the end of this report, stormwater flows in the “bowled”
landscape area will apparently continue to drain toward Tassajara Lane, even after grading and construction per plan is
completed. As noted above, the actual volume
of rain-derived water accessible by the tree’s
root system is likely to be diminished to some
degree as compared to current pre-project
rainwater accessibility by the tree root system.
The long term effect, if any, in terms of
reduction of tree health (vigor) and/or
structure, due to reduction of rainwater access
by the root system, is not known.
2.0(c) Pruning (If Required):
If pruning is required to be performed to clear
airspace for proposed retaining wall
construction and/or drainage ditch
construction, the work shall be directly
monitored on-site by an ISA-Certified Arborist
or an ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist.
All work shall conform to the most current
iteration of ANSI A300 Part 1: Tree, Shrub,
and Other Woody Plant Maintenance –
Standard Practices, Pruning, and per the
ANSI A300 companion publication entitled
“Pruning” (3rd edition, 2019), published in the
USA by International Society of Arboriculture.
Most or all pruning cuts will need to consist of
stem length reduction cuts, per ANSI A300
standards. Refer to the image at right.
Right: Image showing correct stem length
reduction pruning per Gilman’s “Structural
Pruning” text, which shows how a limb system
or branch system is reduced in length through
removal of the outermost end section of the
limb or branch system, pruning back to a
viable fork, using a “reduction cut”.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
6 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Pruning :
The Three-Step Cut Method, and the Reduction
Cut:
Note that for all pruning, the “three-step cut”
sequence shown in the images below and at
right needs to be used, to avoid tearing or
peeling the bark of the tree at the final moment
of the final pruning cut.
The image below and at right shows how a
reduction cut is performed to reduce a two-stem
system down to a one-stem system, thereby
reducing overall limb system length.
For this type of reduction cut, it is also important to
use the “three step cut” sequence in order to avoid
tearing the bark during the pruning, especially
when pruning a stem that is 3 inches diameter or
greater.
Note that even though the image states “entire limb
removal”, this type of “three step cut” applies to
most stem length reduction pruning cuts as
well, and is beneficial as the ANSI -A300
compliant pruning method to be used while
performing most or all pruning cuts.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
7 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
3.0 APPRAISAL:
Using Guide for Plant Appraisal 10th edition, 2nd printing “trunk formula technique” (TFT) (2019), the appraised dollar
value of tree #131 as of today’s date is:
$84,100.1
1 Note that the actual mitigation required per City, in the case that this tree were to be removed from the landscape, may
or may not be based off of appraised dollar value. Typical planning division in-lieu fees paid to City tree planting funds
are more on the order of $5,000 to $20,000 per each single large mature tree specimen removed from site. The actual
fee required for removal of tree #131, (if the tree were to be removed), would need to be determined by City of Danville
Staff.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
8 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
4.0 DIGITAL IMAGES ARCHIVED BY WLCA IN APRIL, 2024:
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
9 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
West Side of Canopy. Note proximity to grade.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
10 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Looking eastward at the northwestward-extended 50 foot long 40 inch diameter (approx.) mainstem that is of roughly
horizontal position on the tree. Note canopy proximity to grade.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
11 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
South side of canopy, looking southeastward. Note proximity to grade. Very little of the live wood in this tree can be
properly pruned per ANSI A300 standards, because there are few if any forks available to use as the pruning cut fork
locations for ANSI A300 compliant stem length-reduction type pruning cuts.
Northwestward stem extending left.
Looking westward.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
12 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Large diameter stem pruned in past is physically decayed
due to wood decay causing fungi, resulting in tissue decay
progression downward from the pruning cut face.
(Intentionally blank)
5.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownership to any
property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and
all property is appraised and evaluated as through free and clean, under responsible ownership and competent
management.
It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinance, statutes, or other government
regulations.
Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible;
however, the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by
others.
The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless
subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described
in the fee schedule and contract of engagement.
