HomeMy WebLinkAbout110122-06.5
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6.5
TO: Mayor and Town Council November 1, 2022
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 93-2022, authorizing the Mayor of the Town of Danville to
certify the Measure J Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 Growth Management
Program Compliance Checklist
BACKGROUND
The Measure J Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist
(“Compliance Checklist”) consists of the 12th and 13th years of Measure J (calendar years
2020 and 2021). As with the previous requirements under Measure C, Measure J requires
that local jurisdictions in Contra Costa County take several actions in order to receive the
18% Local Street Maintenance and Improvement (“return-to-source”) funds for FY 2021/22
and FY 2022/23:
1. Implementation of actions, measures, and programs agreed upon in the Tri-
Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance;
2. Adoption of a development mitigation program to ensure that new
development pays its fair share of the costs associated with that development
and that no funds from the Measure will be used in place of private developer
funding;
3. Implementation of a regional transportation mitigation program (Southern
Contra Costa Regional Fee and the Tri-Valley Transportation Development
Fee);
4. Development of an implementation program, based upon the Capital
Improvement Program and Housing Element, that creates housing
opportunities for all income levels;
5. Participation in cooperative, multi-jurisdictional planning to ease cumulative
traffic impacts. This is accomplished through regular attendance and
participation at the Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT), the
local Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC) created by Measure
C and continued under Measure J;
Measure J Calendar Years 2020 and
2021 GMP Compliance Checklist 2 November 1, 2022
6. Adoption of a five-year Capital Improvement Program to meet and maintain adopted
traffic service and performance standards;
7. Adoption of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance;
8. Adoption of, and compliance with, a voter-approved Urban Limit Line (ULL);
9. Posting of signs meeting Contra Costa Transportation Authority specifications
for all projects exceeding $250,000 that are funded, in whole or in part, with
Measures C and J funds;
10. Adoption of, and compliance with, a Growth Management Element (GME);
11. Maintenance of a specified minimum level of local street and road expenditures
based on a historic amount spent for transportation during a base period; and
12. Submittal of a Local Street Maintenance and Improvement (LSM) report on
Measure J expenditures for FY 2019/20 and FY 2020/21.
Each jurisdiction is required to submit a Compliance Checklist (Attachment B) to the Contra
Costa Transportation Authority (“Authority”) to demonstrate how it complies with the
requirements of Measure J. Upon approval of the Compliance Checklist, the Authority uses
a “population and road miles” formula, based upon the California Department of Finance’s
population estimates and Caltrans’ public road mileage data to allocate funds to each local
agency. The Authority distributed $937,522 in return-to-source funds to Danville for FY
2020/21. The distribution for FY 2021/22 is $1,043,047. Revenue allocation estimates for FY
2022/23 are anticipated to be available in spring 2023.
DISCUSSION
The Town of Danville is in full compliance with the Measure J Growth Management
Program (GMP). Dating back to 1985, before the passage of Measure C in 1988, the Town
Council was in the process of implementing growth management in Danville. Although
Measure C required some formalization and reformatting of growth management efforts
within the Town, Danville’s established practices were already consistent with Measure C
efforts. On April 1, 2009, the Measure J program commenced and elements of the
Countywide GMP compliance reporting requirements were modified from previous
Measure C requirements. Highlights of Danville’s compliance during calendar years 2020
and 2021 are detailed in Attachment B.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Posting of the meeting agenda serves as notice to the general public.
Measure J Calendar Years 2020 and
2021 GMP Compliance Checklist 3 November 1, 2022
FISCAL IMPACT
Following Authority certification of compliance, the Town is expected to receive a total of
$1,043,047 for FY 2021/22.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 93-2022, authorizing the Mayor of the Town of Danville to certify the
Measure J Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist.
Prepared by:
Andrew Dillard
Transportation Manager
Reviewed by:
Tai J. Williams
Assistant Town Manager
Attachments: A – Resolution No. 93-2022
B – Measure J Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 GMP Compliance Checklist
RESOLUTION NO. 93-2022
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE TO CERTIFY THE
MEASURE J CALENDAR YEARS 2020 AND 2021 GROWTH MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
WHEREAS, Measure J requires that the Contra Costa Transportation Authority
(“Authority”) review local jurisdictions’ compliance with the countywide Growth
Management Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville has implemented the actions contained in the Tri-
Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance; and
WHEREAS, the Town has prepared a five-year Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town has adopted a development mitigation program which ensures
that development pays its fair share of the costs associated with that development; and
WHEREAS, the Town has adopted the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee and
the Southern Contra Costa (SCC) Regional Fee for Road Improvements, which ensures
that development pays its fair share of the cost of mitigating regional traffic impacts; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has
certified that the 2014-2022 Danville Housing Element meets the statutory requirements
of, and is in full compliance with, State housing element law; and
WHEREAS, the Town has developed an implementation program that creates housing
opportunities for all income levels; and
WHEREAS, the Town is in compliance with adopted performance standards for all urban
services provided by the Town; and
WHEREAS, the Town has participated in cooperative, multi-jurisdictional planning; and
WHEREAS, the Town has adopted a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
Ordinance and a Growth Management Element; and
WHEREAS, the Town has adopted the Contra Costa County voter-approved Measure L
Urban Limit Line as the Town’s Urban Limit Line as it specifically applies to the Town’s
boundaries; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6939A6A3-111B-45F3-88D6-864DED4090BB
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-2022
WHEREAS, the Town has posted signs in accordance with specifications by the
Authority for all projects exceeding $250,000 that are funded fully or partially by Measure
J revenues; and
WHEREAS, the Town has met the Maintenance of Effort requirements of Measure J; and
WHEREAS, the Town has submitted a Local Street Maintenance and Improvement
Measure J expenditure report for FY 2019/2020 and 2020/21; and
WHEREAS, the Town has satisfied all requirements necessary to be found in compliance
with the Growth Management Program; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Danville Town Council authorizes the Mayor to certify the Measure
J Calendar Years 2020 and 2021 Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist, indicating
the Town’s compliance with the Measure J Growth Management Program.
APPROVED by the Danville Town Council at a regular meeting on November 1, 2022,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
______________________________
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_______________________________ ______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6939A6A3-111B-45F3-88D6-864DED4090BB
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Measure J Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist
1.Action Plans YES NO N/A a.Is the jurisdiction implementing the actions called for in theapplicable Action Plan for all designated Routes of RegionalSignificance within the jurisdiction?b.Has the jurisdiction implemented the following procedures asoutlined in the Implementation Guide and the applicable Action Planfor Routes of Regional Significance?i.Circulation of environmental documents,ii.Analysis of the impacts of proposed General Plan amendmentsand recommendation of changes to Action Plans, andiii.Conditioning the approval of projects consistent with ActionPlan policies?c.Has the jurisdiction followed the procedures for RTPC review ofGeneral Plan Amendments as called for in the Implementation
Guide?
2.Development Mitigation Program YES NO a.Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a local developmentmitigation program to ensure that new development pays its fairshare of the impact mitigation costs associated with thatdevelopment?b.Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented the regionaltransportation mitigation program, developed, and adopted by theapplicable Regional Transportation Planning Committee, includingany regional traffic mitigation fees, assessments, or othermitigation as appropriate?
ATTACHMENT B
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
3. Address Housing Options YES NO a. Has the jurisdiction prepared and submitted a report to the Authority demonstrating reasonable progress in providing housing opportunities for all income levels under its Housing Element? The report can demonstrate progress by (1) comparing the number of housing units approved, constructed, or occupied within the jurisdiction over the preceding five years with the number of units needed on average each year to meet the housing objectives established in its Housing Element; or (2) illustrating how the jurisdiction has adequately planned to meet the existing and projected housing needs through the adoption of land use plans and regulatory systems which provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development; or (3) illustrating how its General Plan and zoning regulations facilitate improvement or development of sufficient housing to meet the Element’s objectives.
Note: A copy of the local jurisdiction’s annual progress report (Tables
A thru C) to the state Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) is sufficient.
b. Does the jurisdiction’s General Plan—or other adopted policy document or report—consider the impacts that its land use and development policies have on the local, regional, and countywide transportation system, including the level of transportation capacity that can reasonably be provided?
c. Has the jurisdiction incorporated policies and standards into its development approval process that support transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access in new developments?
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
4. Traffic Impact Studies YES NO N/A a. Using the Authority’s Technical Procedures, have traffic impact studies been conducted as part of development review for all projects estimated to generate more than 100 net new peak-hour vehicle trips? (Note: Lower traffic generation thresholds established through the RTPC’s Action Plan may apply).
b. If the answer to 4.a. above is “yes”, did the local jurisdiction notify affected parties and circulate the traffic impact study during the environmental review process?
5. Participation in Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional Planning YES NO a. During the reporting period, has the jurisdiction’s Council/Board representative regularly participated in meetings of the appropriate Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC), and have the jurisdiction’s local representatives to the RTPC regularly reported on the activities of the Regional Committee to the jurisdiction's council or board? (Note: Each RTPC should have a policy that defines what constitutes regular attendance of Council/Board members at RTPC meetings.)
b. Has the local jurisdiction worked with the RTPC to develop and implement the Action Plans, including identification of Routes of Regional Significance, establishing Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) for those routes, and defining actions for achieving the MTSOs?
c. Has the local jurisdiction applied the Authority’s travel demand model and Technical Procedures to the analysis of General Plan Amendments (GPAs) and developments exceeding specified thresholds for their effect on the regional transportation system, including on Action Plan MTSOs?
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021 YES NO d. As needed, has the jurisdiction made available, as input into the countywide transportation computer model, data on proposed improvements to the jurisdiction’s transportation system, including roadways, pedestrian circulation, bikeways, and trails, planned and improved development within the jurisdiction, and traffic patterns?
6. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program YES NO Does the jurisdiction have an adopted five-year capital improvement program (CIP) that includes approved projects and an analysis of project costs as well as a financial plan for providing the improvements? (The transportation component of the plan must be forwarded to the Authority for incorporation into the Authority’s database of transportation projects)
7. Transportation Systems Management Program YES NO Has the jurisdiction adopted a transportation systems management ordinance or resolution that incorporates required policies consistent with the updated model ordinance prepared by the Authority for use by local agencies or qualified for adoption of alternative mitigation measures because it has a small employment base?
8. Adoption of a voter-approved Urban Limit Line YES NO N/A a. Has the local jurisdiction adopted and continually complied with an applicable voter-approved Urban Limit Line as outlined in the Authority’s annual ULL Policy Advisory Letter?
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021 b.If the jurisdiction has modified its voter approved ULL or approveda major subdivision or General Plan Amendment outside the ULL,has the jurisdiction made a finding of consistency with theMeasure J provisions on ULLs and criteria in the ULL PolicyAdvisory Letter after holding a noticed public hearing and makingthe proposed finding publicly available?
9.Adoption of the Measure J Growth Management
Element YES NO N/A Has the local jurisdiction adopted a final GME for its General Plan that substantially complies with the intent of the Authority’s adopted Measure J Model GME?
10.Posting of Signs YES NO N/A Has the jurisdiction posted signs meeting Authority specifications for all projects exceeding $250,000 that are funded, in whole or in part, with Measure C or Measure J funds?
11.Maintenance of Effort (MoE)YES NO Has the jurisdiction met the MoE requirements of Measure J as stated in Section 6 of the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance (as amended)? (See the Checklist Instructions for a listing of MoE requirements by local jurisdiction.)
