The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About050322-07.1 CCTA• • • .• 1 • • • • • • • CONNECTING COMMUNITIES Tim Haile, Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority A.,-"Nk CONTRA COSTA transportation authority • • • • • • • • • • • • • • What We Do • /d\ PEDESTRIAN Improvements to sidewalks, crosswalks, trails, and paths LOCAL STREETS Smooth traffic flow on major roads and make surface improvements such as pothole repairs BUSES Invest in a reliable, comfortable and convenient bus network SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS Focus on programs and projects aimed at bicycle and pedestrian safety for K-1 2 students FERRIES Expand ferry system by looking to ferries as an alternate commute method between West County and San Francisco 1 v BICYCLE Invest in safe routes and infrastructure improvements for bicyclists BART Improve BART service and stations, extend routes and increase parking HIGHWAYS Complete Contra Costa's highway system, and improve air quality and noise protection along corridors INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Implement smart transportation infrastructure to reduce congestion and encourage greener travel PROGRAMS FOR SENIORS AND DISABLED Enhance transit options to improve mobility for seniors and people with disa bilities 1-680 IMPROVEMENTS express and auxiliary Vanes opened CALDECOTT TUNNEL bore o fourth pens JL] L [Ir ROAD WIDENING Kirker Pass Road and Vasco Road HIGHWAY 4 IMPROVEMENTS BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS Treat Blvd and San Pablo Dam Road 0 TRAIN STATION Richmond I-680fSR-4 IMPROVEMENTS sin ;� 0 ruist.dQ BART EXTENSIONS to Pittsburg City Center and Antioch EXPANDED AND IMPROVED TRAILS Q Leverage Local Funding u1ndi LEVERAGING RATIO PE , 4 r yt • R�re�rv'r 4k AO $1.4B Measure C/J $4.2B State / Regional / Federal Funds $5.6B Total Investment �.M. Ner-LIi Lf I lit st.IVI ,. AN Ili' -F--IliPS° —t) ki 10 ,. 4.M #► - �I.Ar v Tipping Point Photo credit: Noah Berger/AP, Peter Beeler, the San Diego Union -Tribune, Glydways 1 1-680 I Willingness to Use Modes How much are you willing to use each of the following modes? Carpool with household Private bus or shuttle Rail App -based ridehail ALONE Public bus Carpool with others Walk Telecommute BART Bicycle, skateboard, or scooter App -based carpool Carshare Vanpool Bikeshare or scootershare • 26% 51% 54% 31% 17% 12% 27% 45% 51% 42% 47% 54% Already use 20% Will probably never use 50% 70% 77% 78% 84% 30% Will Consider/ Most Interested 21% 31% 22% 15% 30% 27% 20% 24% 13% 14% 14% 11% 15% 22% .911 16% 1 13% 17% 170/ 14% 9% 5% 20% 19% Will consider using ■ Most interested in using 12% 51% 46% 43% 41% 38% 37% 35% 33% 31% 30% 27% 23% 22% 15% Vision Zero Vision ZERO Traditional Approach to Safety Vision Zero Systemic Approach to Safety Individual responsibility Reduce speeding through signage and enforcement 1E1111111■ Assumes perfect human behavior relikii 1!, it I It) f3 Saving lives is too expensive Shared responsibility i - IT\- Saving lives is IInot expensive 94,%i LJ Reduce speeding through design and technology •� Transportation -related fatalities are preventable Assumes human error is inevitable React to collision hot spots til Transportation -related \ fatalities are inevitable Prevent fatal and severe collisions Anticipate collision risk TRANSIT FIRST Leading an effort to building a better transportation system Optimize existing transit network Identify strategies and infrastructure Development of transit and mobility hubs Creating first and last mile connections Moving to zero emissions Addressing equity priority communities Overcoming institutional challenges Identify local and regional service funding Countywide Safety through Connected Signal System o Developing Countywide Synchronized Signal System to install modern traffic controllers in all 19 cities and towns in Contra Costa County to: o Proactive approach to safety by identifying `close call' situations and preventing future tragedies o Installing bicycle detection software o Prioritization and potential corridor - clearing for emergency vehicles o Transit vehicle priority o Smart infrastructure o Controlling and smoothing traffic flow READY, SET, CHARGE! Electric Vehicle Readiness Blueprint Implementation Goals 04t 1000000r eRD Accelerate use of zero -emission vehicles (ZEVs) and all -electric car share, especially in shared mobility hubs Workforce training of electric vehicle (EV) technicians and educational outreach Install electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) in multifamily dwellings and public locations in underserved communities Rebates to low-income residents for e -bikes and leverage existing e -bike share programs Contra Costa Electric Vehicle Readiness Blueprint July 2019 Prepared for: Contra Costa Transportation Authoritv 2999 Oak Road, suite lOP Walnut creek,<n 9e597 MOBILITY FOR ALL Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan TRANSPORTATION NEEDS AND GAPS The project team's review of existing conditions and survey data identified key needs and gaps in accessible transportation in Contra Costa County. These include: New Funding — Grants are sometimes available for planning and pilots, but all recommendations will require new sustainable funding VSafety — Many respondents feel unsafe while traveling • Volunteer Driving Programs — Additional volunteers are needed, with more reliable funding to increase capacity Medical Access — The Regional Medical Center and