HomeMy WebLinkAbout060821-03.1
Review and Comment
on Draft BMP 1 June 8, 2021
STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM 3.1
TO: Mayor and Town Council June 8, 2021
SUBJECT: Review and Comment on Draft Townwide Bicycle Master Plan, CIP
C-609
BACKGROUND
The Capital Improvement Program includes the Townwide Bicycle Master Plan, CIP C-
609 (Attachment A). The project consists of the development of a comprehensive
Townwide Bicycle Master Plan (“BMP”) to serve as a mechanism to identify and
prioritize bicycle infrastructure improvements, establish policies and objectives, establish
strategies to enhance and maintain bicycle safety, strategically position the Town to
compete for grant funding opportunities, and to encourage and promote bicycling as a
form of transportation throughout Danville.
In the winter of 2020, the Town procured consultant services with Alta Planning +
Design, Inc. (“Consultant”) to assist the Town with the development of the BMP. Work
commenced in February 2020, updates were presented to the Parks, Recreation and Arts
Commission (“Commission”) in May and December 2020, and finally the Draft BMP was
presented to the Commission for review at its regular meeting on May 12, 2021.
The Draft BMP (Attachment B) refines and builds upon the Goals and Policies established
in the Town of Danville 2030 General Plan; the Danville Parks, Recreation and Arts Strategic
Plan Update (2017); and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s Contra Costa
Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2018). Funding of the BMP was provided by a
Measure J Contra Costa Transportation for Livable Communities (“CC-TLC”) grant.
SUMMARY
As previously described, the development of the BMP began in early 2020 with an in-
depth analysis of the Town’s current bicycle infrastructure, analysis of collision history
and identification of historical safety concerns, and a review of planned projects and
programs contained in the Town’s Capital Improvement Program.
Public Outreach
A robust public outreach strategy was planned for the development of the BMP and that
was scheduled to take place throughout the summer and fall of 2020. This task was to
consist of in-person “pop-up” events, listening sessions, group/stakeholder bicycle rides,
Review and Comment
on Draft BMP 2 June 8, 2021
and public workshops at Town facilities to provide an interactive, hands-on opportunity
for the public to provide feedback on bicycling in Danville. Unfortunately, due to the
Covid-19 pandemic, staff and the consultant team were required to retool the outreach
plan and take a completely virtual approach to engage with the public.
In summer 2020, a project-specific website (www.danvillebikeplan.com) was launched
that provided the public with the ability to stay informed on project status, the schedule
of virtual public outreach events, and that featured an interactive mapping webtool (see
Figure 1, pg. 2) that allowed the public to provide detailed comments and feedback on
existing bicycling conditions throughout Danville grouped into two categories consisting
of individual (“spot”) locations and along roadway segments (“corridors”).
Input provided via the public online webtool proved to be one of the key sources of public
comments received on existing bicycling conditions. Subsequently, in 2021, the webtool
was reconfigured and re-opened to offer the public opportunities to comment on
proposed recommendations that were developed through a combination of staff input,
the Town’s current Capital Improvement Program, and public input received via the
virtual events, online webtool, and other traditional forms of public interfacing such as
email and telephone contact.
Figure 1- Interactive Mapping Webtool
In summary, there were a total of five virtual public outreach events held that consisted
of a stakeholder listening session (June 2020), two virtual pop-up events (September
2020), and two public workshops (September 2020 and March 2021). As previously
described, updates on the development of the BMP were provided to the Commission at
Review and Comment
on Draft BMP 3 June 8, 2021
their regularly scheduled meetings on May 20, 2020 and December 8, 2020, and were
requested to comment on the Draft BMP at their regular meeting on May 12, 2021.
BMP Proposed Recommendations
Based on feedback received from the public, Commission, and Town staff, the Draft BMP
contains a comprehensive suite of recommendations for programs, policies and future
infrastructure improvements. The recommendations and prioritization strategies
included in the Final BMP will be used as a planning tool to help prioritize and implement
through regular Town processes such as the adoption of the annual Operating Budget
and Capital Improvement Program. The BMP will also serve as a mechanism to
strategically position the Town to compete for active transportation grant programs.
Given the Town’s limited resources, these will be necessary to fund many of the
recommended infrastructure projects in the future.
Specifically, infrastructure recommendations contained in Chapters 4 and 6 of the Draft
BMP, include 51 location-specific (“spot”) improvements and 44 roadway segment
(“corridor”) improvements to enhance or add new bicycle routes, lanes and paths. A
prioritization rubric was developed to assist with future programming and planning of
the infrastructure project lists. However, it is to be reiterated that all bicycle
infrastructure improvements recommendations will be evaluated in more detail through
future Capital Improvement Program processes and as funding sources are obtained.
Bicycle-related projects that are currently identified in the Town’s FY21/22 Capital
Improvement Program have been included in the Draft BMP and prioritization analysis,
and are as follows (Tables 1 and 2):
Table 1 – Existing “Spot” Improvement Projects
Project Description
Diablo Road Trail, CIP C-055 Trail crossing treatment at intersection of Diablo
Road/Fairway Drive.
Traffic Management Program,
CIP C-305
RRFB Systems at IHT/Love Lane, IHT/Linda Mesa Ave.,
IHT/Del Amigo Rd., IHT/Hartford Rd.
Iron Horse Trail Raised Crosswalks,
CIP C-607
IHT/Paraiso Dr., IHT/El Capitan Dr., IHT/Greenbrook
Dr.
Townwide Bicycle Facilities
Improvements, CIP C-621
Includes bicycle video detection, enhancements to bicycle
lane markings, development of wayfinding plan.
Downtown Traffic Signal
Modernization, CIP C-634
Various traffic signal upgrades throughout the Downtown
core that includes bicycle video detection.
Park and Ride Expansion Project,
CIP C-598
Includes bicycle parking (lockers) and two new
connections to the IHT.
Review and Comment
on Draft BMP 4 June 8, 2021
Table 2 – Existing “Corridor” Improvement Projects
Project Description
Diablo Road Trail, C-055 0.9-mile Class I trail along the Diablo Road corridor.
San Ramon Valley Blvd. Slurry
Seal and Striping, CIP C-578
Includes installation of Class IIB buffered bicycle lanes.
Camino Ramon Improvements,
CIP C-601
Includes Class III bicycle markings.
Town-wide Trails, CIP B-120 Includes long-term trail gap closure projects.
The recommendations in the Draft BMP includes a wide range of projects that vary in
complexity and cost and that will be contingent upon funding. The prioritization
rubric developed included a range of factors including connectivity/proximity to the
downtown, schools and the Iron Horse Trail; safety and collision history; public
support based on input received; perceived rider comfort; and feasibility (including
cost). The top-ranked projects in each project type category are identified as follows
(Tables 3 and 4):
Table 3 – Top-ranked “Spot” Improvements
Project Description
Iron Horse Trail/Love Lane RRFB system, high-visibility crosswalk, improve lighting
Camino Tassajara/Crow Canyon
Rd. Intersection
Bicycle boxes and bicycle video detection
Sycamore Valley Rd/Camino
Ramon/IHT Crossing
Separated bicycle/pedestrian crosswalk, curb and
sidewalk/staging area improvements, video detection
and signal improvements.
Sycamore Valley Rd/Camino
Ramon/IHT Crossing
Bridge overcrossing
Iron Horse Trail/San Ramon Valley
Blvd. Intersection
Raised crosswalk
Iron Horse Trail/Del Amigo Road
Crossing
RRFB system improvements, high-visibility crosswalk,
improve lighting
Table 4 – Top-ranked “Corridor” Improvements
Project Description
San Ramon Valley Blvd. (south) Convert Class II bicycle lanes to Class IIB buffered bicycle
lanes and high-visibility pavement markings
Camino Tassajara Convert Class II bicycle lanes to Class IIB buffered bicycle
lanes
Sycamore Valley Road Convert Class II bicycle lanes to Class IIB buffered bicycle
lanes
Review and Comment
on Draft BMP 5 June 8, 2021
San Ramon Valley Blvd. (north) Convert Class II bicycle lanes to Class IIB buffered bicycle
lanes and high-visibility pavement markings
El Cerro Blvd. Convert Class II bicycle lanes to Class IIB buffered bicycle
lanes
Programmatic Recommendations
The Draft BMP provides a detailed listing of potential bicycle programs and policy that
support and encourage a culture of bicycling in Danville, and equally, initiatives to
enhance bicycle safety through the 5 “E’s”- Engineering, Encouragement, Education,
Enforcement and Evaluation. As with the infrastructure recommendations,
programmatic implementation will be dependent upon funding and staff resources.
Based on feedback received from the Commission, public (including community bicycle
organizations), and staff input, near-term programs that are recommended for
implementation include:
• Implementation of a Town-appointed Bicycle Advisory Committee to assist and
provide direction on future implementation and prioritization of projects and programs
defined in the BMP;
• Incorporation of bicycle parking and end-of-trip facilities at Town facilities (such as at
the Town Green/Community Center) that serve all types of bicyclists and bicycle types;
• Develop a Townwide Bicycle Wayfinding Program;
• Deploy a Townwide Bicycle Counting Program;
• Develop Town-sponsored promotional materials to encourage and support bicycling
and bicycle safety specific to the Town’s bicycle facilities;
• Deploy a bicycle traffic enforcement program to monitor traffic laws at high-collision
locations such as at Iron Horse Trail crossings and in the Downtown.
Proposed Schedule
Upon review and comment by the Town Council, and, in conjunction with any additional
comments received from the public, it is recommended that the Final BMP be presented
to the Danville Town Council for consideration of adoption at its upcoming regularly
scheduled Town Council meeting on July 6, 2021.
Review and Comment
on Draft BMP 6 June 8, 2021
RECOMMENDATION
Review and comment on the Draft Townwide Bicycle Master Plan, CIP C-609.
Prepared by:
Andrew Dillard
Transportation Manager
Review by:
Tai Williams
Assistant Town Manager
Attachments: A – CIP Page C-609
B – Draft Townwide Bicycle Master Plan
www.danville.ca.govCIP116
3URMHFWV
72:1:,'(%,&<&/(0$67(53/$1
352-(&7'(6&5,37,21$1'/2&$7,21
'(6&5,37,212)02',),&$7,216
5$7,21$/()25352326('352-(&7
6WXG\ZLOOSURYLGHJXLGDQFHIRULPSOHPHQWDWLRQRISURJUDPVSURMHFWVDQGSROLFLHVUHODWHGWRELF\FOHVDIHW\DQGLQIUDVWUXFWXUH
(;3(&7(',03$&72123(5$7,1*%8'*(7 $GGLWLRQDOZRUNHUKRXUVUHTXLUHGWRPDLQWDLQSHU\HDU
$GGLWLRQDO7RZQGLUHFWRSHUDWLQJFRVWVSHU\HDU
352-(&7&267(67,0$7(
352-(&7$335235,$7,21$1')81',1*
7KLVSURMHFWFRQVLVWVRIWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIDFRPSUHKHQVLYH%LF\FOH0DVWHU3ODQWRVXSSRUWHQFRXUDJHDQGHQKDQFHELF\FOHWUDYHOLQ'DQYLOOH
7KH0DVWHU3ODQZLOOVXSSRUWDQGVHUYHDVDPHFKDQLVPWRVHWIRUWKLPSOHPHQWDWLRQPHDVXUHVRIWKH*RDOVDQG3ROLFLHVGHILQHGLQWKH7RZQ
V*HQHUDO3ODQUHODWHGWRPXOWLPRGDOFLUFXODWLRQFRPSOHWHVWUHHWVDQGPRELOLW\DQGQHLJKERUKRRGTXDOLW\
35,17('21
&,31R " 67$786 CNOSDC 35,25,7< 352-(&70$1$*(5 #*5((1352-(&7 -N
3ULRU<HDUV 7RWDO([SHQGLWXUH&DWHJRU\
'HVLJQ3ODQ5HYLHZ &RQVWUXFWLRQ
,QVSHFWLRQ $GPLQ
7RWDO&RVW(VWLPDWH 7RWDO([SHQGLWXUH 8QH[SHQGHG RQ
3ULRU<HDUV 7RWDO)XQGLQJ6RXUFH V
0HDV-&&7/&
7RWDO)XQGLQJ
ZZZGDQYLOOHFDJRY"(/
Projects
TOWN OF DANVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN
SPRING 2021
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TOWN OF DANVILLE
Town Council
Renee Morgan, MayorNewell Arnerich, Vice MayorKaren StepperRobert StorerDavid Fong
Parks, Recreation and Arts Commission
Jane Joyce, ChairRandall Diamond, Vice ChairBrittany BeechKevin DonovanAdam Falcon
Jenna MesicAlesia StrauchAlec TappinKyler Fung
Town Staff
Joe Calabrigo, Town ManagerRob Ewing, City AttorneyTai Williams, Assistant Town Manager/Development Services DirectorHenry Perezalonso, Recreation, Arts and Community Services DirectorAndrew Dillard, Transportation ManagerMajid Hafezieh, Traffic Engineering AssociateThomas Valdriz, Transportation Program Analyst
CONSULTANT TEAM:
Alta Planning + Design
Brett Hondorp, Principal-In-ChargeMauricio Hernández, Project ManagerLisa Schroer, Planner/ GIS Analyst
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
Chapter 1: Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Plan Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Public Outreach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Chapter 2: Vision, Goals, and Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Chapter 3: Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Existing Bicycle Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40
Transit and Other Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
Programs and Local Advocacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48
Weaknesses and Strengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
Chapter 4: Infrastructure Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
Corridor Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52
Spot Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
Chapter 5: Programs and Policy Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66
Engineering and Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
Encouragement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70
Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73
Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74
Chapter 6: Implementation Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76
Project Prioritization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78
Cost Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92
Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95
Chapter 7: Wayfinding Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100
Key Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101
Wayfinding Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102
Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Destination Selection & Prioritization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107
Wayfinding Toolkit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .112
Appendices
Appendix 1: Plan Review
Appendix 2: Existing Bike Counts And Data
Appendix 3: Public Comments
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION
DANVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
5
The Town of Danville is a desirable destination in Contra Costa County
and the greater Bay Area for bicycling. Many avid cyclists live in or
visit Danville due to its proximity to regional trails and recreational
attractions such as Mount Diablo State Park and the Iron Horse Trail.
The Town has grown considerably since its origins as a small rural
village. To this day, Danville is primarily residential and continues to
enjoy its semi-rural character, but its close proximity to major employment
centers throughout the Bay Area has brought population growth and new
development to the Town and surrounding areas in Contra Costa County
over the last several decades.
Danville has an extensive bicycle
network of bike routes, bike lanes and
shared-use facilities that has evolved
over time. It is also connected to
the Iron Horse Regional Trail which
bifurcates the downtown area, spanning
from the City of Concord to the City
of Pleasanton providing a continuous,
north-south connection to transit and
other regional destinations.
Bicycling popularity in the Bay Area,
particularly within Danville, has seen
a steady increase over the last decade.
Concurrently, the Town has continued
its commitment to improve upon its
robust network of trails and on-street
bicycle facilities to keep pace with the
demand and to address safety issues.
However, the need to take a holistic
approach to plan for the future of
bicycling in Danville has been sought
by the Town to adequately respond and
be proactive to the needs of the growing
cycling population, and as well, to
provide short and long-term strategies
for improving bicycle connectivity and
safety by way of identifying, planning
and incorporating modern bicycle
facility infrastructure advancements.
In 2020, with funding provided by
Contra Costa’s Measure J ½-cent
transportation sales tax program, the
Town embarked on the development
of its first Bicycle Master Plan that will
serve as the blueprint for the planning
and implementation of programs and
projects to enhance its existing network
through providing safe and comfortable
bicycle facilities for bicyclists of all ages
and abilities.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
6
PLAN ORGANIZATION
The plan is organized into seven
chapters and three appendices.
• Chapter 1 – provides an
introduction to the plan and a
summary of strengths, weaknesses
and opportunities for bicycling
• Chapter 2 – introduces the
collective Vision, Goals and
Objectives for the plan
• Chapter 3 – summarizes the
existing conditions in the Town of
Danville
• Chapter 4 – provides
recommendations for the
infrastructure improvements
throughout the town’s roadways
• Chapter 5 – includes a summary of
Policies and Programs to support
bicycling around town
• Chapter 6 – defines the
implementation strategy for the
plan’s recommendations
• Chapter 7 – wayfinding docket
• Appendix 1 – plan review
• Appendix 2 – existing bike counts
• Appendix 3 – public comments
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
7
PLAN DEVELOPMENT
The Plan was developed over a year-
long process, beginning in 2020. Figure 1 depicts a high-level approach
to creating the final plan. To begin,
an assessment of existing conditions
was completed in spring 2020. This
was the first of several steps for
developing the Town’s Bicycle Master
Plan and that serve as the foundation
for the development of the Plan’s
recommendations. Throughout the
duration of the project, Town staff
requested community feedback
on bicycling accessibility, safety,
existing infrastructure, and desired
improvements.
Figure 1 . Approach to Plan Development
EExxiissttiinngg CCoonnddiittiioonnss
P P u u b b l l i i c c O O u u t t r r e e a a c c h hNNeeeeddss AAsssseessssmmeenntt
RReeccoommmmeennddaattiioonnss
&& IImmpplleemmeennttaattiioonn
DDrraafftt && FFiinnaall PPllaann
Several themes emerged from the
feedback received including a desire for:
• More comfortable bicycle facilities
• Safer bicycle crossings at
intersections particularly along the
Iron Horse Trail
• Increased information sharing
and public input on proposed
and future improvements, project
status, and effectiveness of projects
implemented to date
Finally, a two-pronged approach to
developing the recommendations was
used that consisted of community input,
paired with a data-driven analysis of
existing conditions.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
8
Stakeholder Listening Session
A meeting was held on June 23,
2020 with representatives from local
community-based organizations (CBOs)
and school-age students to discuss the
project goals, review public outreach
strategy, and request feedback on key
destinations, barriers and major gaps
in the bicycling network. Seventeen
people attended the meeting and
provided feedback that included
information about the most challenging
intersections, and potential projects.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Community outreach was affected by
the start of the COVID-19 pandemic
starting in March 2020. While the
Town had hoped to provide in-person
outreach in the form of community
meetings and pop-up events,
restrictions on such gatherings during
2020 and much of the first half of 2021
required a different approach to those
types of traditional outreach events.
Consequently, most of the public
engagement activities were conducted
online through the use of stakeholder
listening sessions, online workshops,
online pop-up meetings, and interactive
webmaps. Feedback obtained was used
to inform the development of this plan.
Online Community Workshops
Two online community workshops were
held to 1) solicit input on safety issues
and concerns; and 2) request feedback
on recommended improvements. The
workshops were held on September
24, 2020 and March 11, 2021 and
included a combined participation of
40 residents and interested individuals.
The meetings were held via Zoom
conference call and afforded the
community the opportunity to ask
questions about the project and
discuss potential improvements and
solutions to enhance bicycle safety
and connectivity. Feedback received
during the workshops helped inform the
recommendations contained in the plan.
Danville Bike Master PlanDanville Bike Master Plan
The Town invites you to collaboratewith us as we develop a visionfor the future of biking throughout
Danville.
VIRTUAL WORKSHOP #1Thursday, September 24th6:00 - 7:00 PM
LEARN MOREwww.danvillebikeplan.com
Click here to register yourself for the Virtual Workshop on Zoom.
Figure 2 . Virtual workshop promotional materials
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
9
Figures 4, 5, and 6 include public
responses to questions asked during the
pop-up meetings A total of 495 people
were directly engaged (i.e., viewed
the recorded video presentation and
provided input) and a total of 2,914
people were reached (i.e., users who
viewed the presentation but didn’t
provide input). Key themes about
providing safer and more connected
facilities emerged from these events.
Figure 3 . Facebook Live streaming of Online Pop-up Event
Figure 4 . Pop-up meeting question abouts facilities and level of comfort
Figure 5 . Pop-up meeting question about
challenging intersections
Figure 6 . Pop-up meeting question about
projects and prioritization
Online Pop-Up Events
In lieu of in-person pop-up events, Town
staff hosted two online pop-up events
on September 2nd and September
10th 2020. The events were streamed
on the Town’s Facebook live-feed and
were recorded so as to increase level of
community outreach and engagement
(see Figure 3).
The pop-ups provided information
about the timeline of the project and
existing facilities. They also afforded
the opportunity for attendees to share
feedback on problem areas in the Town
that represent barriers to bicycling.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
10
Interactive Webmap
Town Staff launched an online
interactive map to increase the
opportunities for the public to provide
feedback on specific locations during
the discovery and implementation
phases of the project. This allowed
residents and webmap users to provide
input on existing issues surrounding
bicycling, and to share their thoughts
on the proposed infrastructure
improvements. The maps were
made available through the project
webpage (https://danvillebikeplan.
com/) and were advertised through
public outreach events and electronic
invitations. Over 400 users provided
feedback about bicycling in Danville,
specific problem areas to address
through this plan, and thoughts on the
Plan’s recommendations.
DISCOVERY PHASE
The first phase of an interactive map
was available online from July to
October 2020. Users were asked to
identify routes they enjoy biking on
and routes where they’d like to bike
on. Users were also asked to identify
specific locations that represent barriers
and safety hazards for biking. Over
150 comments were received during
this period. Figure 7 includes a screen
capture of the interactive map during
the Discovery Phase of the project.
Figure 7 . Online interactive map during discovery phase
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
11
Figure 8 . Online interactive map during implementation phase
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
The interactive map was also made
available to provide residents the
ability to comment on the proposed
improvements. The map was open
from March to April 2021. Users were
asked to “like”, “dislike” and comment
on the proposed facility improvements.
The feedback generated was then
used to help inform the prioritization
portion of the project. A total of 255
users interacted with the webmap and
provided over 1,000 comments during
this period. Figure 8 provides a screen
capture of the Implementation Phase
interactive map.
CHAPTER 2: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
13
The following vision, goals, and objectives were developed to guide the
recommendations included in this Plan and will be used to measure
the Town’s progress towards implementation over time. These were
collaboratively developed by the community and Town staff.
OBJECTIVES
The following section summarizes the
proposed objectives and performance
measures derived from each goal for
the Plan. This section also includes
the names of the parties responsible
for helping improve each performance
measure.
• Objectives are specific action items
that will help to achieve the goals.
• Performance measures are
typically annual data-driven
benchmarks that help the Town
gauge progress towards the Plan’s
goals and objectives.
• Responsible parties are agencies
expected to take the lead in
monitoring data points to meet
the recommended performance
measures for each goal. In
some cases, community-based
organizations (CBOs) may be
included as a responsible party.
VISION
The Town of Danville will strive
to enhance mobility and safety by
creating a well-connected network
of bicycle facilities inclusive of safe
roadway crossings, on-street bicycle
accommodation and off-street facilities
designed for a wide variety of users and
trip purposes. These enhancements will
be achieved through a collaborative
process with the community and will
improve health and safety, encourage
mode shift, and enhance the quality
of life for residents and visitors to the
Town of Danville.
GOALS
1. Connectivity: Provide comfortable,
safe, and connected facilities for all
types of users.
2. Safety: Enhance bicycle safety with
projects, policies and programs.
3. Collaboration and Transparency:
Develop a network of bicycle
facilities through a collaborative
process that builds and maintains
community trust.
4. Institutional: Establish a culture
of biking both at the organizational
and community levels.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
14
GOAL 1 – CONNECTIVITY
Provide comfortable, safe, and connected facilities for ALL cyclists.
Table 1 . Connectivity objectives and measurable outcomes
Objective Metrics Responsible Parties
Provide comfortable, safe
and connected bicycle
facilities
Linear miles of bicycle improvements
per calendar year
• Bike Paths (Class I)
• Bike Lanes (Class II)
• Bike Routes (Class III)
• Protected Bike Lanes (Class IV)
Town/County
Conduct before and after studies of new bicycle facilities to measure effectiveness
Number of people biking (bike counts before/after installation/implementation)
Observed speed of motorists (before/
after)
Reduction in bicycle-involved collisions
Town/CBOs
Develop and implement a
wayfinding protocol that
links different destinations
throughout the Town
Percent increase in number of linear
miles of wayfinding implemented by
year
Town
Design bikeways that provide first- and last-mile connections to transit
Percent increase in linear miles of bicycle improvements per calendar year
• Bike Paths (Class I)
• Bike Lanes (Class II)
• Bike Routes (Class III)
• Protected Bike Lanes (Class IV)
Number of bicycle improvements within
one mile of transit locations
Town/County
Increase the number of available bicycle parking spaces in high-demand areas
Percent increase in number and location of available bicycle parking spaces per year
Town
Improve connections to
and from the Iron Horse
Trail
Percent increase in linear miles of
bicycle improvements per calendar year
• Bike Paths (Class I)
• Bike Lanes (Class II)
• Bike Routes (Class III)
• Protected Bike Lanes (Class IV)
Town/County
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
15
GOAL 2 – SAFETY
Support bicycle safety with projects, policies, and programs.
Table 2 . Safety objectives and measurable outcomes
Objective Metrics Responsible Parties
Reduce frequency and severity
of bicycle collisions through the
implementation of systematic
safety improvements and street
designs that prioritize safety for
vulnerable road users
Percent decrease in number of
bicycle-related fatality, injury, and
crash rates in Danville.
Percent increase in number and location of people biking via bicycle count monitoring.
Town/CBOs
Prioritize bicycle access and
safety along roadways within
one mile of all K-12 schools in
Danville
Percent decrease in number of
bicycle-related fatality, injury, and
crash rates within one mile of all
K-12 schools in Danville.
Linear miles of bicycle improvements within one mile of all K-12 schools in Danville per year
• Bike Paths (Class I)
• Bike Lanes (Class II)
• Bike Routes (Class III)
• Protected Bike Lanes (Class IV)
Town/San Ramon
Valley Unified School
District
Support third party bicycle
safety and education efforts with
funding and/or organizational
capacity (bicyclists, ex. Street
Smarts or 511)
Number of bike safety events
hosted or sponsored in Danville
Number of attendees at hosted or sponsored bike safety events in Danville
Town/San Ramon
Valley Unified School
District/ San Ramon
Valley Street Smarts
Program
Work with local police to train
officers on safe bicycling
practices and current laws
related to bicycling
Percentage of police officers going
through training programs related
to traffic laws related to safety
Town
Maintain line-of-sight and riding surfaces along corridors and at intersections as a maintenance function
Conduct quarterly Townwide inspections along all Class I and II routes
Town
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
16
GOAL 3 – COLLABORATION AND TRANSPARENCY
Develop a network of bicycle facilities through a collaborative process that builds
and maintains community trust.
Table 3 . Collaboration and Transparency objectives and measurable outcomes
Objective Metrics Responsible Parties
Increase the participation
of community members and
vulnerable groups through
the planning process
Number of meetings with CBOs as
part of future planning processes
Number of project-based outreach meetings related to Plan recommendations
Number of targeted outreach efforts
to reach community members who
may not be able to participate in
traditional, in-person meetings
Town/County/CBOs/
Bicycle Advisory
Committee
Follow-through on the Town’s project commitments Number of bike improvements coordinated with the Town’s Pavement Management Program to deliver bicycle enhancements cost-effectively and improve roadway conditions
Number of alternative maintenance
and capital funding obtained to
implement proposed improvements
Town/ Bicycle Advisory Committee
Continue to build community trust Number of quick-build improvements (ex. QuickBuild/Tactical urbanism projects) identified and implemented in collaboration with CBOs
Number of and community
attendance to community meetings
related to the planning, design and
implementation of bicycle facilities
Town/County/CBOs/ Bicycle Advisory Committee
Improve the needs and trip patterns of vulnerable populations
Number of bicycle facilities that address disparities and close gaps in the bicycle network between neighborhoods, schools, transit, and the downtown
Town/County
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
17
GOAL 4 – INSTITUTIONAL
Establish a culture of biking both at the organizational and community levels.
Table 4 . Institutional objectives and measurable outcomes
Objective Metrics Responsible Parties
Share Town accomplishments
through press releases and
social media
Percent of projects shared
through social media/press
releases per year
Town/CBOs
Continue investment in resources to educate Town staff on current bicycle facility design and implementation best-practices
Number of educational opportunities per year related to bicycle safety, policy and/or facility design
Town
Increase bicycle travel on
roadways and trails
Percent increase of bicycle travel
on all Class I –IV facilities
Town/County/CBOs
Increase engagement of other departments (ex. Police, Fire/EMS, others) to help develop policies that are conducive towards improving conditions for people biking
Number of cross-departmental meetings related to bicycle policy and safety attended per year
Town/San Ramon Valley Unified School District/ San Ramon Valley Street Smarts Program
Ensure coordinated
departmental response to
bicycle-related traffic collisions
Number of responses and
collaborations between
Transportation and Police staff to
all bicycle-related collisions
Town/ County
CHAPTER 3:EXISTING CONDITIONS
DANVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
19
The Town of Danville prides itself on a small-town atmosphere and
outstanding quality of life. Situated in the San Ramon Valley at the base of
Mount Diablo, the town’s proximity to regional trails and parks makes it a
popular destination for bicycling and an ideal place to focus on improving
the bicycle network.
Danville is primarily residential, with
a semi-rural character. The historic
downtown is the principal commercial
district, although other commercial
areas and public facilities extend along
I-680 and Camino Tassajara. The
town is approximately 18 square miles
in area. A map of Danville including
key regional destinations is shown in Figure 9.
The Town has an abundance of park
and open space, with over 25% of land
classified as General Open Space.
The town sits between Las Trampas
Wilderness Regional Preserve, the
Sycamore Valley Open Space Reserve,
and Mount Diablo State Park. The Iron
Horse Trail, a regional trail that extends
from Pleasanton north to Concord,
passes through downtown Danville.
These and other trails and recreational
routes bring hundreds of bicyclists into
Danville, and as well, routes leading to
adjacent regional destinations such as
Mount Diablo State Park where bicycles
often outnumber cars on a typical
weekend.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SYC AM O R E V A L L E Y R D
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
D
A
N
VILLEBLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O ME R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
SAN
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
ELCAPITAN
D
R
RIC
H
A
RDL
N
S T G E O R G E R D
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
HI GH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
SanRamon Valley HighSchool
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
EXISTING
LAND USE 0 0.25 0.5MILESFeatures
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Iron Horse Trail
Town Boundary
Land Use Category
Residential
Commercial
Mixed Use
Parks and Open Space
Public / Semi-Public
Map Produced: Jan. 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
!!
!
!
Middem
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Prospect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
Montair Elementary
I680
RICHA RDL
N
RAMP
ESTATES DR
C A N T A D A C I R
VEDA DR
ILO LN
M
I
A
C
T
H
A
R
T
Z A
V
E
S K Y T ER
IRON HORSE TRAIL
T U R R I N I C I R
B A L I C T
BOBBIE DRCATHY LN
AMIGO RD
B O N A N Z A W Y
LA
M
O
N
T W
Y
H
I
G
H
B
R
I
D
G
E
L
N
VIA HERMOSA
VIST A D R
T U R R I N I D R
L O V E L N
SONORAAVE
DIABLO R D
GL
E
N R
D
I680
I680
I
6
8
0
HARTZ AVE
R
A
M
P
I 6 8 0
DIABLORD
Figure 9 . Existing Land Uses
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
Figure 10 . Town of Danville
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
22
LAND USE & MAJOR DESTINATIONS
Most land in Danville is designated for
low-density residential housing. Of the
16,589 housing units in Danville, 89%
are single-family homes. According
to the latest US Census figures, 84%
of all housing structures are owner-
occupied.1 Areas of mixed-use and
commercial development lie primarily
along the I-680 corridor, which
bifurcates the Town, although there are
parcels of commercial and mixed-use
development along San Ramon Valley
Boulevard and the Camino Tassajara
corridor in the eastern area of Danville.
Figure 9 (see page 20) shows land use
designations in Danville. Downtown
Danville is the concentration of mixed-
use development to the west of I-680.
Downtown Danville’s restaurants,
shops, and civic spaces, including the
Town’s theater, community center,
and library, make it a key destination
for Town residents and visitors. Many
recreational bicyclists, including large
group road rides as well as people
bicycling on the Iron Horse Trail, will
stop in one of downtown Danville’s
cafes or restaurants for coffee or a meal.
Outdoor seating at restaurants and
plazas helps to bring the downtown
streetscape to life. Another large
draw to the downtown is the Danville
Farmers’ Market (located at the Railroad
Avenue Municipal Lot) which is open
every Saturday throughout the year
(9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.).
1 US Census Reporter (2018). ACS 5-Year Estimates.
The Town has a considerable amount
of land dedicated to parks and open
space within the town limits. There
are over 20 local and regional parks
and recreation areas in Danville. This
town amenity is another major draw to
Danville residents and visitors alike.
The Iron Horse Trail is one of the
region’s most well-known active
transportation corridors creating
strong north-south bicycle connectivity
through Downtown Danville. The trail
serves as a major regional connector,
providing a 32-mile biking and walking
corridor between Pleasanton and
Concord. The trail follows the Southern
Pacific Railroad right-of-way that
was abandoned in 1978 and provides
connections from Danville north to
Alamo, Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill
and Concord, and south to San Ramon
and Pleasanton. The trail connects
Concord, Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek,
Alamo, and San Ramon, passing
through commercial, residential, and
rural areas along the way. It also serves
as a connector to the Pleasant Hill and
Dublin BART stations which are located
only a few blocks from the trail.
Mount Diablo State Park, located
just outside town limits, is a well-
known regional destination for hikers,
equestrians, cyclists, and campers.
According to official figures, the Park
draws more than 350,000 visitors each
year to explore the park and take in the
spectacular view.2 Bicyclists can be seen
year-round along its roads and trails,
with many attempting to summit the
nearly 4,000 feet of elevation.
2 Mount Diablo State Park brochure. California Department of Parks and Recreation. Accessed April 14, 2020 from https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/517/files/MountDiabloFinalWebLayout2018.pdf
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
23
Within Danville, there are a number of
activity generators that create or could
create increased demand for bicycling.
These include:
Parks and Recreation Areas
• Mount Diablo State Park3
• Diablo Vista Park
• Oak Hill Park
• Hap Magee Ranch Park
• Las Trampas Wilderness Regional
Preserve
• Eugene O’Neill National Historic
Site (NPS)
• Museum of the San Ramon Valley
• Osage Station Park
• Sycamore Valley Regional Open
Space
• Sycamore Valley Park
• Danville South Park
• Greenbrook School Park
• Bret Harte Park
• El Pintado Park
• Town Green
• Various School Parks
• Iron Horse Regional Trail
• Commercial Areas and Corridors
• Danville Boulevard/Railroad
Avenue/Hartz Avenue (Downtown
Danville)
• Diablo Road/El Cerro Boulevard
• San Ramon Valley Blvd.
• Sycamore Valley Road/Camino
Tassajara
• I-680 Corridor
3 South Gate entrance located in close proximity to Town limits.
Major Employment Areas
• Downtown Danville
Schools
• Greenbrook Elementary
• John Baldwin Elementary
• Sycamore Valley Elementary
• Vista Grande Elementary
• Montair Elementary
• Green Valley Elementary
• Diablo Vista Middle
• Charlotte Wood Middle
• Los Cerros Middle
• Monte Vista High School
• San Ramon Valley High School
Civic Buildings/Points of Interest
• Danville Town Meeting Hall
• Danville Community Center and
Library
• Oak Hill Park Community Center
• Village Theatre
• Veterans Memorial Building and
Senior Center
• School-based Teen Centers
Medical Facilities
• Danville Center
Transit
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONNECTION
• Route 21/321
• Route 95X, 97X
• Alamo Creek Shuttle
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
24
DEMOGRAPHICS
Danville is home to 44,605 residents.4
The Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) estimates that
Danville’s population will grow by 6%
by the year 2040 (based on population
estimates for 2020).5 This is a slower
growth rate than the projection for
Contra Costa County at large, which is
forecasted to grow to around 1.4 million
people in 2040, a 23% increase above
2020 projections.6
Table 5 breaks down the population
of Danville by race or ethnicity. The
majority of residents in Danville (75.3%)
identify as white alone and English is
the most commonly spoken language in
Danville.
Table 5 . Demographic Breakdown (Danville vs Contra Costa County)
Race or Ethnicity7 Danville
Contra Costa County
Hispanic or Latino 6.5%25.6%
White alone 75.3%43.8%
Asian alone 13.2%16.5%
Black or African American alone 1.0%8.4%
American Indian and
Alaska Native alone
0.0%0.2%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
0.1%0.5%
Some other race alone 0.1%0.3%
Two or more races 3.8%4.7%
4 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2015-2019). Table DP05
5 Association of Bay Area Governments (2018). Plan Bay Area Projections 2040.
6 Ibid
7 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2015-2019). Table DP05
The median household income in
Danville is $160,808. This is higher
than the median household income of
$99,716 in Contra Costa County.8
COMMUTE MODES AND WORK TRAVEL PATTERNS
A small percentage of people in
Danville commute to work by bicycle.
Based on transportation data from 2019
American Community Survey 5-year
Estimates, just 0.1% of Danville residents
bicycle to work (see Table 6). This
represents approximately 25 daily work-
based bicycle trips. It is important to
note that Census data does not account
for commuters using multiple modes of
travel to and from work. For example, a
commuter that may bicycle to a transit
stop could be counted as a transit trip.
Table 6 . Means of Transportation to Work
Mode 20109 201910
Drive 81.5%80.0%
Public Transit 5.8%5.9%
Taxicab 0.1%0.2%
Motorcycle 0.2%0.1%
Bicycle 0.3%0.1%
Walked 1.5%2.6%
Other Means 0.3%0.6%
Worked at Home 10.3%10.6%
Each day, Danville experiences a net
outflow of workers, meaning more
residents work outside the Town. Just
1,347 workers who live in Danville are
8 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2015-2019). Table DP03
9 US Census Bureau (2010). Table B08301. American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
10 US Census Bureau (2019). Table B08301. American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
25
employed in Danville.11 According to
2017 Census data, 18,259 workers who
live in Danville travel to work outside
of the town limits (Figure 11). Most of
these workers (55%) stay in Contra Costa
County, traveling to places like San
Ramon, Concord, and Walnut Creek.
The remaining workers who commute
outside the town limits primarily travel to
Pleasanton, Oakland and San Francisco.
Figure 12 shows how the percentages
of people who drive alone to work
varies throughout Danville, with
higher rates of driving alone to work
indicated by lighter shades of purple
and lower rates of driving alone to
work indicated by darker shades of
purple. The area of town with the
fewest people driving alone to work is
located east of I-680 between El Cerro
Boulevard and Sycamore Valley Road.
The areas of town east of Camino
Tassajara Boulevard have some of the
highest rates of driving alone to work.
11 US Census Bureau (2017). OnTheMap Inflow/Outflow Analysis. https://onthemap.ces.census.gov/
Higher rates of driving alone to work
can correspond with higher levels of
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and
vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
Travel distance to work is one important
factor that determines the most viable,
effective transportation modes for people
as they commute to work. Thirty-nine
percent of all workers in Danville travel
less than 10 miles to work (Figure 13).12
Northwest, north, south, and southeast
are the primary directions of travel for
workers commuting from Danville.
Over 10,000 people commute into
Danville every day. As shown in Figure 14,13 most jobs in Danville
are concentrated in Downtown along
the I-680 corridor; however, there are
concentrations of employment along
Camino Tassajara and near San Ramon
to the south.
12 US Census Bureau (2017). Travel Time and Distance to Work. https://onthemap.ces.census.gov/
13 US Census Bureau (2017). OnTheMap Employment Density Analysis. https://onthemap.ces.census.gov/
Figure 11 . Employment Inflow/Outflow for Danville and Employment Destinations
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Figure 12 . Means of Transportation to Work - Drive Alone
Figure 13 . Travel Time and Distance to Work Figure 14 . Employment Density
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
28
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Average daily weekday traffic volumes
throughout Danville reveal trends along
frequently used roadways. Sycamore
Valley Road, Camino Tassajara,
Blackhawk Road, Diablo Road, and
San Ramon Valley Boulevard remain
the corridors with the highest daily
traffic volumes within town limits and
reported modest increases (averaging
11%) between 2010 and 2017 based on
the latest data available (see Figure 15).14
All corridors serve as major connectors
to and from I-680 which remains the
main connection to jobs and activity
centers outside town limits. Other
roadways did not experience significant
changes and remained with relatively
low traffic volumes including parts of
Danville Boulevard, Diablo Road (west
of Fairway Drive), Green Valley Road,
14 Average Daily Traffic Volumes. Town of Danville 1992-2017.
and Railroad Avenue. Some roadways
experiencing significantly lower traffic
volumes include portions of El Cerro
Boulevard (west of I-680) and Camino
Ramon (south of Sycamore Valley Road)
which reported 21% and 11% decrease in
traffic respectively.