12.Submittal of LSM Reporting and Audit Forms YES NO Has the local jurisdiction submitted a Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Reporting Form and Audit Reporting Form for eligible expenditures of 18 percent funds covering FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19?
YES NO N/A
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
13.Other Considerations YES NO N/A If the jurisdiction believes that the requirements of Measure J have been satisfied in a way not indicated on this checklist, has an explanation been attached below?
Review and Approval of Checklist This Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist was prepared by:
Signature Date
Name & Title (print)
Phone Email
The Council/Board of ___________ has reviewed the completed Checklist and found that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program.
Certified Signature (Mayor or Chair) Date
Name & Title (print)
Attest Signature (City/Town/County Clerk) Date
Name (print)
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Supplementary Information (Required)
1.Action Plans
a.Please summarize steps taken during the reporting period to implement the actions,
programs, and measures called for in the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional
Significance:
b.Attach, list, and briefly describe any General Plan Amendments that were approved during the
reporting period. Please specify which amendments affected ability to meet the standards in
the Growth Management Element and/or affected ability to implement Action Plan policies or
meet Multimodal Traffic Service Objectives (MTSOs). Indicate if amendments were forwarded
to the jurisdiction’s RTPC for review, and describe the results of that review relative to Action
Plan implementation:
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Provide a summary list of projects approved during the reporting period and the conditions
required for consistency with the Action Plan:
2. Development Mitigation Program
a. Describe progress on implementation of the regional transportation mitigation program:
3. Address Housing Options
a. Please attach a report demonstrating reasonable progress in providing housing opportunities
for all income levels. (Note: A copy of the local jurisdiction’s annual report (Tables A thru C) to
the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is sufficient). PLEASE ADD ATTACHMENTS TO END OF PDF
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
Please attach the jurisdiction’s adopted policies and standards that ensure consideration of
and support for walking, bicycling, and transit access during the review of proposed
development. PLEASE ADD ATTACHMENTS TO END OF PDF
4. Traffic Impact Studies
Please list all traffic impact studies that have been conducted as part of the development
review of any project that generated more than 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips. (Note:
Lower traffic generation thresholds established through the RTPC’s Action Plan may apply).
Note whether the study was consistent with the Authority’s Technical Procedures and whether
notification and circulation were undertaken during the environmental review process.
5. Participation in Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional Planning No attachments necessary
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
6. Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
Please attach the transportation component of the most recent CIP version, if the Authority
does not already have it. Otherwise, list the resolution number and date of adoption of the
most recent five-year CIP.
7. Transportation Systems Management Program
Please attach a copy of the jurisdiction’s TSM ordinance or list the date of ordinance or
resolution adoption and its number.
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
8. Adoption of a voter-approved Urban Limit Line
The local jurisdiction’s adopted ULL is on file at the Authority offices. Please specify any
actions that were taken during the reporting period regarding changes or modifications to the
voter approved ULL, which should include a resolution making a finding of consistency with
Measure J and a copy of the related public hearing notice.
9. Adoption of the Measure J Growth Management Element
Please attach the adopted Final Measure J Growth Management Element to the local
jurisdiction’s General Plan or list the date of ordinance or resolution adoption and its number.
10. Posting of Signs
Provide a list of all projects exceeding $250,000 within the jurisdiction, noting which ones are
or were signed according to Authority specifications.
Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: _______________________________________ For Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Reporting Period: Calendar Years 2020 & 2021
11. Maintenance of Effort (MoE)
Please indicate the jurisdiction’s MoE requirement and MoE expenditures for the past two
fiscal years (FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19). See the Instructions to identify the MoE
requirements.
12. Submittal of LSM Reporting Form and Audit Reporting Form Please attach LSM (Summary) Reporting and LSM Audit (Detail) Forms for FY 2017-18
and FY 2018-19. PLEASE ADD ATTACHMENTS TO END OF PDF
13. Other Considerations
Please specify any alternative methods of achieving compliance for any components for the
Measure J Growth Management Program
ATTACHMENT 1.a Action Plans
The Town actively participated in regional and subregional transportation planning activities through representation on transportation committees including the Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT) and the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC), and
several Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) committees including the CCTA Board
of Directors, Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC), Growth Management Program Task Force, and Innovate 680 Policy Advisory and Technical Advisory Committees. The Town continued collection of the Southern Contra Costa County (SCC) Regional and Sub-
Regional Fees, and the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) for traffic
mitigation. These fee programs meet the objectives of mitigating impacts of new development on the regional on the roadway system and objectives set forth in the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan and Action Plan (TVTP/AP). The Town also actively participated in efforts related to an update to the Tri-Valley Transportation Council’s (TVTC) Nexus Study and Strategic Expenditure Plan
update for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) Program. In FY21-22, the
TVTC, and subsequently the Town of Danville, adopted the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee update and Strategic Expenditure Plan. The Town actively participated on the Dougherty Valley Transit Oversight Committee.
The Town monitored Level of Service performance at 37 intersections, and measured traffic volumes at 32 locations through its biennial traffic count program. The TVTP/AP identifies “Interregional” (pre-existing Routes of Regional Significance) and “Intraregional” (local roads) Routes of Regional Significance throughout the Tri-Valley region, and the establishment of
Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSO’s) for the purpose of measuring
performance and quality of service along these routes. The Town’s analysis of its traffic count data confirmed that all “Intraregional” routes met the established MTSO’s, inclusive of meeting acceptable Level of Service thresholds at monitored intersections.
Partnering with the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County, the Town continued to
participate in the TRAFFIX Student Transportation Program for the San Ramon Valley, a traffic congestion relief program funded through Measure J. TRAFFIX provided student transportation to two high schools, one middle school and two elementary schools within Danville during the reporting period. The program directly supports the Vision, Goals and Policies set forth in
Section 2 of the 2017 TVTP/AP.
In 2021, the Town of Danville adopted its first Townwide Bicycle Master Plan (BMP) that includes an analysis and assessment of existing bicycle facility and circulation conditions town-wide including along all Routes of Regional Significance. The plan identifies a suite of projects
and programs to support and enhance bicycle access and congestion reduction, and that also directly supports the Vision, Goals and Policies prescribed in Section 2 of the 2017 TVTP/AP.
During the reporting period, the Town initiated, completed or continued progress on the following Capital Improvement Program projects to improve roadway safety, circulation and access for all modes of travel; directly contribute to supporting, improving and encouraging mobility for pedestrian and bicycle modes; improving access to transit; and enhancing safety
through promoting and implementing residential and arterial traffic calming:
CIP A-362, Downtown Improvement Project (Master Plan) CIP A-620, Fiber Optic Interconnect (Master Plan) CIP C-017, Townwide Sidewalk Repairs
CIP C- 055, Diablo Road Trail
CIP C-305, Traffic Management Program CIP C-545, Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades CIP C-562, Traffic Signal Interconnect System CIP C-585, Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
CIP C-588, Traffic Signal Battery Back-up Systems
CIP C-600, San Ramon Valley Boulevard Improvements CIP C-601, Camino Ramon Improvements CIP C-607, Iron Horse Trail Crossing Improvements CIP C-609, Townwide Bicycle Master Plan
CIP C-610, Pavement Management Program
CIP C-621, Townwide Bicycle Improvements
ATTACHMENT 3.a
2020 and 2021 Housing Activity Annual Reports
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6.3
TO: Mayor and Town Council May 4, 2021
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 17-2021, receiving and accepting the Housing Element
Annual Progress Report for 2020
BACKGROUND
The State of California requires that all local governments adequately plan to meet local
housing needs through adoption of a General Plan Housing Element that includes policies,
programs, and quantified objectives to guide decisions related to the development of
housing. State law also mandates that each city prepare an Annual Progress Report (APR)
on the implementation of its Housing Element in a format prescribed by the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The report is then used to
monitor the city’s progress toward accommodating its “fair share” assignment of the
region’s housing needs for specific affordability levels.
California Government Code Section 65400 requires that the local legislative body review
and accept the APR (Attachment B), which is then submitted to HCD and the Governor’s
Office of Planning and Research (OPR).
DISCUSSION
The Danville 2014-2022 Housing Element covers the eight-year period from January 2015 to
January 2023. The attached report covers the first six years of that period, reporting housing
activity from 2015 through 2020. The format prescribed for APRs by HCD, beginning with
the 2018 report, requires housing unit production be reported in three categories: (a)
potential housing units that have secured all requisite planning entitlements but have not
yet initiated the building permit process as of the end of the APR reporting year; (b)
potential housing units that have initiated the building permit process and were somewhere
between a building permit status of “Applied” to a status of “Under Construction,” but had
not secured a final building inspection release as of the end of the APR reporting year; and
(c) units that secured final building inspection release in the prior calendar year as of the
APR reporting year.
Income Categories
Danville’s assigned “fair share” of the region’s housing need is determined by the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). For the current planning period, the
assignment is 557 total units comprised of four affordability categories.
Housing Element Annual 2 May 4, 2021
Progress Report for 2020
Each category is defined by the state of California and expressed as a percent of the most
recently published area median income, as follows:
• Very low income (50% or below of area median income): 196 units
• Low income (51-80% of area median income): 111 units
• Moderate income (81-120% of area median income): 124 units
• Above moderate income (>120% of area median income): 126 units
Total Assigned Units - Danville: 557 units
The state of California has not yet released the State Income Limits for 2021, however, the
published area median income for 2020 applicable to Danville is outlined below and further
differentiated by household size:
1-Person
Household
2-Person
Household
3-Person
Household
4-Person
Household
5-Person
Household
Very low income $45,700 $52,200 $58,750 $65,250 $70,500
Low income $73,100 $83,550 $94,000 $104,400 $112,800
Median income $83,450 $95,350 $107,300 $119,200 $128,750
Moderate income $100,150 $114,450 $128,750 $143,050 $154,500
These income categories are based on the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s (HUD) income categories. These income levels reflect a 14.2% increase over
the published median income for 2019 which, in turn, reflected a 7.2% increase over the
published median income for 2018.
It is important to note that state law does not require cities to build housing. The
development of housing is driven by private market forces. The Town’s obligation is to
provide an appropriate amount of land, with the proper general plan land use designation
and the appropriate zoning designation, to accommodate the private development of
housing units for the assigned quantity and affordability levels.
Work Plan for Housing Element Implementation Measures efforts for 2021
Exhibit 1 of Attachment B details the status of efforts made on the Housing Element
Implementation Measures of the Danville 2014-2022 Housing Element through the end of
2020 and the planned efforts to be undertaken in 2021.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Posting of the meeting agenda serves as notice to the general public.
Housing Element Annual 3 May 4, 2021
Progress Report for 2020
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 17-2021, receiving and accepting the Housing Element Annual
Progress Report for 2020.
Prepared by:
David Crompton
Chief of Planning
Reviewed by:
Tai Williams
Assistant Town Manager
Attachments: A - Resolution No. 17-2021
B - Annual Housing Element Implementation Progress Report
Exhibit 1 - Work Plan for Housing Element Implementation
Measures efforts for 2021
RESOLUTION NO. 17-2021
RECEIVING AND ACCEPTING THE HOUSING ELEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2020
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65400(2) requires the planning agency
to provide an Annual Progress Report (APR) to the Danville Town Council, the State
Department of Housing and Community Development, and the State Office of Planning
and Research regarding progress toward implementation of the housing element of the
general plan; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville has prepared an APR for the calendar year 2020,
utilizing the prescribed forms and instructions provided by HCD; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Danville Town Council hereby accepts and receives the APR for
2020 on the Town of Danville 2014-2022 Housing Element and directs that the report be
forwarded to the State Department of Housing and Community Development and the
State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to Government Code Section 65400(2).