VA Medical Center in Martinez need reliable access throughout the county Quality of Life Visits — Consumers have difficulty making quality -of -life essential trips to visit friends and family, the senior center, and church Service Coordination — Accessible services need improved coordination because they are siloed between agencies, cities, and non-profit organizations SURVEY RESULTS Trip Destinations and Challenges An online survey provided insight into how respondents get where they are going, where they go, and what factors complicate their trips. Mode to Destination Trips were most commonly made by solo drivers, followed by those driven by a family, neighbor or paid helper. BART was used by about a third of respondents, with ADA paratransit utilized by 10% of the entire survey sample. Destinations The top destination was medical appointments, with grocery/drugstore shopping in second place. Senior Center trips and non- medical appointments each accounted for an 8% share of destinations. 40% Drive Myself 38% Family, neighbor, or paid driver 32% BART 10% ADA paratransit ' Respondents could choose as many modes as they used. Percentages reflect total respondents {1.463) selecting a particular mode they used. 56% Medical Appointments 46% Grocery/ drugstore ■lin 7 80/ Non-Medical Appointment Respondents could choose up to three trips that they take most often. Percentages reflect total respondents (1,463) identifying each trip type. 8% Senior Center Building a Transportation Plan from the Ground Up CCTA's Process Updated Every 4-5 Years Documents the Authority's Goals, Vision, and Strategies Action Plans are Developed by the Regional Committees Includes 10- and 20 -Year Financially Constrained Project Lists RTPCs CCTA Issues Public Authority RTPCs Adopt Develop Draft Draft CTP Outreach Adopts Final Final Action Action Plans Plan SEIR & CTP Plans RTPC = Regional Transportation Planning Committee CONTRA COSTA transportation authority REDEFINING MOBILITY 41/4 4`.- •-:" .4° i f - ; "P.; • e • • - - • 4144 INNOVATE 680 6 Projects, 1 Fully Connected Corridor 6 PROJECTS AUL: CONNECTED CORRIDOR Pleasant Hill Imagine the Possibilities Innovate 680 ConOps Scenario #1: Travelling via Transit — User Perspective Commuter opens MOD phone app, sees travel and cost options, chooses to travel by bike, then bus, then BART. Congestion on 1-680 prompts bus to use Part -Time Transit Lane located on shoulder, bypassing traffic. At Shared Mobility Hub, bike is stored safely and commuter boards bus. Bus makes timely arrival at BART station, allowing commuter to board train for final stretch of ride. Timed lights on city streets provide smooth ride to on-ramp, where bus takes HOV lane to quickly enter freeway. Commuter arrives with short walk to office and receives app notification of charge for the morning ride. 410 ii10 Innovate 680 System Architecture Diagram MTC FasTrak Legend Existing System MTC Regional Operations Center MTC Express Lanes System Proposed System Future Capability MTC/CHP FSP F 1 CCTA 511 Contra Costa MTC Clipper Caltrans D-4 Traffic Management Center Caltrans D-4 Highway System Various Parking Mgmt. Systems Data Providers Traveler Info. Systems J Mobility Providers Fleet Mgmt. Systems MTC 511 SF Bay Transit Providers Transt Ops. -� Systems Peal Time Information Connection Protection Trip Planning Mobility on Demand (MOD) Advanced Technologies System Countywide Connected Datacenter CCCD) CHP Dispatch Existing Connection Future Connection Local Agencies Traffic Ops. Systems Local Law Enforcement First Responder Systems Dec sion Support System (DSS) Managed Freeways Automated Driving Systems (ADS) Shared Mobility Hubs (SMH) Part -Time Transit Lane {PTTL} Coordinated Adaptive Traffic Signals (CATS) Coordinated Adaptive Ramp Metering (CARM) Performance Monitoring Dashboards Variable Speed Limit Signs (VSL) Lane Use Management Signs (LUMS) Traveler Messaging & Information AV Mobility Platform V2X Technology SAV Shuttles Traveler Information In -Person Trip Planning Trip Matching Curbside Management Parking Management Signal Coordination Transit Signal Priority Dynamic Arterial Signing • • • • Innovate 680 Program ConOps Priority Policy Assumptions Decision Support System Provides Centralized Control of the Corridor Countywide Connected Datacenter Delegated and Automated Control Operations Center •••• Innovate 680 Program ConOps Additional Policy Issues Connection Protection Transit Priority Parking & Curbside Mgmt Harmonizing Freeway & Arterial Operations Data Sharing First & Last Mile Automated & Electric Vehicles Incident & Emergency Mgmt Shoulder Use TDM Program Coordination Emerging Communication Technologies, Security & Privacy Equity Considerations Regional Fare Integration Shared Network Communications Lane Use Mgmt & Variable Speeds Additional O&M Considerations and Funding Some Key Benefits from RTMCs Travel time savings Shared costs: Savings due to combined funding, reduction in administrative costs, and procurement of technology Emergency Responders can access video from state and city Improved traveler information by reducing jurisdictional barriers Less duplication of efforts Person to person contact improves coordination Reduced incident response times and reduction in secondary incidents More capabilities when it comes to TSMO/ATM (i.e. ramp metering, signal synchronization) Event planning - coordination before and after event Thank You Timothy Haile Executive Director thaile@ccta.net @ccta @tthaile in Tim Haile