Figure 16 on the right provides a
summary of ADTs throughout many of
the Town’s largest roadway corridors. As
the Bicycle Plan moves forward with the
recommendations phase, traffic volumes
can be used to assist the decision-
making process—most notably as a
guide for where safer and lower stress
roadways in Danville are located.
Figure 15 . Top 5 Corridors Average Daily Traffic (2010-2017)
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
Figure 16 . Average Daily Weekday Traffic Volumes (2017)
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
30
COLLISION ANALYSIS
To understand problem areas of the
Town with high incidence of bicycle
collisions, a collision analysis was
undertaken utilizing data for a 6-year
period from 2015-2021.15 Data was
provided via the Town’s Crossroads
Software collision database. Several
patterns emerged:
Bicycle-related collisions occurred
at a higher rate along higher speed
roadways and at intersections.
• Areas with commercial and
mixed-use land use designations
experienced higher rates of
collisions compared to other land
use categories.
• Five intersection locations emerged
as key areas where multiple bicycle
collisions occurred (Table 7).
Table 7 . High Collision Incidence
Intersections (2015-2021)
Rank Intersection
Total
Collisions16
1 San Ramon Valley Blvd/ Iron Horse Trail 4
Sycamore Valley Rd/
Camino Ramon
4
2 Danville Blvd/ El Portal 3
Greenbrook Dr/ Iron
Horse Trail
3
Hartz Ave/ Linda Mesa Ave 3
15 Town of Danville’s Crossroads Software Collision Database. Jan 2015- Mar 2021
16 Per Town of Danville’s Crossroads Software collision database
Other key findings included:
• There were a total of 86 reported
bicycle-related collisions within the
Town limits during the 6-year study
period from 2015 through 2021.
• Camino Tassajara experienced
more collisions than any other
roadway with 13 total reported
incidents.
• Two bicycle fatalities occurred
within Town Limits: on San Ramon
Valley Boulevard near Fountain
Springs, and at the intersection of
Crow Canyon Road and Tassajara
Ranch Road.
• 77% of bicycle-related collisions
occurred on arterial roadways.
• 80% of bicycle-related collisions
occurred on a roadway with an
existing bicycle facility.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
31
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
time of day
WEEKEND WEEKDAY TOTAL
Figure 17 . Collisions by Time of Day
As noted in Figure 17, most collisions
occur between the hours of noon to
5 pm, with a peak around noon on
weekends and weekdays. Over 40% of
all collisions were caused by unsafe
motorist behaviors including improper
turns (16%), auto right-of-way violations
(17%), and unsafe speeds (8%) (Figure 18).
As noted in Figure 19, more than a one
third (36%) of bicycle related collisions
were broadside collisions, which
occur when the side of one vehicle (or
bicyclist) is impacted by the front or
rear of another vehicle. Other notable
types of collisions included sideswipes
(5%) and hitting other objects on the
roadway (7%). Furthermore, as shown in Figure 20, more than one in 10 injuries
occurring in Danville’s streets result in
severe injury (12%) or fatality (2%).
Figure 21 shows the spatial distribution
of bicycle-related collisions within
Danville. Collisions resulting in minor
injuries (25) and those registering
general complaint of pain (38) are noted
in yellow icons. Collisions registering
property damage (11) were noted in dark
red icons. Collisions resulting in severe
injuries (10) are noted in bright red
icons. Fatalities (2) are noted with dark
red stars.
Clusters appear within the downtown
areas, along Camino Tassajara, Diablo
Road, and at a number of Iron Horse
Trail intersections. These areas will
be important to consider during the
recommendations phase of the bicycle
plan, as modifications to bicycle
facilities and design changes may
decrease collision risk.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
32
1%1%
Other
Improper
Driving 6%
Trac Signals
and Signs 8%
Unsafe Speed 8%
Improper
Turning
16%
Auto R/W
Violation
17%
Not Stated/Unknown 33%
Ped or Other Under Influence
Pedestrian Violation
Unsafe Lane Change
Unsafe Starting or Backing
Other Hazardous Movement
Wrong Side of Road
Other Improper Driving
Trac Signals and Signs
Unsafe Speed
Improper Turning
Auto R/W Violation
Not Stated/Unknown
Wrong Sideof Road 4%
Other Hazardous
Movement 4%
Unsafe Lane
Change 1%Unsafe Starting
or Backing 1%Ped or Other Under
Influence
PedestrianViolation
Figure 18 . Primary Collision Factor
Figure 19 . Collision Type
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
33
4444%%
2299%%
1133%%
1122%%
22%%
Complaint of Pain
Other Visible
Injury
Property Damage
Only
Severe Injury
Fatal
Figure 20 . Highest Degree of Injury
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
^^
¥680
¥680
I680
SYCA M O R E V A L L E Y R D
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
D
A
NVILLEBLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O ME R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
AN
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
ELC
A
PITAN
D
R
RICH
A
RDL
N
S T G E O R G E R D
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
HIGH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
I
R
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
SanRamon Valley HighSchool
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
BICYCLE
COLLISIONS 0 0.25 0.5
MILESFeatures
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Iron Horse Trail
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Collisions by Severity (Jan 2015 - Mar 2021)
Minor Injury/Complaint of Pain (63)
Property Damage Only (11)
Severe Injury (10)
^Fatality (2)Map Produced: May 2021Data Sources: Town of Danville, Contra Costa County.
!
!
!
Town Green
Montair School Park
Front Street Park
Bret Harte Park
Prospect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
West El Pintado Pocket ParkWest El Pintado Pocket Park
Montair Elementary
I680
TIM CT
LA
QUE
S
TADR
EL DORADO AVE
R
A M P
HILLS I D E D R
ILOLNH
A
R
T
Z
A
V
E
IRON HORSE TRAIL
BOBBIE DR
A L I C E C T
L
A
G
O
N
D
A
W
Y
CATHY LN
AMIGO RD
VEDADR
B O N A N Z A W Y
H
I
G
H
B
R
I
D
G
E
L
N
VIA HERMOSA
L A U R E L D R
ELSIE DR
OLD TOWN LN
EL SOBRANTE DRWINDSTREAM PLVERONA AVE LOVE LN
P R O S P E C T A V E
R
A
IL
R
O
A
D
AVE
SONORAAVE
D
A
N
VILLE BLV
D
R
A
M
P
I680
I 6 8 0
L O V E L N
I 6 8 0
I
6
8
0
ILO LN
I
6
8
0
H
A
R
T
Z
A
V
E
Figure 21 . Bicycle Collisions by Severity (2015-2020)
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
35
STUDIES, PLANS, AND PROJECTS
A plan review was conducted to gain
a better understanding of the existing
conditions in Danville and identify gaps
in existing policies and programs. The
review reveals a history of support for
active transportation and a proactive
stance from the Town of Danville in
planning for all roadway users. High-
level summary findings from select
documents are described below. Please
refer to Appendix 1, Plan Review for
more details about these plans and
other relevant planning documents
in the Town. Relevant bicycle facility
recommendations from the plan
review are identified in Chapter 4,
Infrastructure Recommendations.
2030 TOWN OF DANVILLE GENERAL PLAN – CHAPTER 4, “MOBILITY”
Year published: 2013
The 2030 Town of Danville General
Plan Chapter 4 “Mobility” establishes
goals related to multi-modal circulation,
complete streets, mobility, and
neighborhood quality throughout
Danville. This chapter also discusses
existing conditions of the transportation
system in Danville and the travel
patterns of Danville residents. It is
important that the Danville Bicycle Plan
reflects the vision and goals established
in the General Plan.
The General Plan’s Mobility vision
calls for a “multimodal transportation
system that connects residents to
local and regional destinations via
freeways, roadways, trails, and public
transportation… [that] balance[s] the
needs of all modes of travel on its road
network by providing for pedestrian
and bicycle connectivity, transit
accessibility, and smooth vehicular
flow.”
Numerous policies support bicycle
transportation in Danville, including:
Policy 11.06: Create a connected
circulation system in which it becomes
easier to walk or bicycle from one point
in Danville to another.
• Policy 12.07: Close gaps in the
Town’s bicycle and pedestrian
trail system in order to create a
more fully connected, logical,
comprehensive system of facilities
for non-motorized transportation.
• Policy 12.08: Ensure the provision of
adequate bicycle support facilities,
such as bicycle parking, at all major
bicycle usage locations.
TOWN OF DANVILLE PARKS, RECREATION AND ARTS STRATEGIC PLAN
Year published: 2017
The Town of Danville Parks, Recreation,
and Arts Strategic Plan establishes a
long-range vision and course of action
for creating and sustaining a high
quality, interconnected system of parks,
recreation and arts facilities, services
and programs. Throughout the planning
process, members of the community
identified active transportation projects
and an expanded in-town trail network
as a priority project for Danville. The
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
36
Town of Danville’s Parks, Recreation,
and Art Strategic Plan recommends the
development of a bicycle wayfinding
program, the provision of end-of-trip
bicycle facilities around town, and
specific locations for recommended
end-of-trip facilities. The Danville
Bicycle Plan can reinforce and build
upon the recommendations in the
Parks, Recreation, and Art Strategic
Plan.
Other relevant goals in this plan
include:
• Active Transportation Trail and
Pathways: Connect Town parks
and facilities through a system
of on-street and off-street trails,
paths, and bike lanes serving active
transportation users and providing
a variety of experiences
• Recreation for All: Provide
recreation opportunities for all
Danville residents and visitors of all
age groups and abilities. The Town
will facilitate social connections,
human development, and lifelong
learning by building community
among residents at different stages
of life.
TOWN OF DANVILLE BICYCLE PARKING STUDY
Year published: 2011
Danville’s bicycle parking study
investigated downtown parking needs
and recommended the quantities,
types, and locations of bicycle racks
throughout the Town to accommodate
the need and demand for bicycle
parking in Danville. At the time of the
study, Downtown Danville had capacity
for 121 parking bicycles at designated
public and private property locations.
In addition to establishing guidelines
for bicycle parking design, the Bicycle
Parking Study recommended increasing
downtown bicycle parking capacity
from 121 bicycles to 215 bicycles.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Year published: 2017
The Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle
and Pedestrian Plan establishes
goals, actions, and infrastructure
recommendations to increase
opportunities for safe, comfortable
bicycling and walking throughout the
county.
The Plan envisions that “People
of all ages and abilities, and in all
neighborhoods and districts in Contra
Costa, can walk and bicycle safely,
comfortably, and directly to their chosen
destinations thereby improving health,
reducing emissions of greenhouse
gases, and making our transportation
system more sustainable.”
The Plan makes recommendations for a
countywide low-stress bicycle network
that includes key arterial roadways in
Danville, including Danville Boulevard,
Stone Valley Road, and Camino
Tassajara. The Plan also recommends
programs to support bicycling
throughout all of Contra Costa County.
The recommendations provided in the
Town of Danville’s Bicycle Master Plan
reinforce the recommendations in the
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
37
Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan and has the potential to
increase competitiveness for local and
regional grant funding programs.
FUTURE BICYCLE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
Previous planning documents have
recommended various bicycle facility
improvements in Danville. Some of the
most recent and significant bicycle
projects are listed below. Additional
relevant programs, projects, and
infrastructure recommendations can be
found in the Appendix 1, Plan Review.
Please note that recommended projects
and programs in the City of San Ramon
and Contra Costa County (Iron Horse
Trail) have been included and inter-
jurisdictional coordination will be
required to create seamless connections
between jurisdictions and shared
facilities.
Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan
• Countywide Low-Stress Bicycle
Network
»Danville Boulevard
»Stone Valley Road
»Blackhawk Road
»Diablo Road
»Camino Tassajara
• Iron Horse Trail Crossing
Improvements
• Routes of Regional Significance
»Camino Tassajara
»Danville Boulevard
»Iron Horse Trail
»Sycamore Valley Road
»Contra Costa County Measure J
Expenditure Plan (2019)
• Camino Tassajara (East) Bike Lane
Completion
• Iron Horse Trail/Bollinger Canyon
Road Overcrossing
Town of Danville Bicycle Parking Study
• Bicycle Parking Capacity Additions
(Town of Danville Bicycle Parking
Study)
Town of Danville Parks, Recreation, and Art Strategic Plan
• Missing Trail Connections
»Between Iron Horse Trial and Las
Trampas
»South from Oak Hill Park
»Diablo Road corridor
• End of Trip Facilities at: Diablo
Vista Park, Hap Magee Ranch Park,
Oak Hill Park, Osage Station Park,
Sycamore Valley Park, Bret Harte
Park, and Town Green
Town of Danville Capital Improvement Program
• Front Street Creekside Trail
• Diablo Road Trail (Shared-Use path
from Fairway Drive to Tank Access
Road/Magee Preserve Trail)
• San Ramon Valley Creek Footbridge
at Danville Green
• La Gonda Way Bridge
Improvements
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
38
• New Class II/III bicycle facilities on
Diablo Road from 1-680 NB off-ramp
to Hartz Avenue
• Diablo Road Corridor Class II
Bicycle Improvements
• Green Valley Creek Trail
Improvements
• Sycamore Creek Trail
Improvements
• Iron Horse Trail Raised Crosswalks
and Warning Systems
• Bicycle Detection Systems (at
existing signalized intersections)
City of San Ramon Bicycle Master Plan
• Class IV Separated Bikeway on
Crow Canyon Road
• Iron Horse Trail/Bollinger Canyon
Road Overcrossing
Contra Costa County Iron Horse
Trail Corridor Active Transportation
Study
• Trail crossing improvements
• Wayfinding and amenities
• Separated, parallel paths
POLICIES SUPPORTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES
Local Bicycle-Related Policy
The Town of Danville does not have any
specific policy requirements for new
developments related to bicycle parking
provision or other bicycle facilities
in the municipal code. However,
the Town’s Complete Streets Policy
mandates the consideration and review
of bicycle and pedestrian improvements
as part of Development projects, as
deemed appropriate.
State Bicycle-Related Policy
Complete Streets (AB135)
Assembly Bill 135, also known as the
Complete Streets Act, was signed into
California law in 2008. AB135 requires
that all cities and all counties consider
all users of city, town, and county owner
roads when they are updating their
transportation plans. By aligning the
Danville Bike Plan recommendations
with principles set forth in AB135,
Danville will be eligible for funding
related to bicycle improvements along
its roadways.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
39
Assembly Bill 32 (AB32)
Assembly Bill 32 was passed in 2006
requiring the state of California to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions to
1990 levels by 2020. This legislation
directs the California Air Resources
Board to outline policies that will
meet this target in a Scoping Plan
that is updated every five years.17 The
full implementation of AB 32 will
help mitigate risks associated with
climate change, while improving
energy efficiency, expanding the use
of renewable energy resources, cleaner
transportation, and reducing waste.
The recommendations developed as
part of the Danville Bike Plan will be
complementary of all the goals set forth
in AB 32.
Senate Bill 375 (SB375)
SB375 sets regional targets for
greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions
around California. SB375 also
includes incentives to create walkable
and attractive communities and to
revitalize existing communities. Under
SB375, each Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) is responsible
for establishing a “Sustainable
Communities Strategy” that outlines
how the region could grow to meet its
projected transportation and regional
housing needs while achieving GHG
reduction goals.18 Targets for Danville
were established by the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission, the Bay
Area’s MPO committing the Bay Area
17 California Air Resources Board (2020). “Assembly Bill 32 Overview.” https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32/ab32.htm
18 California Air Resources Board (2020). “What are Sustainable Communities Strategies?” https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/sustainable-communities-program/what-are-sustainable-communities-strategies
region, including Danville, to a 15
percent reduction in GHGs by 2035.
The legislation also allows developers
to streamline environmental reviews
under CEQA if they build projects
consistent with the new sustainable
communities’ strategies.
Senate Bill 743 (SB743)
SB743 mandates a shift in how the
traffic impacts of development and
transportation projects are to be
evaluated and mitigated in California.
To help achieve the State of California’s
climate policy and sustainability
goals, SB743 eliminates traffic delay
as an environmental impact under
California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and instead, requires an
assessment of vehicle miles traveled
(VMT). Assessing and mitigating
VMT as part of development and
transportation projects has the potential
to increase transit options, facilitate
increases in walking and biking
through construction of new facilities,
and support transportation demand
management programs.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
40
EXISTING BICYCLE NETWORK
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) designates four classes of
bicycle facilities: Class I shared use paths, Class II bicycle lanes, Class III bicycle
routes, and Class IV separated bikeways. Table 8 and Figure 22 document existing
bicycle facilities within the Town and provide an explanation about each facility
type.19 As a complement, Figure 23 visualizes the different bicycle facility types by
level of separation.
Table 8 . Existing Bikeways and Mileage by Type (by lane miles)
Facility Type Lane Mileage
Class I Shared-Use Paths
Shared-use paths are bicycle facilities that are completely separated from
the street. They allow two-way travel by people bicycling and walking,
as well as other non-motorized or e-powered users like skateboards or
scooters. Class I facilities are among the most comfortable facilities for
children and inexperienced riders as there are few potential conflicts
between people bicycling and people driving.
7.6
Class II Bicycle Lanes
Bicycle lanes are striped preferential lanes on the roadway for one-way
bicycle travel. Some bicycle lanes include a striped buffer on one or both
sides to increase separation from the traffic lane or from parked cars. When
this striped buffer is included in the design, the facility is known as a Class
IIB Buffered Bicycle Lane.
29.8
Class III Bicycle Routes
Bicycle routes are signed where people bicycling share a travel lane with
people driving. Because they are shared facilities, bicycle routes are most
appropriate for low-speed and low-volume streets. Some Class III bicycle
routes include shared lane markings or “sharrows” that recommend proper
bicycle positioning in the center of the travel lane and alert drivers that
people biking may be present.
21.5
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevards
Bicycle boulevards are low-traffic, local streets where people biking have
priority but share roadway space with motor vehicles. Shared roadway
bicycle markings on the pavement as well as traffic calming features such
as speed humps and traffic diverters keep these streets more comfortable
for bicyclists.
--
Class IV Separated Bikeways
Separated bikeways are on-street bicycle facilities that are physically
separated from motor vehicle traffic by a vertical element or barrier, such as
a curb, bollards, or vehicle parking aisle. They can allow for one-or two-way
travel on one or both sides of the roadway.
--
Total Bikeway Mileage20 58.9
19 Please note that facilities outside Town limits have been included in the maps to understand the importance of regional connectivity.
20 Calculation includes facilities contained within 250 feet of town limits.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SYC A MOR E V A L L E Y R D
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
D
A
NVILLEBLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
NR
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
EL
CAPITAN
D
R
RICH
A
RDL
N
S T G E O R G E R D
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
HI GH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
SanRamon Valley HighSchool
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
EXISTING
BIKEWAYS 0 0.25 0.5MILESExisting Bikeways
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
!!
!
!
Middem
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Prospect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
Montair Elementary
I680
RICHARDL
N
RAMP
ESTATESDR
C A N T A D A C I R
VEDA DR
ILO LN
M
I
A
C
T
H
A
R
TZ A
V
E
S K Y T ER
IRON HORSE TRAIL
T U R R I N I C I R
B A L I C T
BOBBIE DRCATHY LN
AMIGO RD
B O N A N Z A W Y
LAM
O
NT W
Y
HI
G
H
B
R
ID
G
E
L
N
VIA HERMOSA
VIST A D R
T U R R I N I D R
L O V E L N
SONORAAVE
DIABLO RD
GLEN R
D
I680
I680
I
6
8
0
HARTZ AVE
R
A
M
P
I 6 8 0
DIABLO RD
Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
Features
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Figure 22 . Existing Bikeways
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Figure 23 . Bicycle Facilities Toolkit
A striped lane for one-way bike travel on a street. Green
treatments are typically reserved for confl ict areas.
CLASS II: BIKE LANE
A completely separated right of way for the exclusive use of
bicycles and pedestrians with minimized interacti ons with motor vehicles.
CLASS I: SHARED-USE PATH
Streets with low traffi c volumes and speeds, designated and designed to give bicycle travel priority.
CLASS IIIB: BIKE BOULEVARD
A conventi onal bike lane paired with a buff er space separates the bike lane from adjacent travel lane and/or
parking lane.
CLASS IIB: BUFFERED BIKE LANE
Provides for shared use with motor vehicle traffi c.
Treatments include signs and pavement markings.
CLASS III: SIGNED BIKE ROUTE
Least Separati on Most Separati on
BICYCLE FACILITIES TOOLKIT
An on-street bike lane that is separated from traffi c by
a verti cal barrier, such as a curb, median, or bollards. Separated bike lanes, also known as cycle tracks, can be designed for one-way or two-way travel.
CLASS IV: SEPARATED BIKE LANE
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
43
BIKE SUPPORTIVE FACILITIES
Bicycle travel requires a network of
supportive amenities to provide bike
storage and maintenance options.
Among the necessary supports for
bicycle transportation, bike parking
stands out for being vital, convenient,
and user-friendly. Short-term parking is
designed to meet the needs of people
visiting businesses and public facilities,
and others with similar needs—typically
lasting up to two hours.
Short-term users may be infrequent
visitors to a location, so the parking
installation needs to be readily visible
and self-explanatory. Long-term
parking is designed to meet the needs
of employees, residents, public transit
users, and others with similar all-day
needs. These users typically park at a
routine destination such as a workplace
or near transit hubs such as Park and
Ride facilities. They often leave their
bicycles unmonitored for a period of
several hours or longer.
The Town of Danville recognized
this in the 2011 Town of Danville
Bicycle Parking Study and other
recent planning documents. Through
this project, the town conducted
an inventory of existing end-of trip
facilities including bike parking. The
study’s findings noted that in 2011,
there was capacity for 121 bicycles at
formal public parking locations in
downtown Danville. Those locations
are shown below in Figure 24. An
additional 94 locations are identified
and recommended for bicycle parking
facilities in both public spaces and at
businesses (private property).
An additional initiative supporting
bicycling throughout town has been
the installation of “Smart-Cycle” bicycle
detection devices. Bicycle detection is
used at signal intersections to alert the
signal controller of bicycle crossing
demand on a particular approach.
Bicycle detection occurs either
through the use of push-buttons or by
automated means (e.g., in-pavement
loops, video, microwave). There are
benefits to installing bicycle detectors at
intersections including:
• Improving trip efficiency by
reducing delay for bicycle travel.
• Increasing convenience and safety
of bicycling and helping to establish
bicycling as a legitimate mode of
transportation on streets.
• Discouraging red light running
by people biking without causing
excessive delay to motorists.
• Providing prolonged “green phases”
to provide adequate time for people
biking to clear the intersection.
The Town of Danville also installed
SmartCycle bicycle detection devices
in a number of intersections throughout
town. These video camera systems
guarantee that people bicycling are
detected at intersections to trigger
traffic signal cycles, ensure that people
biking have enough time to cross
intersections, improve traffic flow, and
can automate bicycle counts. Figure 24
includes the locations with available
bicycle detectors.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
¥680
¥680
I680
SYC A MO R E V A L L E Y R D
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
D
A
N
VILLEBLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
NR
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
ELC
A
PITAN
D
R
RIC
H
A
RDL
N
S T G E O R G E R D
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
HI GH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
SanRamon Valley HighSchool
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
EXISTING BICYCLE
INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0.25 0.5MILESExisting Bicycle Infrastructure
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Bicycle Parking
Bicycle Video Detection Device
Middem
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Prospect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
Montair Elementary
I680
RICHARD
L
N
RAMP
ESTATES DR
C A N T A D A C I R
VEDA DR
ILO LN
M
I
A
C
T
H
A
R
T
Z A
V
E
S K Y T ER
IRON HORSE TRAIL
T U R R I N I C I R
B A L I C T
BOBBIE DRCATHY LN
AMIGO RD
B O N A N Z A W Y
LA
M
O
NT W
Y
HIG
H
B
RID
G
E
L
N
VIA HERMOSA
VISTA D R
T U R R I N I D R
L O V E L N
SONORAAVE
DIABL O RD
GLE
N R
D
I680
I680
I
6
8
0
HARTZ AVE
R
A
M
P
I 6 8 0
DIABLORD
Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,
Contra Costa County.
Features
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Figure 24 . Bicycle Parking and Bicycle Detection Devices
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
45
TRANSIT AND OTHER FACILITIES
TRANSIT RIDERSHIP
Contra Costa County Connection
currently operates two routes through
Danville. Bus Route 21/321 runs
between the Walnut Creek BART
Station and San Ramon. The bus travels
through Downtown Danville along
Danville Boulevard, Railroad Avenue,
and San Ramon Valley Boulevard
before continuing to the City of San
Ramon along Camino Ramon. County
Connection Bus Route 95x runs
express service between the Walnut
Creek BART Station and San Ramon,
making a single stop at the Danville
Park & Ride Lot near the junction
of Sycamore Valley Road and I-680.
Route 92x (ACE Express) provides
service to the Pleasanton ACE Train
Station. The Alamo Creek Shuttle is
a free service that runs along Camino
Tassajara, connecting Alamo Creek, a
development on the far eastern side of
Danville to the Walnut Creek BART
Station.
Contra Costa County Connection
Buses are equipped with racks that hold
two bicycles. Patrons are responsible
for loading and unloading their own
bicycles and children age 12 and
younger must be accompanied by an
adult if they are using the bicycle racks
on the bus according to the existing
“bikes on buses” guidelines.21
21 Contra Costa County Connection (2020). “Bikes on Buses.” https://countyconnection.com/how-to-ride/bikes-on-buses/
Figure 25 and Figure 26 on the
following pages denote weekday
boardings and alightings at transit
stops in Danville. The highest number
of boardings and alightings are
experienced at Danville Park & Ride
Station. Other stops experiencing
relatively higher boardings or alightings
include those following the 21/321, 92x
and 95x routes. Stops along the Alamo
Creek Shuttle route have lower rates of
boarding and alighting.
BIKESHARE AND OTHER MICRO-MOBILITY PROGRAMS
Currently, there are no private
companies operating bike or e-scooter
share systems within the town of
Danville. The Town is exploring the
development of a partnership with the
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
(CCTA) and City of San Ramon that
would provide micro-mobility services
in the San Ramon Valley as part of
CCTA’s Mobility on Demand (“MOD”)
pilot project funded in part through
the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA).
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SYCAM O RE V A L L E Y R D
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
D
A
N
VILLEBLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
AN
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
EL
CAPITAN
D
R
RIC
H
A
RDL
N
S T G E O R G E R D
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
HIGH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
I
R
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
SanRamon Valley HighSchool
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
DANVILLE BICYCLEMASTER PLAN
BUS RIDERSHIP 0 0.25 0.5
MILESFeatures
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Iron Horse Trail
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Weekday Alightings
(County Connection Bus)
Less than 2
2 - 8
8 - 16
16 - 45
Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
Middem
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Prospect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
Montair Elementary
I680
RICHARDL
N
RAMP
ESTATES DR
C A N T A D A C I R
VEDA DR
ILO LN
M
I
A
C
T
H
A
R
T
Z A
V
E
S K Y T ER
IRON HORSE TRAIL
T U R R I N I C I R
B A L I C T
BOBBIE DRCATHY LN
AMIGO RD
B O N A N Z A W Y
LA
M
O
N
T
W
Y
HI
G
H
B
R
ID
G
E
L
N
VIA HERMOSA
VISTA DR
T U R R I N I D R
L O V E L N
SONORAAVE
DIABLO R D
G
LEN R
D
I680
I680
I
6
8
0
HARTZ AVE
R
A
M
P
I 6 8 0
DIABLO RD
Figure 25 . County Connection Weekday Alightings
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SY C A M O RE V A L L E Y R D
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
D
A
NVILLEBLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
NRA
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
ELCA
PITAN
D
R
RIC
H
A
RDL
N
S T G E O R G E R D
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
HIGH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
I
R
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
SanRamon Valley HighSchool
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
BUS RIDERSHIP 0 0.25 0.5MILESFeatures
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Iron Horse Trail
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Weekday Boardings(County Connection Bus)
Less than 2
2 - 8
8 -20
20 - 70
Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
Middem
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Prospect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
Montair Elementary
I680
RICHA RD
L
N
RAMP
ESTATES DR
C A N T A D A C I R
VEDA DR
ILO LN
M
I
A
C
T
H
A
R
TZ A
V
E
S K Y T ER
IRON HORSE TRAIL
T U R R I N I C I R
B A L I C T
BOBBIE DRCATHY LN
AMIGO RD
B O N A N Z A W Y
LA
M
O
NT W
Y
HI
G
H
B
RI
D
G
E L
N
VIA HERMOSA
VIST A D R
T U R R I N I D R
L O V E L N
SONORAAVE
DIABLO RD
GLEN R
D
I680
I680
I
6
8
0
HARTZ AVE
R
A
M
P
I 6 8 0
DIABLORD
Figure 26 . County Connection Weekday Boardings
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
48
PROGRAMS AND LOCAL ADVOCACY
BICYCLE PROGRAMS
The Town of Danville participates in
Contra Costa County’s annual Bike to
Work Day in May. Danville also has an
active partnership with the San Ramon
Valley Street Smarts Program, a traffic
safety education program for school
children in the San Ramon Valley.
Other community partners associated
with Street Smarts include Contra
Costa County, the City of San Ramon,
the San Ramon Valley Unified School
District, and the San Ramon Valley Fire
Protection District.22 Finally, the Town’s
Parks, Recreation, and Arts Strategic
Plan recently recommended that
Danville implements an Open Streets or
Ciclovia-style event.
LOCAL AND REGIONAL ADVOCACY
There are three bicycle advocacy
groups that represent Danville: Bike
East Bay is a regional advocacy
organization that represents the
needs of people biking in Danville
and other jurisdictions in Contra
Costa and Alameda County. Bike
Danville is the town’s bicycle advocacy
organization. Both organizations
conduct educational programming,
community outreach, advocate for safer
bicycling infrastructure, and organize
social or recreational events related to
22 San Ramon Valley Street Smarts Program (2020). “About Us.”
bicycling. Mt. Diablo Cyclists focuses
on improving bicyclist safety on the
roads both on and around Mt. Diablo.
The Contra Costa County Bicycle
and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
(BPAC) represents the needs and
concerns of people biking in Danville
and throughout the county as they
relate to regional transportation
planning efforts, upcoming projects,
and other issues.
Several clubs and organizations
organize social and recreational bicycle
rides in and around Danville. The
Valley Spokesmen Bicycle Club is a
well-established recreational bicycling
club that organizes regular rides in
Danville and around the county. The
Valley Spokesmen also organize
recreational rides specifically for
women, although everyone is welcome
at all Valley Spokesmen events.23
Danville Bikes, a bicycle shop in town,
also organizes regular recreational
bicycle rides. Students in the area ride
mountain bikes together and compete
in mountain bike races through the
San Ramon Valley and Monte Vista
Mountain Bike Clubs.
23 Valley Spokesmen Bicycle Club. https://www.valleyspokesmen.org/
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
49
WEAKNESSES AND STRENGTHS
Danville’s bicycle infrastructure is
marked by the following strengths and
weaknesses:
Strengths
•Regionality: The Town of Danville
has access to important regional
trails and bicycling destinations
including the Iron Horse Trail and
Mt. Diablo. Danville currently has
approximately 59 miles of bicycle
facilities.
•Interest and Investment: The
Town has firmly committed to
investing in planning efforts and
capital projects to improve the
existing bicycle network. There
is a strong regional culture of
recreational bicycle ridership and
community support for improved
bicycle and trail facilities.
•Advocacy: There are a number of
established and nascent advocacy
groups that operate/advocate
within the Town of Danville for the
improvement of bicycle safety and
infrastructure.
Weaknesses
•Modeshare Issues: Very few people
currently commute to work by
bicycle and much of Danville’s
workforce commutes outside of town
daily.
•Safety Issues: There were 86
reported collisions involving people
biking from 2015-2021, including 2
fatal collisions.
•Comfort Issues: There is a limited
availability of separated bicycle
facilities to serve the need for
all types of bicyclists. With the
exception of the Iron Horse Trail,
there are limited Class I and Class
IV bicycle facilities. These facilities
have been demonstrated to be the
most safe and comfortable for all
users. There is also a need for more
bicycle parking and supportive
facilities throughout town.
•Connectivity Issues: There is
a need for improved east-west
connectivity along low-stress roads
in the existing bicycle network.
CHAPTER 4:INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
DANVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
51
The Proposed Bicycle Network presented in this chapter provides a set of
recommended infrastructure improvements for enhancing connectivity and
safety for people biking in Danville. The proposed network includes linear
corridor improvements as well as spot improvements.
CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
Danville’s proposed network provides
increased connectivity between
destinations through low-stress bicycle
facilities that are comfortable for
all ages and abilities. The proposed
improvements include shared-use
paths (Class I), bicycle lanes (Class
II) and buffered bike lanes (Class
IIB), bicycle routes (Class III), bicycle
boulevards (Class IIIB) and unpaved
trails. The proposed network focuses
on providing increased connectivity
and safety with particular attention
to areas surrounding schools and the
Iron Horse Trail which provides low-
stress connectivity to BART and other
regional destinations. Key crosstown
low-stress connections include potential
separated facilities along, Sycamore
Valley Road, Camino Tassajara, and San
Ramon Valley Boulevard.
Table 9 and Figure 27 provide an
overview of the complete proposed
bicycle network. The recommended
network reflects input from the
community, bicycle needs and
safety challenges unique to Danville
(based, in part, on a collision analysis
conducted as part of this Study), as well
as best practices in bicycle network
planning.
The complete proposed bikeway
network includes new facilities and
upgrades to the existing network.
A full list of recommended corridor
improvements can be found in Table 10
and Figure 27.
Table 9 . Proposed Bikeways Mileage (by
lane miles)
Facility Existing
(mi)
Proposed
(mi)
Total
(mi)
Class I
Shared-Use
Paths
7.6 12.8 20.4
Class II
Bicycle
Lanes
29.8 2.5 32.3
Class IIB
Buffered
Bicycle
Lanes
-17.7 17.7
Class III
Bicycle
Routes
21.5 18.1 39.6
Class IIIB
Bicycle
Boulevards
-10.8 10.8
Unpaved
Trails
-3.3 3.3
TOTAL 58 .9 65 .2 124 .1
Table 10 . Proposed Corridor Improvements by Proposed Facility
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
Description
1 Camino Tassajara Sycamore Valley Rd Hansen Ln Class II Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lanes
2 Sycamore Valley Rd San Ramon Valley
Blvd
Camino
Tassajara
Class II Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lanes
3 San Ramon Valley Blvd Podva Rd Jewel Terrace Class II Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lanes w/HV Green Pavement
Markings
4 Diablo Rd Trail Fairway Dr Mt Diablo Scenic
Blvd / Avenida
Nueva
None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
5 San Ramon Valley Blvd Hartz Way Sycamore Valley
Rd
Class II Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lanes w/HV Green Pavement
Markings
6 Green Valley Trail Highbridge Ln Diablo Rd None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
7 Camino Ramon Sycamore Valley Rd Fostoria Way Class III Class IIIB Sharrow Pavement Markings (HV Green)
8 El Cerro Blvd Danville Blvd Diablo Rd Class II Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lanes
9 Del Amigo Rd Iron Horse Trail Danville Blvd None Class IIIB Sharrow Pavement Markings (HV Green)
10 Greenbrook Dr Camino Ramon Sycamore Valley
Rd
Class III Class IIIB Sharrow Pavement Markings (HV Green)
11 Prospect Ave - Front St Iron Horse Trail Hartz Ave None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
12 El Pintado Rd La Gonda Way El Alamo None Class II Bicycle Lanes
13 El Pintado Rd El Alamo El Cerro Blvd None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
14 Ackerman Dr El Cerro Blvd End None Class IIIB Sharrow Pavement Markings (HV Green)
15 Short Ridge Trail
(unpaved)
SV Regional Open
Space
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved Trail Improve Unpaved Shared-use Trail
16 Shady Slope Trail
(unpaved)
Sycamore Valley Park SV Regional
Open Space
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved Trail Improve Unpaved Shared-use Trail
17 Laurelwood Dr Short Ridge Trail Old Blackhawk
Rd
None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
18 Old Blackhawk Rd Laurelwood Dr Camino
Tassajara
None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
19 McCauley Rd Diablo Rd Short Ridge Trail None Class IIIB Sharrow Pavement Markings (HV Green)
20 Lawrence Rd Shelterwood Ln Trail entrance None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
21 Lawrence Rd Camino Tassajara Shelterwood Ln None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
ID Street Start End Existing Facility Proposed Facility Description
22 Prospect Ave Railroad Ave Sky Ter None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
23 Highland Rd Prospect Ave Trailhead None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
24 Linda Mesa Ave Iron Horse Trail Macomber Rd None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
25 Estates Dr Linda Mesa Ave Prospect Ave None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
26 Harlan Dr Greenbrook Dr St. Christopher
Dr
None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
27 St. Christopher Dr El Capitan Dr Greenbrook Dr None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
28 Cow Creek Greenbrook Dr Harlan Dr Class I Class I Paved Shared-Use Path (widened)
29 Cow Creek El Capitan Dr Greenbrook Dr Class I Class I Paved Shared-Use Path (widened)
30 Greenbelt Path El Capitan Dr Greenbrook Dr Class I Class I Paved Shared-Use Path (widened)
31 Greenbelt Path Greenbrook Drive Van Patten Dr Class I Class I Paved Shared-Use Path (widened)
32 Greenbelt Path Greenbrook HOA
Greenbelt
Class I Class I Paved Shared-Use Path (widened)
33 Greenbelt Path Greenbrook HOA Greenbelt Iron Horse Trail Class I Class I Paved Shared-Use Path (widened)
34 New Trail Matadera Way Dustin Ln None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
35 New Trail Diablo Rd Diablo Rd None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
36 Dustin Ln Diablo Rd New Trail None Class III Sharrow Pavement Markings
37 New Trail El Capitan Dr Sycamore Valley Rd None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
38 New Trail Diablo Rd (Alexan
Riverwalk)
Freitas Trail None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
39 New Trail (unpaved)Magee Preserve SV Regional Open Space Unpaved trail Unpaved Trail Unpaved Shared-Use Trail
40 New Trail Diablo Rd Blackhawk Rd None Class I Paved Shared-Use Path
41 Danville Blvd Del Amigo Rd El Portal Class II Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lanes w/HV Green Pavement Markings
42 Stone Valley Rd MVHS Green Valley Rd Class III Class II Bicycle Lanes
43 La Gonda Way La Gonda Bridge Danville Blvd None Class II Bicycle Lanes
44 Paraiso Dr Camino Ramon Greenbrook Dr Class III Class IIIB Sharrow Pavement Markings (HV Green)
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SYC A M OR E V A L L E Y R D
E L P I N T A D O RD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
DANVILLE BLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISO DR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
EL CERRO
B
LVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
ELCA
PITAN
D
R
ST GEORGERD
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
MONTAIR
D
R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
MontairElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
¬«43
¬«36
¬«31
¬«9
¬«34
¬«33
¬«30
¬«25
¬«32
¬«42
¬«6
¬«28
¬«24
¬«17
¬«29 ¬«27 ¬«21
¬«22
¬«35
¬«12
¬«18
¬«14
¬«5
¬«39
¬«41
¬«16
¬«38
¬«11
¬«23
¬«44
¬«40
¬«26
¬«4
¬«20
¬«37
¬«19
¬«8
¬«13
¬«2
¬«10¬«3
¬«15
¬«7
¬«1
DANVILLE BICYCLEMASTER PLAN
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS
0 0.25 0.5MILES
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Proposed Bikeways
Class I - Shared-Use Path
Class II - Bicycle Lanes
Class IIB - Buffered Bicycle Lanes
Class III - Bicycle Route (w/Sharrows)
Class IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard (w/GB Sharrows)
Unpaved Trail
!!