APPROVED by the Danville Town Council at a regular meeting on May 4, 2021 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
________________________________
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ ________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1C260E34-2D78-40E4-B141-F96FD4BD2371
ATTACHMENT A
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Date Application Submitted
Total Approved Units by Project
Total Disapproved Units by Project
Streamlining Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10
Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category(SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=RenterO=Owner
Date Application Submitted (see instructions)
Very Low-Income Deed Restricted
Very Low-Income Non Deed Restricted
Low-Income Deed Restricted
Low-Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate-Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
Total PROPOSED Units by Project
Total APPROVED Units by project
Total DISAPPROVED Units by Project
Was APPLICATION SUBMITTED Pursuant to GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 5 0 0
206140020 206140020
1485 Lawrence Rd,
Danville, CA 94506
SD 9543 - 1485
Lawrence Road SUB20-0001
SFD O
7/30/2020
5 5 No 5 Lot Tentative Map - 1485
Lawrence Road
206160016 206160016 1475 Lawrence Rd, Danville, CA 94506 MS 851-2020 - Lawrence Road SUB20-0002
SFD O
8/12/2020
4 4 No 4 Lot Tentative Map MS
851-2020 - 1475 Lawrence Road
208041005 208041005 134 El Dorado Ave, Danville, CA 94526
DEV20-00011 SFA O
8/20/2020
5 5 5 No Development Plan request to construct five single
family attached and
detached residences in conjunction with a five-lot
subdivision
206690004 206690004
5 Loyal Dragon Pl,
Danville, CA 94506
DEV20-00012 SFD O
9/1/2020
4 4 No Development Plan & Design
Review for Loyal Dragon Place
0
00
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
51
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes
ATTACHMENT B
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units
Streamlining Infill Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions
Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=RenterO=Owner
Very Low- Income Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Low- Income Deed Restricted
Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
EntitlementDate Approved # of Units issued Entitlements
Very Low- Income Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Low- Income Deed Restricted
Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits
Very Low- Income Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Low- Income Deed Restricted
Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness (see instructions) Date Issued
# of Units issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness
How many of the units were Extremely Low
Income?+
Was Project APPROVED using GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Y/N
Infill Units?Y/N+
Assistance Programs for Each Development (see instructions)
Deed Restriction Type(see instructions)
For units affordable without financial assistance or deed restrictions, explain how the locality determined the units were affordable(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction (years) (if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000)+
Number of Demolished/Destroyed Units+
Demolished or Destroyed Units+
Demolished/Destroyed Units Owner or
Renter+
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 5 22 31 0 0 0 6 0 2 19 27 0 0 4 0 0
203182061 203182061 100 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013696 SFD O 0 0 1 8/27/2020 1 N Y NSFD 3080/GAR 508/CO 203182050 203182050 128 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013705 SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2020 1 N Y NSFD 2954/GAR 524/CO 203182049 203182049 130 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013709 SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2020 1 N Y NSFD 3080/GAR 508/ CO
207202022 207202025 46 Smokewood Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B19-014246 SFD O 0 1 2/12/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4658 / GAR 1102 217010008 217010008 116 Maple Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014681 SFD O 0 1 8/10/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 3596/ATTACHED 217010008 217010008 216 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014756 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/CO 217010008 217010008 229 Akabane Ln, , CA 94506 B20-014753 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 3376/GAR 520/CO 217010008 217010008 203 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014750 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSDF 3376/GAR 520/CO 217010008 217010008 219 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014752 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSDF 4028/ GAR 470/CO 217010008 217010008 209 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014751 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSDF 4028/GAR 470/CO 217010008 217010008 226 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014754 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/CO 217010008 217010008 206 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014757 SFD O 0 1 9/29/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/ CO 217010008 217010008 200 Akabane Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014841 SFD O 0 1 10/15/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028 /GARAGE 47 208074004 208074004 315 Glendora Cir, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014813 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2020 1 0 N Y 1 Demolished O RSFD 4405 / GARAGE 8 208034007 208034007 181 Sonora Ave, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014955 SFD O 0 0 1 1/19/2021 1 N Y THIS PERMIT IS TO FINA 208031024 208031024 372 Cordell Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014845 SFD O 0 1 11/20/2020 1 0 N Y RSFD 3536 / GAR 760
217010008 217010008 101 Maple Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014948 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/ CO
217010008 217010008 19 Fieldstone Dr, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014946 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 3376/GAR 520/CO 217010008 217010008 303 Pine Pl, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014934 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/CO 217010008 217010008 301 Pine Pl, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014935 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 3376/GAR 520/CO
217010008 217010008 21 Fieldstone Dr, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014947 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 3376/GAR 520/ CO
217010008 217010008 307 Pine Pl, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014933 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 3376/GAR 520/CO 217010008 217010008 309 Pine Pl, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014932 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/CO 217010008 217010008 109 Maple Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014949 SFD O 0 1 12/4/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4028/GAR 470/CO 206160030 206160030 19 Mitchell Way, Danville, CA 94506 B19-014210 SFD O 0 1 12/10/2020 1 0 N Y NSFD 4787 / GARAGE 1 199272013 199272013 412 Veda Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014942 SFD O 0 1 12/16/2020 1 0 N Y 1 Demolished O RSFD 3663 SF / GAR 65
217010008 217010008 116 Maple Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014681 ADU O 0 1 8/10/2020 1 0 N Y DB 55 ADU 432 SF W/ PEM
195141004 195141004 216 Fairway Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014365
ADU R
0
0 1
1/28/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.CONVERT STORAGE TO
218381002 218381002 507 El Capitan Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B19-014303
ADU R
0
0 1
11/4/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.ATTACHED ADU 282 / G
201230010 201230010 10 Harmony Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B19-014327
ADU R
0
1
11/10/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.ADU 999 / COV POR 160
218283015 218283015 80 La Pera Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B19-014280
ADU R
0
0 1
12/21/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.ADU 980 W/ PEM
199321001 199321001 193 Love Ln, Danville, CA 94526 B19-014265
ADU R
0
1
1/16/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.ADU 797 / COV POR 24
207162007 207162007 9 Liberta Pl, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014386
ADU R
0
0 1
1/30/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.THIS PERMIT IS TO FINA
196421007 196421007 82 Cumberland Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014411
ADU R
0
0 1
9/23/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.CONVERT BARN TO AD
216151018 216151018 321 La Questa Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014497
ADU R
0
0 1
10/2/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.
CONVERT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE INTO ADU BY ADDING FULL KITCHEN*SEE PERMIT B19-014262* ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 975/COVERED PORCHES 383 W/ PEM
206160007 206160007 10 Meadow Lake Dr, Danville, CA 94506 B20-014359
ADU R
0
1
5/22/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.CONVERT GAR TO ADU
199040013 199040013 740 Clipper Hill Rd, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014518
ADU R
0
1
7/20/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.ADU 800 W/ PEM
202071001 202071001 954 El Cajon Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014589
ADU R
0
1
7/24/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.ADU 860 W/ PEM
199322016 199322016 142 Alice Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014601
ADU R
0
0 1
8/21/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.CONVERT ACCESSORY
200110001 200110001 608 Danville Blvd, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013769
ADU R
0
1
8/11/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.ADU 1198/ GAR 440 / CO
217440012 217440012 2434 Tassajara Ln, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014562
ADU R
0
1
11/2/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.
1 Demolished O
ADU 798 W/ PEM
196340003 196340003 1639 Green Valley Rd, Danville, CA 94526 B20-014931
ADU R
0
1
11/10/2020
1 0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.PRADU 1000SF
208060026 208060026 493 Highland Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B18-012698*
ADU R
0
0 1
6/9/2020
1 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.
Description: NEW DETACHED 640SF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (MANUFACTURED HOME).
Stucco application to unit to be inspected by HCD.
203182047 203182047 115 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B18-013359 SFA O 0 0 1 1/27/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFA 1708/
1
Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy
4 7 10
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed UnitsProject Identifier
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
203182047 203182047 105 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B18-013358 SFA O 0 0 1 1/27/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFA 1457/ 203182047 203182047 110 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013483 SFD O 0 0 1 1/30/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3080 203182053 203182053 120 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013700 SFD O 0 0 1 3/30/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3080 196150006 196150006 554 El Pintado Rd, Danville, CA 94526 B18-013128 SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 1551 206470011 206470011 89 Hackler Ct, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013942*SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2020 1 N Y 1 Demolished O Description: NSFD 3826
206470011 206470011 85 Hackler Ct, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013946*SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3512
203182047 203182047 101 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B18-013330*SFD O 0 0 1 7/31/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3080
217010037 217010037 66 Sherburne Hills Rd, Danville, CA 94526 B18-013048*SFD O 0 0 1 8/12/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 4913 215050018 215050018 18 Walnut Meadow Ln, Danville, CA 94506 B17-012476*SFD O 0 0 1 8/27/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 4079 203182054 203182054 118 Julia Loop, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013697 SFD O 0 0 1 9/1/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3443 197150050 197150050 8 Quiet Country Ln, Danville, CA 94526 B18-012865*SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 7476 206470011 206470011 88 Hackler Ct, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013945*SFD O 0 0 1 11/17/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3512
206470011 206470011 86 Hackler Ct, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013943*SFD O 0 0 1 12/2/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3826
206470011 206470011 81 Hackler Ct, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013940*SFD O 0 0 1 12/9/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3376 206470011 206470011 80 Hackler Ct, Danville, CA 94506 B19-013941*SFD O 0 0 1 12/9/2020 1 N Y Description: NSFD 3376
196235002 196235002 112 Alamatos Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B18-013277*
ADU R
0
0
3/19/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.Description: ADU 890/CO
199322041 199322041 329 Verona Ave, Danville, CA 94526 B19-014104*
ADU R
0
0
4/23/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.Description: ADU 512 W
196140029 196140029 611 Logan Ln, Danville, CA 94526 B18-013056*
ADU R
0
0
5/12/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.Description: ACCESSOR
207193006 207193006 417 Everett Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013648
ADU R
0
0
6/29/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.Description: ADU 832 W
218472007 218472007 300 Century Cir, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013575*
ADU R
0
0
9/4/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.Description: ATTACHED
216182001 216182001 302 La Questa Dr, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013976*
ADU R
0
0
10/23/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.Description: ADU 999 W
200090008 200090008 796 Danville Blvd, Danville, CA 94526 B18-013055*
ADU R
0
0
11/15/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.Description: CONVERT
201171010 201171010 716 Glen Rd, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013972*
ADU R
0
0
11/23/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.Description: ADU 656 SF
218140008 218140008 163 Saint James Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013890
ADU R
0
0
12/11/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-2 person low income household as unit is less than 851 sf in size.Description: ADU 773 / C
196490007 196490007 873 El Quanito Ct, Danville, CA 94526 B19-013753
ADU R
0
0
12/17/2020
0 N Y
“Affordable by design" per HCD's review of Danville's 2015-2022 Housing Element - and as recalibrated per 1/1/2020 State ADU standards - assumed appropriate for 1-3 person moderate income household as unit is in the range of 851 sf to 1,200 sf.Description: CONVERT
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
1 3 4
RHNA Allocation by Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years)Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level
Deed Restricted 10
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted 2 2 1
Non-Deed Restricted 1 5 2 11 3
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted 13 4 7 10 8 5
Above Moderate 126 87 50 36 34 176 22 405
557
101 56 48 46 207 31 489 347
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
77
10
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year
information comes from previous APRs.