Unless required by law otherwise, the possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or
use for any other purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or
verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser.
Unless required by law otherwise, neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof, shall be
conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media,
without the prior expressed conclusions, identity of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any professional
society or institute or to any initiated designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualifications.
This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant/appraiser, and the
consultant’s/appraiser’s fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the
occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
13 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
Sketches, drawings, and photographs in this report, being intended for visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and
should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys unless expressed otherwise. The
reproduction of any information generated by engineers, architects, or other consultants on any sketches, drawings, or
photographs is for the express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only. Inclusion of said information on any
drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by Walter Levison to the sufficiency or accuracy of
said information.
Unless expressed otherwise:
• information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the conditions of
those items at the time of inspection; and
• the inspection is limited to ground-based visual examination of accessible items without climbing, dissection,
excavation, probing, or coring.
• There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property
in question may not arise in the future.
Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report.
Arborist Disclosure Statement:
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees,
recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees.
Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Tree are living
organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground.
Arborist cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time.
Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed.
Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist’s services such
as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. Arborists cannot
take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist
should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way
to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees.
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Cell (415) 203-0990
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Email walterslevisonjr@yahoo.com
14 of 14
Site Address: 2449 Tassajara Lane, Danville, CA Iteration: 8/15/2024
Walter Levison 2024 All Rights Reserved
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Life Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
6.0 CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that all the statements of fact in this report are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief, and are made in good faith.
Signature of Consultant
DIGITAL BADGES:
ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST CREDENTIAL:
https://certificates.isa-arbor.com/f1918723-df46-48cc-ace2-c12625530fec#gs.v54om6
(Renewed through June, 2026)
ISA TREE RISK ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED (TRAQ):
https://certificates.isa-arbor.com/d180515f-ab75-440b-9c66-106005e3cf10?record_view=true#gs.hpb30w
(Renewed through March, 2028)
7.0 ATTACHED: WLCA TREE MAP MARKUP (ADOBE PRO), USING OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET 7 OF 21
(AUGUST, 2024) AND GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET 10 OF 21 (AUGUST, 2024) AS BASIS.
K
E
N
T
A
N
D
V
A
N
D
A
M
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
A
P
N
'
s
:
2
0
7
-
0
6
1
-
0
0
8
&
2
0
7
-
0
6
1
-
0
0
9
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
T
O
W
N
O
F
D
A
N
V
I
L
L
E
2
1
O
F
S
H
E
E
T
N
O
.
REVISIONAPPD.DATEKRACHECKED:NO.JMG/SMS/LLC SMS/LLCDRAWN:DATE:SCALE:DESIGNED:MICHAEL E. MILANI DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:DATER.C.E. No. 35121 REGISTRATION EXPIRES 9/30/25
J
O
B
N
O
.
2
7
0
0
1
9
AS SHOWN AUGUST 2024
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP ~ SUBDIVISION ______
V
E
S
T
I
N
G
T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
M
A
P
7
O
V
E
R
A
L
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
A
N
D
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
L
A
N
K
E
N
T
A
N
D
V
A
N
D
A
M
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
A
P
N
'
s
:
2
0
7
-
0
6
1
-
0
0
8
&
2
0
7
-
0
6
1
-
0
0
9
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
T
O
W
N
O
F
D
A
N
V
I
L
L
E
2
1
O
F
S
H
E
E
T
N
O
.
REVISIONAPPD.DATEKRACHECKED:NO.JMG/SMS/LLC SMS/LLCDRAWN:DATE:SCALE:DESIGNED:MICHAEL E. MILANI DESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:
D
A
T
E
R.C.E. No. 35121 REGISTRATION EXPIRES 9/30/25
J
O
B
N
O
.
2
7
0
0
1
9
AS SHOWN AUGUST 2024
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP ~ SUBDIVISION ______
V
E
S
T
I
N
G
T
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
M
A
P
1
0