!
!
¬«11
¬«38¬«22
¬«24
¬«6
¬«23
¬«35
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Front Street Park
West El Pintado Pocket Park
I680
H ILLSID E D R
TIM CT
LA
QU
E
STA
DR
IRON HORSE TRAIL
R
A
M
P
ESTATES DR
V
E
DADR
ILOLN
L U Z C T
MARIPOSA CT
BOBBIE DR
A L I C E C T
L
A
G
O
N
D
A
W
Y
CATHY LN
GLENDOR A C I R
A D O B E D R
VIA HERMOSA
OLD TOWN LN
EL SOBRANTE DR
DA
N
VILLE
BL
V
D
WINDSTREAM PL
M
A
U
RI C
T
LOVE LN
SONORAAVE L A U R E L D R
I 6 8 0
I680
I 6 8 0
L O V E L N
I6
8
0
I
6
8
0
M A R I P O S A C T ¬«5
¬«8
¬«25
¬«9
¬«43
Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
Features
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Project Number#
Figure 27 . Proposed Bicycle Network
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
55
SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
In addition to providing safer, and
better-connected bikeway corridors,
a well-functioning bicycle network
addresses localized spot issues that
would otherwise present network
barriers. Recommended spot
improvements include:
• Improvements to intersections that
do not comfortably facilitate travel
by bicycle
• Improved access to off-street Class I
Shared-Use Paths including the Iron
Horse Trail
This plan includes 50 spot improvement
recommendations in Danville.
Developed alongside the Town’s
network of linear bicycle improvements,
the proposed spot treatments address
safety concerns in areas with a history
of bicycle collisions, and reflect public
feedback obtained as part of this
master planning process. Table 10 and Figure 29 provide an overview of the
proposed spot improvements along
Danville’s network. Key focus areas
include crossing locations along the
Iron Horse Trail, protected intersections
on crosstown bikeway connections such
as Camino Tassajara, and downtown
connectivity. Please note that specific
spot improvement recommendations
and design for each of the proposed
locations will require case-by-case
development and engineering review.
Class I: Shared-use Path
Ex: Iron Horse Trail
Class IIB: Buffered Bike Lane
Ex: Danville Road
Class III: Bicycle Routes (w Sharrows)
Ex: El Capitan Drive
Class II: Bicycle Lane
Ex: Camino Tassajara
Class IIIB: Bicycle Boulevard (w Green-back Sharrows)
Ex: Del Amigo Road
Figure 28 . Corridor Improvement Examples
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
56
Table 11 . Proposed Spot Improvements
Project Cross Street A Cross Street B Recommendation
1 Camino Tassajara Crow Canyon Rd Protected intersection
2 Camino Tassajara Old Blackhawk Rd Protected intersection
3 Camino Tassajara Tassajara Ranch Rd Protected intersection
4 Camino Tassajara Sycamore Valley Rd Bicycle intersection crossings
5 Sycamore Valley Rd IHT Crossing Bridge overcrossing
6 Hartz Ave Railroad Ave Bike box + Video detection device
7 Love Lane Railroad Ave Bicycle intersection crossings
8 Diablo Rd I-680 Overpass under lighting
9 Iron Horse Trail San Ramon Valley Blvd Raised crosswalk
10 San Ramon Valley Blvd Railroad Ave Bike box + Video detection device
11 Diablo Rd Clydesdale Dr Add lighting
12 Iron Horse Trail Greenbrook Dr Raised crosswalk
13 Iron Horse Trail El Capitan Dr Raised crosswalk
14 Hartz Way Hartz Ave Bike box + Video detection device
15 Iron Horse Trail Linda Mesa Ave RRFB + High visibility crosswalk +
Improve lighting
16 Iron Horse Trail Love Ln RRFB + High visibility crosswalk + Improve lighting
17 Iron Horse Trail Del Amigo Rd RRFB + High visibility crosswalk +
Improve lighting
18 Iron Horse Trail Paraiso Dr Raised crosswalk
19 Iron Horse Trail Hartford Rd RRFB + High Visibility Raised
Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
20 Iron Horse Trail West Prospect Ave RRFB + High visibility crosswalk + Improve lighting
21 Diablo Rd New trail PHB + High Visibility Crosswalk +
Improve Lighting
22 Sycamore Valley Rd Camino Ramon/ Iron Horse Trail Protected intersection + bicycle intersection crossings + improve staging area
23 Blackhawk Rd Mt. Diablo Scenic Blvd Bike box + Video detection device
24 Sycamore Valley Road San Ramon Valley Blvd Bike box + Video detection device
25 San Ramon Valley
Blvd
Hartz Ave Bike box + Video detection device
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
57
Project Cross Street A Cross Street B Recommendation
26 Camino Ramon Greenbrook Dr Bike box + Video detection device
27 Greenbrook Dr Sycamore Valley Rd Bike box + Video detection device
28 Camino Tassajara Crow Canyon Rd Bike box + Video detection device
29 Camino Tassajara Sycamore Valley Rd Bike box + Video detection device
30 La Gonda Way Bridge overcrossing
31 Sycamore Valley Rd Brookside Dr Bike box + Video detection device
32 Danville Blvd El Cerro Blvd Bike box + Video detection device
33 Diablo Rd Camino Tassajara Bike box + Video detection device
34 Diablo Rd El Cerro Blvd -
Ackerman Dr
Bike box + Video detection device
35 Diablo Rd Green Valley Rd Bike box + Video detection device
36 Front St Hartz Ave Bike box + Video detection device
37 Diablo Rd Hartz Ave Bike box + Video detection device
38 Diablo Rd Front St Bike box + Video detection device
39 Diablo Rd West El Pintado Bike box + Video detection device
40 El Cerro Blvd La Gonda Way Bike box + Video detection device
41 Diablo Rd Matadera Way Bike box + Video detection device
42 Green Valley Rd Blemer Rd /Cameo
Drive
Bike box + Video detection device
43 Park & Ride Sycamore Valley Rd Bike Parking
44 Park & Ride Iron Horse Trail Iron Horse Trail connections
45 Sycamore Valley Rd I-680 On/Off Ramps Bicycle intersection crossings
46 Sycamore Valley Rd Camino Ramon Bike box + Video detection device
47 Diablo Road Fairway Dr PHB + High Visibility Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
48 Crow Canyon Rd Tassajara Ranch Dr Bike box + Video detection device
49 Old Orchard Dr Freitas Trail Bicycle intersection crossings
50 Railroad Ave Church St Bike box + Video detection device
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
¥680
¥680
I680
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
G R EEN B R O O K D R
D
A
N
VILLEBLVD
L A W R E N C E
R D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
NRA
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
LAGONDA
WY
E L CERRO BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
E
L
C
A
P
I
T
A
N
D
R
RICH
A
RDL
N
ST GEORGERD
WOOD RANCHCIR
HIGH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
IL
Monte VistaHigh School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
VistaGrandeElementarySan RamonValley High School
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
Greenbrook Elementary
GoldenView Elementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
HapMageeRanch Park
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
Danville South Park DiabloVistaPark
Town Green
Green Valley School Park
MontairSchool Park
BaldwinSchoolPark
Greenbrook School Park
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
Middem
Vista GrandeSchoolPark
GreenbrookPark
Golden ViewSchool Park
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
12
3
4
5
67
8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
3839
40
41
42
4344
45 46
47
48
49
50
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS
0 0.25 0.5MILES
Features
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Proposed Bikeways
Class I - Shared-Use Path
Class II - Bicycle Lanes
Class IIB - Buffered Bicycle Lanes
Class III - Bicycle Route (w/ Sharrows)
Class IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard (w/ GB Sharrows)
Unpaved Trail
Proposed Spot Improvements
RRFB + High Visibility Raised Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
RRFB + High visibility crosswalk + Improve lighting
PHB + High Visibility Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
Bike box + Video detection device
Bicycle intersection crossings
Overpass under lighting
Protected intersection
Bridge overcrossing
Raised crosswalk
Bike parking
Add lighting Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
36
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Front Street ParkProspect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
West El Pintado Pocket Park
Montair Elementary
I680
TIM CT
LA
QUES
T
A
D
RHILLSIDEDR
RA
M
P
ILOLN
IRONHORSETRAIL
VEDADR
T U R R I N I C I R
B E T TENCT
BOBBIE DR
A L I C E C T
L
A
G
O
N
D
A
W
Y
A R R O YODR
CATHY LN
AMIGO RD
HI
G
H
B
RID
G
E
L
N
VIA HERMOSA
A D O B E D R
L A U R E L D R
ELSIE DR
OLD TOWN LN
H I G H B R I D G E C T
WINDSTREAM PL
LOV E LN
T U R R I N I D R
R
A
IL
R
O
A
D
AVE
D
A
N
VILLE B
LV
D
D I A B L O
R D
I680
I 6 8 0
R A M P
I
6
8
0
I
6
8
0
R
A
M
P
ILOL
N
L O V E L N
I 6 8 0
9
8
7
6
50
40
393837
33
32
30
25
20
16
15
14
10
Figure 29 . Proposed Spot Improvements
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
59
Raised Crossings with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs)
The combination of an elevated trail
crossing and a Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon (RRFB) System
can improve the visibility of active
transportation users crossing the street.
Raised crosswalks at intersections
can eliminate grade changes from
the bicycle path and give active
transportation users greater visibility
as they cross the street. Installation of
raised crosswalks have been shown to
reduce pedestrian-vehicle collisions by
up to 46 percent (Elvik and Vaa 2004).
Raised crosswalks also functions as
speed tables, and encourage motorists
to slow down (Figures 30 and 31). As
such, they should be used only in cases
where a special emphasis on active
transportation users is desired. Raised
crosswalks are typically implemented
on low-speed streets, bike boulevards
and other areas of very high pedestrian
activity. Shown in Figure 32, RRFBs
are a type of active warning beacon
used at unsignalized crossings. They
are designed to increase motor vehicle
yielding compliance by alerting
drivers through a flashing light when
someone (i.e., bicyclist or pedestrian)
is using the crossing, therefore giving
further advanced warning to cars.
RRFBs are typically activated by
active transportation users manually
with a push button, or can be actuated
automatically with passive detection
systems. Other companion system
components can include actuated
LED enhanced STOP signs for trail
users and downlighting for crosswalk
illumination.
Figure 30 . Raised crosswalks and RRFBs help improve visibility of users crossing the street
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
60
Figure 31 . Existing Raised Crossing treatment in Danville
Figure 32 . Existing RRFB and improved lighting installation along Iron Horse Trail
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
61
Bicycle Boxes
Bicycle boxes are designated areas
specifically for bicyclists marked in
green paint located at the head of a
traffic lane at a signalized intersection.
The bicycle box provides bicyclists with
a visible way to get ahead of queuing
traffic during the red signal phase
(Figure 33). This can help bicyclists
position themselves to turn left instead
of mixing with traffic to merge across
from the bicycle lane. Figure 34
provides an overview of the typical
application of a bicycle box.
Increased Lighting
Increased lighting helps improve
visibility of people biking at
intersections. Lighting improvements
can also improve perceived safety of
users crossing intersections and create
a more pleasant biking experience at
night.
Figure 33 . Existing Bicycle Box application
on Diablo Road
Figure 34 . Bicycle boxes can provide safer and more visible space for bicyclists by allowing
space in front of queuing traffic
56
Bicycle Toolbox
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
N
T
A
R
O
S
A
B
I
C
Y
C
L
E
A
N
D
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
G
U
I
D
E
L
I
N
E
S
Design Features
»14 foot minimum depth from back of crosswalk to
motor vehicle stop bar. (NACTO, 2012)
»A “No Turn on Red” (CA MUTCD R10-11) or “No
Right Turn on Red” (CA MUTCD R13A) sign shall
be installed overhead to prevent vehicles from
entering the Bike Box. (Refer to CVC 22101 for
the signage) A “Stop Here on Red” (CA MUTCD
R10-6) sign should be post mounted at the stop
line to reinforce observance of the stop line.
»A 50 foot ingress lane should be used to
provide access to the box.
»Use of green colored pavement is
recommended.
Typical Use
»At potential areas of conflict between bicyclists
and turning vehicles, such as a right or left turn
locations.
»At signalized intersections with high bicycle
volumes.
»At signalized intersections with high vehicle
volumes.
»Not to be used on downhill approaches to
minimize the right hook threat potential during
the extended green signal phase.
Bicycle Box
A bicycle box is an experimental treatment, designed to provide bicyclists with a safe and
visible space to get in front of queuing traffic during the red signal phase. Motor vehicles
must queue behind the white stop line at the rear of the bike box. On a green signal, all
bicyclists can quickly clear the intersection. This treatment is currently under experiment,
and has not been approved by Caltrans.
A
B
C
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
62
Bicycle Intersection Crossings
Bicycle intersection crossings are
pavement markings that track through
an intersection. The markings guide
bicyclists on a safe and direct path
through the intersection and provide
a clear boundary between the paths of
bicyclists and pedestrians, and between
bicyclists and motorists in the adjacent
travel lane. Typical applications of
bicycle intersection crossings include:
streets with conventional, buffered, or
separated bike lanes; streets with high
volumes of adjacent traffic; and, roadways
where other potential conflicts exist
between paralleling bicycle and adjacent
motor vehicle traffic. Figure 36 shows
an existing application of a bicycle
intersection crossing treatment along
Diablo Road in Danville. Intersection
markings should be the same width
and in line with the leading bicycle
facility. Implementation may include
dotted lane line extensions (Option A
on Figure 35) or dotted white lines with
solid, or dashed green within the same
extents as the dotted line itself (Option
B on Figure 35). Yellow centerline
striping assists to separate opposing
directions of bicycle travel.
Figure 36 . Existing bicycle intersection
crossing on Diablo Road
Figure 35 . Bicycle intersection crossing options
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
63
Bicycle Video Detection Systems
Video camera detection systems are
able to detect bicyclists at intersections
to trigger traffic signal phases, ensure
that people biking have enough time to
navigate across intersections, improve
traffic flow, and can automate bicycle
counts. See Figure 37 and Figure 38 for
examples of bicycle detection systems
with detection indicator devices.
Figure 37 . Video Detection Indicator on
Diablo Road in Danville, CA
Figure 38 . Video detection application in Berkeley, CA
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
64
Protected Intersections
A protected intersection (Figure 39)
is a design treatment intended to
minimize potential conflicts between
people walking, bicycling, and driving
at intersections. Protected intersections
provide physical separation for walkers
and bikers from moving cars. Vertical
elements such as flexible posts or
concrete islands work to reduce
stressful interactions with cars. The
design maintains a physical separation
within the intersection to define the
turning paths of motor vehicles, slow
vehicle turning speed, and offer a
comfortable place for people bicycling
while waiting at a red light signal.
Figure 39 . Protected intersections help reduce conflicts between right-turning cars and
people bicycling through the intersection by helping reduce turning speeds and providing a
forward stop bar to improve visibility and create a buffer for bicyclists
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
65
This page left intentionally blank
CHAPTER 5: PROGRAMS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
DANVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
67
This section provides a summary of the recommended policies and
support programs to create a bicycle-friendly community within the Town
of Danville. This section includes a description of existing and proposed
recommendations by each programmatic category (i.e., Engineering,
Encouragement, Education, Enforcement and Evaluation).
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
68
ENGINEERING AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Bicycle support facilities provide increased comfort and ease for people who bike. Table 12 summarizes existing and proposed engineering programs in Danville that
work in conjunction with existing bicycle infrastructure to improve user experience.
Table 12 . Existing and Recommended Engineering Programs
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Existing
Bike detection
at intersections
• Bike detection at intersections allow
for people who bike to proceed at
intersections with the same priority as
someone who is driving in a car. These
detectors enhance existing bike routes
and provide smoother connections.
• Connectivity https://www.
danville.ca.gov/736/
Traffic-Signal-
Bicycle-Detection-
Upgrade
Bike rack
installation
program
• Bike rack programs coordinate and
streamline bike rack installations.
Potential components include: long
term parking elements (lockers), end-
of-trip facilities, decorative bike racks,
and others. Implementation should
be prioritized at public facilities and
gathering spaces such as Town Green,
community center and libraries.
• Connectivity https://www.
danville.ca.gov/
DocumentCenter/
View/1292/Danville-
Bicycle-Parking-
Study-PDF
Proposed
Bikeshare and
micromobility
• Bike share and micromobility (i.e.,
scooters, e-bikes, and other personal
mobility devices) are becoming an
increasingly important component of
the transportation environment. These
mobility devices can be personally
owned and rented as part of shared
mobility systems. Micromobility
systems should be implemented in
manner that equitably and successfully
serves all areas of Danville particularly
those with high concentrations of
walking and biking.
• Connectivity
• Institutional
• Collaboration
and
Transparency
www.tam.ca.gov/
planning/bike-
share-feasibility-
study/
End of trip
facilities
• End of trip facilities such as bike
parking, fix-it stations, and bikeshare
docking stations help encourage
people to bike more by providing
the amenities they need at the end
of their trip. Implementation should
be prioritized at public facilities and
gathering spaces such as Town Green,
community center and libraries.
• Connectivity https://
bikesmakelifebetter.
com/bike-parking-
for-employers-
developers-a-
guide-to-end-of-
trip-facilities/
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
69
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
QuickBuild Projects • Infrastructure components such as curb extensions and medians can be implemented faster in the short- to medium-term using quick build strategies and materials. Quick Build projects typically include less expensive materials such as paint, thermoplastic, and bollards/delineators (or other sturdy but removable materials). These improvements share many of the same safety benefits of their permanent counterparts, but can be implemented faster and cheaper, allowing Danville to be more responsive to safety concerns while still planning for long-term funding and implementation.
• Connectivity
• Safety
• Institutional
www.calbike.org/quick-build-street-design/
Tactical
urbanism and
Slow Streets/
School Streets
• Tactical Urbanism Projects are
short-term, temporary bicycle facility
installations that allow the jurisdiction
and community to “test out” different
roadway configurations/infrastructure
treatments prior to detailed design
and permanent construction. These
can last anywhere from one week
to several months depending on
the objectives and data collection/
observation needs of the project.
• Slow Streets and School Streets are streets with either partial or fully-closed access to motor vehicle traffic in order to provide more space (and social distancing if necessary) and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. Slow Streets that front schools can be considered School Streets and can be designed with school/student-specific treatments.
• Connectivity
• Safety
• Institutional
www.oaklandca.
gov/projects/
oakland-slow-
streets
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
70
ENCOURAGEMENT
Encouragement programs help to create lasting bicycle culture and can encourage
shifts in bicycle mode share. Table 13 provides an overview of existing and
recommended bicycle encouragement programs.
Table 13 . Existing and Recommended Encouragement Programs
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Existing
Bike to Work
Day
• The Town has sponsored Bike to
Work Day events consistent with the
region’s annual Bike to Work Day in
May.
• Institutional
Collaboration
and
Transparency
511contracosta.org
Proposed
Open Streets • Open Street events promote and
celebrate bicycling and encourage
participation from neighborhoods.
• Institutional
Adopt-A-Trail
Program
• The program provides individuals,
groups, businesses, and clubs the
opportunity to adopt a section of trail
on an annual basis. Each sponsor
supports their Adopted Trail through
financial contributions and volunteer
trail work.
• Connectivity www.sccgov.
org/sites/parks/
Volunteer/
Documents/Adopt-
a-Trail_Guidelines.
pdf
Bicycle Friendly
Designation
• The Bicycle Friendly America
program sponsored by the League
of American Cyclists provides a
roadmap, hands-on assistance and
recognition for communities around
the U.S. that have made strides on
the implementation of infrastructure,
policy, and programmatic
improvements to enhance bicycling
around their community.
• Institutional www.bikeleague.
org/community
Bicycle Friendly
Business
Program
• Similar to the Bicycle Friendly
Community designation, the
Bicycle Friendly Business program
recognizes businesses for their
efforts to encourage a more bicycle
friendly atmosphere. This requires
businesses to implement different
strategies to accommodate the
different needs of customers and
employees.
• Institutional www.bikeleague.
org/business
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
71
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Bike Trains to School • Bike Trains are organized groups of students biking to school under the supervision of a guardian/adult volunteer. These groups follow predetermined routes and can operate occasionally or daily depending on interest from families.
• Safety
• Institutional
https://alamedacountysr2s.org/our-services/plan-an-event/walking-school-bus-bike-train/
Partnerships
with Bicycle
organizations
• The formation of strong relationships
with local bicycle advocates and
bicycle clubs will encourage mutually
beneficial collaboration and help
Danville reach its plan goals
• Institutional
• Collaboration and Transparency
http://www.calbike.
org/local_partners
Wayfinding • Wayfinding signs provide important destination, distance, and navigation information to roadway users. Specific wayfinding signs designed for people walking and bicycling should be implemented at key locations across the County to further support active transportation.
• Institutional
• Connectivity
https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway-design-guide/bikeway-signing-marking/bike-route-wayfinding-signage-and-markings-system/
Promotional
materials
(bicycle swag)
• Provide Town-sponsored bicycle
lights, bells, and other types of
bicycle safety accessories that
encourages bicycling and promotes
Danville as a bicycle-friendly
community
• Safety
• Institutional
San Ramon Valley
Streets Program
(http://street-smarts.
com/)
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
72
EDUCATION
Bicycle education programs help those who are interested in bicycling to feel more
comfortable, safe, and confident navigating streets and shared-use paths. Table 14
outlines existing educational programs in Danville as well as potential program
expansion.
Table 14 . Existing and Recommended Education Programs
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Existing
San Ramon
Valley
Street Smarts
Program
•Street Smarts is a traffic education
program for the San Ramon Valley
area. The program includes traffic
safety education and on-site school
days for elementary, middle, and high
school students.
•Institutional
•Safety
www.streets-smarts.com
Proposed
Safe Routes
to School
Program (Town
of Danville
sponsored)
•A Town of Danville/San Ramon
Valley Unified School District SRTS
Program would provide education for
school site administrators, parents,
and children about bicycle safety,
pedestrian awareness, and traffic
concerns.
•Safety https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/
our_city/departments_and_
divisions/public_works/
streets/safe_routes_to_
school
Develop facility
maps
•As Danville’s bicycle network
continues to grow, it will be important
to maintain an up-to-date map of
current facilities. This map should be
made available online and also in
print form. Maps can be distributed
at bike shops, libraries, coffee shops,
and other destinations. Both print and
online resources are opportunities
to share safety tips and tutorials of
how to utilize bicycle infrastructure
specific to Danville.
•Safety
•Institutional
https://oakgis.maps.arcgis.
com/apps/MapSeries/in-
dex.html?appid=e778c7f-
232c8400182a7f11e7449b9b2
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
73
ENFORCEMENT
Enforcement programs help to institutionalize safe biking and walking transportation
systems. By prioritizing relationships between law enforcement and people who bike,
these programs help create safe environments for all users. Table 15 below lists the
recommended enforcement programs for Danville.
Table 15 . Recommended Enforcement Programs
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Proposed
Bike patrol
program
•Partner with the Police Department
to develop a Town-wide program
that provides routine patrolling on
bicycles. The program would allow
for increased community contact and
promotion of bicycle safety.
•Collaboration
and
Transparency
www.el-cerrito.
org/246/Bicycle-
Patrol-Program
Traffic Ticket
Reduction
•Development of a partnership
program with Danville Police/Contra
Costa County Sheriff and Bike East
Bay to provide bicycle education as
a traffic court option. Cyclists that
receive a citation/infraction on a
bicycle for California Vehicle Code
violations would be permitted to
attend a Basic Street Skills class
to reduce or waive fines. Provide
targeted enforcement at high-
collision locations such as along the
Iron Horse Trail at crossings.
•Safety
•Collaboration
and
Transparency
www.marinbike.org/
traffic-citation-fee-
reduction/
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
74
EVALUATION
Programs to help evaluate and track progress towards reaching the Plan’s goals are important
for long term success and project implementation. Table 16 lists proposed programs that help
identify what’s working, what’s not working, and where additional efforts are needed following the
completion of the plan. A key recommendation is the formation of a Town-appointed Bicycle Advisory
Committee comprised of Danville residents and stakeholders of all ages, skill sets and interests to
provide oversight and guidance to the Town on future recommendations related to bicycle policy,
programs and projects.
Table 16 . Recommended Evaluation Programs
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Existing
Collision report
analysis
• Quarterly reviews of bicycle
collisions and monthly meetings
by the Police and Transportation
Departments help assess Danville
traffic safety issues, identify collision
reduction strategies, and track
progress towards a safer community
for bicyclists.
• Institutional
• Safety
https://www.sfmta.com/sites/
default/files/reports/2016/San%20
Francisco%20Collisions%20
Report%202012%202015.pdf
Field
reconnaissance
evaluations
• Quarterly field reviews of bicycle
facility operations and maintenance
needs through active observation
of bicycle user behaviors, travel
patterns, utilization of devices, and
condition/operation of devices and
infrastructure.
Proposed
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee
development
• Support formation of an official,
Town-appointed Bicycle Advisory
Committee to assist Danville Town
staff in implementing the Plan. BACs
help to develop annual action plans
and help track project progress.
• Institutional
• Collaboration
and
Transparency
https://www.half-moon-bay.
ca.us/390/BicyclePedestrian-
Advisory-Committee-BPA
Bike counters • Conducting regular bicycle counts is
important to understand how travel
behavior is changing throughout
Danville. Counting methodology
should be consistent with other
regional metrics. Before and after
project counts are another great
method to help judge the impacts of
active transportation projects.
• Institutional http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/planning/
tools_counts.cfm
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
75
Support
Program/
Facility Description Plan Goal Examples
Online Portal • Create and maintain a GIS portal showing recent and ongoing active transportation project planning and status, and quarterly bicycle-involved collision statistics.
• Collaboration and Transparency
• Institutional
https://oakgis.maps.arcgis.com/ apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid= e778c7f232c8400182a7f11e7449b9b2
School Safety
Assessment
• In partnership with Danville’s
existing SRTS program, conducting
safety assessments will help identify
barriers and challenges for students
who bike to/from school and help
develop countermeasures to
improve such deficiencies
• Safety https://alamedacountysr2s.org/our-
program/school-safety-assessments/
CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
DANVILLE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
77
This chapter summarizes the strategy for implementing the projects and
programs contained in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5. It also provides an
overview of the metrics and methodology used to weigh projects to develop
a planning-level assessment for the prioritization of projects and programs.
Finally, a summary of cost estimates and potential funding sources are
included.
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
The approach to enhancing and
expanding Danville’s bicycle network
must consider what is realistic given
historic and anticipated funding, while
also providing the Town with flexibility
to respond to changing conditions
and opportunities that may arise. The
prioritization of proposed projects
helps formulate a strategic list to guide
project implementation. Prioritization
results are flexible concepts that serve
as guidelines. It is recommended that
the Town re-evaluate the proposed
projects and rankings every five years.
Over time as development occurs
or other changes to land uses and
Danville’s transportation network take
place, this framework can be used to
re-evaluate remaining projects and
continue pursuing implementation of
the Plan. For example, a low priority
spot improvement may be completed
ahead of a high priority corridor project
due to immediate funding opportunities
as part of a redevelopment or larger
project. Similarly, a high priority
project may require additional study
and funding making it take longer to
implement.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
78
METHODOLOGY
Recommended projects were evaluated
using five criteria that support the
vision and goals of the plan. Each
evaluation criteria was given a
normalized score as listed in the table
below: projects receiving higher points
were ranked higher based on each
evaluation criteria. The scores were
then combined, and each corridor and
spot improvement was assigned a
Quantitative Corridor Score ranging
from 0–20, with 20 being the best. Table 17 outlines criteria for each
of the prioritization score inputs,
with more details about each input
below. Following score calculations,
improvements were sorted into high,
medium, and low priority categories
based on the distribution of scores.
Final scores can be found in Table 20
and Table 21.
Table 17 . Project Prioritization Criteria
Criteria Measure Points
Safety • Projects that are within 250 ft of at least one bicycle-
related fatality within last 5 years
6.0
• Projects that are within 250 ft of at least one bicycle-
related severe injury collision within the last 5 years
4.0
• Projects that are within 250 ft of at least one bicycle related collision 2.0
Connectivity to
Destinations
• Projects that connect people to Downtown 2.0
• Projects that connect people to a school (i.e., elementary, middle, high school)2.0
• Projects that provide direct connection to the Iron Horse
Trail
2.0
Comfort (type of facility) • Projects that are comfortable for users of all ages and abilities (ex., Class I or Class IIB)3.0
• Other projects (ex., Class II, Class III or Class IIIB)1.0
Public Support • Recommended projects that received high support (50 or more likes for corridor improvements; 30 or more likes for spot improvements; specific comments from user groups)
3.0
• Recommended projects that received medium
support (27-49 likes for corridors; 20-29 likes for spot
improvements)
2.0
• Recommended projects that received low support (1-26 likes for corridor improvements; 6-19 likes for spot improvements)
1.0
Feasibility • Opportunity for quick implementation based on cost
estimates
1.0
• Opportunity for medium effort based on cost estimates 0.5
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
79
A description of the five criteria
considered for this methodology is
included below.
SAFETY
Safety related scores account for the
history of bicycle-related collisions
(2015-2020) within a 250-foot buffer
of a proposed improvement. Projects
with a higher number of bicycle-
related collisions suggest the need for
infrastructure improvements. To this
end, projects within 250 feet of a bicycle-
related fatality received a total of 6
points. Similarly, projects within 250
feet of a bicycle related serious injury,
received 4 points. Finally, projects
within 250 feet of a bicycle-related
collision received 2 points. Using point
data from the collision analysis (see
existing conditions section) of this
Plan, linear bikeway projects and spot
improvements that met this criterion
were identified using the Spatial
Selection tool in GIS. Proposed projects
received a maximum of 6 points based
on their impact on improving safety.
CONNECTIVITY TO DESTINATIONS
Projects that provide increased and
more comfortable connections to
downtown, schools, and the Iron
Horse Trail received connectivity
points. Using the Spatial Selection tool,
linear and spot improvement projects
connecting to these destinations
were identified. Connectivity points
were granted to projects located
within 1,000 feet of said destinations.
Projects received points for providing
connectivity to downtown (2 pts),
schools (2 pts) and the Iron Horse Trail
(2 pts) for a maximum connectivity
scoring of 6.
COMFORT
Projects providing the most comfort
to users of all ages and abilities
received up to 3 points. Because of the
separation from motorists provided,
Class I shared-use paths, and Class IIB
buffered bicycle lanes as well as any
spot improvements connecting to these
facilities received the highest scores.
Other projects including Class II bicycle
lanes, Class III bicycle routes, and
Class IIIB bike boulevards and their
associated spot improvements received
1 point as they did not meet the needs
of all users. Proposed projects received
a maximum of 3 points based on their
impact on user comfort.
PUBLIC SUPPORT
This category awarded points to
projects addressing community
concerns and needs based on feedback
received through the project’s
online interactive web map. Public
comment data was downloaded from
the interactive map and converted
to a geodatabase. Using the Spatial
Selection tool in ARCGIS, the project
team identified linear bikeway projects
and spot improvements receiving
favorable comments in the online
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
80
interactive map. A net number of
positive comments was calculated by
subtracting total ‘Dislikes’ from ‘Likes’
for each project. Using this net positive
value, the projects were then grouped
based on the distribution of values. For
linear improvements, projects with 50
or more net positive comments received
3 points, projects with 27-49 comments
received 2 points, projects with 1-26
comments received 1 point, and projects
with no net positive comments received
0 points. For spot improvements,
projects with 30 or more net positive
comments received 3 points, projects
with 20-29 comments received 2 points,
projects with 6-19 comments received 1
point, and projects with no net positive
comments received 0 points.
FEASIBILITY
Projects with opportunities for quick
implementation based on cost estimates
and Town staff feedback received a
feasibility score of 1. Projects with
medium cost estimates received 0.5
points. Projects requiring higher
planning and engineering involvement
and increased funding, received a score
of 0.
TOTAL SCORE
Following the analysis, each project
received a final combined prioritization
score that included the sum of all
criteria, for a maximum possible score
of 20 points.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
81
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
To focus the Town’s resources and plan
the implementation of improvements
for the next five years, the Proposed
Bicycle Network was further analyzed to
prioritize the projects for implementation. Table 18 and Table 19 include the
“Top Tier” projects for implementation.
The maximum prioritization scoring
received was 14.5 for corridor
improvements and 13.5 for intersection
improvements. For a complete project
list with prioritization scores, see Tables 20 and 21. Reference maps
have been included in Figures 40
and 41.
Table 18 . Top Tier Corridor Improvements
Project
ID
Location Existing Facility Proposed
Improvement
Prioritization
Score
3 San Ramon Valley Blvd Class II Class IIB 14.5
8 El Cerro Blvd Class II Class IIB 14.5
1 Camino Tassajara Class II Class IIB 13.0
2 Sycamore Valley Rd Class II Class IIB 13.0
5 San Ramon Valley Blvd Class II Class IIB 13.0
Table 19 . Top Tier Spot Improvements
Project ID Location Cross Street Proposed Improvement Prioritization Score
16 Iron Horse Trail Love Ln RRFB + High visibility
crosswalk + Improve lighting
13.5
29 Camino Tassajara Crow Canyon Rd Bike box + Video detection device 13.5
22 Sycamore Valley
Rd
Camino
Ramon/ IHT
Protected intersection
+ bicycle intersection
crossings + improve staging
area
12.5
5 Sycamore Valley Rd IHT Crossing Bridge overcrossing 12
9 Iron Horse Trail San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Raised crosswalk 12
17 Iron Horse Trail Del Amigo Rd RRFB + High visibility crosswalk + Improve lighting 12
Table 20 . Corridor Improvements by Prioritization Score
Project Street Start End
Existing
Facility
Recommended
Facility Safety
IHT
Connectivity
Downtown
Connectivity
Schools
Connectivity Comfort
Public
Comment Feasibility TOTAL
3 San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Podva Rd Jewel Ter Class II Class IIB
- Buffered
Bicycle Lanes
6 0 2 0 3 3 0.5 14.5
8 El Cerro
Blvd
Danville Blvd Diablo Rd Class II Class IIB
- Buffered
Bicycle Lanes
4 0 2 2 3 3 0.5 14.5
1 Camino
Tassajara
Sycamore
Valley Rd
Hansen Ln Class II Class IIB
- Buffered
Bicycle Lanes
2 0 2 2 3 3 1 13
2 Sycamore
Valley Rd
San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Camino
Tassajara
Class II Class IIB
- Buffered
Bicycle Lanes
2 2 2 0 3 3 1 13
5 San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Hartz Way Sycamore
Valley Rd
Class II Class IIB
- Buffered
Bicycle Lanes
2 2 2 0 3 3 1 13
23 Highland Rd Prospect
Ave
Trailhead None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
6 0 2 2 1 1 1 13
10 Greenbrook
Dr
Camino
Ramon
Sycamore
Valley Dr
Class III Class IIIB
- Bicycle
Boulevard (w/
GB Sharrows
2 2 2 2 1 3 0.5 12.5
11 Prospect
Avenue-
Front Street
Iron Horse
Trail
Hartz Ave None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
2 2 2 2 1 2 1 12
7 Camino
Ramon
Sycamore
Valley Rd
Fostoria Way Class III Class IIIB
- Bicycle
Boulevard (w/
GB Sharrows
2 2 2 0 1 3 1 11
9 Del Amigo
Rd
Iron Horse
Trail
Danville Blvd None Class IIIB
- Bicycle
Boulevard (w/
GB Sharrows
4 2 2 0 1 1 1 11
33 Greenbelt
Path
Greenbrook
HOW
Greenbelt
Iron Horse
Trail
Class I Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 2 2 2 3 2 0 11
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Project Street Start End
Existing
Facility
Recommended
Facility Safety
IHT
Connectivity
Downtown
Connectivity
Schools
Connectivity Comfort
Public
Comment Feasibility TOTAL
34 New Trail Matadera
Way
Dustin Ln None Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
2 0 2 2 3 2 0 11
41 Danville Bld Del Amigo El Portal Class II Class IIB
- Buffered
Bicycle Lanes
2 0 2 0 3 3 0.5 10.5
4 Diablo Rd
Trail
Fairway Dr Mt Diablo
Scenic Blvd/
Avenida
Nueva
None Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
2 0 2 0 3 3 0 10
22 Prospect
Ave
Railroad Ave Sky Ter None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
0 2 2 2 1 2 1 10
44 Paraiso Dr Camino
Ramon
Greenbrook
Dr
Class III Class IIIB
- Bicycle
Boulevard (w/
GB Sharrows
2 2 2 2 1 0.5 0.5 10
19 McCauley
Rd
Diablo Rd Short Ridge
Trail
None Class IIIB
- Bicycle
Boulevard (w/
GB Sharrows
0 0 2 2 1 3 1 9
24 Linda Mesa
Ave
Iron Horse
Trail
Macomber
Road
None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
0 2 2 2 1 1 1 9
28 Cow Creek Greenbrook
Dr
Harlan Dr Class I Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 0 2 2 3 2 0 9
31 Greenbelt
Path
Greenbrook
Drive
Van Patten
Dr
Class I Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 0 2 2 3 2 0 9
35 New Trail Diablo Rd Diablo Rd None Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 0 2 2 3 2 0 9
6 Green
Valley Trail
Highbridge
Ln
Diablo Rd None Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 0 2 2 3 1 0 8
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
Project Street Start End
Existing
Facility
Recommended
Facility Safety
IHT
Connectivity
Downtown
Connectivity
Schools
Connectivity Comfort
Public
Comment Feasibility TOTAL
14 Ackerman Dr El Cerro Blvd End None Class IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard (w/GB Sharrows
2 0 2 0 1 2 1 8
18 Old
Blackhawk
Rd
Laurelwood
Dr
Camino
Tassajara
None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
2 0 2 0 1 2 1 8
25 Estate Dr Linda Mesa Ave Prospect Ave None Class III - Bicycle Route (w/ Sharrows)
0 0 2 2 3 0 1 8
26 Harlan Dr Greenbrook
Dr
St.
Christopher
Dr
None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
0 0 2 2 1 2 1 8
37 New Trail El Capitan Dr Sycamore Valley Rd None Class I - Shared-Use Path
0 0 2 2 3 1 0 8
16 Shady
Slope Trail
(unpaved)
Sycamore
Valley Park
SV Regional
Open Space
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved Trail 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 7
29 Cow Creek El Capitan Dr Greenbrook Dr Class I Class I - Shared-Use Path
0 0 2 2 3 0 0 7
32 Greenbelt
Path
Greenbrook
HOA
Greenbelt
N/A Class I Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 0 2 2 3 0 0 7
40 New Trail Diablo Rd Blackhawk Rd None Class I - Shared-Use Path
0 0 2 0 3 2 0 7
43 La Gonda
Way
La Gonda
Bridge
Danville Blvd None Class II -
Bicycle Lanes
0 0 2 2 3 0 0 7
12 El Pintado Rd La Gonda Way El Alamo None Class II - Bicycle Lanes 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 6
13 El Pintado
Rd
El Alamo El Cerro Blvd None Class III -
Bicycle Route
0 0 2 0 1 2 1 6
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Project Street Start End
Existing
Facility
Recommended
Facility Safety
IHT
Connectivity
Downtown
Connectivity
Schools
Connectivity Comfort
Public
Comment Feasibility TOTAL
21 Lawrence Rd Camino Tassajara Shelterwood Ln None Class III - Bicycle Route 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 6
30 Greenbelt
Path
El Capitan
Dr
Greenbrook
Dr
Class I Class I -
Shared-Use
Path
0 0 2 0 3 1 0 6
38 New Trail Diablo Rd (Alexan Riverwalk)
Freitas Trail None Class I - Shared-Use Path
0 0 2 0 3 1 0 6
43 Stone Valley
Rd
MVHS Green Valley
Rd
Class III Class II -
Bicycle Lanes
0 0 2 2 1 0 1 6
36 Dustin Ln Diablo Rd New Trail None Class III - Bicycle Route (w/ Sharrows)
0 0 2 0 1 2 0.5 5.5
15 Short
Ridge Trail
(unpaved)
SV Regional
Open Space
N/A Unpaved
trail
Unpaved Trail 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 5
27 St. Christopher Dr
El Capitan Dr Greenbrook Dr None Class III - Bicycle Route (w/ Sharrows)
0 0 2 0 1 1 1 5
17 Laurelwood
Dr
Short Ridge
Trail
Old
Blackhawk
Rd
None Class III -
Bicycle Route
(w/ Sharrows)
0 0 2 0 1 0 1 4
20 Lawrence Rd Shelterwood Ln Trail entrance None Class III - Bicycle Route (w/ Sharrows)
0 0 2 0 1 0 1 4
39 New Trail Magee
Preserve
SV Regional
Open Space
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved Trail 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 4
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SYCA M O R E V A L L E Y R D
E L P I N T A D O R D
CAMINOTASSAJARA
DANVILLE BLVD
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISO DR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
L
A
GONDAWY
EL CERRO
B
LVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
ELCAPITAN
D
R
S T GEORGERD
WOODRANCH
C
I
R
MONTAIR
D
R
I
R
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
Monte Vista High School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementary
MontairElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary GoldenViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DiabloVistaPark
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
¬«43
¬«36
¬«31
¬«9
¬«34
¬«33
¬«30
¬«25
¬«32
¬«42
¬«6
¬«28
¬«24
¬«17
¬«29 ¬«27 ¬«21
¬«22
¬«35
¬«12
¬«18
¬«14
¬«5
¬«39
¬«41
¬«16
¬«38
¬«11
¬«23
¬«44
¬«40
¬«26
¬«4
¬«20
¬«37
¬«19
¬«8
¬«13
¬«2
¬«10¬«3
¬«15
¬«7
¬«1
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS
0 0.25 0.5MILES
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Proposed Bikeways
Class I - Shared-Use Path
Class II - Bicycle Lanes
Class IIB - Buffered Bicycle Lanes
Class III - Bicycle Route (w/Sharrows)
Class IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard (w/GB Sharrows)
Unpaved Trail
!!