47Moderate
196
111
124
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here
27
2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation ProgressPermitted Units Issued by Affordability
186
84
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Date of Rezone Type of Shortfall
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of Rezone Very Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-
Income
Type of Shortfall Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum
Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing
Uses
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
83
Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description
1
Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need
Table C
Jurisdiction Danville
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation
Permit-Ready Garden
Cottage Program
The program offers a selection of pre-
approved, permit-ready ADU building
plans that can be downloaded free-of-
charge (detached units only). Because
these ADU plans have been pre-plan
checked, they are eligible for expedited
processing and lower building permit
fees.
31-Aug-20 Completed
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.
Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7
Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Period 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Extremely Low-
Income+Very Low-Income+Low-Income+TOTAL UNITS+
Extremely Low-
Income+
Very Low-
Income+Low-Income+TOTAL UNITS+
Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Residential Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with
the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are
considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.
Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be
counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you
to populate these fields.The description should adequately document how each
unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code
Section 65583.1+
Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Ju
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Re
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
P
e
r
i
o
d
20
2
0
(
J
a
n
.
1
-
D
e
c
.
3
1
)
AN
N
U
A
L
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
G
R
E
S
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
23
4
AP
N
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
+
Lo
c
a
l
J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
c
k
i
n
g
I
D
+
Re
a
l
i
s
t
i
c
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
En
t
i
t
y
t
o
w
h
o
m
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
In
t
e
n
d
e
d
U
s
e
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
1
Su
m
m
a
r
y
R
o
w
:
S
t
a
r
t
D
a
t
a
E
n
t
r
y
B
e
l
o
w
No
t
e
:
"
+
"
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
a
n
o
p
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
i
e
l
d
Ce
l
l
s
i
n
g
r
e
y
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
a
u
t
o
-
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
m
u
l
a
s
(C
C
R
T
i
t
l
e
2
5
§
6
2
0
2
)
Ta
b
l
e
G
Lo
c
a
l
l
y
O
w
n
e
d
L
a
n
d
s
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
S
i
t
e
s
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
s
o
l
d
,
l
e
a
s
e
d
,
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
d
o
f
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
r
NO
T
E
:
Th
i
s
t a bl
e
m
u
s
t o
n
l y
b e
fi
l
l
e d o
u
t if
th
e
h ou
s
i ng
e
l em
e
n
t s
it
es
in
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
s
a
s
i
t
e
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
o
r
w
a
s
o
w
n
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
ju
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
s
o
l
d
,
l
e
a
s
e
d
,
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
d
o
f
du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
y
e
a
r
.
AT
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
B
Jurisdiction Danville
Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Reporting Period 2020
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain
auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres)Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
Jurisdiction Danville
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 1
Non-Deed Restricted 3
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 5
22
31
4
18
5
0
0
0
0
0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:
Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:
Total Housing Units Approved:
Total Housing Units Disapproved:
Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-
income permitted units totals
Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Jurisdiction Danville
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.
Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Other
Funding Notes
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2)
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
0
0
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 1
Non-Deed Restricted 3
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 5
22
31
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 6
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 2
19
27
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section
50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
-$
Task Status
Table G: Danville 2019 APR – Summary of 2020 Work Efforts and 2021 Work Plan
1.1.1. By the end of 2016 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, alternatives
to density standards (e.g., floor area ratio standards, lot coverage standards
and/or other design standards) that would serve as a catalyst for the development
of small infill projects.
Action taken in 2017 (with overlap into early 2018): Through a Town-initiated
General Plan Amendment request, the Town adjusted the manner net acreage
is calculated for the Residential Single Family Low and for the Residential
Single Family Medium land use designations in the 2030 General Plan. The
change affects a small number of remaining infill project sites carrying these
land use designations. With the change, affected future projects may
calculate allowable project density retaining that portion of their site that
would need to be devoted vehicular rights-of-ways. This change is projected
to add 15%-25% to the development density that could be requested on the
affected properties, potential leading to an estimated 20-40 additional single
family residences between 2017 and 2030 - the horizon year established in the
Danville 2030 General Plan.
Update for 2020: The Town has development and implementation a “permit-
ready” ADU program and. The ADU program includes permit ready ADUs
of 650 square feet, 850 square feet and 1,000 square feet. The Town anticipates
the permit ready ADU program will result in a measurable increase in the
production of housing units in Danville appropriate for low- and moderate-
income households by simplifying the design, permitting and construction
need for ADUs and by reducing the costs associated with ADUs an
streamlining the approval process.
1.1.3. By the end of 2016 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, reduced side
and rear yard minimum setbacks for smaller multifamily properties to facilitate
their development.
Action taken in 2017 (with overlap into early 2018): Through a Town-initiated
General Plan Amendment request, the Town corrected an error that had been
made in the Land Use Map for the Danville 2010 General Plan and the
Danville 2030 General Plans, reverting 4.87 acres near the west side of
Downtown Danville to a Residential Multiple Family Low/Medium density
(13 to 20 units per acre) land use designation from the Residential Single
Family Low density (1 to 3 units per acre) land use designation imposed in
error. In conjunction with that action, through a Town-initiated Preliminary
Development Plan - Rezoning action, the Town rezoned the area to a P-1
Planned Unit Development zoning designation, eliminating the need for
future development projects proposed in the area to secure a legislative
action while also implementing design standards that would provide future
EXHIBIT 1
projects with flexibility in building setback standards where compared with
the standards set forth by previously applicable M-30 Multiple Family
Residential District standards.
Update for 2020: No additional work on Housing Implementation Measure
1.1.3. is anticipated to occur through the end of the current Housing Element
planning period. The impending delivery by Danville of three options for
permit ready ADUs (see discussion above), when coupled with the
anticipated effects of statewide changes dealing with ADUs going into effect
on January 1, 2020, will reasonably result to production of an additional 25 to
50 ADUs each year over historic production rates. This enhanced yield of
ADUs will result in the equivalent of adding one to two acres of multifamily
residential in Danville annually – and will result in development of units that
are more appropriate for low- and moderate-income households than could
be anticipated to be delivered by market rate housing projects on multifamily
designated property without significant financial subsidy.
1.2.2. On an ongoing basis, provide incentives, such as density bonuses and increases in
floor area ratios, when proposed mixed use development projects include a
housing component.
Action taken in 2017 (and overlapping into early 2018): Through its approval
of a 150-unit for-rent project on the 3.75 acres abutting the south side of
Diablo Road along the east side of the southbound onramp for I-680, the
Town culminated a several-year effort to facilitate the redevelopment of an
aging office project to a multifamily use. The project site was identified as a
RHNA shortfall site in the Danville 2030 General Plan and secured
Residential Multiple Family High Density (25 to 30 units per acre) land use
designation with the adoption of the 2030 General Plan. That action was
followed by a Town-initiated rezoning of the site, eliminating the need for a
future development project for the property to secure a legislative action
while also implementing design standards that would the future project with
flexibility in building setback standards where compared with the standards
set forth M District standards in the municipal code. As a for-rent project on
a RHNA shortfall site, the project was determined to be exempt from an
additional CEQA review beyond the program-level review secured through
the EIR prepared for the 2030 General Plan. As a project invoking a density
bonus, the project secured a 10% bump in otherwise allowable floor area ratio
as a project development concession. As a density bonus project, the baseline
yield for the site could increase from 113 units to 150 units - being a 35%
density bonus above the top end of the site’s 25-30 units per acre density
range. The target affordable units to occur on the site will be very low income
units with a minimum of thirty years of affordability to be assured from the
to-be-prepared affordable housing agreement that the Town will develop in
conjunction with processing building permits for the project.
Update for 2020: The project sponsor elected to reduce the overall unit count
for this density bonus project from 150 to 144 units – which reduced the
number of required very low income units to ten units. The term of
affordability under the recorded housing agreement was 55 years.
1.3.2. On an ongoing basis, continue to encourage second units in new construction as a
development option to meet the requirements of the Town’s Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance.
Action taken in 2017: The 22-unit single family Podva/Ponderosa Homes
project under construction in 2017 at the southwest edge of the Downtown
area pulled building permits in 2017 for two single family homes equipped
with attached second dwelling units (aka “Accessory Dwelling Units” or
“ADUs”). The ADUs were the provided in response to the Town’s
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements. As ADU’s that will be less
than 550 square feet in size, the ADUs will align with requirements that allow
them to be deemed appropriate for low income households.
Update for 2020: Significant changes that will affect the review process for
ADUs and will lead to an increase in the production of ADUs were put in
motion at the state level in 2019, culminating with the adoption of revised
statewide ADU legislation that went into effect on January 1, 2020. Danville
prepared and posted an update to its ADU Handout reflective of early
summaries of the new state regulations. In addition, the Town has adopted a
new ADU ordinance which complies, and in some area, exceeds the
requirements of the State law. Danville also implemented a permit-ready
ADU program to incentivize construction of ADUs. The program provides
Danville residents with three size options of pre-approved permit-ready
detached ADU building plans. These plans are available for free-of-charge
downloading. Because these ADU plans have been pre-plan checked, they
are eligible for expedited processing and lower building permit fees. Taken
together, the state changes for ADU standards (importantly leading to
Danville’s removal of owner-occupancy requirements and the ability for
properties to provide an ADUs and a JADU on one residential property) will
lead to a reduction in market rental rates of ADUs as the changes will result
in a measurable increase in the number of ADUs built in Danville. Other
jurisdictions that have created permit ready ADU programs (e.g., the City of
Encinitas) experienced a tripling of the annual output of ADUs after the
programs were introduced. A change in the relative scarcity of number of
ADUs that are available will make both existing and future ADUs more
affordable to low- and moderate-income households. Significantly, the
increase in the number of ADUs moving forward will have occurred at a time
where the “buying power” of low- and moderate-income households in the
area has substantially increased. The 2014 HCD-published income figures
indicated a two-person low income household had an income range that
would make rental housing affordable (i.e., <30% of gross household income)
where rents were in the range of $935 to $1,350 a month. The 2020 HCD-
published income figures indicate a two-person low income household now
has an income range that would make rental housing affordable (again
holding housing costs to <30% of gross household income) where rents were
in the range of $1,305 to $2,090 a month. At the high end of the ranges, this
is a $740 a month (55%) swing on the relative “buying power” of low income
households in the area. With these changes, Danville will recalibrate the size
of ADUs it will consider to be affordable by design for low- and moderate-
income households for the 2015-2022 planning period (see Attachment 1).
Danville will assume new ADUs delivered in the eight year period to be
affordable by design for one- or two-person low income households where
the ADU is <851 square feet in size. Additionally, Danville will assume new
ADUs delivered in the eight year period to be affordable by design for one-
or three-person moderate income households where the ADU is in a size
range of 851 square feet to 1,200 square feet.
1.3.3. By the end of 2016, initiate multi-jurisdictional discussions (using the Tri-Valley
Affordable Housing Committee or an equivalent forum) with a goal of presenting
a coordinated, multi-jurisdictional voice to pertinent utility agencies seeking
reduction of capital facility and/or connection fees assessed on new second units.
Action taken in 2017: Legislative action taken at the State level 2017 served to
restrict utility agencies from assessing capital facility fees for sewer or water
for new ADUs. That action fully addressed the issue identified in this
implementation policy. During 2017 the Town saw immediate “fruits” from
this action, which serves to significantly reduce the development costs
associated with construction of ADUs, by experiencing an uptick in requests
for ADUs.