!
!
¬«11
¬«38¬«22
¬«24
¬«6
¬«23
¬«35
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Front Street Park
West El Pintado Pocket Park
I680
H ILLSID E D R
TIM CT
LA
QUE
STADR
IRON HORSE TRAIL
R
A
M
P
ESTATES DR
V
E
DADR
ILO LN
L U Z C T
MARIPOSA CT
BOBBIE DR
A L I C E C T
L
A
G
O
N
D
A
W
Y
CATHY LN
GLEN D O R A C I R
A D O B E D R
VIA HERMOSA
OLD TOWN LN
EL SOBRANTE DR
D
A
N
VILLE
B
LV
D
WINDSTREAM PL
M
A
U
RI CT
LOVE LN
SONORAAVE L A U R E L D R
I 6 8 0
I680
I 6 8 0
L O V E L N
I
6
8
0
I
6
8
0
M A R I P O S A C T ¬«5
¬«8
¬«25
¬«9
¬«43
Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
Features
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Project Number#
Figure 40 . Corridor Improvements
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Table 21 . Spot Improvements by Prioritization Score
Project Cross Street A Cross Street B Recommendation Safety
IHT
Connectivity
Downtown
Connectivity
Schools
Connectivity Comfort
Public
Comment Feasibility TOTAL
16 IHT Love Ln RRFB + High visibility
crosswalk + Improve
lighting
4 2 2 2 1 2 0.5 13.5
28 Camino Tassajara Crow Canyon Rd Bike box + Video
detection device
6 0 1 0 3 3 0.5 13.5
22 Sycamore Valley
Rd
Camino Ramon/
Iron Horse Trail
Protected intersection
+ bicycle intersection
crossings + improve
staging area
4 2 2 0 1 3 0.5 12.5
5 Sycamore Valley
Rd
Iron Horse Trail
Crossing
Bridge overcrossing 2 2 2 0 3 3 0 12
9 Iron Horse Trail San Ramon Valley
Blvd
Raised crosswalk 2 2 2 0 3 3 0 12
17 Iron Horse Trail Del Amigo Rd RRFB + High visibility
crosswalk + Improve
lighting
4 2 2 0 1 2.5 0.5 12
19 Iron Horse Trail Hartford Rd RRFB + High Visibility
Raised Crosswalk +
Improve Lighting
4 2 2 0 1 2 0.5 11.5
32 Danville Blvd El Cerro Blvd Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 2 2 3 2 0.5 11.5
46 Sycamore Valley
Rd
Camino Ramon Bike box + Video
detection device
4 2 2 0 1 2 0.5 11.5
1 Camino Tassajara Crow Canyon Rd Protected intersection 4 0 1 0 3 3 0 11
10 San Ramon Valley
Blvd
Railroad Ave Bike box + Video
detection device
2 2 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 11
47 Diablo Road Fairway Dr PHB + High Visibility
Crosswalk + Improve
Lighting
4 2 0 0 2 3 0 11
6 Hartz Ave Railroad Ave Bike box + Video
detection device
4 0 2 2 1 1 0.5 10.5
18 Iron Horse Trail Paraiso Dr Raised crosswalk 2 2 0 2 1 3 0.5 10.5
7 Love Lane Railroad Ave Bicycle intersection
crossings
2 0 2 2 1 2 1 10
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
Project Cross Street A Cross Street B Recommendation Safety IHT Connectivity Downtown Connectivity Schools Connectivity Comfort Public Comment Feasibility TOTAL
8 Diablo Rd I-680 Overpass under
lighting
4 0 2 0 1 2 1 10
15 Iron Horse Trail Linda Mesa Ave RRFB + High visibility crosswalk + Improve lighting
0 2 2 2 1 2.5 0.5 10
20 Iron Horse Trail West Prospect
Ave
RRFB + High visibility
crosswalk + Improve
lighting
0 2 2 2 1 2 0.5 9.5
14 Hartz Way Hartz Ave Bike box + Video detection device 2 0 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 9
25 San Ramon Valley
Blvd
Hartz Ave Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 9
36 Front St Hartz Ave Bike box + Video detection device 2 0 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 9
38 Diablo Rd Front St Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 9
39 Diablo Rd West El Pintado Bike box + Video detection device 2 0 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 9
41 Diablo Rd Matadera Way Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 0 2 3 1.5 0.5 9
45 Sycamore Valley Rd "I-680 On/Off Ramps Bicycle intersection crossings 2 0 2 0 1 3 1 9
12 Iron Horse Trail Greenbrook Dr Raised crosswalk 2 2 0 0 1 3 0.5 8.5
13 Iron Horse Trail El Capitan Dr Raised crosswalk 2 2 0 0 1 3 0.5 8.5
23 Blackhawk Rd Mt Diablo Scenic
Blvd
Bike box + Video
detection device
4 0 0 0 1 1 0.5 8.5
24 Sycamore Valley Road San Ramon Valley Blvd Bike box + Video detection device 0 0 2 0 3 3 0.5 8.5
33 Diablo Rd Camino Tassajara Bike box + Video
detection device
0 0 2 2 1 3 0.5 8.5
35 Diablo Rd Green Valley Rd Bike box + Video detection device 0 0 0 2 3 3 0.5 8.5
37 Diablo Rd Hartz Ave Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 2 0 1 3 0.5 8.5
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Project Cross Street A Cross Street B Recommendation Safety IHT Connectivity Downtown Connectivity Schools Connectivity Comfort Public Comment Feasibility TOTAL
44 Park & Ride Iron Horse Trail Iron Horse Trail
Connection
0 3 3 0 0 1 1 8.0
3 Camino Tassajara Tassajara Ranch Rd Protected intersection 2 0 0 0 3 2.5 0 7.5
4 Camino Tassajara Sycamore Valley
Rd
Bicycle intersection
crossings
2 0 0 0 3 2.5 0 7.5
26 Camino Ramon Greenbrook Dr Bike box + Video detection device 4 0 0 0 1 2 0.5 7.5
29 Camino Tassajara Sycamore Valley
Rd
Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 0 0 3 2 0.5 7.5
34 Diablo Rd El Cerro Blvd - Ackerman Dr Bike box + Video detection device 2 0 0 0 3 2 0.5 7.5
48 Crow Canyon Rd Tassajara Ranch
Dr
Bike box + Video
detection device
6 0 0 0 1 0 0.5 7.5
2 Camino Tassajara Old Blackhawk Rd Protected intersection 2 0 0 0 3 2 0 7.0
11 Diablo Rd Clydesdale Dr Add lighting 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 7.0
40 El Cerro Blvd La Gonda Way Bike box + Video detection device 0 0 2 0 3 1.5 0.5 7
42 Green Valley Rd Blemer Rd /
Cameo Drive
Bike box + Video
detection device
2 0 0 2 1 1 0.5 6.5
30 La Gonda Way Bridge overcrossing 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 6.0
27 Greenbrook Dr Sycamore Valley
Rd
Bike box + Video
detection device
0 0 0 0 3 2 0.5 5.5
31 Sycamore Valley Rd Brookside Dr Bike box + Video detection device 0 0 0 0 3 2 0.5 5.5
41 Old Orchard Dr Freitas Trail Bicycle intersection
crossings
0 0 2 0 1 1 0.5 4.5
21 Diablo Rd New trail PHB + High Visibility Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4
50 Railroad Ave Church St Bike box + Video
detection device
1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4
43 Park & Ride Sycamore Valley Rd Bike Parking 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
¥680
¥680
I680
E L P I NTADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
GR E E N B R O O K
D R
D
A
N
VILLEBLVD
L A W R E N C E
R D
M O R N I N G H O M E R D
DIABLORD
PARAISO DR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
AN
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
L
V
D
LAGOND
A
WY
E L CERR O BLVD
SILVER
L
A
K
E
D
R
E
L
C
A
P
I
T
A
N
D
R
RICH
A
RDL
N
ST GEORGERD
WOOD RANCH CIR
HI GH L A N D D R
MONTAIR
D
R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
IL
Monte VistaHigh School
Los Cerros Middle School
Green ValleyElementary
VistaGrandeElementarySan RamonValley High School
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
Greenbrook Elementary
GoldenView Elementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
HapMageeRanch Park
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
Danville South Park DiabloVistaPark
Town Green
Green Valley School Park
MontairSchool Park
BaldwinSchoolPark
Greenbrook School Park
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
Middem
Vista GrandeSchoolPark
GreenbrookPark
Golden ViewSchool Park
HapMagee RanchPark
EugeneO'Neill NationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
12
3
4
5
67 8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
3839
40
41
42
4344
45 46
47
48
49
50
DANVILLE BICYCLE
MASTER PLAN
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS
0 0.25 0.5MILES
Features
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Existing Bikeways
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Proposed Bikeways
Class I - Shared-Use Path
Class II - Bicycle Lanes
Class IIB - Buffered Bicycle Lanes
Class III - Bicycle Route (w/ Sharrows)
Class IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard (w/ GB Sharrows)
Unpaved Trail
Proposed Spot Improvements
RRFB + High Visibility Raised Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
RRFB + High visibility crosswalk + Improve lighting
PHB + High Visibility Crosswalk + Improve Lighting
Bike box + Video detection device
Bicycle intersection crossings
Overpass under lighting
Protected intersection
Bridge overcrossing
Raised crosswalk
Bike parking
Add lighting Map Produced: May 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
36
Town Green
Montair School Park
Bret Harte Park
Front Street ParkProspect/Quinterra Rest Area
Prospect Mall Park
West El Pintado Pocket Park
Montair Elementary
I680
TIM CT
LA
QUES
T
A
D
RHILLSIDEDR
R
A
M
P
ILOLN
IRO
NHORSETRAIL
V
EDADR
T U R R I N I C I R
B E T TENCT
BOBBIE DR
A L I C E C T
L
A
G
O
N
D
A
W
Y
A R R O YO DR
CATHY LN
AMIGO RD
H
I
G
H
B
RID
G
E L
N
VIA HERMOSA
A D O B E D R
L A U R E L D R
ELSIE DR
OLD TOWN LN
H I G H B R I D G E C T
WINDSTREAM PL
LOVE LN
T U R R I N I D R
R
A
IL
R
O
A
D
A
VE
D
A
N
VIL
L
E BLV
D
D I A B L O R D
I680
I 6 8 0
R A M P
I
6
8
0
I
6
8
0
R
A
M
P
ILOL
N
L O V E L N
I 6 8 0
9
8
7
6
50
40
393837
33
32
30
25
20
16
15
14
10
Figure 41 . Spot Improvements
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021 BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
91
COST ESTIMATES
The generalized cost estimates (see Table 22 and Table 23) prepared
for this plan are based on the basic
understanding of certain roadway
infrastructure elements that would need
to be added, removed, and/or modified
to implement the proposed bike
facility improvement. For example, the
installation of new pavement markings
and signing are relatively easily
installed if other existing infrastructure
is not impacted nor requires additional
modifications; costs are based on an
estimate of bike lane markings and
sign placement of approximately $20
per lane mile (each side of the street).
However, improvements that require
modifying existing street widths can
require the removal and replacement of
curb / gutter, drainage infrastructure,
utilities, and landscaping/trees. These
types of improvements may also require
the purchase of additional right-of-way
or establishment of an easement – all
of which can increase the cost of a bike
facility improvement substantially.
Costs do not include estimates
for on-going maintenance such as
sweeping which may add to the cost of
implementation. Until a specific street is
identified for a particular improvement,
costs for new infrastructure can
only be estimated at a general level.
Considering these factors, the following
tables summarize the planning level
cost ranges for the project types.
Please note that all costs are based on
values obtained from Bid Documents
of local (i.e., Contra Costa, Alameda,
Santa Clara, and San Mateo counties)
projects from 2019 to present, or historic
planning level costs generated for
local (i.e., Contra Costa, Alameda,
Santa Clara, and San Mateo counties)
planning efforts from 2018 to present.
Values derived from Bid documents
were multiplied by a planning-level
contingency factor to account for
additional project needs not explicitly
stated in the descriptions. Costs
include the cost of materials, labor
and administration of the identified
facilities and items, and do not include
design fees, public outreach efforts,
or inter-agency coordination. The
only cost not based on local data is
the cost of Bridge Overcrossings.
Too little data was available locally to
support the identification of planning
level costs of construction. The values
reported are based upon the FHWA’s
PEDSAFE Pedestrian Safety Guide and
Countermeasure Selection System’s
guidelines for Pedestrian Overpasses
and Underpasses
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
92
Table 22 . Generalized Cost Estimates (Linear Improvements)
Facility Type Unit Cost Estimates Notes
Low High
Class I – Shared Use Path Mile $700,000 $1,000,000 12-ft wide with 2-ft shoulders.
Class II –
Bicycle Lanes
Mile $80,000 $420,000 High-cost estimate assumes
grinding, overlay or slurry seal of
roadway with bike lane installation.
Class IIB – Buffered Bike Lanes
Mile $130,000 $420,000 High-cost estimate assumes grinding, overlay or slurry seal of roadway with bike lane installation.
Class III –
Bicycle Route
Mile $15,000 $40,000 With shared lane markings and
signage. High end cost estimate
assumes ‘green-backed’ shared
lane markings, with wayfinding
and warning signs, and a higher
frequency of installation.
Class III – Bicycle Boulevard
Mile $290,000 $1,000,000 Appropriate treatments TBD.
Class IV –
Separated
Bikeway
Mile $350,000 $500,000 Assumes painted buffer with
flexible post separation. Costs
may vary with separation types
and widths.
Table 23 . Generalized Cost Estimates (Spot Improvements)
Item Unit Cost Estimates Notes
Low High
Bike Box EA $1,500 Bike box per requirements in IA-
18, striping only.
Additional
Lighting
EA $15,000 $35,000 Assumes spot lighting with
nearby power access or solar
power.
Bridge
Overcrossing
EA $1,000,000 $6,000,000
Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon
EA $200,000 $500,000 Assumes there is currently no
signalized control or warning
system at crossing location, and
there is nearby power access.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
93
Item Unit Cost Estimates Notes
Low High
Raised Crosswalk EA $9,000 $75,000 Estimate includes drainage enhancements. Low-cost estimate is for HMA raised crosswalk with no drainage infrastructure changes. High-cost estimate assumes PCC raised crosswalk with 2 additional SD inlets, and sidewalk reconstruction.
High Visibility
Crosswalk –
Short (3 lanes or
less)
EA $2,500 Assumes 12’ crosswalk width for
single leg of intersection, or mid-
block crossing. Does not include
changes to curb ramps or lighting.
High Visibility Crosswalk – Medium (4-5 lanes)
EA $3,750 Assumes 12’ crosswalk width for single leg of intersection, or mid-block crossing. Does not include changes to curb ramps or lighting.
High Visibility
Crosswalk –
Long (6 lanes or
more)
EA $5,000 Assumes 12’ crosswalk width for
single leg of intersection, or mid-
block crossing. Does not include
changes to curb ramps or lighting.
Signage EA $500 Includes new sign on single post with foundation.
Rectangular
Rapid Flashing
Beacon (RRFB)
EA $30,000 $60,000 Assumes 2 - 3 solar powered
RRFBs per crossing location.
Includes new poles and all
necessary equipment.
Pavement Markings (Stop / Yield)
EA $2,000
Wayfinding
Signs
MI $30,000 Assumes 10 standard wayfinding
signs per mile with new single
post and foundation for each sign.
Protected Intersection EA $750,000 $1,500,000 Includes reconstruction of all 4 corners of intersection and traffic signal modifications.
Video Detection
Systems (full)
EA $25,000 Assumes video detection
cameras, bike indicators, wiring
and module for a standard four-
way signalized intersection
Video Detection System (one direction)
EA $7,000 Assumes video detection camera, bike indicator, wiring and module for one direction of a signalized intersection
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
94
FUNDING
Identifying and securing funding for
the bicycle projects proposed in this
Plan is crucial to achieving its goals
and objectives. A variety of sources
exist to fund the proposed bicycle
infrastructure projects and programs.
While federal grant programs represent
a good source of funding for the
construction of new facilities and
implementation of programs, local and
regional funding sources can be used
for construction and/or maintenance of
bicycle improvements. The following
section outlines potential sources for
funding Danville’s proposed bikeway
projects.
LOCAL AND REGIONAL
Contra Costa Measure J – Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Measure J provides funding for
countywide and local transportation
projects and programs through the year
2034. Eligible improvements include
pedestrian, bicycle, and trail facilities,
local streets and road maintenance, and
transportation for livable communities.
Transportation Fund for Clean Air, County Program Manager Fund – Contra Costa Transportation Authority
The Transportation Fund for Clean Air
funds bicycle facilities including paths,
lanes, routes, lockers, and racks.
511 Contra Costa Bike Rack and Locker Program – 511 Contra Costa
511 Contra Costa is a countywide
program that strives to reduce traffic
congestions and improve air quality
by providing the public with resources
and tools that promote mobility options
beyond driving alone. Eligible projects
include bicycle parking racks and
lockers.
One Bay Area Grant - Contra Costa Transportation Authority
The One Bay Area grant program
(OBAG) emphasizes funding for
projects within Priority Development
Areas (PDAs) in the region that are
in-line with housing and land use goals.
Projects that are within or provide
access to these PDAs could qualify for
OBAG grants.
Transportation Development Act Article 3 - Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Transportation Development Act
Article 3 (TDA 3) provides funding
annually for bicycle and pedestrian
projects. Two percent of TDA 3 funds
collected within the county are used for
TDA 3 projects. MTC policies require
that all projects be reviewed by a BPAC
or similar body before approval.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
95
Transportation for Livable Communities Program – Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Designed to support community-based
transportation projects that bring
“new vibrancy” to downtown areas,
commercial cores, neighborhoods, and
transit corridors. The projects resulting
from these grants are intended to
provide for a range of transportation
choices including bicycling, should
support connections between
transportation and land use, and should
be developed through an inclusive
community planning process.
Bicycle Facilities Grant Program – Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Throughout the nine-county Bay Area,
the Bicycle Facilities Grant program
strives to reduce emissions from on-
road vehicles and improve air quality by
helping residents and commuters shift
to bicycling and walking as alternatives
to driving for short distances and
first- and-last mile trips. The Bay Area
Air Quality Management District
(BAAQMD) has grant programs that
fund both on-street facilities and bicycle
parking facilities. Funding comes from
the BAAQMD’s Transportation Fund for
Clean Air.
Climate Initiatives Innovative Grants Fund – Metropolitan Transportation Commission
MTC’s Climate Initiatives Program
promotes innovative ways to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions in the Bay
Area; and taps federal funding for a
pair of competitive grant programs.
Innovative grants of $1 million and
up are used to support high-impact
projects that can be replicated around
the region.
STATE FUNDING SOURCES
California’s Active Transportation Program (ATP) – California Transportation Commission
This grant cycle funds infrastructure
and programmatic projects that support
the program goals of shifting trips
to walking and bicycling, reducing
greenhouse gas emissions, and
improving public health.
Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning (STP) Grants - Caltrans
Available to communities for planning,
study, and design work, STP grants
identify and evaluate projects, including
conducting outreach or implementing
pilot projects.
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grants - Caltrans
HSIP grants fund projects on any
publicly owned road or active
transportation facility, including bicycle
improvements.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
96
FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
Funds may be used for either the
construction of bicycle transportation
facilities or non-construction projects
(e.g., maps, brochures, and public
service announcements) related to safe
bicycle use. Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) – This federal funding
program authorized under MAP-21
provides funding for transportation
alternatives programs and projects,
including on- and off-road bicycle
facilities, regional trail programs, and
Safe Routes to School.
Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD)
The Better Utilizing Investments to
Leverage Development, or BUILD
Transportation Discretionary Grant
program, provides a unique opportunity
for the DOT to invest in road, rail,
transit and port projects that promise to
achieve national objectives. Previously
known as Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery, or
TIGER Discretionary Grants, Congress
has dedicated nearly $8.9 billion for
twelve rounds of National Infrastructure
Investments to fund projects that have a
significant local or regional impact.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Grants
Transit grants such as Urbanized Area
Formula and Capital Investment can
be used for improving bicycle access to
transit facilities.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Grants can be used for bicycle
education programs and projects that
provide connections and/or improve the
safety along routes to K-8 schools.
Additional funding opportunities
for the implementation of bicycle
infrastructure and programs from
the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) can be found in
the links below:
• FHWA https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
environment/bicycle_pedestrian/
funding/funding_opportunities.cfm
• FTA https://www.transit.dot.
gov/regulations-and-guidance/
environmental-programs/livable-
sustainable-communities/fta-
program-bicycle
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
97
This page left intentionally blank
CHAPTER 7: WAYFINDING STRATEGY
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
99
The following document chapter as a summary of principles for developing
the Town of Danville’s Bicycle Wayfinding Strategy. Drawing from best
practices for wayfinding from North America and California, the key
principles of a successful wayfinding system are identified. This document
also outlines standards and guidelines for wayfinding elements, destination
selection, prioritization, sign typologies, and sign placement. The California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Part 9 and
California Highway Design Manual (HDM) were consulted. The American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, National Association of
City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Bikeway Design Guide, Contra
Costa Transportation Authority Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Update, and Iron Horse Trail Active Transportation Corridor Study were
also referenced for the development of this document.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
100
OBJECTIVES
Danville’s Bicycle Wayfinding Strategy
strives to create a cohesive, consistent
wayfinding system to serve residents
and visitors who ride bicycles. Working
in tandem with infrastructural
improvements, quality bicycle wayfinding
further encourages cycling as a mode
of transportation and as a recreational
activity. The strategy aims to:
• Inform and direct residents and
visitors toward cultural, historical,
and recreational amenities, local
businesses and services
• Create signage that will meet the
specific needs of all bicyclists
traveling through and within Danville
• Establish a high quality of design
that reflects the local character and is
coherent and attractive
• Understand key spatial relationships
between gateways to Danville and
decision points along the bicycle
network
A bicycle wayfinding system should
be designed to maximize the legibility
of the built environment for active
transportation users. Increased
environmental legibility allows
bicyclists to move safely, efficiently, and
comfortably. A well-designed wayfinding
system enables individuals to:
• Easily and successfully find their
destination
• Understand where they are with
respect to other key locations
• Orient themselves in an
appropriate direction with little
misunderstanding or stress
• Discover new places and services
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
101
KEY PRINCIPLES
The following guiding principles, based on best practices from around North America and guidance
from CA MUTCD, CA HDM, and NACTO will help create an effective wayfinding system in Danville:
characteristics—will determine how quickly
it can be understood. This is particularly
important for people biking, who can travel
at higher speeds. A wayfinding system
that allows users to keep moving allows
for a better user experience and relieves
congestion in busy corridors, like the Iron
Horse Trail.
BE PREDICTABLE
When wayfinding information is consistent
and predictable, it can be quickly recognized
and understood. A systematic approach
to designing and locating signs can foster
a sense of trust between people biking
and the wayfinding cues along their route.
Signs that are consistent in their placement
prior to, during, and after decision points
will reinforce navigational confidence and
create better travel experiences. Using an
intuitive and predictable system to present
wayfinding information will lessen the time
it takes for users to learn and understand the
“language” of wayfinding.
PROMOTE ACTIVE TRAVEL
A wayfinding system is a natural extension
of active transportation infrastructure.
Infrastructural and wayfinding elements
reinforce one another, enabling better
experiences for people walking and
biking. Wayfinding can also validate one’s
decision to bike or walk. By effectively
communicating network connectivity and
addressing perceived barriers such as time
and distance to destinations, wayfinding can
show that walking and bicycling are viable
transportation options. Wayfinding signage
increases awareness of bicycle facilities and
their relationship to community services and
amenities. Good wayfinding makes active
modes of transportation more attractive to
more users.
MAKE CONNECTIONS
A wayfinding system should connect people
with the places they want to go. Effective
wayfinding not only provides navigational
assistance, it fosters a deeper understanding of
one’s environment and helps build a sense of
place. Residents and visitors alike benefit from
wayfinding. It is an extension of the bicycling
and walking network, creating an intuitive
travel experience while also supporting the
local economy and reflecting community
values.
KEEP INFORMATION SIMPLE
Wayfinding information should be presented
to users in a manner that is clear, logical
and concise. This principle involves making
information accessible to the widest possible
audience, with consideration for users with
varying levels of English language proficiency,
educational attainment, and spatial reasoning
skills. It also includes presenting an
appropriate amount of information. Too much
information at one time can overburden the
user and hinders one’s ability to make quick
decisions; too little information promotes
poor understanding and decision-making.
Information should be provided in advance of
where major changes in direction are required,
repeated only as necessary, and confirmed
when a maneuver is complete.
KEEP USERS MOVING
Users should be able to interpret signage
while safely maintaining motion on a trail,
bike lane, or bike route. Information that is
quickly and easily grasped will contribute to
a more seamless travel experience, without
the need to stop to process navigational cues.
Wayfinding signage should be conducive
to quick interpretation and comprehension.
How information is presented—the amount
of information, the font, size, and visual
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
102
WAYFINDING ELEMENTS
The goal of wayfinding is to allow
individuals to orient themselves in
the built environment, navigate easily
to desired destinations, and discover
new places and services within a
community. To accomplish this goal,
a wayfinding system employs a series
of elements, each playing a vital role
in the overall system. Elements can
be categorized into three groups of
elements:
• Access Elements
• Fundamental Navigational
Elements
• Enhanced Navigational Elements
Figure 42 . Generalized Access Elements
ACCESS ELEMENTS
Gateway Monument
Define the entry into distinct districts,
neighborhoods, trailheads or access
points. These elements allow for
placemaking and integrated artwork to
be included
Information Kiosks
Kiosks provide a particular area’s
map, destinations, rules of use, and
safety information. Maps highlight
major/minor access points, landmarks,
restrooms and other trail and on-street
bikeway networks.
Secondary Access
Signage provides orientation where
limited user traffic may not necessitate
as much information as information
kiosks (e.g., maps).
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
103
FUNDAMENTAL NAVIGATIONAL ELEMENTS
Decision Signs
Clarify route options when more than
one potential route or multiple regional
destinations exist.
Confirmation Signs
Reassure users that they are on the
correct route. These signs should
be placed after turn movements or
intersections.
Figure 43 . Generalized Fundamental Navigational Elements
Turn Signs
Clarify a specific route at changes in
direction when only one route option
is suggested. Turn signs may include
branding, route name, and directional
arrow.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
104
ENHANCED NAVIGATIONAL ELEMENTS
Pavement Markings
Reinforce directionality of route,
bicyclist positioning, and/or system
branding.
Mile Markers
Orient users along off-street facilities
about their location in relation to others.
Reinforce system branding.
Figure 44 . Generalized Enhanced Navigational Elements
Street/Trail Intersection Signs
Orient off-street trail users at street
crossings and inform vehicular traffic of
trail crossing.
Fingerboard Signs
Clarify route options where two or more
routes converge.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
105
STANDARDS
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) is a document
issued by the Federal Highway
Administration of United States
Department of Transportation (FHWA).
The MUTCD specifies the standard for
all traffic control devices installed on
any street, highway, bikeway, or private
road open to public travel. The MUTCD
was established in order to achieve
uniformity and consistency in traffic
control devices (wayfinding signage
is considered a traffic control device)
so that information would be readily
recognized and understood by travelers.
Both on-street and off-street bicycle
facilities are required to follow the
standards within the MUTCD. The State
of California has adopted specific state
standards for all traffic control devices
called the CA MUTCD, which includes
the FHWA MUTCD standards, but is
amended for the state, thus superseding
the MUTCD. At the time of writing, the
most recent version is Revision 5 of the
2014 edition of the CA MUTCD.
BICYCLE GUIDE SIGNS
The fundamental navigational
elements (see Figure 40), as well as
pavement markings on public streets,
are wayfinding elements whose
standards are dictated by the CA
MUTCD. Access elements, enhanced
navigational elements, and interpretive
elements allow for more flexibility and
customization. Per the CA MUTCD,
devices should be designed so that:
• Size, shape, color, composition,
lighting or retro-reflection, and
contrast are combined to draw
attention to the devices;
• Simplicity of message combine to
produce a clear meaning
• Legibility and size combine with
placement to permit adequate time
for response
• Uniformity, size, legibility, and
reasonableness of the message
combine to command respect
The CA MUTCD also recommends
the arrangement and amount of text,
or legend, on each section of each sign
(see Figure 45):
• Guide signs should be limited
to no more than three lines of
destinations, which include place
names, route numbers, street names,
and cardinal directions.
Figure 45 . Standard CA MUTCD-Compliant Directional or
Decision Sign
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
106
• A straight-ahead location should
always be placed in the top slot
followed by the destination to
the left and then the right. If two
destinations occur in the same
direction, the closer destination
should be listed first, followed by the
farther destination.
• Arrows shall be depicted as shown
in Figure 44 for glance recognition,
meaning straight and left arrows
are to be located to the left of the
destination name, while an arrow
indicating a destination to the right
shall be placed to the right of the
destination name. The approved
arrow style must be used.
• Nineteen (19) characters (including
spaces) in title case should be
considered a maximum length
for a single destination title. 10-14
characters (including spaces) in
title case should be considered an
ideal maximum length for a single
destination title.
• In situations where two destinations
of equal significance and distance
may be properly designated and the
two destinations cannot appear on
the same sign, the two names may
be alternated on successive signs.
• Approved fonts include the Federal
Series (series B, C, or D), also known
as Highway Gothic. Clearview is
also currently approved for use,
however the FHWA is considering
rescinding the use of Clearview.
• A contrast level of 70% needs to be
achieved between foreground (text
and graphics) and background.
COLORS
Color coding may be used on
wayfinding guide signs to help
users distinguish between multiple
potentially confusing traffic generator
destinations located in different
neighborhoods or subareas within
a community or area. Community
wayfinding guide signs may use
background colors other than green in
order to provide a color identification
for the wayfinding destinations by
geographical area within the overall
wayfinding guide signing system.
Green is the standard color for guide
signs. Blue and brown are also used
for traveler information including
destination and street name signs. The
remaining colors are eligible for use on
community wayfinding signs as long as
they are sufficiently different from the
“assigned colors.”
The CA MUTCD prohibits the use of
some colors for wayfinding signs, these
colors are known as “assigned colors.”
The “assigned colors” consist of the
standard colors of red (ex. Stop sign),
orange (ex. Work zone sign), yellow
(ex. Crosswalk sign), purple, or the
fluorescent versions thereof, fluorescent
yellow-green, and fluorescent pink.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
107
They cannot be used as background
colors for community wayfinding guide
signs, in order to minimize possible
confusion with critical, higher-priority
regulatory and warning sign color
meanings readily understood by road
users.
Ultimately, the described standards
and design elements should serve as
the basis for the future development of
a comprehensive Bicycle Wayfinding
Design Guidelines document specific
to the Town of Danville to use as a
project-level document for the planning,
implementation and deployment of
bicycle wayfinding signage.
SUPPLEMENTAL WAYFINDING ELEMENTS
Pavement Markings
Directional pavement markings
indicate confirmation of bike rider
presence on a designated route and
where riders should turn. Especially
in urban settings, pavement markings
can often be more visible and can help
supplement or reinforce signage.
On-Street Markings
Figure 46 shows different types
of pavement markings used for
wayfinding purposes. While the shared
lane marking is currently the only
FHWA approved pavement marking
shown, cities have experimented with
the other options.
DESTINATION SELECTION & PRIORITIZATION
DESTINATION HIERARCHY
Because there are many desirable
destinations in the Danville region that
are reachable by bicycle, they will need
to be organized into a hierarchy. A clear
hierarchy helps present wayfinding
information quickly and legibly. When
there are too many destinations to show,
the established destination hierarchy
helps determine what information is
presented, and as importantly, where it
is presented along the bicycle network.
Simply put, a hierarchy of destinations
ensures that people biking get the right
information at the right time.
Figure 46 . Types of Wayfinding Pavement
Markings
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
108
Establishing a destination hierarchy
also helps determine the physical
distance from which the locations are
signed. Signs for primary destinations
are located farther from the destination,
signs for tertiary locations are located
nearer to the destination.
Primary Destinations
These destinations are of primary
or regional significance, including
Downtown Danville and Mount Diablo
State Park. Directional information
to their location appears on signs
from a large radius throughout the
region. Destinations in this category
can include nationally recognized
destinations, downtowns, regional
trails, and neighboring municipalities.
Primary destinations typically appear
on wayfinding signs within five (5)
miles of their location.
Secondary Destinations
Secondary destinations are generally
recognized destinations that have
access to the bikeway or trail system
nearby, such as the Iron Horse Trail and
Diablo Road Trail. These might include
transit stations, community parks,
schools, and neighborhood shopping
districts. Secondary destinations
typically appear on wayfinding signs
within two (2) miles of their location.
Tertiary Destinations
The third category are minor
destinations that are often accessed by
bicycle or other non-motorized activity,
such as the Library and Community
Center/Town Green, Village Theatre
and Art Gallery, and public parks.
These are generally local attractions
and activities, such as community and
recreation centers. Tertiary destinations
typically appear on wayfinding signs
within one (1) mile of their location.
DESTINATION ORDER
Decision signs should be limited to no
more than three lines of destinations,
which include place names, route
numbers, street names, and cardinal
directions.
A straight-ahead location should always
be placed in the top slot followed by
the destination to the left and then the
right, even if destinations to the right
or left are closer. If two destinations
occur in the same direction, the closer
destination should be listed first
followed by the farther destination.
Arrows should be placed for glance
recognition, meaning straight and left
arrows are located to the left of the
destination name, while right arrows
are to be placed to the right of the
destination name (see Figure 47 for
reference). Figure 47 . CA MUTCD Figure 9B-4 shows
proper arrangement of destinations,
distances and arrows
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
109
SIGN PLACEMENT GUIDELINES
Proper placement of wayfinding
elements will ensure maximum
legibility and safety. The Guide for the
Development of Bicycle Facilities by the
American Association of State Highway
Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
provides information on the physical
infrastructure needed to support
bicycling facilities. The AASHTO
Bike Guide largely defers to Part 9 of
the California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices, (CA MUTCD)
for basic guidelines related to the
design of bicycle wayfinding systems.
Wayfinding guidance may be used to
provide connectivity between two or
more major facilities, such as a street
with bike lanes and/or sidewalks and a
shared-use path.
• Wayfinding may be used to provide
guidance and continuity in a
gap between existing sections of
a facility, such as a bike lane or
shared-use path
• Road/path name signs should be
placed at all path-roadway crossings
to help users track their locations
• Reference location signs (mile
markers) assist path users in
estimating their progress, provide
a means for identifying the location
of emergency incidents, and are
beneficial during maintenance
activities
• On a Class I - Shared-use path,
obstacles (including signs) shall
be placed no closer than 24” from
the near edge of the travel way and
no more than 6’ away. For pole-
mounted signs, the lowest edge
of the sign shall be 4’ above the
existing ground plane, and 8’ above
the ground plane for overhead
placement.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
110
Accessibility Standards
Wayfinding signage should conform to
technical guidance from the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). In doing so,
it will allow many types of users to use
facilities without undue stress or safety
concerns. Signage should not impede
the travel of people walking and biking,
and/or those with disabilities. The CA
MUTCD provides guidance for the safe
and effective placement of signage.
The Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board provides
guidance for accessible design for the
built environment. Standards which
should be considered when designing
and placing wayfinding signs include
recommendations of vertical clearance,
post mounted objects, protruding
objects, required clear widths, and signs
on shared use paths. The following
standards for placement should be
considered when designing and placing
wayfinding signs (see Figure 48).
Figure 48 . Summary of sign placement guidance adapted from CA MUTCD and ADA Guidance
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
111
VERTICAL CLEARANCE
On-Street: Vertical clearance shall be
a minimum of 84” when adjacent to a
sidewalk or on-street environment.
Off-Street: Vertical clearance shall be
96” high maximum (when overhanging
the path), or 48” minimum from the
grade of the path to the bottom of the
sign and 24” from the edge of the path
tread to the edge of the sign when the
sign is mounted adjacent to the trail.
POST-MOUNTED OBJECTS
Where a sign or other obstruction is
mounted between posts or pylons and
the clear distance between the posts
or pylons is greater than 12”, the lowest
edge of such sign or obstruction shall
be 27” minimum or 80” maximum
above the finished floor or ground.
PROTRUDING OBJECTS
Objects with leading edges more than
27” and not more than 80” above the
finished floor or ground shall protrude
4” maximum horizontally into the
circulation path.
REQUIRED CLEAR WIDTH
Protruding objects may not, in any
case, reduce the clear width required
for accessible routes. Generally, this
requirement is met by maintaining
4’ minimum clear width for people
maneuvering mobility devices. This
requirement applies to sidewalks and
other pedestrian circulation paths.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
112
Figure 49 . Proposed Family of Signs
WAYFINDING TOOLKIT
The following section provides
guidance on the development and
implementation of a wayfinding docket
for the Town of Danville. It describes
the proposed family of signs and
includes mockups of the proposed
signage. An outline to implementation
and programming is also provided.
Finally, a set of signage placement
guidelines is included for consideration.
BICYCLE WAYFINDING SIGN FAMILY
The bicycle wayfinding family of signs
establishes a cohesive identity for the
Town of Danville bikeways. Consistent
use of each member of the family
improves navigation, encourages use,
and provides a recognizable identity
for the bicycle network. The following
section provides a summary of each
sign including a short description,
placement guidance, recommended
dimensions and materials.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
113
Figure 50 . Kiosk
Kiosk
DESCRIPTION
Kiosks are freestanding two-sided
information displays that orient users to
Danville’s bicycle and pedestrian routes.
Kiosks provide a particular area’s map
(ex. Downtown Danville), destinations,
rules of use, and safety information.
A detailed map should show the local
district or trail, indicating “You are
Here”, highlight major/ minor access
points, landmarks, restrooms and other
trail and on-street bikeway networks.
The kiosk could provide additional
information on local destinations within
a 5-minute ride or 10-minute walk from
the current location. The kiosk is also
an opportunity to illustrate historical,
ecological or cultural interpretive
information of the local area. Kiosk
colors and logos should conform to
the Town of Danville’s style guide and
branding standards.
PLACEMENT
Kiosks can be located at trailheads,
trail access points and selected public
gathering spaces (ex. Downtown
Danville, Iron Horse Trail, Town Green).
The Kiosk should be setback from
the path of travel a minimum of 3 feet
to provide space for people to read
and consider the information without
blocking the sidewalk or trail, and to
avoid any safety hazards for users.
A minimum of three (3) feet should
also be provided for each side of the
map board per federal accessibility
guidelines.
MATERIALS
Kiosks can be made of a variety of
materials. This plan recommends
painted aluminum which is a strong,
durable and lightweight material.
Materials should correspond with
town design standards, and reinforce
branding and placemaking efforts.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
114
Figure 51 . Directional Sign
DIRECTIONAL SIGN
DESCRIPTION
Directional signs clarify route options
when more than one potential route or
multiple regional destinations exist.
Signs consist of the regional bike
route plaque and space for up to three
destinations with arrows. A mockup is
included below.
PLACEMENT
Directional signs should be installed
along a bikeway prior to decision
making points and at intersections.
Sufficient distance should be allowed
prior to the intersection to provide
safe recognition and response to
information provided. Directional
signs should be placed on the near
side of the intersection and followed
by a confirmation sign with mileage
on the far side of an intersection (see
Sign Placement section below for more
details).
MATERIALS
• 0.080-inch-high intensity prismatic
aluminum sign panel
• Front of sign to be solvent print
or 3M EC Film with UV Gloss
Laminate
• Artwork to be solvent print or
digitally imaged vinyl applied to
sign
• Mount to post
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
115
Figure 52 . Confirmation Sign
CONFIRMATION SIGN
DESCRIPTION
Confirmation signs should be placed
after a turn movement or intersection
to reassure people biking (i.e., the user)
that they are on the correct route and
provide the distance to destination.
Signs can consist of the regional
bikeway branding and space for up to
three destinations with mileage.
PLACEMENT
Signs should be placed 50 to 100 feet
after turns following decision signs.
Confirmation signs with mileage should
also be placed at the beginning of
regional routes and on the far side of an
intersection following directional signs.
MATERIALS
• 0.080-inch-high intensity prismatic
aluminum sign panel
• Front of sign to be solvent print
or 3M EC Film with UV Gloss
Laminate
• Artwork to be solvent print or
digitally imaged vinyl applied to
sign
• Mount to post
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
116
Figure 53 . Town of Danville Turn Sign
Figure 54 . Turn Sign Plaques
TURN SIGN
DESCRIPTION
These types of signs are used to
clarify a specific route at changes in
direction when only one route option is
suggested.
PLACEMENT
Signs should be placed at turns prior to
the turning action to provide cyclists
advance notice of a change in direction.
Turn signs may be used in conjunction
with a directional sign at complex
intersections warranting additional
information.
MATERIALS
• 0.080-inch-high intensity prismatic
aluminum sign panel
• Front of sign to be solvent print
or 3M EC Film with UV Gloss
Laminate
• Artwork to be solvent print or
digitally imaged vinyl applied to
sign
• Mount to post
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
117
Figure 55 . Sign Topper Options
SIGN TOPPER
DESCRIPTION
Sign toppers can be added to new or
existing street signs to indicate streets
that are part of designated bicycle
boulevard networks. Bike Boulevards
are intended to serve as low-stress
bikeway networks, providing direct, and
convenient routes across Danville. Key
elements of Bike Boulevards are unique
signage and pavement markings,
traffic calming and diversion features
to maintain low vehicle volumes, and
convenient major street crossings.
PLACEMENT
Plaques should be mounted to posts
above existing street signs. These
should be located at key access points
and major signalized intersections
along the bicycle boulevard.
MATERIALS
• 0.080-inch high-intensity prismatic
aluminum sign panel
• Front of sign to be solvent print
or 3M EC Film with UV Gloss
Laminate
• Artwork to be solvent print or
digitally imaged vinyl applied to
sign
• Mount to post
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
118
PROGRAMMING & DESTINATIONS
WHAT IS SIGN PROGRAMMING?
Sign programming refers to the
messages that appear on signs. Sign
messages enable users to navigate to
destinations and along local/ regional
bikeways.
The following guidance outlines
a consistent approach to message
identification based on broad
identification of destinations associated
with each route, selecting destinations
that would appear on signs (based
on signing distances outlined in the
following pages), and identifying the
message order (based on distance and
direction). All destinations to be signed
should be open and accessible to the
public.
SIGNING DISTANCE AND TIERS
Signing distances suggest how far away
specific destinations should appear
on signs. This process ensures that
information is spread along the journey
according to the immediate needs of a
person riding a bicycle.
Figure 56 . Guidance on sign programming
Destinations are organized into tiers
to provide a straightforward signage
hierarchy. Level 1 destinations include
those with regional importance such
as adjacent jurisdictions and regional
trails. These should appear on signs
up to five miles away. Level 2 tends to
include more localized destinations
such as community parks, schools, and
neighborhood shopping districts. These
should be included on signs up to two
miles away. Level 3 destinations should
only be signed for up to one mile away
and provide directions to neighborhood
destinations including parks, recreation
centers, and cultural sites.
Distances may be measured either to a
destination boundary or center, as long
as the approach is consistent throughout
the region. Level 1 destinations typically
have a well-defined edge and should
be measured to boundary lines. Level
2 destination tend to be less defined
in terms of their boundaries and thus
should be measured to their centers.
Level 3 destinations are typically specific
addresses and thus distances should be
measured to the main entrance of the
specific location. If a Level 3 destination
is large or has several access points,
distance should be measured to the point
at which the bike rider will arrive.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
119
DESTINATION LIST
The list of destinations for Danville’s bicycle wayfinding is listed in Table 24 below.
Table 24 . Wayfinding Destinations List
TYPE DESTINATION ABBREVIATION
TIER 1
Town of Danville Downtown Danville Downtown
Neighboring Jurisdictions Alamo Alamo
Blackhawk Blackhawk
San Ramon San Ramon
Walnut Creek Walnut Creek
State Parks Mount Diablo State Park Mt. Diablo State Park
TIER 2
Trails Iron Horse Trail Iron Horse Trail
Diablo Road Trail Diablo Rd Trail
Park and Ride Sycamore Valley Park & Ride Sycamore Val. P&R
TIER 3
Cultural/Civic Centers Library & Community Center Library & Community Center
Village Theatre & Art Gallery Village Theatre & Art Gallery
Veterans Memorial Building &
Senior Center
Veterans Memorial Building &
Senior Center
Museum of the San Ramon Valley Museum of the SRV
Local Parks Sycamore Valley Park Sycamore Valley Park
Osage Park Osage Park
Oak Hill Park Oak Hill Park
Hap Magee Ranch Park Hap Magee Ranch Park
Diablo Vista Park Diablo Vista Park
Figure 57 and Figure 58 below provide a summary of tiered local and regional
destinations as well as proposed routes where wayfinding implementation should be
prioritized.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
Figure 57 . Danville Bicycle Network and Destinations
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
Figure 58 . Danville Bike Network and Priority Wayfinding Routes
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
122
Figure 59 . Typical Sign Placement
SIGN PLACEMENT
PLACEMENT GUIDANCE
The contents of this section address
typical scenarios to navigating to
various destinations in Danville to
ensure consistent placement. The
bicycle wayfinding signs in the Town
of Danville should be located in a
consistent manner throughout the
bicycle network. Figure 59 below
illustrates typical placement and
sequencing of on-street wayfinding
signs. Directional signs (D) are located
prior to an intersection of two bicycle
facilities, turns in routes (T), and
in relation to regional destinations.
Confirmation signs (C) are provided
after the turn movement, as well
as periodically along the route for
reassurance.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
123
TYPICAL SCENARIOS
ON-STREET INTERSECTION (TWO ROUTES, MULTIPLE DESTINATION OPTIONS)
Where two bicycle routes intersect
and both continue straight, multiple
decision options exist. Directional
signs may be placed around 100 feet
away from the intersection to alert bike
riders of upcoming destination options.
Confirmation signs may be placed 50
feet after the intersection to assure the
rider they are on the correct route.
Figure 60 . On-street Intersection Sign Placement - Two Routes, Multiple Destinations
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
124
Figure 61 . On-street Intersection Sign Placement - Two Routes, Two Destination Options
ON-STREET INTERSECTION (TWO ROUTES, TWO DESTINATION OPTIONS)
Where two bicycle routes intersect and
one continues while the other ends at
the intersection, options for placement
of decision signs exist. Directional signs
may be placed around 100 feet away
from the intersection to alert bike riders
of upcoming options. Confirmation
signs may be placed 50 feet after the
intersection to assure the rider they are
on the correct route.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
125
Figure 62 . On-street Intersection Sign Placement - Two Routes Ending at their Intersection
ON-STREET INTERSECTION (TWO ROUTES, ENDING AT THEIR INTERSECTION)
Where two bicycle routes end at the
same intersection, a bike rider will
turn to continue on a bike route. Turn
signs may be placed around 100 feet
from the approaching intersection.
Confirmation signs may be placed after
the intersection to assure the bike rider
they are on the correct route.
TOWN OF DANVILLE | SPRING 2021
126
ON-STREET JOG
Where physical barriers (ex., highways,
creeks, topography, development, etc.)
create continuous gaps in on-street
facilities, users are often routed to
adjacent streets to navigate around the
barrier and continue along the route.
The typical pattern for wayfinding
signs includes a turn sign prior to
each intersection where a turn is
necessary to circumnavigate the barrier.
Confirmation signs are placed after
intersections to reinforce that the bike
rider made the correct movement.
Figure 63 . On-street Gap Signage
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | SPRING 2021
127
PATHWAY-ROADWAY INTERSECTION 1
Shared-Use Path users should
be directed to cross roads where
improvements such as curb ramps,
crosswalk striping, and warning signs
exists. If the cross street has on-street
bike facilities, a directional sign should
be placed prior to the intersection
to inform bike riders of their route
options. If a bike-oriented stop sign is
present, it should not be obscured by
the wayfinding sign. Confirmation signs
may optionally be placed at path entries
to assure riders that they are on a bike
facility.
1 Note: development and implementation of wayfinding plan and related signage related to Iron Horse Trail should follow be coordinated with the East Bay Regional Park District.
Figure 64 . Path-Roadway Intersection Sign Placement
If direct travel via a mid-block roadway
crossing is not provided travelers
are expected to divert to the nearest
improved or signalized intersection. In
this scenario, turn signs should be used
to direct cyclists to the intersection with
safety improvements.
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 – Plan Review
Appendix 2 – Existing Bike Counts
Appendix 3 – Public Comments
APPENDIX 1: PLAN REVIEW
MEMORANDUM
Town of Danville | 1
To: Thomas Valdriz, Town of Danville
From: Mauricio Hernandez, Alta Planning + Design
Date: April 29, 2020
Re: Town of Danville Bicycle Master Plan – Task 3.1 Existing Policies and Plan Review
Introduction
The study team reviewed the following planning studies and reports to gain a better understanding of existing
conditions in the Town of Danville. This memo provides a summary of the policies and projects contained in these
planning documents that are pertinent to this project’s framework and recommendations. This plan review memo
provides information about the following documents:
• 2030 Town of Danville General Plan, Chapter 4 “Mobility”
• 2019/2020 Town of Danville Capital Improvement Plan
• Town of Danville Municipal Code
• Town of Danville Parks, Art, and Recreation Strategic Plan (2018)
• Town of Danville Bicycle Parking Study (2011)
• Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan (2017)
• Contra Costa Measure J Expenditure Plan (2011)
• Contra Costa Measure J Expenditure Plan (2019)
• Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan
• Applicable Traffic Counts
• Local Street Design Guidelines
• Downtown Parking Management Plan
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 2
2030 Town of Danville General Plan - Chapter 4 “Mobility”
Date Published March 2013
Link https://www.danville.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1026/2030-General-Plan-PDF?bidId=
Overview The 2030 Town of Danville General Plan Chapter 4 “Mobility” establishes goals related to
multi-modal circulation, complete streets, mobility, and neighborhood quality throughout
Danville. This chapter also discusses existing conditions of the transportation system in
Danville and the travel patterns of Danville residents.
Vision Statement The Town of Danville is served by a multi-modal transportation system that connects
residents to local and regional destinations via freeways, roadways, trails, and public
transportation. The Town strives to balance the needs of all modes of travel on its road
network by providing for pedestrian and bicycle connectivity, transit accessibility, and
smooth vehicular flow. Danville’s roads are complemented by attractive and well-
maintained streetscapes, miles of bicycle lanes and trails, crosswalks, sidewalks, and traffic
calming features.
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• Danville will consider alternatives to Level of Service as the operational standard
for traffic operations. Even where LOS D remains the standard, the Town will
consider service to bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users when new
development is evaluated and when measures to mitigate impacts on traffic are
developed.
• Goal 11: Provide a safe, efficient multi-modal circulation system.
• Policy 11.06: Create a connected circulation system in which it becomes easier
to walk or bicycle from one point in Danville to another.
• Goal 12: Create walkable neighborhoods and shopping areas, with streets that safely
and comfortably accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as
motor vehicles
• Policy 12.07: Close gaps in the Town’s bicycle and pedestrian trail system in order
to create a more fully connected, logical, comprehensive system of facilities
for non-motorized transportation.
• Policy 12.08: Ensure the provision of adequate bicycle support facilities, such
as bicycle parking, at all major bicycle usage locations.
• Goal 12: Create viable transportation alternatives to the single occupant
automobile.
• Goal 14: Integrate land use and transportation planning to increase the viability of
alternative transportation modes, minimize vehicle trips, and make more efficient
use of the transportation system.
• Goal 15: Reduce the adverse effects of vehicle traffic on Danville’s neighborhoods
and natural environments.
Relevant
Standards
• The Town of Danville recognizes three classes of bicycle routes: Class I, Class II,
and Class III bicycle routes. (Page 4-15)
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• Projects consistent with the 2009 Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan,
including:
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 3
o A bike/walkway along Diablo Road from Green Valley Rd to Mt. Diablo
Scenic Blvd. (requires additional right-of-way dedication and construction
by private parties)
o Camino Tassajara Improvements from Sycamore Valley Rd to the eastern
Town limit and Crow Canyon Rd improvements from Camino Tassajara to
the southern Town limit, including sidewalks and bicycle facilities
o Extension of Camino Tassajara bike lane from the eastern town limit
toward Dublin.
• Projects identified in the 2006 Parks, Recreation, and Arts Strategic Plan including:
o Closing gaps on the Sycamore Creek Trail
o Improvements to the Green Valley Creek Trail
• Improved connectivity between the Sycamore Valley Park and Ride Lot and
Downtown Danville
• Ongoing improvements such as signalized crossings, bike lockers, and bike racks
2019/2020 Town of Danville Capital Improvement Plan
Date Published 2019
Link https://www.danville.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1751/CIP-2019-20-Final-Book-
PDF?bidId=
Overview The 2019/2020 Town of Danville Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies upcoming
expenditures for the design, construction, and renovation of major capital projects that
will benefit the Town of Danville. The CIP also outlines funding and revenue sources for
the Town.
Vision Statement N/A
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• N/A
Relevant
Standards
• N/A
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• Front Street Creekside Trail (2021/22): A cantilevered 8’ trail over the creek from
opposite side of Town Meeting Hall to Diablo Road (approximately 1/8 mi)
• Diablo Road Trail from Alameda Diablo to Tank Access Road: An asphalt
pedestrian/bicycle multi-use path that would traverse along the south side of
Diablo Rd from the vicinity of the Fairway Drive/Calle Arroyo intersections to the
west of the EBMUD tank access road. A 2018 feasibility study identified three
route options.
• Traffic Signal and Street Light Maintenance Program: Replacing in-ground
crosswalks with RRFBs at 8 locations
• San Ramon Valley Creek Footbridge at Danville Green: A pedestrian footbridge
over San Ramon Valley Creek at the Danville Green
• La Gonda Way Bridge Improvements: Bridge replacement due to structural
deficiency and inadequate traffic, bicycle, and pedestrian conditions
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 4
• Town-wide Bicycle Facilities Improvements: Enhancements to existing and new
Class II/III bicycle facilities on Diablo Rd from 1-680 NB off-ramp to Hartz Ave and
enhancements to Class II bicycle facilities for the approaches to Diablo/Green
Valley intersection; new projects identified in Bicycle Master Plan
• Pavement Management Program
• Town-wide Trails: Green Valley Creek Trail and Sycamore Creek trail
improvements, other maintenance and gap closures, supportive facilities and
wayfinding
• Iron Horse Trail Raised Crosswalks and Flashing Beacons: Raised crosswalks and
RRFBs along the Iron Horse Trail
Previously Funded Projects
• Town-wide Wayfinding and Directional Signage
• Green Valley Trail from Highbridge Lane to Diablo Road
• Feasibility study for a trail from the Green Valley Shopping Center (Woodbine
Bridge at Highbridge Ln) to Diablo Rd via Green Valley Creek
• Downtown Improvement Project
• Town-Wide Bicycle Parking Project
Many streets are candidates for upcoming pavement maintenance. A full list of
projects for the 2019/20 fiscal year is on page CIP25 and CIP26.
Town of Danville Municipal Code
Date Published 1990 (last updated in 2019)
Link https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/danvilleca/latest/danville_ca/0-0-0-1
Overview The Town of Danville Municipal Code establishes laws, ordinances, and guidelines for the
town, including standards for the design and development of roads.
Relevant
Standards
Road Standards (12-8)
• Principal Thoroughfares; Type A
o 110’ with 72’ of roadway, 20’ of sidewalk, and 18’ of dividing strip
• Principle Thoroughfares; Type B
o 100’ width with 64’ of roadway, 20’ of sidewalk area, and 16’ of dividing
strip
• General Thoroughfares
o Width of 84’ with 64’ of roadway, 20’ of sidewalk area
• General Arterials
o 60’ width with 40’ of roadway and 20’ of sidewalk area
• Industrial Arterials
o 68’ width with 48’ of roadway and 20’ of sidewalk area
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 5
Parking Standards
• The Town of Danville established parking minimums for the Downtown Business
District in the municipal code. These can be found in
• The Town established a Transportation Improvement Program fee to collect fees
from new non-residential development. The Town Manager can grant
exemptions to this fee if the new development makes contributions that benefit
the circulation and transportation networks.
Town of Danville Parks, Recreation, and Art Strategic Plan (2018)
Date Published 2018
Link https://issuu.com/townofdanville/docs/2017_danville_pra_plan_update_reduc?e=1473944
/52228994
Overview “The Town of Danville’s Parks, Recreation, and Art Strategic Plan update establishes a long-
range vision and course of action for creating and sustaining a high quality, interconnected
system of parks, recreation and arts facilities, services and programs. The Plan Update
provides recommendations and tools to preserve Danville’s ability to respond to emerging
opportunities over the next ten or more years.”
Vision
Statement
The plan establishes seven vision principles for parks, recreation, and arts amenities in town,
including: 1) Parks are community places; 2) Parks are interwoven into the community; 3)
Community members are engaged in creating community spaces and becoming park
stewards; 4) Amenities are located to promote comfort and sociability of public spaces; 5)
Activities enhance the use of public spaces and community sociability; 6) Partnership sustain
parks, recreation and the arts; 7) Cultural arts enhance the livability of the community
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• Active Transportation Trail and Pathways: Connect Town parks and facilities
through a system of on-street and off-street trails, paths, and bike lanes
serving active transportation users and providing a variety of experiences
• Recreation for All: Provide recreation opportunities for all Danville residents
and visitors of all age groups and abilities. The Town will facilitate social
connections, human development, and lifelong learning by building community
among residents at different stages of life.
• Community Stewards and Partnerships: Residents will be active members of the
planning, design, and upkeep of facilities, promoting civic responsibility for the
parks, recreation, and arts system.
• Goals identified in the community outreach process include:
o Programming for Danville’s aging population
o Innovative public art
o Active Transportation Connections
“Over half of participants [in the online questionnaire] noted that
an expanded trail network would be a priority project for them”
Relevant
Standards
• N/A
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 6
Relevant
Projects &
Infrastructure
Recommendatio
ns
• “Develop a regular bicycle or walking tour of Danville’s parks as a new recreation
program.”
• Create “Ciclovia” or “Sunday Streets” events where a looped route of streets and
trails are closed to traffic and opened for citizens of all ages to interact with each
other through exercise, entertainment, and fun”
• Provide end-of-trip facilities (e.g., bike parking, bike repair stations) for cyclists at
parks and community centers.
• Identify and mark “Safe Routes to Parks” from locations such as schools, shopping
centers, libraries, after-school programs, community centers, and residential
neighborhoods.
• Fill in key missing connections in the existing bike and pedestrian network, such as
between the Iron Horse Trail and Las Trampas or south from Oak Hill Park
• Integrate public art into parks and facilities
• Apply universal design principles as the preferred guidance for design solutions in
parks, striving to exceed Americans with Disabilities Act requirements.
• End-of-trip Bicycle Facilities at: Diablo Vista Park, Hap Magee Ranch Park, Oak Hill
Park, Osage Station Park, Sycamore Valley Park, Bret Harte Park, and Town Green
• Develop an “arts trail” downtown
• Integration of art into trailheads and bicycle wayfinding
• Possible new bicycle park (location unspecified)
Town of Danville Bicycle Parking Study
Date Published 2011
Link Provided by Town (Not available online)
Overview Danville’s bicycle parking study investigated downtown parking needs and
recommended the quantities, types, and locations of bicycle racks throughout town to
accommodate the need and demand for bicycle parking in Danville. At the time of the
study, Downtown Danville had capacity for 121 bicycles at formal parking locations.
Vision Statement • N/A
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• N/A
Relevant
Standards
• Universal Design Standards for:
o Bicycle Rack Designs
o Bicycle Rack Parking Location Selection
o Bicycle Parking Dimensions and Placement
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• The study recommended increasing bicycle parking capacity in Downtown
Danville from 121 bicycles to 215. The plan estimated the total cost of these new
racks and their installation to be $36, 850. The study also prioritized the
recommendations and sorted them into three Phases (Table 5-1).
• New bicycle parking locations (see figure below) and Plan Table 4-1
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 7
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 8
Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Date Published 2017
Link http://ccta.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/5b8ec26192756.pdf
Overview The Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan establishes goals, actions, and
infrastructure recommendations to increase opportunities for safe, comfortable bicycling
and walking throughout the county.
Vision Statement “People of all ages and abilities, and in all neighborhoods and districts in Contra Costa, can
walk and bicycle safely, comfortably, and directly to their chosen destinations thereby
improving health, reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, and making our
transportation system more sustainable.”
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• Encourage more people to walk and bicycle
• Increase safety and security for pedestrians and bicyclists
• Create a safe, connected, and comfortable network of bikeways and
walkways for all ages and abilities
• Increase the livability and attractiveness of Contra Costa’s communities and
districts
• Increase the number of low-stress bikeways in Contra Costa
• Integrate complete streets principles and best practices into Authority funding
and design guidance.
Relevant
Standards
• Shifting to Level of Traffic Stress analysis
• Bike Facility Definitions: Class I, Class II, Class II B, Class III, Class IV
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• Low Stress Countywide Bicycle Network:
o Danville Boulevard
o Stone Valley Road
o Blackhawk Road
o Diablo Road
o Camino Tassajara
• Support Programs including:
o Education and Outreach Programs
o Community Based Encouragement Programs
o Bicycle Parking
o End-of-trip facilities
o Bike Share Programs
o Electric Assist Bicycles
o Transit Access
o Wayfinding
o Evaluation Methods
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 9
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 10
Contra Costa Measure J Sales Tax Expenditure Plan (2011)
Date Published 2011
Link N/A (Document provided by the Town of Danville)
Overview The Contra Costa County Measure J Expenditure Plan summarizes the transportation
projects and programs in the county that will be funded by a half-cent local transportation
sales tax. The Expenditure Plan directs jurisdictions to establish a growth management
plan in order to qualify for Measure J funds.
Vision Statement N/A
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• Relevant goals of the required Growth Management Program include:
o Assure that new residential, business, and commercial growth pays for
the facilities required to meet the demands resulting from that growth
o Require cooperative transportation and land use planning among
Contra Costa County, cities, towns, and transportation agencies
o Support land use patterns within Contra Costa that make more efficient
use of the transportation system, consistent with the General Plan of local
jurisdictions
Relevant
Standards
• N/A
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• Relevant countywide projects include:
o Safe Transportation for Children
o Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities
o Transportation for Livable Communities Project Grants
o Commute Alternatives Program
• Relevant southwest county subregion projects include:
o Additional Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements
o Major Streets: Traffic Flow, Safety, and Capacity Improvements
Contra Costa Measure J Expenditure Plan (2019)
Date Published 2019
Link https://www.ccta.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Measure-J-Strategic-Plan.pdf
Overview The Contra Costa Measure J Expenditure Plan forecasts the revenue that is expected to be
generated by the county’s half-cent transportation sales tax, guides the implementation
of projects, and makes commitments to individual projects by fiscal year.
Vision Statement N/A
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• The plan’s policies primarily concern financial guidelines for Measure J funding
Relevant
Standards
• N/A
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 11
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• San Ramon Valley Boulevard Lane Addition and Overlay (FY20/21)
• San Ramon Valley Boulevard and Danville Boulevard Improvements (FY20/21)
• Camino Ramon Improvements (FY22)
• Diablo Road Trail (FY21/22)
• Danville Boulevard/Orchard Rd Complete Streets Improvements (Currently in
design phase)
• San Ramon Valley Boulevard Slurry and Seal Striping (Construction in FY20/21)
• Camino Tassajara Bike Lane Completion (Currently underway)
Tri-Valley Transportation Plan and Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance
Date Published 2017
Link https://ccta.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/59cd5be5a55a2.pdf
Overview The Tri-Valley Transportation Council is made up of the Cities of Dublin, Livermore,
Pleasanton, San Ramon, the Town of Danville, and the Counties of Alameda and Contra
Costa. This plan outlines the vision, goals, and policy objectives, and action items for
transportation improvements along Routes of Regional Significance in Tri-Valley
jurisdictions.
Vision Statement NOTE: Please refer to goals and policies below
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• Integrate transportation planning with planning for air quality, community
character, and other environmental factors.
• Support corridor management programs to make the most efficient, effective,
and safe use of existing facilities and services.
• Consider both the need for vehicular mobility and congestion reduction, and such
livability concepts as walkability, bicycle access, and community character
Relevant
Standards
• Routes of Regional Significance are defined as: 1) Connect two or more subareas;
2) cross county boundaries; 3) carry a significant amount of through traffic, or; 4)
provide access to a regional highway or transit facility
• Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives (MTSOs) are defined for both
Routes of Regional Significance and the Iron Horse Trail. The Iron Horse Trail
MTSOs include: Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes, Auto Volumes at Crossings,
Average Trail User Delay at Major Crossings, Frequency of Pedestrian or Bicyclist
Injury, Pavement Conditions
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• Routes of Regional Significance in Danville are:
o Camino Tassajara
o Danville Boulevard
o Iron Horse Trail
o Sycamore Valley Road
• Camino Tassajara Widening (East Blackhawk Drive to County Line)
• Iron Horse Trail Crossing Improvements
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 12
Applicable Traffic Counts
Date Published Unknown
Link N/A (Provided by Town of Danville)
Overview Camino Tassajara and Sycamore Valley Road carry the most average daily weekday traffic
in Danville. This is a major east-west thoroughfare in town. Danville Boulevard, Blackhawk
Drive, Greenbrook Drive, and El Capitan Drive carry the next highest traffic volumes.
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 13
Local Street Design Guidelines
Date Published Unknown
Link N/A (Provided by Town of Danville)
Overview NOTE: Street design standards for Minor/Local Streets in Danville are shown in the figure
below.
Town of Danville – Plan Review | 14
Downtown Parking Management Plan
Date Published 2010
Link https://www.danville.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/142/Downtown-Parking-
Management-Plan-PDF
Overview The Downtown Parking Management Plan analyzed the existing conditions of private and
public parking infrastructure and policies in downtown Danville. The study found that the
existing parking supply in Downtown Danville was sufficient for existing demand,
recommended an online permit sales and management program, and recommended new
curb marking policies and procedures.
Vision Statement N/A
Relevant Goals
and Policies
• N/A
Relevant
Standards
• NOTE: See below for map of parking regulations in Downtown Danville
Relevant Projects
& Infrastructure
Recommendations
• N/A
APPENDIX 2: EXISTING BIKE COUNTS AND DATA
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
¥680
¥680
I680
SYCAMORE VALLEY R D
E L P I N TADORD
CAMINOTASSAJARA
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
R
D
D I A B L O R D
PARAISODR
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
A
M
O
N
S
A
N
R
A
M
O
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
B
LV
D
LAGONDAWY
E L C ERR O B LVD
ELCAPITANDR
S
T
G E O R G E R D
WOODR A N CH CIR
H I G H L A N D D R
IR
O
N
H
O
R
S
E
T
R
A
I
L
D U NH ILL
DR
E D INBURGHCIR
Monte VistaHigh School
Los CerrosMiddle School
Green ValleyElementary
Vista GrandeElementarySan Ramon ValleyHigh School
MontairElementary
John BaldwinElementary
Charlotte WoodMiddle School
GreenbrookElementary
Golden ViewElementary
SycamoreValleyElementary
Diablo VistaMiddle School
CreeksideElementary
SAN RAMON
ALAMO
Hap MageeRanch Park
OsageStationPark
OakHillPark
DanvilleSouthPark
DiabloVista Park
TownGreen
SycamoreValley Park
Sycamore ValleyRegionalOpen Space
SycamoreValley RegionalOpen Space
Las TrampasRegionalWilderness
Middem
BretHarte Park
CastenadaTrailhead
Mill Creek Hollow
Golden View School Park
Hap MageeRanch Park
Eugene O'NeillNationalHistoric Site
Mount DiabloState Park
1
1816
11
2
12
9
15
33
8
29
3
10
2014
22
2119
353432
31
23 24
25
26
27 2830
45
6 7
TOWNWIDE BICYCLEMASTER PLAN
EXISTINGBICYCLE COUNTS 0 0.25 0.5MILESFeatures
!Post Office
!School
!Park & Ride
Parks and Open Space
Town Boundary
Map Produced: Jan. 2021.Data Sources: Town of Danville,Contra Costa County.
Bicycle Volume Counts
2017
2018
2019 - Current
Townwide Bicycle Master Plan
Existing Bicycle Volume Count Data
ID Intersection Year Start Date End Date Count Type AM Peak MD Peak PM Peak
1 Stone Valley and MVHS 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 4 9 21
10 Diablo and El Cerro and Ackerman 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 12 13 22
11 El Cerro and La Gonda 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 4 4 5
12 El Cerro and Danville 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 8 16 27
13 Danville and La Gonda 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 4 4 5
14 Danville and Hartz and Railroad 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 4 8 13
15 IHT and Love**2019 10/1/2019 10/1/2019 Screenline, Daily 25 38 35
16 Railroad and Linda Mesa 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 2 17 13
17 Hartz and Linda Mesa 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 1 7 16
18 Diablo and Hartz 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 10 14 12
19 Railroad and Prospect 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 2 18 13
2 Stone Valley and Green Valley 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 3 9 26
20 Camino Tassajara and Diablo 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 6 6 8
21 SRV and Hartz and Railroad 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 7 17 21
22 SRV Blvd and Sycamore Valley 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 6 4 4
23 Sycamore Valley and Brookside 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 1 12 15
24 Sycamore Valley and Greenbrook and Old Orchard 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 0 3 5
25 Camino Tassajara and Sycamore Valley 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 7 15 16
26 Camino Tassajara and Holbrook and Creekside 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 4 16 15
27 Crow Canyon and Camino Tassajara and Blackhawk 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 3 6 12
28 Camino Tassajara and Lawrence 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 7 5 9
29 Camino Tassajara and Hansen 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 2 2 8
3 Green Valley and Blemer 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 4 32 4
30 Greenbelt and Greenbrook Drive 2017 11/7/2017 11/8/2017 TMC 48 HR 13 10 3
31 SR Creek Trail and Van Patten 2018 11/7/2018 11/8/2018 TMC 48 HR 15 6 11
32 SR Creek Trail and Brookside 2018 11/7/2018 11/8/2018 TMC 48 HR 9 9 5
33 IHT and Greenbrook 2018 11/3/2018 11/6/2018 TMC 2x 24 HR 51 72 39
34 SRV and Greenbrook 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 8 5 8
35 El Capitan and St Regis 2018 12/12/2018 12/13/2018 TMC 48 HR 5 12 3
4 Diablo and Calle Arroyo 2017 3/30/3017 3/30/2017 TMC AM/PM 3 46 32
5 Diablo and Alameda Diablo 2017 3/30/2017 3/30/2017 TMC AM/PM 3 10 19
6 Diablo and Avenida Nueva 2017 3/30/2017 3/30/2017 TMC AM/PM 1 13 4
7 Diablo and Blackhawk and Mt Diablo Scenic 2017 3/11/2017 3/12/2017 TMC 2x AM/PM 1 12 31
8 Diablo and Green Valley and McCauley 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 17 15 16
9 Diablo and Matadera 2017 4/25/2017 4/25/2017 TMC AM/PM 8 12 21
**See corresponding maps for monthly counts at IHT/Love Lane
APPENDIX 3: PUBLIC COMMENTS
PHASE 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Danville Bicycle master plan
Jim DeFrisco <jim.defrisco@gmail.com>
Sat 3/28/2020 1:30 PM
To: Thomas Valdriz <TValdriz@danville.ca.gov>
***CAUTION***
This email originated from outside of the Town of Danville. Do not click on links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Thomas,
My name is Jim DeFrisco, and I’d love to get involved some way with the Town-wide Bicycle
Master Plan that I read about today in the quarterly newsletter.
I’ve lived in town since 1992, currently on La Gonda Way, where we’ve been since 1996. I’ve
been an avid cyclist my whole life, cycling cross the US in 1977 and generally doing a few
week-long tours per year around the US and abroad. I’ve been a life member of Adventure
Cycling since the early 80s. I commute to work between Danville and Pleasanton on the Iron
Horse Trail as often as I can - typically 2 times per week (25 miles round trip). I work as a
software developer focusing on data visualization.
I’m not sure how I can help given the current pandemic situation, but I have a great interest
and passion for the subject! Let me know, and if not - best of luck with the plan!
Cheers,
Jim
PS - a shot of me from today, shopping with my trailer ⶡⶢⶣⶤⶥ
1
Thomas Valdriz
From:Mark Higgins <mark_e_higgins@yahoo.com>
Sent:Saturday, March 28, 2020 12:17 PM
To:Thomas Valdriz
Subject:Bicycle Master Plan Improvements
***CAUTION***
This email originated from outside of the Town of Danville. Do not click on links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mr. Valdriz:
My name is Mark Higgins. My wife and I live in the Cameo Neighborhood and are both cyclists. I saw the article
with your contact information in the quarterly newsletter. I was very happy to hear that Danville will be working towards
improvements for cyclists. My wife commutes to Chevron in San Ramon via the iron horse trail. Cycling to work keeps her
healthy and happy, but I am nervous every day when I know she's on the bike because of a few dangerous spots. She
commutes year round, often in the dark both directions, and I have noticed some areas that are dangerous for her that I
would love to see improved.
Stop signs for automobile traffic needs to be added where the iron horse trail crosses roads in Danville.
Currently there is signage and lighting, but this is not enough, a stop sign for traffic must be implemented for pedestrian
and cyclist safety. These crossings are incredibly dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians, especially during commute
times as drivers often drive above the speed limit and don't stop, presenting the possibility of a devastating side on
collision. The following crossings need a stop sign:
Fostoria way- this crossing is by far the most dangerous. No signage whatsoever exists and both sides of the trail
have a blind corner.
Greenbrook Drive
El Capitan Drive
I am not as familiar with the Northern end, but there are many small street crossings that could also stand to have
stop signs.
There are a number of left turns that are dangerous for cyclists on Diablo Road. Improvements should be made
to the roadway to make these left turns accessible to cyclists without having to cross multiple lanes of traffic on a high
speed roadway. The following are turns that I'm aware of:
Left turn from Diablo Rd. eastbound to Green Valley road northbound.
Left turn from Diablo Rd. westbound onto Diablo Road Southbound (at the Diablo/El Cerro Blvd intersection)
left turn from Diablo Rd. Southbound onto Camino Tassajara eastbound. This light system has a sensor for cyclists,
but improvements need to be made to the road paint to allow cyclists access to the left turn lane.
2
Green Valley Road northbound needs improvements to the bicycle lane. The lane is narrow and is especially
dangerous on trash day when the entire bike lane is take up with residents trash cans. In addition the bike lane briefly
disappears at the Green Valley/ Verde Mesa intersection. There's a strange curb here that makes it awkward and
dangerous for cyclists.
Thanks for your work! this is an important project. Let me know how I can help!
Mark Higgins
650 750 5176
Bicycle Master Plan
Peter Williams <rpwilliams1958@gmail.com>
Sun 3/29/2020 7:43 PM
To: Thomas Valdriz <TValdriz@danville.ca.gov>
***CAUTION***
This email originated from outside of the Town of Danville. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Thomas
I am just responding to the articles in the Danville quarterly newsletter about the bicycle master plan
and also the updated traffic signals. One of the biggest issues for bicyclists is that many of the Town's
traffic signals don't recognize the presence of cyclists, and leave them stranded. For example, I live in
Wood Ranch, off Camino Tassajara. The Woodranch/Tassajara lights will not recognize the presence of
cyclists, so if I am coming out of Woodranch I have to get off and push the pedestrian button (unless a
car happens to be coming behind me and activates the lights); and if I am turning left into Wood Ranch
when coming from a Blackhawk direction, I get stranded in the middle of the road and, again unless
there is a car also turning, I have to run the light. (I was once pulled over by a Danville cop for doing
exactly that, until I pointed out that the lights don't work for cyclists, and he let me off!)
If you want a town that is safe and suitable for cyclists, please fix this!!!
--
Dr. Peter Williams
+1 (925) 648 7975; cell +1 (415) 215 2112
DBAC REPORT
1
Danville Bicycle Advisory Committee Report
(update #1)
Andy Dillard May 3, 2021
Town of Danville Transportation Manager
Danville, Ca
The Danville Bicycle Advisory Committee (DBAC) is an ad hoc committee made up of devoted
and passionate road and mountain cyclists banding together to assist the Town of Danville with
recommendations for bicycle infrastructure improvements that will promote the use of non-
motorized transportation, promote healthy lifestyles, increase safety of the bicycling public and
help make Danville a more livable community.
This ad hoc committee recommends that the Town of Danville establish a formal bicycle
advisory committee composed of stakeholders, e.g., recreational cyclists, school
representatives, bicycle transportation advocates, etc.
The DBAC conducted an in-depth analysis of the Danville Bicycle Master Plan Draft Proposal
(March 11, 2021), Proposed Facilities Spot and Segment Improvements (slides #15 – #22). DBAC
members spent a significant amount of time reviewing and visiting all proposed improvement
locations and amended the Town’s recommended safety improvements. In addition, DBAC
members identified additional locations and potential safety improvements. Each DBAC
member identified their top 30 high priority spot improvements and those choices are reflected
in the DBAC priority (see attached Tables and Appendix), representing a cyclist’s view of the
safety impact of each improvement. Each spot improvement recommendation in Table 1 is
hyperlinked to an appendix table of detailed safety-focused analysis and recommendations.
We look forward to working with the Town of Danville to revise and implement the Bicycle
Master Plan.
Sincerely,
Alan Kalin, Bruce Bilodeau, John Gallagher, Linda Kwong, Jeff Eorio, Mark Dedon, Steve Whalen,
Mike Anciaux
CC: Renee Morgan, Danville Mayor; Town Council Members: Newell Arnerich, Karen Stepper,
Robert Storer, Dave Fong; Allen Shields, Chief of Police; Joe Calabrigo, Town Manager; Tai
Williams, Assistant Town Manager; Jane Joyce, Chair Parks, Recreation and Arts Commission
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
2
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
WEST DANVILLE
7 LOVE LANE RAILROAD AVE BICYCLE INTERSECTION
CROSSINGS
+ Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway)
0
6 HARTZ AVE RAILROAD AVE BIKE BOX + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE NB
Railroad.