Update for 2020: The primary focus of the Tri-Valley Affordable Housing
Committee during 2019 was tracking statewide housing legislation. Housing
legislation going into effect on January 1, 2020 further advanced changes
made at the state level in 2017 as regards restrictions on the amount of capital
facility fees that may be assessed on new ADUs.
1.3.4. By the end of 2015, update and make general distribution (posting on the Town’s
website) of the Town’s "How-to" brochure for development of second units, with
updates to include “value engineering” suggestions to assist potential applicants
as to ways to minimize development costs associated with construction
regulations, impact fees, and capital facility and/or connection fees.
Status: The “How-to” brochure was updated in July, 2017 to reflect changes
to the Town’s Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance (now referred to as the
Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance) made to address changes in state
legislation pertaining to accessory dwelling units (i.e., SB 1009, AB 2299, and
AB 2406).
Update for 2020: As mentioned above, Danville prepared and posted an
update to its ADU Handout reflective of early summaries of the new state
regulations .These handouts have been revised several times since the initial
round of changes and serve to advise residents of the permit-ready ADU
program changes that are underway. In addition, the Town approved a new
ADU ordinance consistent with State law requirements.
1.3.5. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the regulations set forth in the Town’s (Accessory Dwelling Unit) Ordinance
(amended in 2014) relative their effectiveness in meeting the intent of Policy 1.3
and the purpose of the Ordinance.
Status and action to be taken in 2018: The Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
was last updated in July 2017 - with the changes bringing the regulations into
alignment with SB 1009, AB 2299, and AB 2406.Changes in State legislation
that went into effect January 1, 2018 will be reviewed to determine if further
revisions to the Town’s Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance need to be made
to assure the regulations remain consistent with the intent and requirements
of state housing law.
Update for 2020: Danville’s Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance was
rendered moot by the adoption of new statewide ADU legislation that went
into effect on January 1, 2020. The Town has adopted a new ADU which is
compliance, and in some area, exceeds the minimum requirements
established under the State laws.
1.3.7. With a minimum frequency of once every three years, survey (accessory dwelling
unit) rents to see which income groups they are serving.
Action to be taken in 2018: Reflecting HCD input and concurrence, the
Danville 2007-2014 Housing Element assumed accessory dwelling units
(ADUs) of up to 750 square feet in size could be assumed to be appropriate
for low income households and that second units between 751 and 1,000
square feet in size could be assumed to be appropriate for moderate income
households. Changes in market rate rent conditions leading into the start of
the 2014-2022 Planning Period prompted Danville, again with HCD input
and concurrence, to adjust the assumptions on affordability of ADUs. With
the adoption of the 2014-2022 Housing Element, Danville documented that
ADUs that were up to 550 square feet in size could be assumed to be
appropriate for low income households and that second units between 551
and 1,000 square feet in size could be assumed to be appropriate for moderate
income households. In recognition to ongoing upward pressure on rental
rates, the Town will review the assumptions put forward in the 2014-2022
Housing Element during 2018.
Update for 2020: In recognition of discussion above regarding the size of
ADUs that may be considered affordable by design to low- and moderate-
income households, Danville will review market rate rent conditions once the
permit-ready ADU program comes online.
1.5.1. Annually update the residential development site inventory of the housing
element (i.e., Tables 32, 33 and 34 and Figure A) to facilitate the dissemination of
the amount, type, location and size of vacant and underutilized land suitable for
residential development.
Status and action to be taken in 2018: An update was done in conjunction
with 2016 Contra Costa County Urban Limit Line (ULL) Review. A second
round of updates occurred in 2018 (i.e., updates to Tables 32, 33 and 34 and
Figure A of the Housing Element), leveraging off of efforts taken in 2017 to
respond to requests from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority to
review draft projections through 2040. An update will be made in 2019 to
reflect application planning entitlement approvals through 2018 and to
reflect changes, affecting a handful of sites, as to how allowable development
densities are calculated - specifically changes to allow properties with either
a Residential - Single Family - Low Density (1 to 3 units per acre) or
Residential - Single Family - Medium Density (3 to 5 units per acre) to include
area that will be required for public or private roadway purposes in their
density calculations. The updated information will be made available on the
Town’s website and at the Town Offices.
Update for 2020: Danville’s residential development site inventory in the
housing element (i.e., Tables 32, 33 and 34 and Figure A) were updated in
2019 to facilitate the dissemination of the amount, type, location and size of
vacant and underutilized land suitable for residential development.
1.7.1. On an ongoing basis, continue to work with pertinent individuals and groups (e.g.,
property owners and prospective multifamily developers) to maintain the
continued availability and development feasibility of the properties designated for
multifamily use as a result of the 2007-2014 RHNA shortfall analysis.
Action taken in 2017 (with overlap into early 2018): For background
discussion related to this implementation measure, refer to discussion for
Implementation Measure 1.2.2 above. During the later stages of 2017 and
through 2018 the Town actively worked with Trammell Crow Residential
(TCR) as they were transitioning into the role of project developer for the 3.75
acre Diablo Road RHNA shortfall site. The effort resulted in an issuance of a
determination of “substantial conformance” for project changes proposed by
TCR - with all changes having been deemed by the Town to be project
upgrades. Securing a “substantial conformance” determination allows the
project to progress with a smoother, and faster, transition from the 2017
entitlement approval to building permit submittal - avoiding project
uncertainty that could have occurred if another round of project public
hearings was determined to be required. As a result, TCR is working towards
a building permit issuance date by early 2019.
Update for 2020: Frequent discussion with potential residential builders
occurred in 2019 involving the EBRPD/Borel site (being two acres of
multifamily 20-25 dus/acre and five acres of multifamily 25-30 dus/acre as
well as being the last undeveloped RHNA shortfall sites created by the 2013
General Plan update effort). Additional discussions occurred in 2019
involving the Mixed Use Faz Restaurant property in the Downtown Core
area (would provided residential uses in a 20-25 dus/acre range) and the
West El Pintado multifamily 20-25 dus/acre site (which secured an
entitlement in late 2019, but are currently looking to have the project re-
approved with higher density based on State Density Bonus Law.). Other,
smaller mixed use and multifamily sites were also discussed over the course
of the year.
1.7.2. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the regulations contained in the Municipal Code that address non-conforming
uses to assure significant non-residential reuse of sites designated for multifamily
use does not occur without careful consideration through a land use permit review
as to whether the proposed reuse of the site would preclude conversion of the site
for residential use in the reasonable future.
Status and action to be taken: In advance of processing the Development Plan
request for the for-rent 144-unit density bonus project on the Danville Office
Partners property, the Town denied the property owner’s request for a land
use permit to expand and extend the life of the non-conforming office uses
that occupy the 3.75 acre site.
Update for 2020: As has been an ongoing policy directive for two-plus
decades, Danville continued to discourage the “loss” of multifamily sites to
the developed of licensed residential care facilities.
1.8.1. Consistent with Policies 1.03, 1.04, 1.05, and 3.08 of the Danville 2030 General Plan
initiate a zoning text amendment by the end of 2017 to create a zoning overlay
district for smaller, underutilized multifamily residential parcels to facilitate their
redevelopment with new, or denser, multifamily residential uses.
Action taken in 2017 (and early 2018): For background discussion related to
this implementation measure, refer to discussion for Implementation
Measure 1.1.3 above. The Town-initiated General Plan Amendment and P-1
Preliminary Development Plan requests serve as a de facto zoning overlay
district for the properties along the east side of El Dorado Ave. with
remaining development potential, eliminating the need for a subsequent
legislative action and implementing design guidelines that provide future
projects more flexibility in design than would have been available if the old
M District standards had remained in place.
Update for 2020: The Town has development and implementation a “permit-
ready” ADU program and. The ADU program includes permit ready ADUs
of 650 square feet, 850 square feet and 1,000 square feet. The Town anticipates
the permit ready ADU program will result in a measurable increase in the
production of housing units in Danville appropriate for low- and moderate-
income households by simplifying the design, permitting and construction
need for ADUs and by reducing the costs associated with ADUs an
streamlining the approval process.
1.8.2 By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
the regulations set forth in the Density Bonus Ordinance relative the merits of
offering a tiered density bonus program based on lot size to encourage
consolidation of small lots for multifamily development.
Status and action to be taken in 2019: Danville’s Density Bonus Ordinance
was last updated in October 2014. Changes in state legislation pertaining to
density bonus regulations subsequent to that update create a need to again
review the ordinance for consistency with state housing law. Part of that
review should include the review additional changes suggested for
consideration in Policy 1.8.2. During 2019, the Town will assess whether
changes to the Density Bonus Ordinance are warranted or required in
response to the collection of housing laws that went into effect Statewide in
January 2018.
Update for 2020: The Town has development and implementation a “permit-
ready” ADU program and. The ADU program includes permit ready ADUs
of 650 square feet, 850 square feet and 1,000 square feet. The Town anticipates
the permit ready ADU program will result in a measurable increase in the
production of housing units in Danville appropriate for low- and moderate-
income households by simplifying the design, permitting and construction
need for ADUs and by reducing the costs associated with ADUs an
streamlining the approval process.
2.1.1. Utilize the applicable density bonus regulations to encourage the development of
affordable housing.
Action taken in 2017 (and early 2018): See above for discussion pertaining to
Implementation Measure 1.2.2 and the approval of a 150-unit for-rent project
along Diablo Road that invoked density bonus and will supply 11-12 for-rent
very low income units in the project. Late in 2017, the Town approved a 19
unit project within the Old Blackhawk Road Specific Plan area that will
provide two moderate income units after invoking density bonus.
Update for 2020: As density bonus approval was secured in 2019 by Trumark
on a 5.15 acre former garden nursery site to develop 18 detached single family
residences. The target units to qualify for the density bonus were eight 423
sq. ft. attached Junior ADUs. Market analysis supports considering the
ADUs as “affordable by design" for 1- to 2-person low income households.
The State's new January 1, 2020 ADU standards - coupled with Danville's
"permit ready" ADU program - will suppress "market values" of ADUs in this
size range over time, keeping them affordable.
2.2.1. Using the development review process, integrate new multifamily housing
developed in and around the Downtown area through linkages to shopping,
transit facilities, and civic uses – maximizing the walkability of the ultimate project
design.
Action taken in 2017: The Diablo Road project approval discussed above for
Implementation Measure 1.2.2 will lead to an installation of a critical
pedestrian linkage in the Downtown Area, with the project cost to be initially
split 50/50 between developer and the Town and with provision of possible
future reimbursement to the developer if abutting private properties
redeveloped.
Update for 2020: The Trammell Crow Residential project was under
construction throughout 2020 and the developer is taking the lead to assure
the construction of the pedestrian bridge over San Ramon Creek in a
partnership with the Town.
2.3.1. Continue to require new developments to provide the requisite minimum
percentage of low or moderate income housing in their project through imposition
of the regulations contained in the Town’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
Update for 2020: Projects greater than eight units in size continued to be
required to address Danville’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Related
actions have been the preparation of a new handout describing the process
that would need to be taken to allow temporary rental of ownership below
market rate units. That handout was last updated in October 2014. Two
significant residential projects secured approvals in 2019 that will lead to
development of units appropriate for low or moderate incomes households
as a result of the imposition of the Town’s inclusionary housing requirements
(i.e., the Magee Ranch/Davidon Homes project which would supply ADUs
appropriate for low income households and the West El Pintado project
which would supply for-sale moderate income condominiums).