2
10 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
RAILROAD AVE BIKE BOX + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE 2
27 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
HARTZ AVE VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX 2
36 DANVILLE BLVD EL CERRO BLVD VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX WB El Cerro onto
Danville Blvd
4
14 HARTZ WAY HARTZ AVE VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX SB Hartz Ave for left
turn onto Hartz Way
2
26 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
SAN RAMON VALLEY
BLVD
VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX WB Sycamore Valley
Road in the #2 lane to facilitate
left turn onto SRVB. Also, a Bike
Box and/or bike NB SRVB.
6
41 DIABLO RD HARTZ AVE VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX WB Diablo Rd. 3
42 DIABLO RD FRONT ST VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX WB Diablo Road onto
Front street
3
43 DIABLO RD WEST EL PINTADO VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX SB West El Pintado
onto EB Diablo Road
0
44 EL CERRO BLVD LA GONDA WAY VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX WB El Cerro onto SB La
Gonda Way
2
40 FRONT ST HARTZ WAY VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX SB Front street onto
EB Hartz Way
0
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
3
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
9 IHT SAN RAMON VALLEY
RD
PROTECTED INTERSECTION + RAISED CROSSWALK. Long term:
Bridge crossing of SRVB.
6
15 IHT LINDA MESA AVE RRFB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
+ Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway) for IHT users. Sidewalks
on Linda Mesa adjacent to IHT
5
16 IHT LOVE LN RRFB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
+ Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway) for IHT users. Sidewalks
on Love Lane adjacent to IHT
5
17 IHT DEL AMIGO RD RRFB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
+ Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway) for IHT users. Sidewalks
on Del Amigo adjacent to IHT
5
21 IHT WEST PROSPECT AVE RRFB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
+ WIDEN PAVEMENT AREA
WHERE CYCLISTS & PEDESTRIANS
STOP
4
20 IHT HARTFORD RD RRFB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
+ Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway) for IHT users.
3
NORTH DANVILLE
8 DIABLO RD I-680 OVERPASS OVERPASS UNDER LIGHTING + VDD WB Diablo Road at SB I-680
exit
4
37 DIABLO RD CAMINO TASSAJARA VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX & BICYCLE
INTERSECTION CROSSINGS &
SIGNAGE
5
38 DIABLO RD EL CERRO BLVD-
ACKERMAN
VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX 4
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
4
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
22 DIABLO RD NEW TRAIL (GREEN
VALLEY CREEK TRAIL)
PHB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
1
45 DIABLO RD MATADERA WAY VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX & CROSSWALK 1
39 DIABLO RD GREEN VALLEY RD VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX needed on eastbound 5
11 DIABLO RD CLYDESDALE DR ADD LIGHTING 3
32 BLACKHAWK RD MT. DIABLO SCENIC
BLVD
VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX 4
24 BLACKHAWK RD MT. DIABLO SCENIC
BLVD
BIKE BOX + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE 3
33 BLACKHAWK RD MT. DIABLO SCENIC
BLVD
BIKE BOX (SAME AS # 24) 4
46 GREEN VALLEY RD BLEMER RD VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX & DASHED GREEN
PAINT IN BIKE LANE
1
SOUTH DANVILLE
25 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
SAN RAMON VALLEY
BLVD
BIKE BOX + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE SB
SRVB (TURNING LEFT/STRAIGHT)
5
5 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
IHT CROSSING BRIDGE CROSSING 4
23 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
(SAN RAMON CREEK
TRAIL)
PHB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK+IMPROVE
LIGHTING
1
35 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
BROOKSIDE DR VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX 1
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
5
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
29 GREENBROOK DR SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX (TURNING
LEFT/STRAIGHT)
3
4 CAMINO TASSAJARA SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
PROTECTED INTERSECTION 5
31 CAMINO TASSAJARA SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX at EB Tassajara. 5
30 CAMINO TASSAJARA CROW CANYON RD VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX, Long Term: add bike
lane from Old Blackhawk Rd to
Blackhawk Plaza Road to close gap
in lanes (both directions)
6
1 CAMINO TASSAJARA CROW CANYON RD PROTECTED INTERSECTION + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX & BICYCLE
INTERSECTION CROSSINGS
3
2 CAMINO TASSAJARA OLD BLACKHAWK RD PROTECTED INTERSECTION 2
3 CAMINO TASSAJARA TASSAJARA RANCH
RD
PROTECTED INTERSECTION 2
12 IHT GREENBROOK DR RAISED CROSSWALK + Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway)
4
13 IHT EL CAPITAN DR RAISED CROSSWALK + Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway)
4
19 IHT PARAISO DR RAISED CROSSWALK + Bicycle slowing design (split
trailway)
4
28 CAMINO RAMON GREENBROOK DR VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE + BIKE BOX 4
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
6
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS NOT INCLUDED IN THE DANVILLE (ALTA) REPORT
47 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
I-680 HWY
OVERPASS
+ BICYCLE INTERSECTION
CROSSINGS & SIGNAGE (WEST &
EAST BOUND)
5
48 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
+ VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX & BICYCLE
INTERSECTION CROSSINGS (SB
TURNING LEFT ONTO 680 HWY
OVERPASS)
6
49 CAMINO RAMON SYCAMORE VALLEY
BLVD
+ VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX & BICYCLE
INTERSECTION CROSSINGS (NB
TURNING LEFT ONTO OVERPASS)
4
50 IHT GREENBROOK TO
RAILROAD AVE
+ BICYCLE ONLY MULT-IUSE
PAVED PATH
2
51 DIABLO RD FAIRWAY + CROSSWALK & SIGNAGE 1
52 DIABLO RD DIABLO RD TRAIL + FLASHING SIGNAGE FOR
CYCLISTS TO USE DIABLO RD TRAIL
(EB & WB)
3
53 DANVILLE TOWN
LIMITS
DANVILLE TOWN
LIMITS
+ COUNT BICYCLE USAGE ON ALL
MAJOR BIKE ROUTES, IHT &
PATHS
1
54 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
I-680 HWY
OVERPASS
+ VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX & BICYCLE
INTERSECTION CROSSINGS
2
55 CAMINO TASSAJARA DIABLO RD + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX
2
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
7
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
56 DANVILLE BLVD EL CERRO BLVD + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX
4
57 GREEN VALLEY RD CAMEO DR (WB) + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX
3
58 STONE VALLEY RD BETWEEN MVHS
AND GREEN VALLEY
RD
+ PHB OR AT LEAST RRFB ON EB
STONE VALLEY RD WHEN CYCLISTS
ARE RIDING ONTO STONE VALLEY
0
59 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
SYCAMORE VALLEY + BIKE BOX (NB) 3
60 DIABLO RD TRAIL CLYDESDALE + REMOVE FENCES & BUSHES 2
61 RAILROAD AVE CHURCH ST + VIDEO DETECTION DEVICE &
BIKE BOX (WB CHURCH ONTO SB
RAILROAD)
0
62 DIABLO ROAD DIABLO ROAD TRAIL + SIGNAGE (WB & EB) REMOVE
DANGEROUS SLIPPERY
TRUNCATED DOMES AT
INTERSECTION CROSSINGS
0
63 DANVILLE TOWN
LIMITS
DANVILLE TOWN
LIMITS
+ ANNUAL REVIEW OF TRAFFIC
COLLISION REPORTS: BIKE VS
VEHICLE & SOLO BIKE COLLISIONS
0
64 SYCAMORE VALLEY
RD
IHT + RRFB+HIGH VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK & VIDEO DETECTION
DEVICE + SIGNAGE +CROSSWALK
6
65 Prospect IHT Wider pavement on trail (west of
the museum)
3
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 1. PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
8
ID#
(Link to
details)
CROSS STREET A CROSS-STREET B PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS DBAC
PRIORITY
6 Hi/0 Lo
66 “Freitas Road Trail” Crosswalks and ramped curbs at
Old Orchard and Tunbridge
1
67 RAILROAD AVENUE
FROM W. LINDA
MESA TO W
PROSPECT AVE
Long Term: add bike lane to both
directions to close gap in bike lane
1
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
9
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
West Danville
22 Prospect Ave Railroad Ave Sky Ter None Class III New sharrows
23 Highland Rd Prospect Ave Trailhead None Class III New sharrows
24 Linda Mesa
Ave
Iron Horse
Trail
Macomber
Road
None Class III New sharrows
25 Estate Dr Linda Mesa
Ave
Prospect Ave None Class III New sharrows
45 New Trail Diablo Road Front Street Class I New trail from Diablo Rd to Front St, along the
north side of San Ramon Creek and crossing the
new bridge by the library. This should be a nice
path and the bridge provides good access for the
apartment dwellers, but may be redundant with
other paths.
42 Danville Blvd Del Amigo El Portal Class II Class IIB Buffered bike lane on Danville Blvd. Both sides?
11 Prospect Ave-
Front St
IHT Hartz Ave None Class III New sharrows
9 Del Amigo Rd IHT Danville Blvd None Class IIIB
36 New Trail None Class I New trail that follows Green Valley Creek
between I-680 and W. El Pintado Rd. Could be
used by students at Valley Christian and SRVHS.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
10
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
Awesome route but how will the trail get under
the freeway?
5 San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Hartz Way Sycamore
Valley Rd
Class II Class IIB Buffered bike lane on SRVB. Both sides?
North Danville
4 Diablo Rd
Trail
Fairway Dr Mt Diablo
Scenic Blvd
None Class I New trail from McCauley Rd along south side of
Diablo Rd. Good alternative to avoid riding on
Diablo Rd. Could be used to access Magee
Preserve. Requires cyclists to cross Diablo Rd
twice to access MDSP.
6 Green Valley
Trail
Highbridge
Ln
Diablo Rd None Class I New trail along Green Valley Creek from Diablo
Rd past Green Valley Shopping Center (Smart &
Final), under I-680. Connects with #34, 35, & 36.
The ped bridge across Green Valley Creek at the
Smart and Final shopping center is a well
designed asset. But there is no ped/bike access to
Diablo Road from the back (north) end of the
center. Placing a priority on the trail along Green
Valley Creek under I680 would mitigate that
shortfall.
12 El Pintado Rd La Gonda
Way
El Alamo None Class II New painted bike lane on shoulder. Seems like a
good idea and there is room.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
11
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
14 Ackerman Dr El Cerro Blvd Town Limits None Class II New painted bike lane on shoulder.
43 Stone Valley
Rd
MVHS Green Valley
Rd
Class III Class II New painted bike lane on shoulder. It would be
good to have some warning for drivers heading
east on SVR about cyclists crossing SVR to turn
left on Green Valley Rd.
13 El Pintado Rd El Alamo El Cerro Blvd None Class III New sharrows. No room for extra lane but it
would be a nice bike route.
8 El Cerro Blvd Danville Blvd Green Valley
Rd
Class II Class IIB Buffered bike lane on El Cerro. This is a high bike
traffic route. Both sides?
34 New Trail None Class I New trail that follows Green Valley Creek
between Diablo Rd and Matadera Way.
35 New Trail None Class I New trail that follows Green Valley Creek
between Diablo Rd and Diablo Rd, coming out
near Richard Lane. Awesome route, but how will
it get under the freeway?
37 Dustin Ln Trail El Cerro Blvd None Class III New sharrows
41 New Trail Diablo Road Blackhawk
Road
None Class I New trail on the south side of Diablo Rd in Magee
Preserve development, ending at Jillian Way.
15 Short Ridge
Trail
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved
Trail
Existing dirt ranch road connecting the end of
McCauley Rd to Sycamore Open Space through
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
12
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
Magee Preserve. Will be popular with mountain
bikers.
19 McCauley Rd Diablo Rd Short Ridge
Trail
None Class IIIB Good use of residential street.
40 New
Unpaved Trail
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved
Trail
Existing dirt ranch road connecting Short Ridge
Trail to Magee Preserve development.
South Danville
28 Greenbrook
Creek
Greenbrook
Dr
Harlan Dr Class I Class I This trail follows Cow Creek and is already paved.
Not sure what “Greenbrook Creek” is.
29 Greenbrook
Creek
El Capitan Dr Greenbrook
Dr
Class I Class I Already exists as a paved trail.
30 Greenbrook
Creek
El Capitan Dr Greenbrook
Dr
Class I Class I Not sure how this is different than #29.
31 Greenbrook
Creek
Greenbrook
Drive
Van Patten
Dr
Class I Class I The extension from Danville Station HOA
clubhouse to El Capitan Dr. will require another
bridge to cross Cow Creek. Not very realistic
when there is another paved path on the
opposite side of San Ramon Creek.
32 Existing Trail Existing Trail Class I Class I This trail is between San Ramon Creek and
Vanpatten Dr.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
13
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
33 Existing Trail Existing Trail Class I Class I This trail cuts the corner between Greenbrook Dr.
and IHT near Greenbrook Elementary.
38 New Trail El Capitan Dr Sycamore
Valley Dr
None Class I New trail on the northeast side of San Ramon
Creek from El Capitan Dr. to Sycamore Valley Rd.
past Charlotte Wood MS and Osage Station Park.
39 New Trail Diablo Rd Trail None Class I New trail on the northeast side of San Ramon
Creek from the trail bridge off of Brookside &
Laurel Dr. that ends at La Questa Dr. where the
creek goes under I-680. A good way to get to the
library if we could figure out how to cross both
the creek and I-680.
The extension of this trail in the other direction
(existing trail along Freitas Rd and parallel to
Sycamore Valley Rd) has no crossing at Old
Orchard or at Tunbridge. Obstructions such as
this prevent its use as a bicycling route.
Pedestrians ignore the signage at Old Orchard.
44 La Gonda
Way
Bridge Danville Blvd None Class II Short section of painted bike lane. Used by
SRVHS students.
1 Camino
Tassajara
Sycamore
Valley Rd
Hansen Ln Class II Class IIB Buffered bike lane all along Camino Tassajara.
Both sides?
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
14
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
2 Sycamore
Valley Rd
San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Camino
Tassajara
Class II Class IIB Buffered bike lane all along Sycamore Valley Rd.
Both sides?
3 San Ramon
Valley Blvd
Podva Rd Jewel Ter Class II Class IIB Buffered bike lane on SRVB. Both sides?
16 Shady Slope
Trail
Unpaved
trail
Unpaved
Trail
Existing dirt ranch road connecting Short Ridge
Trail to Sycamore Valley Elementary.
Unreasonably steep in places.
17 Laurelwood
Dr
Short Ridge
Trail
Old
Blackhawk
Rd
None Class III New sharrows
18 Old
Blackhawk Rd
Laurelwood
Dr
Camino
Tassajara
None Class III New sharrows
20 Lawrence Rd Shelterwood
Ln
Trail
entrance
None Class III New sharrows
21 Lawrence Rd Camino
Tassajara
Shelterwood
Ln
None Class III New sharrows
26 Harlan Dr Greenbrook
Dr
St.
Christopher
Dr
None Class III New sharrows
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
TABLE 2. PROPOSED FACILITIES SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS
15
ID Street Start End Existing
Facility
Proposed
Facility
DBAC Comments/Recommendations
27 St.
Christopher
Dr
El Capitan Dr Greenbrook
Dr
None Class III New sharrows
7 Camino
Ramon
Sycamore
Valley Rd
Fostoria Way Class III Class IIIB It is highly unlikely this will ever be a bike
boulevard without significant changes to the
street. Traffic volume is relatively low but the
speed limit is 35-40 MPH.
10 Greenbrook
Dr
Camino
Ramon
Sycamore
Valley Dr
Class III Class IIIB
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
16
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
WEST DANVILLE
7 LOVE LANE RAILROAD AVE No suggestions
6 HARTZ AVE RAILROAD AVE This is admittedly a difficult
intersection. I assume that a VDD will
be on SB Hartz Ave. where it turns left
onto Hartz Way. Good idea.
A BB on WB Hartz Way at Hartz Ave./SRVB
would also be helpful. Is that Project #10?
When turning left from WB Hartz Way onto
SRVB, one does not know if the car to the
rider’s left is turning or continuing straight onto
Railroad.
10 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
RAILROAD AVE This is admittedly a difficult
intersection. I assume that a VDD will
be on SB Hartz Ave. where it turns left
onto Hartz Way. Good idea.
A BB on WB Hartz Way at Hartz Ave./SRVB
would also be helpful. Is that Project #10?
When turning left from WB Hartz Way onto
SRVB, one does not know if the car to the
rider’s left is turning or continuing straight onto
Railroad.
27 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
HARTZ AVE This is admittedly a difficult
intersection. I assume that a VDD will
be on SB Hartz Ave. where it turns left
onto Hartz Way. Good idea.
A BB on WB Hartz Way at Hartz Ave./SRVB
would also be helpful. Is that Project #10?
When turning left from WB Hartz Way onto
SRVB, one does not know if the car to the
rider’s left is turning or continuing straight onto
Railroad.
36 DANVILLE
BLVD
EL CERRO
BLVD
BB and VDD for cyclists turning left from SB
Danville Blvd onto El Cerro, and from WB El
Cerro onto SB Danville Blvd. VDD for the NB
Danville Blvd bike lane.
14 HARTZ WAY HARTZ AVE This is admittedly a difficult
intersection. I assume that a VDD will
be on SB Hartz Ave. where it turns left
onto Hartz Way. Good idea.
A BB on WB Hartz Way at Hartz Ave./SRVB
would also be helpful. Is that Project #10?
When turning left from WB Hartz Way onto
SRVB, one does not know if the car to the
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
17
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
rider’s left is turning or continuing straight onto
Railroad.
26 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
I think that the BB plan shows the
location to be WB Sycamore to SB
SRVB. Great idea! Same with a VDD
for the same bike box. It should be
noted that motorcycles have the
same problem. That is, the light often
does not activate for a motorcycle on
WB Sycamore turning left onto SB
SRVB. The rider has to wait, hoping a
car will show up.
41 DIABLO RD HARTZ AVE The VDD (WB Diablo Rd. to SB Hartz
Ave.) is good. A bike lane for WB
Diablo Road onto SB Hartz Ave. will
be good.
42 DIABLO RD FRONT ST VDD is good, but the default for that
stoplight is green for Diablo Road
with the left turn from WB Diablo Rd
onto SB front not controlled. Low
priority. VDD from SB Front onto EB
Diablo Rd is good.
43 DIABLO RD WEST EL
PINTADO
Similar to #42. VDD. Will there be a
plan for the confluence of Green
Valley Creek and San Ramon Creek?
Where will bikes and peds enter and
exit those trails?
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
18
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
44 EL CERRO
BLVD
LA GONDA
WAY
VDDs in each direction are good. BB
for WB El Cerro for turning left onto
NB La Gonda.
40 FRONT ST HARTZ WAY VDD is fine. A BB on EB Hartz Way would facilitate a left turn
onto Front St.
9 IHT SAN RAMON
VALLEY RD
There are bike auto-detection sensors
in the IHT on the north and south
sides of San Ramon Blvd. that rely on
bikes riding or stopping over a sensor.
These locations are marked by bike
symbols stenciled onto the
pavement. The problem is that the
symbols are now very faded and it is
difficult to know where the bike
should be to activate the signal.
A raised crosswalk at this protected intersection
might be helpful to reduce traffic speed.
15 IHT LINDA MESA
AVE
16 IHT LOVE LN It should be a priority to provide
sidewalks on Love Lane on both sides
of the IHT. As it is, students of SRVHS
(and other peds) have no safe access
to the IHT except from the far north
end of the campus. It will be worse
with the new security fence on the
west side of SRVHS.
17 IHT DEL AMIGO RD Recommend raised crosswalk in addition to
other improvements. The lack of sidewalks
adjacent to the IHT is very bad, too.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
19
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
21 IHT WEST
PROSPECT AVE
20 IHT HARTFORD RD
NORTH DANVILLE
8 DIABLO RD I-680
OVERPASS
Lights would be good. VDD at WB
Diablo Rd. and the SB 680 exit.
37 DIABLO RD CAMINO
TASSAJARA
This is a major bikeway. Cyclists ride
through on the street in every
direction. Elementary school children
riding to and from Vista Grande
Elementary.
1. Video Detection Device and bike box for
cyclists turning left from Camino Tassajara onto
Diablo Road (as planned).
2. Dashed green paint in bike lane on northwest-
bound Camino Tassajara through intersection
with Vista
Grande St.
3. Signage for cyclists wanting to ride to Mount
Diablo, to downtown Danville, or avoid
downtown and head to El Cerro Blvd.
4. Widen the bike lane on northeastbound
Diablo Rd to make room for cars + bikes.
38 DIABLO RD EL CERRO
BLVD-
ACKERMAN
22 DIABLO RD NEW TRAIL
(GREEN
VALLEY CREEK
TRAIL)
Trail will be used by casual cyclists
riding on paved neighborhood trail.
45 DIABLO RD MATADERA
WAY
1. Westbound Diablo Road is busy enough not
to require a video detection device. However
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
20
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
the left turn from eastbound Diablo Rd to
Matadera Way could use one.
2. Crosswalk across Matadera Way where the
path intersects the street. It will connect with a
path to be built along Green Valley Creek.
39 DIABLO RD GREEN VALLEY
RD
11 DIABLO RD CLYDESDALE
DR
32 BLACKHAWK
RD
MT. DIABLO
SCENIC BLVD
See #24 See #24
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
21
24 BLACKHAWK
RD
MT. DIABLO
SCENIC BLVD
This intersection is a three-way
junction of Diablo Road, Blackhawk
Rd and Mt Diablo Scenic. Traffic from
all three
directions is currently controlled by
stop signs. Traffic traveling Eastbound
has a dedicated left turn lane onto Mt
Diablo Scenic. The posted maximum
speed is 35 mph on Diablo/Blackhawk
Roads and 25 mph on Mt. Diablo
Scenic. Diablo Road/ Blackhawk Rd is
a heavily traveled regional connector
providing access between schools,
homes and highway 680. In the most
recent traffic study, peak hour traffic
on Diablo/ Blackhawk Roads has a
Level of Service score of E/F during
the AM and PM school peak periods.
At other times of day, the Level of
Service was C. Mt Diablo Scenic
provides access for residents who live
along the road, Athenian School and
is the South Gate to Mt Diablo State
Park. Blackhawk Road is designated
as a Class 3 bike route. Diablo Road
and Mt. Diablo Scenic are not
designated as bike routes. All roads
are largely straight, substandard in
width and lack bike lanes. Parking is
permitted in the eastbound direction
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
22
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
of Diablo Road. Parking is prohibited
in all other locations. A single street
light exists at the intersection.
Leading risks to cyclists for this type
of intersection include:
● Vehicles turning into the path of
cyclists.
● Driver inattention resulting in
vehicles overtaking
● cyclists or where the vehicle turns
into the lane occupied by a cyclist.
● Failure to yield
● Dangerous road conditions
● Limited visibility at night
● Designation of Diablo Rd, Blackhawk Road
and Mt. Diablo Scenic as bike routes with
appropriate signage.
● Widen roads to meet current standards.
● Traffic calming measures to reduce vehicle
speeds.
● Level water valve/manhole covers on West
bound Blackhawk Rd.
33 BLACKHAWK
RD
MT. DIABLO
SCENIC BLVD
See #24 See #24
46 GREEN VALLEY
RD
BLEMER RD SRV and MV mountain bike teams use
this intersection to ride to Mount
Diablo via the Diablo (Barbara Hale)
trail by turning left onto Green Valley
Rd. A rider must cross the oncoming
lane at the blind corner to push the
crosswalk button.
1. A video detection device and bike box which
triggers a longer green light would make this
safer.
2. Add dashed green paint in the bike lane on
southbound Green Valley Rd before Blemer Rd.
SOUTH DANVILLE
25 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
I think that the BB plan shows the
location to be WB Sycamore to SB
SRVB. Great idea! Same with a VDD
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
23
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
for the same bike box. It should be
noted that motorcycles have the
same problem. That is, the light often
does not activate for a motorcycle on
WB Sycamore turning left onto SB
SRVB. The rider has to wait, hoping a
carwill show up.
5 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
IHT CROSSING The IHT crosses Sycamore Valley Rd.
at the intersection of Camino Ramon
on the south side and the Danville
Sycamore Park and Ride on the north
side. Traffic from all four directions is
controlled by stop lights. Posted
speed limit on Sycamore Valley Rd.
east bound is 45 MPH. Posted speed
limit on Camino Ramon north bound
is 45 MPH.
Leading risks to cyclists for this type
of intersection include:
● Cyclists in crosswalk ignoring red
light and being hit by traffic on
Sycamore (I witnessed a near
collision like this in the first 5
minutes of observing the
intersection!).
● Vehicles failing to obey light.
● Limited visibility at night
Since the bridge will likely take years to be
designed, funded, and built, interim safety
measures are recommended:
● From Park and Ride heading north, bike
sensors are needed to detect and change
the light for bikes traveling straight (south)
or turning left onto Sycamore (east). When
sensors are added, the “bike detected” light
is also recommended.
● From Camino Ramon heading north bike
detection is needed for bikes heading
straight into the Park and Ride (north) and
turning left onto Sycamore (west). When
sensors are added, the “bike detected” light
is also recommended.
● On westbound Sycamore just before the
intersection with the IHT, install signage
that warns drivers that there is a trail
crossing and to beware of pedestrians and
cyclists in the intersection.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
24
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
23 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
(SAN RAMON
CREEK TRAIL)
35 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
BROOKSIDE DR
29 GREENBROOK
DR
SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
Bike boxes needed for straight and
left turn lanes. Agree with video
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
25
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
detection and bike indicators needed
here.
4 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
31 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
A VDD from EB Tassajara to EB Tassajara.
30 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
CROW
CANYON RD
1 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
CROW
CANYON RD
2 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
OLD
BLACKHAWK
RD
3 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
TASSAJARA
RANCH RD
12 IHT GREENBROOK
DR
Agree with raised crosswalk
13 IHT EL CAPITAN DR Agree with the recommended raised
crosswalk. It appears there are
obsolete lights in the crosswalk.
No other changes to recommend.
19 IHT PARAISO DR Agree with the raised crosswalk. Street striping should be brighter and need to
ensure that motion on the north side of Paraiso
Dr. is free from vegetation.
28 CAMINO
RAMON
GREENBROOK
DR
VDD for all directions would be very
helpful. WB Greenbrook is especially
annoying since a cyclist has to
dismount to activate the crosswalk
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
26
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
sign if an automobile doesn’t
conveniently appear.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS NOT INCLUDED IN THE DANVILLE (ALTA) REPORT
47 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
I-680 HWY
OVERPASS
48 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
49 CAMINO
RAMON
SYCAMORE
VALLEY BLVD
How does a cyclist turn from NB
Camino Ramon onto WB Sycamore
Valley Rd.?
50 IHT GREENBROOK
TO RAILROAD
AVE
51 DIABLO RD FAIRWAY
52 DIABLO RD DIABLO RD
TRAIL
53 DANVILLE
TOWN LIMITS
DANVILLE
TOWN LIMITS
54 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
I-680 HWY
OVERPASS
55 CAMINO
TASSAJARA
DIABLO RD
56 DANVILLE
BLVD
EL CERRO
BLVD
57 GREEN VALLEY
RD
CAMEO DR
(WB)
SRV and MV mountain bike teams use
this intersection to ride back from
Mount Diablo via the Diablo (Barbara
1. A bike box and video detection device which
triggers a longer green light would make this
safer.
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
27
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
Hale) trail by turning left from Cameo
Dr onto Green Valley Rd (and then a
quick right onto Blemer Rd). A rider
must cross the oncoming lane at the
blind corner to push the crosswalk
button.
2. A bike box, sharrows, and signage to help
cyclists turn left from southbound Green Valley
Rd onto Cameo Dr. to avoid the Green Valley
Rd/Diablo Rd intersection by taking Clydesdale.
3. Make Clydesdale a bike boulevard.
58 STONE VALLEY
RD
BETWEEN
MVHS AND
GREEN VALLEY
RD
Riders entering SVR from paved trail
intending to turn left on GVR are
endangered by cars speeding east on
SVR as they crest the hill.
Put a RRFB or PHR at the top of the hill to warn
drivers of riders entering SVR, similar to IHT
crossings.
59 SAN RAMON
VALLEY BLVD
SYCAMORE
VALLEY
NB SRVB at Sycamore Valley Rd. A
bike lane and BB are desperately
needed. Many autos turn right from
NB SRVB onto EB Sycamore; the bikes
have nowhere to stop unless they
totally block the crosswalk or the RH
turn lane.
SB SRVB at Sycamore Valley Road. BB
for cyclists who need to turn left from
SB SRVB onto EB Sycamore.
60 DIABLO RD
TRAIL
CLYDESDALE
61 RAILROAD AVE CHURCH ST A VDD for WB Church onto SB Railroad.
62 DIABLO ROAD DIABLO ROAD
TRAIL
63 DANVILLE
TOWN LIMITS
DANVILLE
TOWN LIMITS
DBAC RECOMMENDATIONS (RED TEXT) May 3, 2021
DANVILLE MASTER BICYCLE PLAN
APPENDIX A. DETAILS FOR PROPOSED FACILITIES SPOT IMPROVEMENTS
28
No. Cross Street A Cross Street B Description Recommended Improvements
64 SYCAMORE
VALLEY RD
IHT
65 Prospect IHT The jog in the trail is a convenient,
shady stopping place for peds and
cyclists. The trail is often blocked by
bikes, strollers, etc.
The pavement should be wider.
WEBMAP COMMENTS
Danville Bike Plan ‐ Website Comments Phase 1
Email Comment Submission time
adele.madelo@gmail.com The only concern I have is the stretch on Diablo Road between Avenida Nueva and Calle
Arroyo. There should be a separate bike facility.7/14/2020 21:12
danoleson@gmail.com Hello,
I just placed two "destinations" on the public map at Hap Magee Ranch Park and Osage Park. I
didn't realize my full name would be visible to the public. Can my last name be removed from
the two posts?
Thanks,
Dan 7/31/2020 15:24
anthonymoy@comcast.net Please consider installing one of the new bike‐sensitive signals @Morninghome/Sycamore
Valley Rd. The left turn from Morninghome onto eastbound Sycamore requires a car or
pressing the 'beg' button in order to get the traffic signal to change. Bikes take the bridge
over the creek from Brookside to Old Farm Rd. sometimes instead of staying on Brookside.
10/17/2020 19:22
mre2409@gmail.com resist banning e‐bikes on any routes,please 1/12/2021 11:55
blhooper@pacbell.net How can I add comments or get involved to share regarding the proposed Bake Plans along
Diablo Road / Blackhawk Road 2/21/2021 22:07
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
18
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
"B
i
k
e
vs
Bi
k
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
06
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
5
,
09
0
0
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& 11
6
We
s
t
of
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Pl
a
z
a
Ci
r
c
l
e
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:18
18
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
"B
i
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
"H
i
t
& Ru
n
.
"
(S
a
t
,
03
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
5
,
11
1
1
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:42
18
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
"B
i
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
09
/
0
5
/
2
0
1
5
,
11
4
5
h
s
)
Su
m
m
e
r
f
i
e
l
d
St
r
e
e
t
& Dr
i
v
e
w
a
y
,
16
5
f
t
We
s
t
of
Je
n
n
i
f
e
r
'
s
Pl
a
c
e
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:32
18
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
"B
i
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
u
e
,
09
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
5
,
15
2
8
h
r
s
)
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
Av
e
& Lo
v
e
La
n
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:35
17
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
"B
i
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
u
e
,
12
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
6
,
09
1
1
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Me
s
s
s
i
a
n
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:43
26
8
Ma
r
k
Ak
a
b
a
n
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ad
d
i
n
g
a bi
c
y
c
l
e
re
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
li
g
h
t
on
bo
t
h
si
d
e
s
of
th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
.
Th
i
s
is
a ve
r
y
bu
s
y
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
an
d
th
e
r
e
ha
v
e
be
e
n
ma
n
y
car and a few pedestrian accidents
he
r
e
.
Ma
n
y
bi
c
y
c
l
e
ri
d
e
r
s
on
th
e
Wo
o
d
r
a
n
c
h
si
d
e
an
d
th
e
No
r
t
h
r
i
d
g
e
si
d
e
wo
u
l
d
be
n
e
f
i
t
fr
o
m
th
i
s
.
Th
a
n
k
yo
u
fo
r
ta
k
i
n
g
th
i
s
in
t
o
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Point
0
0
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
23:59
30
4
Ro
b
e
r
t
To
r
o
n
y
i
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
la
n
e
ne
e
d
s
fr
e
q
u
e
n
t
cl
e
a
n
i
n
g
al
o
n
g
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
an
d
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
be
c
a
u
s
e
of
fa
l
l
e
n
le
a
v
e
s
an
d
br
a
n
c
h
e
s
.
Ga
r
d
e
n
i
n
g
Tr
u
c
k
s
ne
e
d
to put up cones behind their trucks as
we
l
l
as
no
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
al
o
n
g
tu
r
n
s
.
Al
l
of
th
e
s
e
po
i
n
t
s
ha
v
e
an
d
wi
l
l
ca
u
s
e
ac
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Point
0
0
1
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
1
14:26
51
Da
n
Ma
h
o
n
e
y
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
fo
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
ra
r
e
l
y
wo
r
k
s
.
Point
4
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
7:22
14
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Bi
k
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
06
/
0
5
/
2
0
1
0
,
09
3
7
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:53
21
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Bi
k
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
02
/
0
9
/
2
0
1
3
,
09
4
5
h
r
s
)
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
& Ge
n
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
Pl
a
c
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:37
22
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
r
,
06
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
2
,
12
5
7
h
r
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Li
n
d
a
Me
s
a
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
8:12
21
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
("
D
o
o
r
Pr
i
z
e
"
)
,
(M
o
n
,
03
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
4
,
12
0
3
h
r
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Sh
o
r
t
St
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
"
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:17
23
5
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(F
r
i
,
04
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
0
,
08
3
4
h
r
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Mc
C
a
u
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
6:49
24
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(F
r
i
,
09
/
1
7
/
2
0
1
0
,
12
4
6
hr
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Li
n
d
a
Me
s
a
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:23
23
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(M
o
n
,
05
/
2
3
/
2
0
1
1
,
17
3
2
hr
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Ch
u
r
c
h
St
r
e
e
t
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
7:16
23
7
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
a
t
,
07
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
0
,
12
4
7
hr
s
)
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Ro
a
d
& La
s
Ba
r
r
a
n
c
a
s
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:01
24
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
a
t
,
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
0
,
18
2
0
hr
s
)
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
& Ha
r
t
z
Wa
y
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:36
23
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
a
t
,
08
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
0
,
17
5
2
hr
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
6:44
23
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
a
t
,
09
/
0
3
/
2
0
1
1
,
11
3
8
hr
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Pr
o
s
p
e
c
t
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
7:22
22
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
a
t
,
10
/
1
3
/
2
0
1
2
,
10
2
8
hr
s
)
.
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
& Bo
o
n
e
Ct
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
6:50
23
3
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(W
e
d
,
09
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
2
,
21
0
6
h
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
a
t
,
12
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
1
,
13
5
0
hr
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
St
r
e
e
t
& Sc
h
o
o
l
St
r
e
e
t
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
7:30
22
7
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(S
u
n
,
11
/
0
4
/
2
0
1
2
,
12
1
6
hr
s
)
.
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
& Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
6:56
23
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(T
h
u
r
,
02
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
0
,
17
4
3
hr
s
)
Fr
o
n
t
St
r
e
e
t
& Ha
r
t
z
Wa
y
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:19
23
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(T
h
u
r
,
04
/
0
9
/
2
0
1
5
,
15
1
0
h
r
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Cl
y
d
e
s
d
a
l
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
6:54
22
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(T
h
u
r
,
08
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
1
,
12
1
5
hr
s
)
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
& El
Po
r
t
a
l
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
7:12
24
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(T
u
e
,
08
/
1
7
/
2
0
1
0
,
17
4
5
hr
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Sh
o
r
t
St
r
e
e
t
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:26
22
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(T
u
e
,
11
/
2
7
/
2
0
1
2
,
11
0
0
hr
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
7:03
23
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(W
e
d
,
07
/
2
8
/
2
0
1
0
,
19
1
6
hr
s
)
El
Ce
r
r
o
Bl
v
d
& Ad
o
b
e
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:10
24
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(W
e
d
,
08
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
0
,
08
5
3
hr
s
)
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
& 54
3
f
t
So
u
t
h
of
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
7:46
22
5
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(W
e
d
,
09
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
2
,
21
0
6
hr
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Li
v
e
r
p
o
o
l
St
r
e
e
t
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
6:45
23
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(W
e
d
,
11
/
2
3
/
2
0
1
1
,
19
0
2
hr
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Pr
o
s
p
e
c
t
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
7:25
13
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(F
r
i
,
02
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
2
,
16
5
9
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:33
14
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(F
r
i
,
04
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
1
,
15
4
1
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& De
l
Am
i
g
o
Rd
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:45
17
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(M
o
n
,
07
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
6
,
11
4
8
h
r
s
)
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
& El
Po
r
t
a
l
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:55
13
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(M
o
n
,
08
/
0
3
/
2
0
1
5
,
15
1
5
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:06
13
7
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
04
/
0
7
/
2
0
1
2
,
09
2
5
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:28
22
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
04
/
2
8
/
2
0
1
2
,
07
4
2
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Pl
a
z
a
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
8:05
13
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
07
/
1
2
/
2
0
1
4
,
10
3
2
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:08
17
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
08
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
7
,
11
4
4
h
r
s
)
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
Av
e
& Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
No
n
‐In
j
u
r
y
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:36
13
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
09
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
2
,
16
5
5
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& W.
Pr
o
s
p
e
c
t
Av
e
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:23
21
7
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
10
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
,
11
5
1
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Sh
e
r
b
u
r
n
e
Hi
l
l
s
Rd
,
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
"
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:26
22
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
12
/
2
9
,
20
1
2
,
14
5
3
h
r
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Ri
c
h
a
r
d
La
n
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
"
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
8:00
17
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
a
t
,
0
3
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
5
,
09
3
0
h
r
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Al
a
m
e
d
a
Di
a
b
l
o
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
"H
i
t
& Ru
n
.
"
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:14
14
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
u
n
02
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
0
,
14
1
5
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:49
17
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
u
n
,
07
/
1
7
/
2
0
1
6
,
12
5
7
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Lo
m
i
t
a
s
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Se
r
i
o
u
s
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:09
21
5
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
u
n
d
a
y
,
03
/
2
3
/
2
0
1
4
,
11
4
0
h
r
s
)
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Ha
r
t
z
Wa
y
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:09 2
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
17
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
,
05
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
7
,
1
5
3
8
h
s
)
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
& Do
n
n
a
La
n
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:31
13
5
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
,
10
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
3
,
07
1
9
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
/
C
a
m
i
n
o
Ra
m
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:17
13
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
,
11
/
0
3
/
2
0
1
6
,
09
4
1
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Pa
r
a
i
s
o
Dr
.
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:01
14
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
r
,
05
/
1
6
/
2
0
1
1
20
0
1
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& El
Ca
p
i
t
i
a
n
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
8:12
17
7
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
r
,
07
/
0
7
2
0
1
6
,
14
2
4
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
:
Sy
a
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd
& Ca
m
i
n
o
Ra
m
o
n
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:01
14
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
h
u
r
,
08
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
1
,
16
2
5
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& El
Ca
p
i
t
a
n
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:42
18
5
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
u
e
,
05
/
0
5
/
2
0
1
5
,
16
3
7
h
r
s
)
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Ro
a
d
& Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
Ra
n
c
h
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Fa
t
a
l
i
t
y
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:46
22
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
u
e
,
05
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
2
,
15
5
0
h
r
s
)
Pa
r
a
i
s
o
Dr
& Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:52
22
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
u
e
,
08
/
0
7
/
2
0
1
2
,
13
3
1
h
r
s
)
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
& Bo
o
n
e
Ct
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
8:19
18
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(T
u
e
,
10
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
4
,
12
0
0
h
r
s
)
Oc
h
o
Ri
o
s
Dr
& Po
d
v
a
La
n
e
In
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:55
16
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(W
e
d
,
06
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
9
,
16
2
4
h
r
s
)
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Bl
v
d
& Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
,
at
Bl
i
n
d
Cu
r
v
e
.