2.3.2. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the regulations set forth in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to assure they
continue to meet the intent of Policy 2.3 and of the stated purpose of the Ordinance.
Update for 2020: Danville’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was last
updated in October 2014. Changes in state legislation pertaining to density
bonus regulations after that update potentially create a need to review the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as there are areas of overlap between the
regulations.
2.3.3. Monitor litigation responding to Palmer/Sixth Street Properties L.P. v. City of Los
Angeles ("Palmer"), the case considered recently California Court of Appeal that
limits the allowable scope of local inclusionary requirements, and review current
regulations in light of subsequent litigation to determine if further amendment to
Danville’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance is warranted.
Update for 2020: The successful passage of AB 1505, known as the “Palmer
Fix” bill, means that cities and counties in California once again have the full
power of inclusionary housing at their disposal.
2.4.1. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the home occupation regulations to assure they continue to meet the intent of
Policy 2.4 and of the stated purpose of the regulations.
Update for 2020: Danville’s home occupation regulations were last updated
in October 2014 (as part of the updates to the Ordinances regulating single
family and multifamily property). With the range of work items slated to
occur in 2020 and with short- to mid-term reductions in work force, work
associated with Implementation Policy will be pushed forward to 2021.
2.6.1. Explore opportunities for the Successor Housing Agency to leverage its remaining
assets towards provision of affordable housing units in the community.
Update for 2020: Town has continued to explore opportunities to utilize these
funds, including initiating discussions with the Town’s partner Bridge
Housing for the 74-unit senior rental project along Laurel Drive.
2.7.2. Monitor the affordability of units developed through the Town’s inclusionary
housing program to assure that rents paid and incomes of occupants are consistent
with applicable guidelines and/or recorded affordable housing agreements.
Update for 2020: Note is made of the conversion in early 2017 of the Rose
Garden and Podva/Sequoia Grove apartment projects from their affordable-
by-design status. Both projects were deemed affordable-by-design from
initial occupancy through early 2017. The Podva/Sequoia Grove project
“termed out” in early 2020. The affordable-by-design status was provided for
in the respective housing agreements and was allowed as long as all the units
in the projects were subject to a rental schedule making them affordable to
households earning median income (i.e., 100% of published median income
for the Alameda and Contra Costa County Area). With the change, 15% of
the units in the respective projects were required to be occupied by
households whose incomes have been reviewed by the Town to assure
incomes are at, or below, 110% of area median income. The BMR units in
both projects have been occupied by qualified moderate income households
since the end of 2017. Parallel to this effort is the ongoing oversight of the
Quail Ridge BMRs to assure full compliance with the requirements set forth
in that project’s affordable housing agreement to have seven of the thirteen
for-rent multifamily units occupied by income certified very low income
households. The project has been compliant since Fall of 2017 with five of
seven households in the BMR being Section 8 voucher recipients from the
County Housing Authority.
2.9.1. By the end of 2015, research the opportunities and merits of supporting shared
housing opportunities in Danville through Town-contribution to appropriate
County agencies and/or community-based organizations.
Update for 2020: With the range of work items slated to occur in 2020, work
associated with Implementation Policy will be pushed forward to 2021.
3.1.4. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to existing land use controls, building codes, and permit and processing
procedures relative their potential to constrain development, maintenance, and
improvement of housing for persons with disabilities.
Update for 2020: With the range of work items slated to occur in 2020, work
associated with Implementation Policy 3.1.4. will be pushed forward to 2021.
3.1.5. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance (adopted in 2014) relative its
effectiveness to provide relief to Code regulations and permitting procedures that
may have a discriminatory effect on housing for individuals with disabilities, with
the monitoring to include a review of the procedures for requesting
accommodation, the timeline for processing requests and appeals, and the criteria
used for determining whether a requested accommodation is reasonable.
Update for 2020: Changes in state legislation that went into effect in both
January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020 will be reviewed to determine if
revisions to Danville’s regulations that might serve to constrain
development, maintenance, or improvement for persons with disabilities
need to be made to assure the regulations remain consistent with the intent
and requirements state housing law.
3.2.3. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the current regulations pertaining to emergency shelters (amended in 2014 by
way of approval of LEG 13-02) relative their effectiveness to meet the intent and
requirements of Policy 3.2 and the intent and requirements of SB 2 approved by
the state in 2007.
Update for 2020: Changes in state legislation that went into effect in both
January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020 will be reviewed to determine if
revisions relative to Danville’s regulations pertaining to emergency shelters
need to be made to assure the regulations remain consistent with the intent
and requirements state housing law.
3.3.1. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the current regulations pertaining to supportive housing relative their
effectiveness to meet the intent of Policy 3.3 and the intent and requirements of SB
2 approved by the state in 2007.
Update for 2020: Changes in state legislation that went into effect in both
January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020 will be reviewed to determine if
revisions relative to Danville’s regulations pertaining to supportive
housing need to be made to assure the regulations remain consistent with
the intent and requirements state housing law.
3.4.1. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the current regulations pertaining to transitional housing relative their
effectiveness to meet the intent of Policy 3.4 and the intent and requirements of SB
2 approved by the state in 2007.
Status and action to be taken in 2019: Amendments to Danville single family
and multifamily regulations pertaining to transitional housing (as required
by SB 2) occurred in October 2014.
Update for 2020: Changes in state legislation that went into effect in both
January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020 will be reviewed to determine if
revisions relative to Danville’s regulations pertaining to transitional
housing need to be made to assure the regulations remain consistent with
the intent and requirements state housing law.
5.1.2. By the end of 2017 complete Phase 2 of the update to the zoning and land use
sections of the Municipal Code, including a review of opportunities to provide for
more housing on lands within the Downtown Business District.
Update for 2020: : The Town has development and implementation a “permit-
ready” ADU program and. The ADU program includes permit ready ADUs
of 650 square feet, 850 square feet and 1,000 square feet. The Town anticipates
the permit ready ADU program will result in a measurable increase in the
production of housing units in Danville appropriate for low- and moderate-
income households by simplifying the design, permitting and construction
need for ADUs and by reducing the costs associated with ADUs an
streamlining the approval process.
7.1.1. Continue to work with the sellers of the below market rate units established
through the inclusionary housing program to reset the twenty year resale
restriction upon sale of the units.
Update for 2020: Approximately eight for-sale below market rate units
(BMR) have had their term of affordability extended because of staff actions
with the sellers of the BMRs. The Town will continue to look for
opportunities to extend the term of affordability as additional units become
available through resale.
7.2.1. By the end of 2017 review, and approve where deemed appropriate, amendments
to the current Condominium Conversion Ordinance relative its effectiveness in
protecting existing affordable housing and relative to its conformity to state
legislation pertaining to the residential condominium conversion process.
Update for 2020: Changes in state legislation that went into effect in both
January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020 will be reviewed to determine if
revisions relative to Danville’s regulations pertaining to condominium
conversions need to be made to assure the regulations remain consistent
with the intent and requirements state housing law.
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6.4
TO: Mayor and Town Council April 19, 2022
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 25-2022, receiving and accepting the Housing Element
Annual Progress Report for 2021
BACKGROUND
The State of California requires that all local governments adequately plan to meet local
housing needs through adoption of a General Plan Housing Element that includes policies,
programs, and quantified objectives to guide decisions related to the development of
housing. State law also mandates that each city prepare an Annual Progress Report (APR)
on the implementation of its Housing Element in a format prescribed by the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The report is then used to
monitor the city’s progress toward accommodating its “fair share” assignment of the
region’s housing needs for specific affordability levels.
California Government Code Section 65400 requires that the local legislative body review
and accept the APR (Attachment B), which is then submitted to HCD and the Governor’s
Office of Planning and Research (OPR).
DISCUSSION
The Danville 2014-2022 Housing Element covers the eight-year period from January 2015 to
January 2023. The attached report covers the first seven years of that period, reporting
housing activity from 2015 through 2021. The format prescribed for APRs by HCD,
beginning with the 2018 report, requires housing unit production be reported in three
categories: (a) potential housing units that have secured all requisite planning entitlements
but have not yet initiated the building permit process as of the end of the APR reporting
year; (b) potential housing units that have initiated the building permit process and were
somewhere between a building permit status of “Applied” to a status of “Under
Construction,” but had not secured a final building inspection release as of the end of the
APR reporting year; and (c) units that secured final building inspection release in the prior
calendar year as of the APR reporting year.
Income Categories
Danville’s assigned “fair share” of the region’s housing need is determined by the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). For the current planning period, the
assignment is 557 total units comprised of four affordability categories.
Housing Element Annual 2 April 19, 2022
Progress Report for 2021
Each category is defined by the state of California and expressed as a percent of the most
recently published area median income, as follows:
• Very low income (50% or below of area median income): 196 units
• Low income (51-80% of area median income): 111 units
• Moderate income (81-120% of area median income): 124 units
• Above moderate income (>120% of area median income): 126 units
Total Assigned Units - Danville: 557 units
The published area median income for 2021 applicable to Danville is outlined below and
further differentiated by household size:
1-Person
Household
2-Person
Household
3-Person
Household
4-Person
Household
5-Person
Household
Very low income $47,950 $54,800 $61,650 $68,500 $74,000
Low income $76,750 $87,700 $98,650 $109,600 $118,400
Median income $87,900 $100,500 $113,050 $125,600 $135,650
Moderate income $105,500 $120,550 $135,650 $150,700 $162,750
These income categories are based on the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s (HUD) income categories.
It is important to note that state law does not require cities to build housing. The
development of housing is driven by private market forces. The Town’s obligation is to
provide an appropriate amount of land, with the proper general plan land use designation
and the appropriate zoning designation, to accommodate the private development of
housing units for the assigned quantity and affordability levels.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Posting of the meeting agenda serves as notice to the general public.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Housing Element Annual 3 April 19, 2022
Progress Report for 2021
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 25-2022, receiving and accepting the Housing Element Annual
Progress Report for 2021.
Prepared by:
David Crompton
Chief of Planning
Attachments: A - Resolution No. 25-2022
B - Annual Housing Progress Report Element Implementation Progress
Report
RESOLUTION NO. 25-2022
RECEIVING AND ACCEPTING THE HOUSING ELEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2021
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65400(2) requires the planning agency
to provide an Annual Progress Report (APR) to the Danville Town Council, the State
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and the State Office of
Planning and Research regarding progress toward implementation of the housing
element of the general plan; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville has prepared an APR for the calendar year 2021,
utilizing the prescribed forms and instructions provided by HCD; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Danville Town Council hereby accepts and receives the APR for
2021 on the Town of Danville 2014-2022 Housing Element and directs that the report be
forwarded to the State Department of Housing and Community Development and the
State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to Government Code Section 65400(2).
APPROVED by the Danville Town Council at a regular meeting on April 19, 2022, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
________________________________
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________ ________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
DocuSign Envelope ID: B429D6BD-0668-427B-8C9D-410F7357AA92
ATTACHMENT A
Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v 3_9_2022
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used
when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick
an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be
copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be
updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you
may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl
+ d.
510 La Gonda Way
Danville
94526
Please Start Here
General Information
2021
Danville
Contact Information
David
Crompton
Chief of Planning
dcrompton@danville.ca.gov
9253143349
Mailing Address
Annual Progress Report January 2020ATTACHMENT B
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Date Application Submitted
Total Approved Units by Project
Total Disapproved Units by Project
Streamlining
2 3 4 6 7 8 9
Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=RenterO=Owner
Date Application Submitted+(see instructions)
Very Low-Income Deed Restricted
Very Low-Income Non Deed Restricted
Low-Income Deed Restricted
Low-Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate-Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
Total PROPOSED Units by Project
Total APPROVED Units by project
Total DISAPPROVED Units by Project
Was APPLICATION SUBMITTED Pursuant to GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining)
Was a Density Bonus requested for this housing development?
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 24 6 218 248 0 0
200140011,12 200140011,12 359 & 375 West El
Pintado
375 W. El Pintado
Condominiums DEV21-0006 5+O
11/22/2021
53 53 No Yes
208022041 208022041 600 Hartz Avenue 600 Hartz Avenue DEV21-0013 5+O 11/28/2021 6 31 37 No No
218090031 218090031 3020 Fostoria Way Borel Property DEV21-0005 5+O 9/17/2021 24 134 158 No No
217010003
217010018
217010003
217010018
2570 Camino
Tassajara
Mission PUD19-0001 5+O 3/20/2019 18 18 No Yes
217010003
217010018
217010003
217010018
2570 Camino
Tassajara
Mission PUD19-0001 ADU O 3/20/2019 18 18 No Yes
00
0
00
000
000
00
0
00
0
00
Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
51
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus
10
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulasPlanning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Table A2Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units
Streamlining Infill Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions
Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=RenterO=Owner
Very Low- Income Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Low- Income Deed Restricted
Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
EntitlementDate Approved # of Units issued Entitlements
Very Low- Income Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Low- Income Deed Restricted
Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits
Very Low- Income Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Low- Income Deed Restricted
Low- Income Non Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted
AboveModerate-Income
Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness (see instructions) Date Issued
# of Units issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness
How many of the units were Extremely Low Income?+
Was Project APPROVED using GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Y/N
Infill Units?Y/N+
Assistance Programs for Each Development(may select multiple - see instructions)
Deed Restriction Type(may select multiple - see instructions)
For units affordable without financial assistance or deed restrictions, explain how the locality determined the units were affordable(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction (years) (if affordable in perpetuity enter 1000)+
Number of Demolished/Destroyed Units
Demolished or Destroyed Units
Demolished/Destroyed Units Owner or Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to the Project (Percentage Increase in Total Allowable Units or Total Maximum Allowable Residential Gross Floor Area)
Number of Other Incentives, Concessions, Waivers, or Other Modifications Given to the Project (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Reductions)
List the incentives, concessions, waivers, and modifications (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Modifications)
Did the project receive a reduction or waiver of parking standards? (Y/N)Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 24 0 8 11 43 10 0 0 7 0 3 148 168 0 0 11 0217010008217490021101 Maple Ln B20-014948 SFD O 0 0 1 10/21/2021 1 N Y21701000821749002221 Fieldstone Dr B20-014947 SFD O 0 0 1 10/21/2021 1 N Y217010008217490029216 Akabane Ln B20-014756 SFD O 0 0 1 6/17/2021 1 N Y217010008217490025209 Akabane Ln B-20-014751 SFD O 0 0 1 6/22/2021 1 N Y217010008217490026219 Akabane Ln B20-014752 SFD O 0 0 1 6/17/2021 1 N Y217010008217490020109 Maple Ln B20-014949 SFD O 0 0 1 10/8/2021 1 N Y217010008217490030206 Akababe Ln B20-014757 SFD O 0 0 1 7/6/2021 1 N Y20720202620720202644 Smokewood Ct B19-014246 SFD O 0 0 1 3/2/2021 1 N Y208034007208034007181 Sonora Ave B20-014955 SFD O 0 0 1 1/19/2021 1 N Y197100052197100052900 El Pintado Rd B16-011679 SFD O 0 0 1 11/8/2021 1 N Y197150042197150042782 El Pintado Rd B19-013814 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2021 1 N Y199272013199272013412 Veda Dr B20-014942 SFD O 0 0 1 8/16/2021 1 N Y216120037216120037373 Diablo Rd B18-012838 5+R 0 0 10 134 4/16/2021 144 N Y DB 55 30.0%0 No201192004201192004617 Camino Amigo B21-015359 ADU R 0 0 1 10/20/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 495 s f ADU216272031216272031601 Derbyshire Pl B21-015286 ADU R 0 0 1 12/6/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 495 s f ADU202071001202071001954 El Cajon B20-014589 ADU R 0 0 1 3/22/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 860 s f ADU216053005216053005601 Brookside Dr B-20-014866 ADU R 0 0 1 3/22/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 495 s f ADU2020100152020100159 Buckeye Ln B17-012484 ADU R 0 0 1 3/22/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 599 s f ADU20812000120812000117 Sky Terrace B19-013511 ADU R 0 0 1 11/5/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 525 s f ADU2020100032020100035 Willowmere Rd B20-014835 ADU R 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 432 s f ADU200020049200020049301 Romae Ct B21-015124 ADU R 0 0 1 7/22/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 1041 s f ADU207284002207284002309 Bolero Dr B18-013437 ADU R 0 0 1 8/25/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 992 s.f. ASU197150044197150044863 El Pintado B20-014692 ADU R 0 0 1 8/13/2021 1 N Y199220030199220030357 Love Ln D19-000117 SFD O 0 0 2/26/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O197161020197161020632 El Pintado D21-000172 SFD O 0 0 11/22/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O216141007216141007922 El Rincon B19-013597 ADU R 0 0 1 6/3/2021 1 N Y208041005208041005134 El Dorado D21 000174 SFD O 0 0 8/20/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O2001100052001100058 Ramon Ct D20-000137 SFD O 0 0 4/15/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O2061400202061400201485 Lawrence Rd D21-000175 SFD O 0 0 4/13/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O19934101419934101423 William Ct D21 000180 SFD O 0 0 5/25/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O19934100419934100423 Mary Ct D21-000178 SFD O 0 0 5/18/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O19727001219727001251 Betten Ct D20 000142 SFD O 0 0 10/22/2021 0 N 1 Demolished O19715005219715005228 Quiet Country Ln B20-014809 ADU R 0 0 1 11/1/2021 1 N Y Affordable by design 600 s f ADU218264012218264012101 Franciscan B21-015386 ADU R 0 1 5/25/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 660 s f ADU195923995195923995101 Nuevo Rd B21 015947 ADU R 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 490 s f ADU2083230102083230101017 Ocho Rios B21-015185 ADU R 0 1 10/7/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 560 s.f. ADU199322031199322031102 Danvilla Ct B21-015821 ADU R 0 1 10/5/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 640 s f ADU2031710402031710401028 Belleterre Dr B21-015676 ADU R 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 495 s.f. ADU217490019217490019106 Maple Ln B21-015001 ADU R 0 1 1/22/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 495 s.f. ADU2021410072021410071191 Camino Tass B21-015476 ADU R 0 1 6/7/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 500 s.f. JUDU2074600102074600101227 Dutch Mill Dr B21-015247 ADU R 0 1 5/4/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 688 s f ADU2074720222074720221270 Vailwood Dr B21-015071 ADU R 0 1 4/8/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 1100 s f ADU207271013207271013140 Brookside Pl B21-015596 ADU R 0 1 7/15/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 640 s f ADU207091008207091008143 San Thomas Way B21-015484 ADU R 0 1 7/26/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 539 s.f.ADU2061600192061600191463 Lawrence Road B21-014824 ADU R 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 1150 s.f. ADU208330027208330027150 Town & Country B21-015316 ADU R 0 1 8/2/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 373 s f ADU20017000920017000917 Cathy Ln B21-015391 ADU R 0 1 5/21/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 612 s.f. ADU20812001620812001619 Sky Terr B21-015768 ADU R 0 1 10/12/2021 1 0 N Y 1355 s.f. ADU20811000120811000122 Sky Terr B21-015406 ADU R 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 1135 s f ADU196232002196232002221 El Sobrante Dr B21-015828 ADU R 0 1 12/7/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 597 s.f. ADU218172009218172009252 Waterman Cl B21-015684 ADU R 0 1 10/15/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 452 s.f. ADU20006001420006001429 La Gonda Ct B21-015624 ADU R 0 1 9/30/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 700 s f ADU216041007216041007349 Glen Arms Dr B21-015823 ADU R 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 836 s.f. ADU201230005201230005363 Cordell Dr B21-015519 ADU R 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 636 s.f. ADU199130061199130061440 Montcrest Pl B21-015544 ADU R 0 1 9/2/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 1125 s.f. ADU19939200619939200648 Emerald Dr B-21-015544 ADU R 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 623 s f ADU298060006298060006511 Highland Dr B21-015348 ADU R 0 1 4/13/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 100 s f ADU196150011196150011566 El Pintado B20-014498 ADU R 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 1000 s f ADU201202009201202009633 Camino Amigo B21-015363 ADU R 0 1 4/26/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 840 s f ADU216232012216232012655 Thornhill Rd B21-015642 ADU R 0 1 8/26/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 1183 s f ADU20648007620648007666 Plumeria Ct B21-015385 ADU R 0 1 5/11/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 408 s f ADU20805204420805204468 Mariposa B21-015096 ADU R 0 1 9/9/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 400 s f ADU201220010201220010683 Pixie Ln B21-015522 ADU R 0 1 6/21/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 840 s f ADU1971500531971500538 Quiet Country Ln B21-015560 ADU R 0 1 11/2/2021 1 0 N Y 1298 s f ADU197150020197150020853 El Pintado B19-013967 ADU R 0 1 6/18/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 991 s f ADU2020100022020100021 Willowmetre B21-015622 ADU R 0 1 8/23/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 800 s f ADU2083610042083610041055 Westridge Ave B21-015170 ADU R 0 1 3/29/2021 1 0 N Y Affordable by design 840 s f ADU208041002208041017136 El Dorado B21-015130 2 to 4 O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0 N Y208041002208041018138 El Dorado B21-015131 2 to 4 O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0 N Y208041002208041019140 El Dorado B21-015132 2 to 4 O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0 N Y208041002208041015142 El Dorado B21-015137 2 to 4 O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0 N Y2070610152070610152460 Tassajara Ln B21-014695 SFD O 0 1 4/26/2021 1 0 N Y20614002020614003381 Rivers Ln B21-015267 SFD O 0 1 6/29/2021 1 0 N Y20614002020614003483 Rivers Ln B21-015266 SFD O 0 1 6/29/2021 1 0 N Y20614002020614003186 Rivers Ln B21-015264 SFD O 0 1 6/29/2021 1 0 N Y20614002020614003288 Rivers Ln B21-015265 SFD O 0 1 6/29/2021 1 0 N Y199242016199242016121 Camino Amigo Ct D21-000201 SFD O 0 0 0 N Y 1 Demolished O196241006196241006123 Arroyo Dr D21-000196 SFD O 0 0 0 N 1 Demolished O199273004199273004477 Veda Dr D21-000179 SFD O 0 0 0 N 1 Demolished O197110013197110013932 La Gonda Way SFD O 4 12/9/2020 4 0 0 N Y206690004206690004Loyal Dragon Pl SFD O 4 9/14/2021 4 0 0 N Y2070610152070610152460 Tassajara Lane SFD O 1 8/10/2021 1 0 0 N Y2174400122174400122434 Tassajara Lane SFD O 1 10/26/2021 1 0 0 N Y000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed UnitsProject Identifier
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus
1
Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy
4 7 10
Jurisdiction Danville ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202)
1 3 4
RHNA Allocation by Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years)
Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level
Deed Restricted ----10 ----
Non-Deed Restricted ---------
Deed Restricted -2 --2 1 ---
Non-Deed Restricted 1 -5 2 11 3 24 --
Deed Restricted ---2 -----
Non-Deed Restricted 13 4 7 8 8 5 8 --
Above Moderate 126 87 50 36 34 176 20 11 --414 -
557
101 56 48 46 207 29 43 - - 530 315
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals and must be reported as very low-income units.