Fa
t
a
l
i
t
y
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:23
13
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(W
e
d
,
08
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
6
,1
2
2
6
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
6:56
13
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(W
e
d
,
10
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
1
,
07
4
4
h
r
s
)
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:39
13
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
09
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
6
(
T
u
e
,
12
5
9
h
r
s
)
,
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
& El
Ca
p
i
t
a
n
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
6:48
18
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Bi
k
e
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
.
"H
i
t
& Ru
n
.
"
(
M
o
n
,
03
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
4
,
13
1
4
h
r
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Cl
y
d
e
s
d
a
l
e
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:51
37
Ma
r
k
De
d
o
n
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ca
l
l
e
Ar
r
o
y
o
is
th
e
sa
f
e
s
t
ro
u
t
e
fo
r
ro
a
d
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
ac
c
e
s
s
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
fr
o
m
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
Bu
t
so
m
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
ar
e
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
ac
c
e
s
s
on
th
i
s
pr
i
v
a
t
e
road. The proposed MaGee Ranch trail
co
u
l
d
he
l
p
re
s
o
l
v
e
th
i
s
bu
t
ma
y
be
fa
r
in
th
e
fu
t
u
r
e
.
Point
1
8
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
23:24
16
8
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ca
r
s
dr
i
v
e
ve
r
y
fa
s
t
on
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
y
ro
a
d
an
d
up
th
r
o
u
g
h
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
.
I li
k
e
ac
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
th
e
s
e
ro
a
d
on
a bi
k
e
bu
t
tr
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
sp
e
e
d
ha
v
e
grown I no tend to avoid this road Point
0
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
23:59
48
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Co
u
n
t
th
e
nu
m
b
e
r
of
wa
y
s
to
cr
o
s
s
I6
8
0
on
a bi
k
e
in
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
th
a
t
do
n
'
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
fe
n
d
i
n
g
of
f
ca
r
s
tr
y
i
n
g
to
ge
t
on
t
o
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
.
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
,
IHT & Laurel Dr, Hap Magee. Any others?Point
2
0
6
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
21:39
28
2
Le
s
l
i
e
Me
y
e
r
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
be
t
w
e
e
n
Fa
i
r
w
a
y
Dr
an
d
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Bl
v
d
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
th
e
r
e
is
no
bi
k
e
la
n
e
or
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
Point
1
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
19:51
27
6
Ia
n
Mc
N
e
i
l
l
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
br
i
d
g
e
ac
r
o
s
s
th
e
cr
e
e
k
st
i
f
l
e
s
bo
t
h
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
an
d
bi
k
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
wh
e
n
bo
t
h
ar
e
pr
e
s
e
n
t
,
pa
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
on
th
e
no
r
t
h
si
d
e
.
Th
e
na
r
r
o
w
right land and high curb discourages bikes
on
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
so
bi
k
e
r
s
mo
v
e
to
th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
.
Th
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
is
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
to
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
bo
t
h
.
Yo
u
'
l
l
of
t
e
n
se
e
a pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
or
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
wa
i
t
on one end to let another pedestrian
or
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
pa
s
s
.
Point
0
0
9
/
2
9
/
2
0
2
0
16:26
71
Da
n
Sc
h
a
e
f
e
r
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
be
a
r
Di
a
b
l
o
‐
po
o
r
ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
SP
fo
r
bo
t
h
ro
a
d
an
d
MT
B
.
Ne
e
d
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
ac
c
e
s
s
fo
r
ea
c
h
du
e
to
sp
e
e
d
,
va
r
i
a
b
l
e
ri
d
i
n
g
,
groups, teams, etc.Point
8
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:37
20
2
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
y
ac
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
on
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ra
m
o
n
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
.
We
s
t
‐bo
u
n
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
is complex especially crossing the north ‐
bo
u
n
d
fr
e
e
w
a
y
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
tw
o
la
n
e
s
tu
r
n
i
n
g
ri
g
h
t
(l
i
m
i
t
e
d
vi
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
co
n
t
i
n
u
i
n
g
to
tr
a
v
e
l
We
s
t
.
To
ac
c
e
s
s
th
e
Li
v
e
r
y
,
sa
f
e
s
t
ro
u
t
e
via iron horse trail but it is not a direct
ro
u
t
e
an
d
fa
m
i
l
i
e
s
at
t
e
m
p
t
to
na
v
i
g
a
t
e
SV
R
to
ge
t
to
SR
V
B
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
0
23:16
49
Sc
o
t
t
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
En
s
u
r
e
th
a
t
th
e
bi
k
e
sy
s
t
e
m
ac
t
i
v
a
t
o
r
is
ac
t
i
v
a
t
e
d
no
t
on
l
y
fo
r
tu
r
n
i
n
g
le
f
t
fr
o
m
th
e
tu
r
n
la
n
e
fr
o
m
di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
bu
t
al
s
o
if
yo
u
ar
e
at
Mc
C
a
u
l
e
y
Rd. Also if on diablo road going straight
to
th
e
we
s
t
wo
u
l
d
be
ni
c
e
if
th
e
ac
t
i
v
a
t
o
r
wo
r
k
s
fo
r
th
a
t
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Point
8
0
7
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
18:47
14
9
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ev
e
r
y
ye
a
r
th
e
r
e
is
a sh
r
u
b
/
t
r
e
e
th
a
t
ov
e
r
gr
o
w
s
th
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
la
t
e
sp
r
i
n
g
in
t
o
su
m
m
e
r
.
It
ne
e
d
s
to
be
re
m
o
v
e
d
so
th
i
s
ha
z
a
r
d
do
e
s
n
'
t
ha
p
p
e
n
every year until city crews come out to
pr
u
n
e
it
ba
c
k
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:30
72
Da
n
Sc
h
a
e
f
e
r
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
fe
n
c
e
s
an
d
ga
t
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
El
Al
a
m
o
,
EB
R
P
D
tr
a
i
l
,
an
d
Al
a
m
o
cu
l
‐de
‐sa
c
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:39
26
2
Be
v
e
r
l
y
Ku
m
a
r
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Fr
o
m
El
w
o
r
t
h
y
Ra
n
c
h
to
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Rd
on
th
e
so
u
t
h
bo
u
n
d
la
n
e
.
It
'
s
no
t
sa
f
e
pa
s
s
a
g
e
to
co
n
n
e
c
t
ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
/ fa
m
i
l
i
e
s
to
sc
h
o
o
l
ro
u
t
e
s
an
d
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
.
If you live at Danville Ranch or
Ch
a
t
e
a
u
yo
u
ca
n
ri
d
e
ac
r
o
s
s
di
r
e
c
t
l
y
to
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
an
d
ca
t
c
h
th
e
IH
T
an
d
go
vi
a
un
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
in
t
o
to
w
n
or
to
CW
.
Ki
d
s
th
a
t
at
t
e
n
d
Mo
n
t
a
i
r
or
SRVHS don't have that liberty. There is a
sa
f
e
pa
s
s
a
g
e
di
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
on
a wo
r
r
i
s
o
m
e
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
ro
a
d
.
Point
0
0
9
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
22:43
17
5
St
e
v
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ho
p
i
n
g
th
a
t
a wa
y
to
cr
o
s
s
fr
e
e
w
a
y
,
av
o
i
d
i
n
g
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
un
d
e
r
‐pa
s
s
e
s
is
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
A pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
or
cy
c
l
i
n
g
tr
a
i
l
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:45
15
0
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
I ra
r
e
l
y
fe
e
l
th
a
t
I ca
n
sa
f
e
l
y
ge
t
to
th
e
tu
r
n
la
n
e
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
to
tu
r
n
le
f
t
to
ge
t
to
th
e
bi
k
e
tr
a
i
l
on
th
e
no
r
t
h
si
d
e
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
.
I en
d
up
go
i
n
g
through the intersection to McCauley
bu
t
li
g
h
t
do
e
s
n
'
t
de
t
e
c
t
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
th
e
n
fr
o
m
Mc
C
to
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
.
Point
2
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:35
24
8
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Provide a formal queuing space for
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
e
th
i
s
le
f
t
turn every year at this very DANGEROUS
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
!
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:48
25
2
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a formal queuing space for
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
9:04
24
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Ro
a
d
& Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Provide a formal queuing space for
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
e
th
i
s
le
f
t
turn every year at this very DANGEROUS
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
!
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:51
24
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a fo
r
m
a
l
queuing space for bicyclists making
a tw
o
‐st
a
g
e
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
ar
i
s
i
n
g
fr
o
m
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
qu
e
u
i
n
g
in
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
or crosswalk. Separate turning
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
fr
o
m
th
r
o
u
g
h
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
e
th
i
s
le
f
t
tu
r
n
ev
e
r
y
ye
a
r
!
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:12 3
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
24
5
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a fo
r
m
a
l
queuing space for bicyclists making
a tw
o
‐st
a
g
e
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
ar
i
s
i
n
g
fr
o
m
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
qu
e
u
i
n
g
in
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
or crosswalk. Separate turning
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
fr
o
m
th
r
o
u
g
h
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
e
th
i
s
le
f
t
tu
r
n
ev
e
r
y
ye
a
r
!
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:22
25
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
El
Ce
r
r
o
Bl
v
d
& Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a formal queuing space for bicyclists to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
9:00
24
7
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
& Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Provide a formal queuing space for
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
i
n
g
a tw
o
‐st
a
g
e
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
ar
i
s
i
n
g
fr
o
m
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
qu
e
u
i
n
g
in a bike lane or crosswalk.
Se
p
a
r
a
t
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
fr
o
m
th
r
o
u
g
h
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:37
25
3
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
& Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a formal queuing space for bicyclists to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
9:08
24
6
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
le
f
t
turn. Provide a formal queuing space for
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
i
n
g
a tw
o
‐st
a
g
e
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
co
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
ar
i
s
i
n
g
fr
o
m
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
qu
e
u
i
n
g
in a bike lane or crosswalk.
Se
p
a
r
a
t
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
fr
o
m
th
r
o
u
g
h
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
e
th
i
s
le
f
t
tu
r
n
ev
e
r
y
ye
a
r
!
Point
1
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:34
25
4
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
& Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
a left turn. Provide a formal queuing
sp
a
c
e
fo
r
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
9:17
25
0
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
IN
S
T
A
L
L
BI
K
E
BO
X
at
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
We
s
t
& Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
sa
f
e
l
y
an
d
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
ma
k
e
left turn. Provide a formal queuing space
fo
r
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
tu
r
n
.
Re
d
u
c
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
/
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
ma
k
e
th
i
s
left turn every year at this DANGEROUS
IN
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
!
Point
1
0
7
/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:56
96
Sc
o
t
t
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
co
u
l
d
us
e
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
Point
2
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
10:08
11
0
Sc
o
t
t
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
co
u
l
d
us
e
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
Point
2
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
13:08
11
1
Sc
o
t
t
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
co
u
l
d
us
e
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
.
Tr
i
e
d
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
on
t
o
Ha
r
t
z
wa
y
an
d
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
li
g
h
t
di
d
n
’
t
se
n
s
e
ou
r
pr
e
s
e
n
c
e
.
Point
3
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
13:56
94
Sc
o
t
t
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
co
u
l
d
us
e
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
s
Point
2
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
10:04
95
Sc
o
t
t
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
co
u
l
d
us
e
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
s
Point
1
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
10:04
14
7
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
li
g
h
t
on
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ra
m
o
n
th
r
o
u
g
h
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
at
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
is
to
o
sh
o
r
t
of
a cy
c
l
e
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Point
2
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:21
14
8
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
li
g
h
t
tu
r
n
s
re
a
d
be
f
o
r
e
I ca
n
ge
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:23
20
0
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Li
t
t
l
e
to
no
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
ma
k
e
s
bi
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
be
t
w
e
e
n
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
ga
t
e
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
as
a ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
route. Bicycles have been hit along
th
i
s
ro
u
t
e
.
Al
a
m
e
d
a
Di
a
b
l
o
an
d
ot
h
e
r
ro
u
t
e
s
in
Di
a
b
l
o
Co
u
n
t
r
y
Cl
u
b
ca
n
/
a
r
e
us
e
d
to
re
d
u
c
e
ri
s
k
.
Wi
t
h
th
e
ne
w
ho
u
s
i
n
g
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
,
there is opportunity to make this a
mo
r
e
bi
c
y
c
l
e
‐fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
ro
u
t
e
wi
t
h
mo
r
e
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
an
d
wa
r
n
i
n
g
s
to
dr
i
v
e
r
s
to
wa
t
c
h
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Point
2
0
7
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
0
23:05
29
8
Ki
m
Sc
h
a
e
f
e
r
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Mo
r
e
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
an
d
Al
A
m
o
!
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
19:21
33
Jo
h
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
Point
9
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
21:22
34
Jo
h
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
Point
9
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
21:24
35
Jo
h
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
Point
4
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
21:27
29
4
Sh
a
r
o
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
s
at
th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Point
1
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
9:01
29
3
Sh
a
r
o
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
s
.
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
8:59
29
2
Sh
a
r
o
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
se
n
s
o
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
li
g
h
t
in
al
l
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
8:58
29
1
Sh
a
r
o
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
se
n
s
o
r
s
on
bo
t
h
si
d
e
s
of
Br
o
o
k
s
i
d
e
,
no
t
ju
s
t
on
e
.
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
8:57
28
7
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
se
n
s
o
r
to
de
t
e
c
t
bi
k
e
s
An
d
ch
a
n
g
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
to
gr
e
e
n
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
0:06
28
8
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
se
n
s
o
r
to
de
t
e
c
t
bi
k
e
s
An
d
ch
a
n
g
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
to
gr
e
e
n
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
0:06
28
9
Jo
h
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
se
n
s
o
r
to
de
t
e
c
t
bi
k
e
s
An
d
ch
a
n
g
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
to
gr
e
e
n
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
0:08
29
0
Sh
a
r
o
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ne
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
se
n
s
o
r
to
de
t
e
c
t
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
8:54
21
2
Jo
h
n
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
No
bi
k
e
la
n
e
go
i
n
g
up
th
e
hi
l
l
Ea
s
t
‐bo
u
n
d
on
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
.
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
of
t
e
n
go
e
s
ve
r
y
fa
s
t
.
It
is
of
t
e
n
a ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
to
ge
t
ov
e
r
to
th
e
le
f
t
la
n
e
s
to turn onto Blackhawk road. Many
ot
h
e
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
go
th
i
s
wa
y
to
Di
a
b
l
o
Point
2
0
7
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
0
15:33
14
6
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Ov
e
r
a
l
l
,
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Li
g
h
t
s
do
n
'
t
se
n
s
e
bi
k
e
s
an
d
ca
r
s
le
a
v
i
n
g
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ma
k
i
n
g
le
f
t
s
ra
r
e
l
y
us
e
tu
r
n
in
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
.
Ca
r
s
behind cyclists making left turns get
im
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:16
30
5
An
d
y
Di
l
l
a
r
d
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Re
q
u
e
s
t
fr
o
m
Ca
m
e
o
Ac
r
e
s
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
to
in
s
t
a
l
l
bi
c
y
c
l
e
vi
d
e
o
de
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
at
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
/
C
a
m
e
o
(f
o
r
Ca
m
e
o
Dr
i
v
e
)
Point
0
0
1
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
1
17:43
27
5
Ch
a
r
l
i
e
Go
k
b
a
y
r
a
k
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Sc
h
o
o
l
ri
a
d
Point
0
0
9
/
2
7
/
2
0
2
0
20:31
18
1
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
So
l
o
Bi
k
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
(T
u
e
,
09
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
5
,
10
0
3
h
r
s
)
El
Pi
n
t
a
d
o
Dr
& Do
l
p
h
i
n
Dr
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:22
21
9
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
So
l
o
Bi
k
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(W
e
d
,
12
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
,
09
0
5
h
s
)
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
& Fr
o
n
t
St
r
e
e
t
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:44
27
7
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Th
e
bi
c
y
c
l
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
an
d
si
g
n
a
l
fr
o
m
Mc
C
a
u
l
e
y
Rd
to
th
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
tr
a
i
l
wa
s
re
m
o
v
e
d
(4
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
re
d
u
c
e
d
to
3)
.
Ri
d
e
r
s
fr
o
m
Hi
d
d
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
now need to go against traffic or do 2 ‐3
ro
a
d
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
to
ac
c
e
s
s
th
e
tr
a
i
l
Point
0
0
1
0
/
1
2
/
2
0
2
0
8:06 4
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
12
6
Ja
m
e
s
Fo
s
t
e
r
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Th
e
di
a
b
l
o
co
u
n
t
r
y
cl
u
b
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
ha
v
e
ba
s
i
c
a
l
l
y
wa
l
l
e
d
of
f
th
e
on
l
y
sa
f
e
ap
p
r
o
a
c
h
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
so
u
t
h
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
.
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
ne
e
d
s
fi
x
e
d
or
something needs to be done. I am
su
r
p
r
i
s
e
d
th
e
r
e
ar
e
no
t
mo
r
e
ac
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
Point
7
0
7
/
7
/
2
0
2
0
20:15
14
5
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Th
e
li
g
h
t
is
to
o
sh
o
r
t
fo
r
me
to
ge
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
on
my
bi
k
e
an
d
I'
m
a pr
e
t
t
y
go
o
d
"o
l
d
"
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
If
I ca
n
'
t
ge
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
,
a lo
t
of
in
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
certainly cannot cross before it
tu
r
n
s
re
d
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:10
21
3
Jo
h
n
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Th
e
r
e
is
no
bi
k
e
la
n
e
he
r
e
an
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
do
e
s
no
t
pa
y
at
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
Point
2
0
7
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
0
15:34
55
Lu
k
e
Hi
c
k
e
y
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
— in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
el
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
sc
h
o
o
l
ag
e
ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
li
k
e
my
so
n
(F
i
n
n
,
8y
o
,
Jo
h
n
Ba
l
d
w
i
n
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
)
.
Even when the crosswalk button is
pu
s
h
e
d
,
an
d
wa
l
k
si
g
n
is
li
t
,
th
e
ca
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
tu
r
n
i
n
g
ri
g
h
t
fr
o
m
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
(W
e
s
t
bo
u
n
d
fr
o
m
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
)
on
t
o
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
(N
o
r
t
h
bound toward Diablo Rd) have a green
tu
r
n
li
g
h
t
.
Mo
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
do
no
t
st
o
p
,
an
d
do
no
t
yi
e
l
d
.
Th
e
si
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
gr
e
e
n
li
g
h
t
an
d
wa
l
k
si
g
n
a
l
ar
e
a sa
f
e
t
y
ha
z
a
r
d
fo
r
yo
u
n
g
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Point
9
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
9:41
90
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
Bo
n
a
d
i
o
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
To
o
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
to
ri
d
e
th
i
s
ro
u
t
e
to
ge
t
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Point
7
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:17
54
Ch
a
r
l
i
s
Jo
y
c
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Vi
s
t
a
Gr
a
n
d
e
to
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
co
u
l
d
us
e
a sm
o
o
t
h
e
r
tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
al
l
o
w
av
o
i
d
a
n
c
e
of
th
e
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
/ Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Point
3
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
9:38
15
6
Av
i
t
a
l
an
d
Ti
m
An
d
r
e
w
s
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
We
de
s
p
e
r
a
t
e
l
y
ne
e
d
a cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
at
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
.
an
d
El
Po
r
t
a
l
so
th
a
t
we
ca
n
sa
f
e
l
y
ge
t
to
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
17:49
10
5
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
to
Bi
k
i
n
g
Wh
y
we
r
e
th
e
s
e
bu
m
p
o
u
t
s
pl
a
c
e
d
on
Fr
o
n
t
St
r
e
e
t
?
?
?
Th
e
y
ar
e
a da
n
g
e
r
to
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
I do
n
'
t
se
e
an
y
ap
p
a
r
e
n
t
be
n
e
f
i
t
fr
o
m
th
e
m
.
I su
g
g
e
s
t
removing them.Point
1
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:25
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Co
m
m
e
n
t
3 Bi
k
e
s
vs
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Co
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
,
(S
u
n
d
a
y
,
02
/
2
3
/
2
0
1
4
,
11
4
6
h
r
s
)
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
& Wo
o
d
r
a
n
c
h
Rd
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
"S
e
r
i
o
u
s
In
j
u
r
i
e
s
to
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
s
Cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
"
7/23/2020 7:03
‐
Li
s
a
Ha
m
m
i
l
l
Co
m
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
1/9/2021 18:28
‐
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
,
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
li
g
h
t
ne
v
e
r
se
n
s
e
s
my
bi
k
e
an
d
ca
r
s
le
a
v
i
n
g
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ce
n
t
e
r
do
n
'
t
si
g
n
a
l
le
f
t
s
.
Ma
k
e
it
a di
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
li
g
h
t
pa
t
t
e
r
n
.
Overall this intersection doesn't work
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
7/14/2020 12:14
‐
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Sm
a
l
l
e
y
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Ag
r
e
e
.
Ne
i
t
h
e
r
El
Ce
r
r
o
or
Di
a
b
l
o
ar
e
sa
f
e
ro
u
t
e
s
fr
o
m
Ea
s
t
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
to
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
.
I wo
u
l
d
le
t
my
te
e
n
a
g
e
ki
d
s
ri
d
e
on
th
e
i
r
ow
n
th
e
sh
o
r
t
distance to downtown or St. Isidore
sc
h
o
o
l
if
th
i
s
wa
s
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
7/17/2020 8:57
‐
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Co
m
m
e
n
t
An
d
du
r
i
n
g
a pa
n
d
e
m
i
c
,
fo
r
c
e
d
to
ta
k
e
IH
T
at
th
i
s
po
i
n
t
.
Ve
r
y
cr
o
w
d
e
d
wi
t
h
al
l
ty
p
e
s
of
tr
a
i
l
us
e
r
s
.
7/14/2020 12:18
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
As
a 72
ye
a
r
ol
d
wo
m
a
n
wh
o
lo
v
e
s
to
cy
c
l
e
up
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
ea
c
h
we
e
k
,
I am
fr
i
g
h
t
e
n
e
d
ab
o
u
t
th
e
th
o
u
g
h
t
or
ri
d
i
n
g
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
& Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
roads where there is no cycling lane and
ca
r
s
fl
y
by
fa
s
t
an
d
cl
o
s
e
.
We
re
a
l
l
y
ne
e
d
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
he
r
e
!
7/16/2020 15:48
‐
De
e
p
i
n
d
e
r
Si
n
g
h
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
Co
u
n
t
r
y
Cl
u
b
ro
a
d
s
ar
e
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
us
i
n
g
pu
b
l
i
c
mo
n
e
y
,
an
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
sh
o
u
l
d
no
t
be
al
l
o
w
e
d
to
po
s
t
si
g
n
s
/
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
‐gu
a
r
d
s
to
in
t
i
m
i
d
a
t
e
cyclists.7/6/2020 16:06
‐
Jo
a
n
Sp
i
e
g
e
l
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
is
a te
r
r
i
b
l
e
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
.
We
re
a
l
l
y
ne
e
d
a sa
f
e
wa
y
to
ac
c
e
s
s
th
e
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
ro
a
d
an
d
ju
s
t
to
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
up
to
w
a
r
d
s
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
7/14/2020 19:01
‐
Jo
a
n
Sp
i
e
g
e
l
Co
m
m
e
n
t
I ag
r
e
e
.
th
e
tu
r
n
fr
o
m
Fr
o
n
t
to
Ha
r
t
z
is
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
i
n
g
.
7/14/2020 18:59
‐
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Sm
a
l
l
e
y
Co
m
m
e
n
t
I ag
r
e
e
.
We
ne
e
d
so
m
e
ea
s
t
/
w
e
s
t
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
sa
f
e
fr
o
m
tr
a
f
f
i
c
in
th
i
s
pa
r
t
of
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
Fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
on
e
of
th
e
cr
e
e
k
s
wo
u
l
d
be
a gr
e
a
t
id
e
a
!
‐
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Smalley 7/17/2020 8:55
‐
St
e
v
e
Be
c
k
Co
m
m
e
n
t
I wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
to
se
e
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
be
c
o
m
e
mo
r
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
an
d
bi
k
e
fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
by
ma
k
i
n
g
it
a on
e
‐wa
y
,
on
e
‐la
n
e
st
r
e
e
t
fo
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
us
i
n
g
the extra space for bike lanes and more
sp
a
c
e
fo
r
ou
t
d
o
o
r
di
n
i
n
g
.
Th
i
s
ma
y
al
s
o
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
tr
a
f
f
i
c
fr
o
m
us
i
n
g
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
wh
e
n
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
is
ba
c
k
e
d
up
.
7/3/2020 0:42
‐
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Co
m
m
e
n
t
No
ot
h
e
r
sa
f
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
du
r
i
n
g
a pa
n
d
e
m
i
c
.
Cr
o
w
d
e
d
wi
t
h
al
l
ty
p
e
s
of
tr
a
i
l
us
e
r
s
.
7/14/2020 12:19
‐
To
m
Ba
r
d
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Pe
r
h
a
p
s
so
m
e
of
th
e
an
t
i
‐bi
k
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
of
Di
a
b
l
o
wo
u
l
d
be
wi
l
l
i
n
g
to
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
su
p
p
o
r
t
/
f
u
n
d
th
e
ne
w
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
al
o
n
g
Diablo Rd. Something creative and urgent
ne
e
d
s
to
be
do
n
e
to
sp
e
e
d
up
th
e
pl
a
n
,
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
pr
o
c
e
s
s
,
an
d
th
e
ex
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
of
th
i
s
mu
c
h
ne
e
d
e
d
pr
o
j
e
c
t
!
!
Wh
a
t
'
s
th
e
de
l
a
y
?
!
1/9/2021 10:42
‐
Jo
s
h
Pe
t
e
r
m
a
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
So
r
r
y
‐
ty
p
o
.
It
is
Cl
a
s
s
II
up
h
i
l
l
(e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
)
bu
t
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
WE
S
T
b
o
u
n
d
.
1/10/2021 21:47
‐
Jo
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
e
bi
k
e
de
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
de
v
i
s
e
in
fr
o
n
t
of
Cr
u
m
b
s
re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
on
Ha
r
t
z
Wa
y
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
,
is
no
t
wo
r
k
i
n
g
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
l
y
fo
r
so
m
e
ti
m
e
no
w
.
7/17/2020 16:27
‐
Jo
a
n
Sp
i
e
g
e
l
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
on
to
Al
c
o
s
t
a
is
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
i
n
g
.
Ma
y
b
e
ad
d
on
e
of
th
e
Bi
k
e
Se
n
s
o
r
li
g
h
t
s
th
a
t
yo
u
ha
v
e
on
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
bl
v
d
by
th
e
hi
g
h
sc
h
o
o
l
.
th
o
s
e
ar
e
great!7/14/2020 18:56
‐
Jo
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
e
no
r
t
h
we
s
t
co
r
n
e
r
at
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
an
d
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Pl
a
z
a
Ci
r
c
l
e
ha
s
3 or
4 fa
i
r
l
y
de
e
p
di
v
o
t
s
in
th
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
,
be
e
n
th
e
r
e
fo
r
ye
a
r
s
.
7/17/2020 16:22
‐
Jo
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
e
r
e
is
a da
m
a
g
e
s
se
c
t
i
o
n
of
ro
a
d
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
ne
x
t
to
th
e
Te
x
i
c
o
st
a
t
i
o
n
ju
s
t
pa
s
t
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
Ra
n
c
h
Rd
th
a
t
ha
s
be
e
n
re
p
a
i
r
e
d
ma
n
y
ti
m
e
s
bu
t
never a lasting fix. This is where the lanes
ar
e
re
d
u
c
e
d
fr
o
m
3 to
2.
7/17/2020 16:31
‐
Jo
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
co
u
l
d
al
s
o
us
e
a bi
k
e
de
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
se
n
s
o
r
on
no
r
t
h
ea
s
t
co
r
n
e
r
.
7/17/2020 16:18
‐
Jo
a
n
Sp
i
e
g
e
l
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
i
s
is
a ve
r
y
di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Wh
e
n
yo
u
ar
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
le
f
t
fr
o
m
th
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
lo
t
to
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
,
it
'
s
al
m
o
s
t
im
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
to
ha
v
e
en
o
u
g
h
ti
m
e
fo
r
a turn. One of your bike sensing signals
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
.
7/14/2020 18:58
‐
Jo
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Th
i
s
la
s
t
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
fr
o
m
Li
v
e
r
p
o
o
l
St
to
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Rd
op
e
n
s
up
to
3 la
n
e
s
fr
o
m
2.
Pl
e
n
t
y
of
ro
o
m
fo
r
a fu
l
l
bi
k
e
lane here but only Green Sharro
ma
r
k
e
r
s
ar
e
in
pl
a
c
e
.
Th
i
s
is
an
up
w
a
r
d
gr
a
d
e
an
d
ca
r
s
us
u
a
l
l
y
ac
c
e
l
e
r
a
t
e
he
r
e
pu
t
t
i
n
g
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
in
da
n
g
e
r
.
7/17/2020 16:15
19
8
Ke
v
i
n
Cr
o
n
i
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
vi
a
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
ma
k
e
s
th
e
ri
d
e
to
o
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
be
f
o
r
e
yo
u
ev
e
n
ge
t
to
th
e
mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
18:00
26
5
to
d
d
sm
i
t
h
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
As
ma
n
y
ha
v
e
po
s
t
e
d
th
e
#1
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
in
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
of
al
l
ty
p
e
s
is
a de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
fr
o
m
cu
r
r
e
n
t
bike path end at Calle Arroyo and
ex
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Rd
.
Th
i
s
wo
u
l
d
ma
k
e
bi
k
i
n
g
al
o
n
g
th
i
s
po
p
u
l
a
r
ro
u
t
e
sa
f
e
wh
i
l
e
al
s
o
re
l
i
e
v
i
n
g
th
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
of
Di
a
b
l
o
CC
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
using their "private" roads for safe
ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
or
co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
to
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
.
Th
i
s
wo
u
l
d
re
q
u
i
r
e
ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
on
cu
r
r
e
n
t
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
.
.
.
.
m
u
c
h
ne
e
d
e
d
Point
2
0
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
22:21
73
Da
n
Sc
h
a
e
f
e
r
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Be
t
t
e
r
ac
c
e
s
s
to
pa
r
k
an
d
sc
h
o
o
l
s
fr
o
m
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
pa
r
k
(p
a
r
k
ma
s
t
e
r
pl
a
n
fo
r
un
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
ar
e
a
s
)
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
bi
k
e
le
a
r
n
i
n
g
co
u
r
s
e
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:41
28
3
Ch
r
i
s
wi
n
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Bi
k
e
la
n
e
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
as
it
he
a
d
s
ea
s
t
pa
s
t
to
w
n
of
Di
a
b
l
o
an
d
th
e
th
e
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Ro
a
d
.
Point
0
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
19:54
64
Da
n
i
e
l
K
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Bi
k
e
pa
t
h
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
So
u
t
h
Ga
t
e
pl
e
a
s
e
Point
1
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
14:06 5
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
30
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
RA
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
is
no
t
sa
f
e
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
I ri
d
e
fr
o
m
DC
C
ar
e
a
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
.
Ca
r
s
us
e
th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
bi
k
e
la
n
e
as
a tu
r
n
la
n
e
in
se
v
e
r
a
l
pl
a
c
e
s
.
Th
e
co
r
n
e
r
of Diablo Rd as it makes a 90 degree
ri
g
h
t
tu
r
n
,
he
a
d
i
n
g
ea
s
t
ac
r
o
s
s
fr
o
m
Sl
o
a
t
s
,
ca
r
s
cu
t
th
e
co
r
n
e
r
.
Ca
n
we
pu
t
in
a di
v
i
d
e
r
to
ke
e
p
tr
a
f
f
i
c
aw
a
y
fr
o
m
ca
r
s
on
th
e
co
r
n
e
r
wh
e
n
tu
r
n
i
n
g
?
Point
4
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
20:55
59
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
.
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
BL
V
D
.
Th
i
s
is
ve
r
y
ha
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
.
I us
u
a
l
l
y
cu
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
CC
,
bu
t
th
e
r
e
ha
v
e
be
e
n
co
m
p
l
a
i
n
t
s
of
th
a
t
re
c
e
n
t
l
y
.
Point
4
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
11:41
16
0
Pa
t
t
y
Cl
e
g
g
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
ne
e
d
s
a bi
g
bi
k
e
la
n
e
.
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
wo
u
l
d
en
j
o
y
th
e
sa
f
e
t
y
,
an
d
au
t
o
dr
i
v
e
r
s
wo
u
l
d
be
ha
p
p
i
e
r
if
th
e
y
di
d
n
’
t
have to dodge cyclists.Point
2
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:55
20
3
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
to
ac
c
e
s
s
th
e
li
v
e
r
y
by
bi
c
y
c
l
e
co
m
i
n
g
fr
o
m
th
e
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Ha
r
d
to
tr
a
v
e
l
wi
t
h
fa
m
i
l
y
fr
o
m
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
to
Livery. Cars do not see pedestrians/bikes
re
a
d
i
l
y
at
th
e
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
at
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
,
he
a
d
i
n
g
We
s
t
.
Mo
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
of
t
e
n
lo
o
k
to
th
e
le
f
t
bu
t
do
no
t
se
e
the illuminated crosswalk making this a
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
0
23:18
70
Li
z
M
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
El
Pi
n
t
a
d
o
Ro
a
d
Hi
l
l
ro
u
t
e
fo
r
fi
t
n
e
s
s
ri
d
i
n
g
Point
2
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:07
66
Ni
c
o
l
a
s
Da
m
o
n
t
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
sc
h
o
o
l
‐
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
an
d
Pa
r
a
i
s
o
ar
e
sh
a
r
e
d
ro
a
d
s
‐
wi
t
h
tr
a
n
s
i
t
ma
i
n
l
y
Gr
e
e
n
b
o
o
k
wh
a
t
I th
i
n
k
we
sh
o
u
l
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
fo
r
ki
d
s
Point
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
15:12
68
Ma
r
c
Du
b
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
En
t
r
y
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Point
2
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:01
15
7
Ka
r
e
n
M Gu
s
t
a
f
s
o
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
ar
e
a
of
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Point
1
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:20
56
Ja
m
i
e
Ha
r
g
r
a
v
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Ge
t
t
i
n
g
to
an
d
fr
o
m
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
sa
f
e
l
y
.
Th
e
id
e
a
th
a
t
th
e
ro
a
d
s
in
Di
a
b
l
o
CC
ar
e
pr
i
v
a
t
e
in
pr
e
p
o
s
t
e
r
o
u
s
an
d
a sa
f
e
ro
u
t
e
ne
e
d
s
to
be
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
.
Additionally, the road leading to Mt.
Di
a
b
l
o
,
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
,
I be
l
i
e
v
e
is
in
ne
e
d
of
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
pe
r
th
e
re
g
s
it
wa
s
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
un
d
e
r
.
Point
9
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
10:37
10
9
St
e
v
e
Mi
l
l
e
r
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Go
i
n
g
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
to
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
ne
e
d
s
wi
d
e
r
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
.
Point
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:42
19
2
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I bi
k
e
fr
o
m
Ra
s
s
a
n
i
Dr
i
v
e
to
do
w
n
to
w
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
vi
a
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
,
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Ro
a
d
or
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Rd
.
Be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
of
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Pl
a
z
a
at
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
an
d
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Rd
th
e
r
e
is
no
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
an
d
no
on
e
us
e
s
th
e
si
d
e
wa
l
k
to
bike because it is to dangerous. It also is a
pr
o
b
l
e
m
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Rd
at
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
sa
f
e
l
y
to
pr
o
c
e
e
d
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
at
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
is
di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
ha
n
d
tu
r
n
.
Al
s
o
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
go
i
n
g
un
d
e
r
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
is
da
r
k
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
11:18
47
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I do
n
'
t
ri
d
e
to
th
e
gr
o
c
e
r
y
st
o
r
e
or
th
e
Li
v
e
r
y
ve
r
y
of
t
e
n
be
c
a
u
s
e
ri
d
i
n
g
ac
r
o
s
s
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
is
to
o
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
Point
3
0
6
/
2
5
/
2
0
2
0
21:36
78
Sc
o
t
t
Ko
u
n
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I en
j
o
y
ri
d
i
n
g
to
th
e
to
p
of
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
an
d
th
e
n
ba
c
k
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
an
d
ha
v
e
lu
n
c
h
at
ma
n
y
of
th
e
re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
.
Th
e
po
r
t
i
o
n
of
ro
a
d
fr
o
m
Di
a
b
l
o
to Athenian School is very dangerous.
I’
v
e
al
m
o
s
t
be
e
n
hi
t
by
a ca
r
an
d
ha
v
e
fe
l
t
ot
h
e
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
ne
a
r
l
y
hi
t
th
e
ba
c
k
of
my
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
.
Th
e
r
e
is
re
a
l
l
y
no
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
to
ri
d
e
on
.
Th
a
n
k
yo
u
fo
r
th
i
s
fo
r
u
m
Point
8
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
17:45
93
Ki
r
s
t
e
n
Cu
r
t
i
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I en
j
o
y
i
n
g
bi
k
i
n
g
up
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Point
3
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:52
92
Ki
r
s
t
e
n
Cu
r
t
i
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I li
k
e
to
bi
k
e
up
ca
m
i
n
o
ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
,
ar
o
u
n
d
to
Br
u
c
e
Dr
i
v
e
,
an
d
ba
c
k
to
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Point
0
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
7:48
16
1
Br
o
o
k
e
Fa
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I li
v
e
on
th
e
Ea
s
t
si
d
e
of
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
ne
a
r
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
el
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
.
Th
e
r
e
is
no
t
a sa
f
e
ro
u
t
e
to
bi
k
e
wi
t
h
ki
d
s
to
jo
i
n
th
e
ir
o
n
ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:56
18
9
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Sm
a
l
l
e
y
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I li
v
e
wi
t
h
i
n
1/
2
a mi
l
e
of
St
.
Is
i
d
o
r
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
wo
u
l
d
al
l
o
w
my
ol
d
e
r
ki
d
s
to
ri
d
e
to
sc
h
o
o
l
bu
t
si
n
c
e
we
'
r
e
on
th
e
ea
s
t
si
d
e
of
68
0
th
e
r
e
is
no
safe way to travel via El Cerro or Diablo
to
th
i
s
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:58
25
8
Jo
s
h
Ca
r
r
o
l
l
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I of
t
e
n
le
a
v
e
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
wi
t
h
my
so
n
to
fi
n
d
si
n
g
l
e
tr
a
c
k
fo
r
mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
bi
k
i
n
g
.
We
wo
u
l
d
lo
v
e
to
se
e
mo
r
e
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
lo
c
a
l
l
y
.
Di
a
b
l
o
is
be
a
u
t
i
f
u
l
bu
t
mountain biking fire roads isn't all that
fu
n
or
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
i
n
g
.
Point
0
0
8
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
20:33
86
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
Bo
n
a
d
i
o
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I ri
d
e
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
3 ti
m
e
s
a we
e
k
an
d
ge
t
t
i
n
g
to
So
u
t
h
Ga
t
e
is
a pe
r
i
l
o
u
s
en
d
e
a
v
o
u
r
.
Ri
d
i
n
g
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
so
th
e
sa
f
e
s
t
ro
u
t
e
is
through the Diablo Country Club.Point
3
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:13
21
0
To
m
m
y
Sc
h
r
o
d
e
r
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I wa
n
t
to
be
ab
l
e
to
ma
k
e
it
do
w
n
to
w
n
co
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
y
on
an
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
de
v
i
c
e
(s
c
o
o
t
e
r
or
si
m
i
l
a
r
)
.
Th
a
n
k
s
!
Point
0
0
7
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
0
9:02
29
6
Be
n
Ro
h
r
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
sa
f
e
ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
so
u
t
h
ga
t
e
fr
o
m
we
s
t
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Point
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
14:50
26
9
Ky
l
e
Bo
n
a
g
u
r
a
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
It
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
if
th
e
r
e
wa
s
a bi
c
y
c
l
e
la
n
e
to
ge
t
to
At
h
e
n
i
a
n
en
ro
u
t
e
to
th
e
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
ga
t
e
.
Ri
d
i
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
ca
n
be
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
on
c
e
yo
u
cr
o
s
s
over Green Valley and Mt. Diablo is one
of
th
e
pr
e
m
i
e
r
cy
c
l
i
n
g
sp
o
t
s
in
th
e
st
a
t
e
.