60
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will include units that were permitted
since the start of the planning period.
Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at apr@hcd.ca.gov.
69
10
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past yearinformation comes from previous APRs.
55 Moderate
196
111
124
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here
51
2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation ProgressPermitted Units Issued by Affordability
186
Jurisdiction Danville
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 24
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 8
11
43
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 6 5 12
2 to 4 0 4 0
5+0 0 144
ADU 0 34 12
MH 0 0 0
Total 6 43 168
3
248
0
0
0
0
0
0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:
Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:
Total Housing Units Approved:
Total Housing Units Disapproved:
Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals
Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Jurisdiction Danville
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.
Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement Requested Other Funding Notes
Prepare Programatic
Environmental Impact Report for
the Town's 2023-2031 Housing Element Update
$150,000.00 $98,000.00
Local
General
Fund
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2)
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
6
6
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 24
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 8
11
43
Current Year
Deed Restricted 10
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 7
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 3
148
168
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
150,000.00$
Task Status
In Progress
ATTACHMENT 3.b. Multimodal Policies and Standards
Section 4, “Mobility” of the Town’s 2030 General Plan
(TO BE INCLUDED WITH CCTA SUBMITTAL)
ATTACHMENT 6 2022/23 through 2026/27 Capital Improvement Program
Section C - Transportation
(TO BE INCLUDED WITH CCTA SUBMITTAL)
ATTACHMENT 7 Transportation Systems Management Program
TSM Ordinance and Resolutions 94-15 and 97-10
(TO BE INCLUDED WITH CCTA SUBMITTAL)
ATTACHMENT 8 Urban Limit Line Adoption
(Resolutions No. 8-2007)
(TO BE INCLUDED WITH CCTA SUBMITTAL)
ATTACHMENT 9 Measure J Growth Management Element
(Chapter 3, “Planning and Development” of the 2030 General Plan)
(TO BE INCLUDED WITH CCTA SUBMITTAL)
ATTACHMENT 12 Measure J LSM Reporting forms for
FY 2019-20 and 2021-22
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597
ANNUAL REPORTING FORM
for MEASURE J LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS (LSM) FUNDS
(18% LSM FUNDS & 2.09% ADDITIONAL FUNDS)
FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES DURING FISCAL YEAR 2019-20
Jurisdiction: _____Town of Danville_________________________________
If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact Matt Kelly at CCTA, mkelly@ccta.net.
Please return the form to CCTA, along with the LSM Audit Reporting Form spreadsheet, Attn: Jackie Reyes (at
address listed below or jreyes@ccta.net)
Total for FY 2019-20
Balance as of July 1, 2019 1,729,365
18% + 2.09% Funds Received during FY 2019-20 (actual, not accrued) 853,034
LSM Eligible Expenditures (Please describe all expenditures in excess of
$10,000 on the LSM Audit Reporting spreadsheet)
Local Street and Roads 152,376
Growth Management Planning and Compliance
Transit Capital and Operations
Trails
Parking Facilities
Transportation Demand Management/Transportation Systems
Management 231,129
Total LSM Expenditures during FY 2019-20 383,505
Funds Remaining
Interest Earned 32,004
Balance as of June 30, 2020 2,230,898
Form prepared by: _____Lani Ha_______________________ Phone: 925-314-3358_______
Email: _lha@danville.ca.gov_______
Title: ____________Finance Manager/Treasurer_____________________________
Date: _1/5/2021_______________
ATTACHMENT
LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS FUNDS
Projects Funded With 18 Percent Funds Return to Source Fiscal Year 2019-20
The summary total expenditures of $152,376 represent:
Local Street and Roads
• $4,900 for the project that includes annual construction of handicap ramps, sidewalks,
traffic signal modifications, and public park access on an as-needed basis during the upcoming five-year period (Danville CIP project #A-064).
• $12,509 for the project of maintenance of 54 Town and County owned signalized
intersections (Danville CIP project #C-418).
• $19,321 for the project of replacing the fluorescent lamps with energy efficient LED lamps, and replacing street name sign panels that have reach the end of service life (Danville CIP
project #C-552).
• $18,303 for the project of providing ongoing support for infrastructure maintenance and upgrades for the traffic signal interconnect network, and annual software support and
maintenance services or the traffic management software (TMS) system (Danville CIP
project #C-562).
• $7,191 to rehabilitate the pavement and replacement of traffic signal detection systems on
El Cerro Blvd. from El Pintado Rd. to La Gonda Way (Danville CIP project #C-584).
• $43,799 for maintaining the battery backup systems for traffic signals (Danville CIP project #C-588).
• $25,000 for replacing illuminated crosswalks systems at Iron Horse Trail crossings on Greenbrook Drive, El Capitan Drive and Paraiso Drive with New RRFB systems, flashing LED STOP signs and trail crossing illumination systems (Danville CIP project #C-607).
• $21,353 for pavement maintenance projects consisting of asphalt overlay and repairs of failed pavement on selected streets. The pavement management program is an annual effort approved by the Town Council to maintain the Town’s street system at a high level of service. A proactive approach to pavement maintenance prevents more costly pavement
repairs in the future. These expenditures are consistent with the requirements of Streets
and Highways Code Section 2151 (Danville CIP project #C-610).
Growth Management Planning and Compliance and TDM/TSM
• $231,129 to pay for the cost of operational activities related to compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Growth Management Program. Included preparation of bi-annual traffic counting and monitoring program; participation and support for regional and sub-regional growth management; and voluntary, employer-based TDM efforts. Expenses included consulting services for the Street Smart and SWAT Programs
($39,422).
Ju
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
:
T
o
w
n
o
f
D
a
n
v
i
l
l
e
Re
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
P
e
r
i
o
d
:
F
Y
2
0
1
9
‐
2
0
2
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
y
p
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
J
F
u
n
d
s
Expended ($)
R
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
M
e
t
r
i
c
(
s
e
e
i
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
)
Lo
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
R
o
a
d
s
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
T
o
w
n
w
i
d
e
$
12,509 Maintenance of and upgrades to 54 Town‐owned traffic signals.
Lo
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
R
o
a
d
s
L
E
D
I
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
S
i
g
n
s
T
o
w
n
w
i
d
e
$
1
9
,
3
2
1
Replacement of 46 Illuminated street name sign panels and LED conversion kits.
Lo
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
R
o
a
d
s
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
T
o
w
n
w
i
d
e
$
1
8
,
8
0
3
Maintenance and system support for one (1) Traffic Management System operating 54 Town‐owned traffic signals.
Lo
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
R
o
a
d
s
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
T
o
w
n
w
i
d
e
$
43,799 Replacement of 22 battery backup systems for traffic signals.
Lo
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
R
o
a
d
s
R
R
F
B
C
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
G
r
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
D
r
,
E
l
Ca
p
i
t
a
n
D
r
,
P
a
r
a
i
s
o
D
r
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Replacement of three (3) crosswalk warning systems.
Lo
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
R
o
a
d
s
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
T
o
w
n
w
i
d
e
$
21,353 45,000 SF 4" AC dig‐out repair, 11,652 TN of AC (overlay); 52 curb ramps, 700 SF concrete sidewalk, 600 LF concrete curb and gutter.
TD
M
/
T
S
M
G
r
o
w
t
h
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
,
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
T
D
M
CT
A
G
M
P
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
/
s
u
b
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
g
r
o
w
t
h
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
;
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
m
a
r
t
s
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
u
p
p
o
r
;
b
i
e
n
n
i
a
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
o
u
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)
,
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
a
n
d
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
‐
b
a
s
e
d
T
D
M
/
T
S
M
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
,
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
f
St
r
e
e
t
S
m
a
r
t
s
a
n
d
S
W
A
T
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
$
2
3
1
,
1
2
9
1. Participation and support for subregional, cooperative transportation planning (Tri‐Valley Transportation Council, Southwest Area Transportation Committee). 2. Street Smarts Program: Support and implementation of program at 11 SRVUSD schools included 17 assemblies (12 elementary, 3 middle, 3 high school) serving 6,677 students. 3. Traffic monitoring program (28 intersections and 36 street segments). 4. TDM: Employer and student‐based carpool and transit incentives.
CC
T
A
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
J
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
&
R
o
a
d
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
d
i
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
F
o
r
m
(for expenditures of $10,000 or more)
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597
ANNUAL REPORTING FORM
for MEASURE J LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS (LSM) FUNDS
(18% LSM FUNDS & 2.09% ADDITIONAL FUNDS)
FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES DURING FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
Jurisdiction: _________________Town of Danville_____________________
If you have any questions regarding this form, please contact Matt Kelly at CCTA, mkelly@ccta.net.
Please return the form to CCTA, along with the LSM Audit Reporting Form spreadsheet, Attn: Jackie Reyes (at
address listed below or jreyes@ccta.net)
Total for FY 2020-21
Starting Balance as of July 1, 2020 2,230,898
18% + 2.09% Funds Received during FY 2020-21 (actual, not accrued) 715,578
LSM Eligible Expenditures (Please describe all expenditures in excess of
$10,000 on the LSM Audit Reporting spreadsheet)
Local Street and Roads 103,637
Growth Management Planning and Compliance
Transit Capital and Operations
Trails
Parking Facilities
Transportation Demand Management/Transportation Systems
Management 193,319
Total LSM Expenditures during FY 2020-21 220,645
Funds Remaining
Interest Earned 20,578
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 2,669,682
Form prepared by: __Lani Ha______________________ Phone: ___9253143358_____________
Email: lha@danville.ca.gov______
Title: ________________Finance Director/Treasurer_________________________
Date: ___1/28/2022_____________
ATTACHMENT
LOCAL STREET MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS FUNDS
Projects Funded With 18 Percent Funds Return to Source Fiscal Year 2020-21
The summary total expenditures of $103,637 represent: Local Street and Roads
• $10,000 for the project that includes annual construction of handicap ramps, sidewalks,
traffic signal modifications, and public park access on an as-needed basis during the upcoming five-year period. (Danville CIP project #A-064).
• $60,000 for the project of replacing 170 traffic controllers at 54 intersections with new
Advanced Traffic Signal Controllers (ATC). A new traffic management software (TMS) system (Econolite – Centracs) will replace the current TMS (QuikNet). (Danville CIP project #C-545).
• $25,162 for the project of providing ongoing support for infrastructure maintenance and upgrades for the traffic signal interconnect network, and annual software support and maintenance services or the traffic management software (TMS) system. Danville CIP project #C-562).
• $8,475 for the project that addresses improvements, repair and capital maintenance of Town-wide bicycle facilities. (Danville CIP project #C-621).
Growth Management Planning and Compliance and TDM/TSM
• $193,319 to pay for the cost of operational activities related to compliance with the Contra
Costa Transportation Authority Growth Management Program. Included preparation of
bi-annual traffic counting and monitoring program, participation, and support for regional and sub-regional growth management, and voluntary, employer-based TDM efforts. Expenses included consulting services for the Street Smart and SWAT Programs ($10,000).