Point
1
0
9
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:23
62
St
e
p
h
e
n
Wi
e
n
k
e
r
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
vi
a
So
u
t
h
g
a
t
e
.
Gr
e
e
n
v
a
l
l
e
y
to
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Ro
a
d
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
is
ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
an
d
ne
e
d
s
a de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
.
I wi
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
to ride through the community of
Di
a
b
l
o
un
t
i
l
a de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
is
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
.
Point
7
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
12:36
26
3
Ch
a
r
m
a
i
n
e
Le
i
b
b
r
a
n
d
t
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
My
ki
d
s
bi
k
e
to
sc
h
o
o
l
vi
a
Al
l
e
g
h
e
n
y
,
El
Ca
p
i
t
a
n
,
Pa
r
a
i
s
o
,
Br
o
o
k
s
i
d
e
Dr
i
v
e
.
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
:
s
p
e
e
d
i
n
g
mo
t
o
r
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
,
dr
i
v
e
r
s
ha
v
i
n
g
no
re
g
a
r
d
fo
r
bicycles, parked vehicles in bike lanes.Kids
ha
v
e
to
me
r
g
e
in
t
o
tr
a
f
f
i
c
la
n
e
to
pa
s
s
pa
r
k
e
d
ca
r
s
.
M
y
14
ye
a
r
ol
d
so
n
pa
s
s
e
d
a pa
r
k
e
d
ca
r
an
d
th
e
dr
i
v
e
r
di
d
n
’
t
se
e
hi
m
,
op
e
n
e
d
hi
s
ca
r
do
o
r
.
M
y
son collided into car door and went
fl
y
i
n
g
ov
e
r
th
e
do
o
r
in
t
o
th
e
ro
a
d
.
T
h
a
n
k
go
o
d
n
e
s
s
th
e
r
e
wa
s
no
on
c
o
m
i
n
g
tr
a
f
f
i
c
,
bu
t
he
wa
s
in
j
u
r
e
d
& to
o
fr
i
g
h
t
e
n
e
d
to
bi
k
e
ag
a
i
n
.
Point
0
0
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
12:52
10
0
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Ne
e
d
a be
t
t
e
r
wa
y
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
to
tu
r
n
le
f
t
fr
o
m
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
to
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Ro
a
d
.
On
e
ca
n
si
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
a co
u
p
l
e
li
g
h
t
ch
a
n
g
e
s
wh
i
l
e
waiting for a car to assist with setting
th
e
si
g
n
a
l
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
de
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
lo
o
p
s
.
Bi
k
e
s
do
n
'
t
se
t
of
f
th
o
s
e
lo
o
p
s
.
Point
5
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:13
60
Je
f
f
Pa
t
r
y
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Ne
e
d
a sa
f
e
ro
u
t
e
fr
o
m
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
St
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
.
I ta
k
e
th
e
tr
a
i
l
pa
s
t
St
Ti
m
o
t
h
y
th
e
n
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
,
th
e
“h
o
l
e
in
th
e
wa
l
l
”
,
to
South Gate. Diablo Road is much too
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
Point
9
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
11:43
41
Ch
r
i
s
t
i
n
e
Ro
o
s
a
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Of
t
e
n
ri
d
e
to
th
i
s
po
i
n
t
on
my
wa
y
up
to
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Point
3
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
8:40
25
5
Da
n
Ol
e
s
o
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
to
bi
k
e
to
th
i
s
pa
r
k
1 ‐2x
/
m
o
n
t
h
wi
t
h
my
fa
m
i
l
y
.
Point
0
0
7
/
3
1
/
2
0
2
0
15:20 6
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
25
6
Da
n
Ol
e
s
o
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
to
bi
k
e
to
th
i
s
pa
r
k
1 ‐2x
/
m
o
n
t
h
wi
t
h
my
fa
m
i
l
y
.
Point
0
0
7
/
3
1
/
2
0
2
0
15:21
12
8
Ma
r
k
R an
d
Cy
n
t
h
i
a
M
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
e
a
s
e
cr
e
a
t
e
a sa
f
e
bi
k
e
ro
u
t
e
be
t
w
e
e
n
At
h
e
n
i
a
n
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Fa
i
r
w
a
y
Dr
i
v
e
.
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
ti
m
e
s
I'
v
e
be
e
n
pu
t
in
da
n
g
e
r
by
un
s
a
f
e
dr
i
v
e
r
s
.
Point
3
0
7
/
1
3
/
2
0
2
0
15:58
91
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
e
a
s
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
sa
f
e
cy
c
l
i
n
g
ro
a
d
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
go
i
n
g
up
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
to
th
e
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Ac
c
e
s
s
ro
a
d
Point
4
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:20
42
Ch
r
i
s
t
i
n
e
Ro
o
s
a
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
ri
d
e
he
r
e
to
ge
t
co
f
f
e
e
or
me
e
t
fr
i
e
n
d
s
fo
r
gr
o
u
p
ri
d
e
s
Point
1
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
8:41
16
7
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Sa
f
e
ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Lo
o
k
i
n
g
fo
r
sa
f
e
en
t
r
y
an
d
ex
i
t
po
i
n
t
s
to
an
d
fr
o
m
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
an
d
ba
c
k
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
an
d
sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
va
l
l
e
y
ro
a
d
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
23:57
29
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
RA
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Sa
f
e
ac
c
e
s
s
to
So
u
t
h
Ga
t
e
Rd
.
Fr
o
m
th
e
we
s
t
as
I li
v
e
ne
a
r
th
e
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd
/
D
i
a
b
l
o
Rd
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
I am
an
“o
l
d
”
la
d
y
wh
o
wa
n
t
s
to
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
riding the mountain Point
9
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
20:52
11
2
Ma
r
c
y
Go
l
d
e
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
sa
f
e
.
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
al
o
n
g
di
a
b
l
o
to
ac
c
e
s
s
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Point
3
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
11:06
58
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Sh
o
p
s
an
d
re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
on
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
.
Wh
i
l
e
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
ha
s
th
e
Ir
o
n
ho
r
s
e
,
it
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
if
th
e
r
e
wa
s
a wa
y
to
bi
k
e
up
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
.
I re
a
l
i
z
e
th
i
s
might be a difficult challenge. Danville is
al
r
e
a
d
y
a gr
e
a
t
pl
a
c
e
to
bi
k
e
an
d
I th
i
n
k
it
is
am
a
z
i
n
g
th
a
t
th
e
to
w
n
is
ev
e
n
wo
r
k
i
n
g
on
im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
it
.
Point
2
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
11:39
12
5
Ja
m
e
s
Fo
s
t
e
r
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Th
e
ap
p
r
o
a
c
h
to
th
e
so
u
t
h
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
of
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
is
no
t
sa
f
e
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
.
Wi
t
h
th
e
re
c
e
n
t
cl
o
s
u
r
e
of
Ca
l
l
e
Ar
r
o
y
o
it
pu
t
s
ev
e
r
y
o
n
e
at
hi
g
h
risk. Mt Diablo approach via Diablo
ro
a
d
sh
o
u
l
d
be
th
e
to
p
pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
fo
r
th
e
ci
t
y
.
Su
r
p
r
i
s
e
d
Point
4
0
7
/
7
/
2
0
2
0
20:13
46
Di
a
n
a
Fu
e
r
y
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Th
e
ri
d
e
up
El
Ce
r
r
o
to
ge
t
to
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
is
ve
r
y
na
r
r
o
w
an
d
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
if
we
ar
e
no
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
to
go
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
sh
o
r
t
cu
t
.
We need a bike lane or some other
ac
c
e
s
s
ro
u
t
e
to
be
sa
f
e
an
d
ke
e
p
dr
i
v
e
r
s
sa
f
e
as
we
l
l
.
Point
1
5
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
21:34
16
3
Kr
i
s
t
i
n
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Th
e
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
ro
a
d
fr
o
m
th
i
s
co
r
n
e
r
to
Cr
e
e
k
l
e
d
g
e
is
no
t
fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
to
bi
k
e
s
.
Ca
r
s
go
to
o
fa
s
t
an
d
th
e
la
n
e
is
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
.
Ne
e
d
to
be
im
p
r
o
v
e
d
.
Needs better signage to warn cars about
sh
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
ro
a
d
.
Point
0
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
21:13
27
3
Ch
a
r
l
i
e
Go
k
b
a
y
r
a
m
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Th
e
r
e
is
no
bi
c
y
c
l
e
ro
a
d
on
El
ca
p
i
t
a
n
Point
1
0
9
/
2
7
/
2
0
2
0
20:30
20
8
St
a
c
y
Mc
M
i
l
l
a
n
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
We
bi
k
e
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
ti
m
e
s
a we
e
k
.
Point
0
0
7
/
2
0
/
2
0
2
0
14:16
19
6
Bo
b
Gr
i
e
r
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
We
l
l
kn
o
w
n
th
a
t
we
ne
e
d
a sa
f
e
wa
y
to
ac
c
e
s
s
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
St
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
17:26
28
4
Ch
r
i
s
wi
n
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wh
i
l
e
th
e
ro
a
d
up
to
to
p
of
Mt
Du
b
a
l
e
is
un
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
,
it
’
s
a hu
g
e
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
dr
a
w
.
A bi
k
e
la
n
e
on
th
e
up
h
i
l
l
si
d
e
wo
u
l
d
be
a hu
g
e
win.Point
1
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
19:56
20
6
Br
i
t
t
B
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
u
l
d
be
aw
e
s
o
m
e
to
ge
t
sa
f
e
l
y
to
pa
r
k
an
d
ri
d
e
fr
o
m
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
ar
e
a
Point
0
0
7
/
1
9
/
2
0
2
0
2:02
15
9
E Le
e
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
a sa
f
e
ro
a
d
or
pa
t
h
to
cy
c
l
e
fr
o
m
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
an
d
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
to
th
e
So
u
t
h
Ga
t
e
Ro
a
d
of
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:49
20
5
Br
i
t
t
B
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
to
be
ab
l
e
to
sa
f
e
l
y
ge
t
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
(w
i
t
h
ki
d
s
pr
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
y
)
fr
o
m
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
/
D
i
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
‐
cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
do
e
s
not feel safe to bike with hobbyist or
yo
u
n
g
bi
k
e
r
s
.
Point
1
0
7
/
1
9
/
2
0
2
0
2:00
25
7
Co
l
e
Ca
r
r
o
l
l
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
u
l
d
lo
v
e
to
se
e
mo
r
e
bi
k
e
le
g
a
l
si
n
g
l
e
t
r
a
c
k
bo
t
h
on
Di
a
b
l
o
an
d
an
y
w
h
e
r
e
el
s
e
.
Point
0
0
8
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
20:29
44
Ri
c
h
a
r
d
Gi
e
s
s
n
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
A wi
d
e
r
bi
k
e
la
n
e
is
ne
e
d
e
d
on
ea
s
t
bo
u
n
d
la
n
e
.
LineString
0
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
15:23
57
JR
Da
u
g
h
t
e
r
s
Ro
u
t
e
Ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Bl
v
d
vi
a
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
is
pr
o
b
l
e
m
a
t
i
c
an
d
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Di
a
b
l
o
CC
is
be
c
o
m
i
n
g
in
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
l
y
le
s
s
re
c
e
p
t
i
v
e
to cyclists transiting that community. The
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
fr
o
m
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
/
G
r
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
to
ne
a
r
Di
a
b
l
o
CC
wa
s
a gr
e
a
t
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
of
a bi
k
e
pa
t
h
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Bl
v
d
wo
u
l
d
protect cyclists and appease Diablo CC
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
10:51
43
Ch
r
i
s
t
i
n
e
Ro
o
s
a
Ro
u
t
e
An
y
t
h
i
g
n
on
th
i
s
ro
a
d
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Ca
r
s
ha
v
e
li
t
t
l
e
pa
t
i
e
n
c
e
an
d
th
e
r
e
'
s
bl
i
n
d
tu
r
n
s
an
d
in
so
m
e
sp
o
t
s
no
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
.
LineString
0
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
8:42
31
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
RA
Ro
u
t
e
Ar
e
th
e
r
e
so
m
e
cr
e
e
k
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
th
a
t
ca
n
ge
t
a tr
a
i
l
fo
r
sa
f
e
r
of
f
ro
a
d
ac
c
e
s
s
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
?
LineString
3
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
20:59
12
4
j il
t
Ro
u
t
e
Be
t
t
e
r
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
& si
g
n
a
g
e
fo
r
I6
8
0
on
& of
f
ra
m
p
s
on
bo
t
h
si
d
e
s
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
7
/
2
0
2
0
10:25
77
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ro
u
t
e
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
ac
c
e
s
s
is
li
m
i
t
e
d
an
d
ex
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
Sh
a
r
e
d
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
ar
e
no
t
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
17:00
39
Do
n
Me
d
w
e
d
e
f
f
Ro
u
t
e
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
ac
r
o
s
s
I6
8
0
,
ex
c
e
p
t
fo
r
La
u
r
e
l
Dr
i
v
e
/
I
r
o
n
h
o
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
ar
e
al
l
sa
f
e
t
y
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
d
du
e
to
co
m
p
l
e
x
tr
a
f
f
i
c
pa
t
t
e
r
n
s
an
d
la
c
k
of
bike lanes. Diablo Road crossing is a key
on
e
to
ad
d
r
e
s
s
as
it
is
pa
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
co
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
an
d
fl
a
t
.
LineString
3
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
23:57
16
5
An
n
e
Ha
r
d
i
n
g
Ro
u
t
e
Bi
k
e
pa
t
h
is
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
LineString
1
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
21:51
15
5
Ju
l
i
e
Ro
u
t
e
Bi
k
e
Pa
t
h
ne
e
d
e
d
be
c
a
u
s
e
MT
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
to
Mn
t
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Bl
v
d
is
un
s
a
f
e
to
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
8:50
18
7
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Sm
a
l
l
e
y
Ro
u
t
e
Bi
k
i
n
g
on
Di
a
b
l
o
pa
s
t
68
0
is
ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
wi
t
h
ca
r
s
sp
e
e
d
i
n
g
on
t
o
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
(B
o
t
h
No
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
an
d
So
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
)
.
I wi
s
h
th
e
r
e
wa
s
a tr
a
i
l
that connected under the freeway
be
t
w
e
e
n
Vi
a
He
r
m
o
s
a
an
d
Fr
o
n
t
St
r
e
e
t
(L
i
b
r
a
r
y
)
al
o
n
g
th
e
cr
e
e
k
.
Fo
r
th
o
s
e
of
us
th
a
t
li
v
e
in
Wo
o
d
b
i
n
e
,
th
e
r
e
is
no
sa
f
e
wa
y
to
ri
d
e
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
(Via Diablo OR El Cerro).LineString
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
8:53
81
Jo
n
a
t
h
a
n
Mi
l
e
l
l
i
Ro
u
t
e
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
at
Bl
a
c
k
Ha
w
k
is
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
fo
r
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
.
Ne
e
d
s
to
be
im
p
r
o
v
e
d
LineString
2
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
15:57
20
4
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Ro
u
t
e
Ca
r
s
of
t
e
n
ru
n
ye
l
l
o
w
an
d
re
d
li
g
h
t
s
at
Tu
n
b
r
i
d
g
e
Ro
a
d
an
d
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
,
es
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
in
su
m
m
e
r
af
t
e
r
n
o
o
n
/
e
v
e
n
i
n
g
wh
e
n
th
e
su
n
se
t
s
west and shines down SVR. Better
vi
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
of
re
d
li
g
h
t
to
al
l
o
w
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
of
bi
k
e
s
fr
o
m
Tu
n
b
r
i
d
g
e
,
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
,
et
c
.
wo
u
l
d
be
he
l
p
f
u
l
.
Th
e
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Cr
e
e
k
tr
a
i
l
is
a go
o
d
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
but does not provide continuity and
is
of
t
e
n
us
e
d
by
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
0
23:21
52
La
r
r
y
Ho
u
s
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
fr
o
m
th
e
we
s
t
is
do
w
n
r
i
g
h
t
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
Mo
s
t
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
ta
k
e
th
e
sa
f
e
r
sh
o
r
t
c
u
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
wh
i
c
h
ha
s
di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
y
of its own as you probably know.LineString
2
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
8:28
26
7
to
d
d
sm
i
t
h
Ro
u
t
e
Cr
e
a
t
e
de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
/
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
pa
t
h
al
o
n
g
cr
e
e
k
th
a
t
wo
u
l
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
sa
f
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
‐fr
e
e
ac
c
e
s
s
fr
o
m
ea
s
t
si
d
e
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
(G
r
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
‐Di
a
b
l
o
‐Ca
m
e
o
Acres neighborhoods, etc) to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
Fa
m
i
l
y
'
s
th
a
t
li
v
e
th
i
s
ar
e
ha
v
e
no
sa
f
e
ac
c
e
s
s
vi
a
bi
k
e
to
ge
t
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
& ar
e
fo
r
c
e
d
to
ri
d
e
on
bu
s
y
st
r
e
e
t
s
.
Ma
n
y
no
v
i
c
e
riders opt not to do so and miss the
jo
y
of
ri
d
i
n
g
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
or
to
ac
c
e
s
s
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
LineString
1
0
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
22:40
82
Jo
n
a
t
h
a
n
Mi
l
e
l
l
i
Ro
u
t
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
68
0
on
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
ro
a
d
is
ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
Es
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
th
e
On
Ra
m
p
of
N.
Bo
u
n
d
68
0
wi
t
h
2 la
n
e
s
to
tu
r
n
ri
g
h
t
LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
15:58 7
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
12
2
An
d
r
e
w
Bo
d
i
s
c
o
Ro
u
t
e
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
ha
s
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
,
bu
t
ca
r
s
tr
a
v
e
l
so
fa
s
t
,
th
a
t
it
sh
o
u
l
d
be
co
l
o
r
e
d
to
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a mo
r
e
st
a
r
k
vi
s
u
a
l
re
m
i
n
d
e
r
to
be
sa
f
e
an
d
wa
t
c
h
fo
r
bicycles.LineString
1
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
19:04
12
9
Ma
r
k
R an
d
Cy
n
t
h
i
a
M
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
Ro
u
t
e
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Ro
a
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
be
t
w
e
e
n
Al
c
o
s
t
a
Bl
v
d
.
an
d
St
Ge
o
r
g
e
Rd
.
is
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
du
e
to
th
e
sp
e
e
d
of
th
e
ca
r
s
pa
s
s
i
n
g
bi
k
e
s
.
Th
e
r
e
is
le
s
s
than 3' between cars going 40 ‐60 mph.
an
d
bi
k
e
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:05
29
5
To
m
Ba
r
d
Ro
u
t
e
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
or
pa
t
h
al
o
n
g
th
e
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
wi
t
h
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
ro
a
d
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
10:19
19
0
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Sm
a
l
l
e
y
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
68
0
Un
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
bo
t
h
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
to
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
So
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
of
f
r
a
m
p
ca
n
n
o
t
se
e
fu
l
l
cr
o
s
s
wa
l
k
.
No
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
on
r
a
m
p
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
speed merging up. Southbound onramp
si
m
i
l
a
r
l
y
ha
v
e
se
e
n
ca
r
s
sp
e
e
d
th
r
u
an
d
me
r
g
e
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
9:02
40
Do
n
Me
d
w
e
d
e
f
f
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
ha
s
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
sa
f
e
t
y
is
s
u
e
s
.
Bi
k
e
sa
f
e
t
y
is
on
e
.
An
o
t
h
e
r
is
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
.
Th
e
s
e
co
u
l
d
be
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
si
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
l
y
by widening with bike lanes in such a
wa
y
to
al
l
o
w
2 la
n
e
s
to
be
us
e
d
fo
r
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
eg
r
e
s
s
.
LineString
1
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
0:01
11
7
An
d
r
e
w
Bo
d
i
s
c
o
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
.
be
t
w
e
e
n
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
an
d
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Rd
.
.
.
.
.
B
l
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Rd
.
to
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
.
I kn
o
w
wi
t
h
th
e
re
c
e
n
t
pr
o
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
th
e
r
e
is
mo
n
e
y
go
i
n
g
in Diablo, a known problem.
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
is
al
s
o
ba
d
wi
t
h
ca
r
s
dr
i
v
i
n
g
to
o
fa
s
t
,
bi
k
e
la
n
e
no
t
sm
o
o
t
h
in
so
m
e
ar
e
a
s
an
d
no
t
we
l
l
de
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
d
.
Al
s
o
,
no
bi
k
e
la
n
e
he
a
d
e
d
We
s
t
when going by entrance to Blackhawk CC LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:55
63
St
e
p
h
e
n
Wi
e
n
k
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
fr
o
m
Gr
e
e
n
v
i
l
l
e
to
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Ro
a
d
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
12:37
98
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
St
e
i
n
b
r
e
c
h
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
fr
o
m
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
to
we
s
t
of
th
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
of
f
r
a
m
p
fr
o
m
so
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
I ‐68
0
ha
s
on
l
y
a na
r
r
o
w
bi
k
e
la
n
e
that is unmarked for significant
po
r
t
i
o
n
s
of
th
e
ro
u
t
e
.
A ma
r
k
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
wi
t
h
3 fo
o
t
bu
f
f
e
r
is
es
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
to
re
d
u
c
e
th
e
ri
s
k
to
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
tr
a
v
e
r
s
i
n
g
th
i
s
ro
u
t
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
11:47
16
6
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
Mo
t
t
o
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
ha
s
be
e
n
lo
n
g
kn
o
w
n
to
be
on
e
of
th
e
mo
s
t
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
ro
a
d
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
n
g
in
th
e
ar
e
a
.
Th
e
r
e
ha
v
e
be
e
n
se
v
e
r
a
l
we
l
l
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
bike/auto incidences on this road. It
mu
s
t
be
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
.
LineString
2
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
21:55
79
Bo
b
Ha
g
e
r
t
y
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
is
a de
a
t
h
tr
a
p
!
Ad
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
,
I do
n
'
t
wa
n
t
to
cu
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
ar
e
a
,
wa
n
t
to
st
a
y
on
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
pu
b
l
i
c
ro
a
d
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:19
11
4
An
t
h
o
n
y
Mo
y
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
is
te
r
r
i
f
y
i
n
g
to
cy
c
l
e
on
;
th
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
is
fa
s
t
an
d
so
m
e
SU
V
s
do
'p
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
pa
s
s
e
s
'
.
No
w
ap
p
a
r
e
n
t
l
y
we
ca
n
'
t
dr
i
v
e
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
Di
a
b
l
o
subdivision and I'm wondering what
th
e
ch
o
i
c
e
s
ar
e
no
w
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:35
11
3
De
e
p
i
n
d
e
r
Si
n
g
h
Ro
u
t
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
to
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
is
tr
e
a
c
h
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
du
e
to
la
c
k
of
a wi
d
e
‐en
o
u
g
h
bi
k
e
la
n
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
15:54
10
6
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ro
u
t
e
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd
W cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
ov
e
r
Hw
y
68
0
‐
su
p
e
r
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
wi
t
h
th
e
ca
r
s
me
r
g
i
n
g
of
f
of
SB
68
0
.
Th
e
ca
r
s
ar
e
tr
a
v
e
l
l
i
n
g
fa
s
t
and don't usually expect to see a bicyclist
he
r
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:28
67
Ni
c
o
l
a
s
Da
m
o
n
t
e
Ro
u
t
e
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
sc
h
o
o
l
‐
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
an
d
Pa
r
a
i
s
o
ar
e
sh
a
r
e
d
ro
a
d
s
‐
wi
t
h
tr
a
n
s
i
t
ma
i
n
l
y
Gr
e
e
n
b
o
o
k
wh
a
t
I th
i
n
k
we
sh
o
u
l
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
fo
r
ki
d
s
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
15:13
27
9
Da
v
i
d
Sm
i
t
h
Ro
u
t
e
Ex
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
th
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
Tr
a
i
l
ea
s
t
w
a
r
d
ab
o
u
t
45
0
fe
e
t
al
o
n
g
th
e
no
r
t
h
si
d
e
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
fr
o
m
Ca
l
l
e
Ar
r
o
y
o
to
Al
a
m
e
d
a
Di
a
b
l
o
wo
u
l
d
ha
v
e
a HUGE POSITIVE IMPACT on the safety
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
i
n
g
be
t
w
e
e
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
an
d
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
15:56
19
3
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ro
u
t
e
Fr
o
m
th
e
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Li
b
r
a
r
y
to
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
.
Th
e
r
e
is
a un
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
di
r
t
ro
a
d
le
a
d
i
n
g
fr
o
m
th
e
tr
a
i
l
to
th
e
ba
c
k
of
th
e
cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
of
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Shops this is a safer access to the Iron
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
th
a
n
ac
r
o
s
s
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Bl
v
d
.
Al
s
o
th
e
ba
r
r
i
e
r
s
to
ke
e
p
ou
t
ca
r
s
ar
e
a ha
z
a
r
d
at
th
e
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
to
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
do
we
really need them that close together?LineString
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
11:25
10
8
St
e
v
e
Mi
l
l
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Go
i
n
g
up
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
fr
o
m
th
e
to
w
n
to
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
pl
a
z
a
,
th
e
r
e
is
a se
c
t
i
o
n
of
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
th
e
r
e
th
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
en
d
s
an
d
be
c
o
m
e
s
a ca
r
la
n
e
.
TH
I
S
IS VERY DANGEROUS. This area just
be
f
o
r
e
th
e
Mc
D
o
n
a
l
d
'
s
is
th
e
r
e
th
e
in
c
l
i
n
e
is
st
e
e
p
ca
u
s
i
n
g
th
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
sl
o
w
do
w
n
go
i
n
g
up
th
e
hi
l
l
.
Th
e
su
n
ca
s
t
s
sh
a
d
o
w
s
on
th
i
s
ne
w
lane making it extremely difficult to see a
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
.
Al
t
h
o
u
g
h
th
e
r
e
is
a bi
k
e
si
g
n
on
th
e
ne
w
la
n
e
mo
s
t
dr
i
v
e
r
s
ju
s
t
ca
n
'
t
se
e
th
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
.
I'
v
e
be
e
n
a dr
i
v
e
r
an
d
wa
s
su
r
p
r
i
s
e
d
by
LineString
1
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:38
20
1
Da
n
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Ro
u
t
e
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
ha
s
ve
r
y
li
t
t
l
e
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
n
g
.
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
ro
a
d
s
en
t
e
r
i
n
g
GV
R
al
s
o
ad
d
di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
y
to
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
al
o
n
g
th
i
s
ro
u
t
e
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
shoulder and/or caution signs would be
he
l
p
f
u
l
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
0
23:09
29
9
ma
r
i
e
bo
r
s
e
l
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
do
e
s
no
t
ha
v
e
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
.
Ca
r
s
ar
e
al
w
a
y
s
pa
r
k
e
d
on
si
d
e
.
It
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
wh
e
n
I pa
s
s
th
e
pa
r
k
e
d
ca
r
s
,
du
e
to
th
e
ma
n
y
ca
r
s
dr
i
v
i
n
g
by me. The
sh
a
r
e
th
e
la
n
e
bi
k
e
re
m
i
n
d
e
r
s
do
n
'
t
wo
r
k
LineString
0
0
1
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
1
14:53
12
0
An
d
r
e
w
Bo
d
i
s
c
o
Ro
u
t
e
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
,
Ol
d
Or
c
h
a
r
d
,
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
.
Ne
e
d
s
bi
k
e
"s
h
a
r
e
th
e
la
n
e
"
pa
i
n
t
i
n
g
on
st
r
e
e
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
pr
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
y
wi
t
h
co
l
o
r
to
wa
r
n
ca
r
s
to
slow, be patient and share the road with
bi
k
e
s
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
19:01
11
9
An
d
r
e
w
Bo
d
i
s
c
o
Ro
u
t
e
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
.
be
t
w
e
e
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
.
an
d
RR
/
SR
V
bl
v
d
.
ne
e
d
s
bi
k
e
"s
h
a
r
e
th
e
ro
a
d
"
pa
i
n
t
e
d
on
st
r
e
e
t
an
d
pr
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
y
wi
t
h
co
l
o
r
.
Lo
t
s
of
ca
r
s
,
bu
t
heavily traveled by bikes. Parked cars
wi
t
h
op
e
n
i
n
g
do
o
r
s
ca
n
be
a pr
o
b
l
e
m
,
so
bi
k
e
s
ne
e
d
to
ri
d
e
in
tr
a
f
f
i
c
la
n
e
an
d
ge
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
tr
a
v
e
l
sa
m
e
sp
e
e
d
as
ca
r
s
.
Bu
t
ca
r
s
ne
e
d
vi
s
u
a
l
re
m
i
n
d
e
r
s
to be patient and allow for bicycle
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:58
11
5
An
t
h
o
n
y
Mo
y
Ro
u
t
e
He
a
d
i
n
g
so
u
t
h
on
Br
o
o
k
s
i
d
e
,
th
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
at
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
do
e
s
n
'
t
se
n
s
e
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
so
I ha
v
e
to
ei
t
h
e
r
wa
i
t
fo
r
a ca
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
th
e
li
g
h
t
or
go
to
the corner and press the pedestrian
bu
t
t
o
n
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:38
12
1
An
d
r
e
w
Bo
d
i
s
c
o
Ro
u
t
e
he
a
v
i
l
y
tr
a
v
e
l
e
d
by
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
,
no
bi
k
e
la
n
e
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
19:03
16
4
An
n
e
Ha
r
d
i
n
g
Ro
u
t
e
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
un
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
At
bo
t
h
El
Ce
r
r
o
an
d
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Ne
e
d
a be
t
t
e
r
wa
y
to
ge
t
fr
o
m
ea
s
t
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
to
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
an
d
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
.
LineString
2
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
21:49
17
2
St
e
v
e
Ro
u
t
e
I ag
r
e
e
wi
t
h
ot
h
e
r
co
m
m
e
n
t
s
th
a
t
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
is
no
t
sa
f
e
,
es
p
wh
e
n
tr
y
i
n
g
to
ge
t
fr
o
m
we
s
t
si
d
e
da
n
v
i
l
l
e
to
ea
s
t
si
d
e
da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
Th
e
r
e
ne
e
d
s
to
be a better/safer means for cyclists (and
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
)
to
na
v
i
g
a
t
e
un
d
e
r
th
e
di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
fr
e
e
un
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:39
30
2
Jo
s
h
Pe
t
e
r
m
a
n
Ro
u
t
e
I do
n
'
t
th
i
n
k
al
l
of
Ol
d
Or
c
h
a
r
d
ne
e
d
s
st
r
i
p
i
n
g
,
bu
t
th
e
se
g
m
e
n
t
be
t
w
e
e
n
Ol
d
Cr
e
e
k
an
d
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
is
wh
e
r
e
me
d
i
a
n
s
an
d
/
o
r
on
‐st
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
really limit space for recreational cyclists
to
hu
g
th
e
cu
r
b
.
Un
l
i
k
e
l
y
th
a
t
we
ca
n
sq
u
e
e
z
e
in
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
th
e
r
e
bu
t
wo
u
l
d
be
ni
c
e
to
in
c
l
u
d
e
so
m
e
sh
a
r
e
d
la
n
e
‐us
e
ar
r
o
w
s
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
1
21:52
84
Er
i
n
Co
x
Ro
u
t
e
I ri
d
e
so
u
t
h
on
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
,
bu
t
do
no
t
ri
d
e
no
r
t
h
du
e
to
th
e
wi
s
t
e
r
i
a
gr
o
w
i
n
g
at
th
e
Cl
o
c
k
To
w
e
r
pa
r
k
i
n
g
lo
t
.
Th
e
y
in
t
r
u
d
e
in
t
o
th
e
wa
y
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Also the stretch of Railroad between
Li
n
d
a
Me
s
a
an
d
Pr
o
s
p
e
c
t
ne
e
d
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
‐
du
e
to
th
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
bu
m
p
ou
t
s
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
ar
e
fo
r
c
e
d
ou
t
in
t
o
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:11 8
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
10
1
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ro
u
t
e
I su
g
g
e
s
t
pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
l
y
ma
k
i
n
g
th
e
cu
r
b
la
n
e
a bi
c
y
l
c
e
on
l
y
la
n
e
.
Th
e
r
e
ar
e
a lo
t
of
bi
k
e
s
th
a
t
us
e
th
i
s
la
n
e
an
d
it
is
ve
r
y
un
s
a
f
e
to
sh
a
r
e
it
wi
t
h
cars going 45 mph. There are three car
la
n
e
s
he
r
e
no
w
.
Th
e
r
e
is
no
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
to
ri
d
e
on
,
so
we
ha
v
e
to
sh
a
r
e
th
i
s
la
n
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:16
19
9
Su
s
a
n
Re
g
a
l
i
a
Ro
u
t
e
I wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
to
se
e
hi
g
h
sp
e
e
d
bi
k
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
re
‐ro
u
t
e
d
aw
a
y
fr
o
m
th
i
s
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
se
c
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
on
we
e
k
e
n
d
mo
r
n
i
n
g
s
.
Th
e
r
e
ar
e
families walking with kids on bikes and
in
st
r
o
l
l
e
r
s
at
th
a
t
ti
m
e
an
d
it
'
s
a da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
co
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
It
wo
u
l
d
be
mu
c
h
sa
f
e
r
if
bi
k
e
r
s
we
r
e
re
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
to
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
Av
e
n
u
e
on
th
a
t
st
r
e
t
c
h
,
especially near Lunardi's and the
Fa
r
m
e
r
s
'
Ma
r
k
e
t
.
I ha
v
e
wi
t
n
e
s
s
e
d
ma
n
y
"n
e
a
r
mi
s
s
e
s
"
wi
t
h
bi
k
e
s
vs
.
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
on
th
a
t
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
tr
a
i
l
.
Th
a
n
k
yo
u
fo
r
as
k
i
n
g
!
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
0
12:28
15
4
St
e
v
e
Be
c
k
Ro
u
t
e
I wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
to
se
e
th
e
en
t
i
r
e
le
n
g
t
h
of
Ha
r
t
z
Av
e
fr
o
m
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
Av
e
on
th
e
no
r
t
h
to
Sc
h
o
o
l
St
on
th
e
so
u
t
h
be
ma
d
e
mo
r
e
bi
c
y
c
l
e
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
friendly by reducing vehicle traffic to
on
e
‐wa
y
,
on
e
‐la
n
e
wi
t
h
di
a
g
o
n
a
l
pa
r
k
i
n
g
on
on
e
si
d
e
an
d
us
i
n
g
th
e
ex
t
r
a
sp
a
c
e
fo
r
bi
c
y
c
l
e
la
n
e
s
an
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
di
n
i
n
g
sp
a
c
e
.
Th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
Fr
i
d
a
y
through Sunday closure of Hartz Ave
sh
o
u
l
d
se
r
v
e
as
pr
o
o
f
th
a
t
th
i
s
co
n
c
e
p
t
ca
n
wo
r
k
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
16:33
28
5
Le
s
l
i
e
Me
y
e
r
s
Ro
u
t
e
Im
p
r
o
v
e
ac
c
e
s
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
fr
o
m
La
u
r
e
l
Dr
to
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
ne
a
r
SR
V
hi
g
h
sc
h
o
o
l
.
Th
e
r
e
’
s
no
t
a st
a
n
d
a
r
d
wa
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
on
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
,
and the bike path is too congested
wi
t
h
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
s
,
an
d
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
20:13
69
Ma
r
c
Du
b
e
Ro
u
t
e
Im
p
r
o
v
e
ro
u
t
e
fr
o
m
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
to
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:03
74
Da
n
Sc
h
a
e
f
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Im
p
r
o
v
e
d
ac
c
e
s
s
at
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Ro
a
d
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:43
30
1
Jo
s
h
Pe
t
e
r
m
a
n
Ro
u
t
e
In
my
op
i
n
i
o
n
,
th
i
s
is
in
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
l
y
la
b
e
l
e
d
on
th
e
ma
p
as
Cl
a
s
s
II
.
It
is
Cl
a
s
s
II
up
h
i
l
l
(e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
)
bu
t
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
.
I do
no
t
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
th
e
frontage road a "bike lane". This is a
ba
r
r
i
e
r
fo
r
ev
e
r
y
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
ri
d
e
r
an
d
el
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
/ mi
d
d
l
e
sc
h
o
o
l
ch
i
l
d
th
a
t
mi
g
h
t
wa
n
t
to
ri
d
e
fr
o
m
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
or
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
to Vista Grande, or up to Los Cerros. This
do
w
n
h
i
l
l
se
g
m
e
n
t
al
l
o
w
s
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
an
d
ca
r
s
to
pi
c
k
up
sp
e
e
d
an
d
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
sh
o
u
l
d
ha
v
e
so
m
e
ri
g
h
t
of
wa
y
,
if
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
1
21:46
28
1
Br
y
a
n
La
w
v
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
co
u
l
d
us
e
sp
e
e
d
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
wa
r
n
i
n
g
sy
s
t
e
m
to
al
e
r
t
sp
e
e
d
de
m
o
n
s
th
a
t
th
e
y
ar
e
no
t
ju
s
t
en
d
a
n
g
e
r
i
n
g
th
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
an
d
us
e
r
s
bu
t
ruin the cherished reputation of bike
us
e
r
s
wh
o
fo
l
l
o
w
th
e
ru
l
e
s
.
Le
t
th
e
m
hi
t
45
mp
h
on
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
bu
t
ob
e
y
th
e
15
mp
h
on
th
e
tr
a
i
l
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
16:38
15
8
Ka
r
e
n
M Gu
s
t
a
f
s
o
n
Ro
u
t
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:21
26
1
Ka
r
i
Ga
n
n
a
m
Ro
u
t
e
It
wo
u
l
d
be
ve
r
y
be
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
if
th
e
r
e
wa
s
a wa
y
to
cr
o
s
s
un
d
e
r
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
to
ge
t
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
ei
t
h
e
r
at
di
a
b
l
o
or
El
Ce
r
r
o
th
a
t
di
d
no
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
bi
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
across the on/off ramps to the
fr
e
e
w
a
y
.
A pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
tu
n
n
e
l
or
br
i
d
g
e
wo
u
l
d
be
id
e
a
l
.
LineString
1
0
9
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
16:19
27
1
Ro
b
Cu
l
n
Ro
u
t
e
Ju
s
t
ob
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
ne
e
d
so
m
e
so
r
t
of
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
in
th
a
t
ar
e
a
LineString
0
0
9
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
19:57
28
0
Br
y
a
n
La
w
v
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Le
f
t
tu
r
n
fr
o
m
El
Ca
p
an
d
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
Rd
ne
e
d
s
bi
k
e
le
f
t
tu
r
n
en
a
b
l
i
n
g
si
m
i
l
a
r
to
IH
tr
a
i
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
V Bl
v
d
.
wh
e
r
e
bi
k
e
tr
e
d
an
d
bu
t
t
o
n
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
8
/
2
0
2
1
16:27
87
Er
i
n
Co
x
Ro
u
t
e
Li
g
h
t
to
tu
r
n
le
f
t
on
t
o
El
Ce
r
r
o
Bl
v
d
.
fr
o
m
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
.
is
n
'
t
tr
i
g
g
e
r
e
d
by
cy
c
l
i
s
t
‐
‐
ha
v
e
to
wa
i
t
fo
r
a ca
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
it
.
Ne
e
d
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:14
27
0
Ro
b
e
r
t
Ha
n
l
e
i
n
Ro
u
t
e
Ma
n
y
in
ou
r
ar
e
a
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
my
fa
m
i
l
y
,
wo
u
l
d
re
a
l
l
y
lo
v
e
to
ha
v
e
a sa
f
e
bi
k
i
n
g
pa
t
h
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
an
d
/
o
r
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
to
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Trail.LineString
1
0
9
/
1
3
/
2
0
2
0
7:59
83
Jo
n
a
t
h
a
n
Mi
l
e
l
l
i
Ro
u
t
e
Mo
r
e
si
n
g
l
e
tr
a
c
k
tr
a
i
l
s
fo
r
Mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Bi
k
i
n
g
.
Ni
c
e
to
ha
v
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:01
26
6
to
d
d
sm
i
t
h
Ro
u
t
e
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
fr
o
m
I6
8
0
bo
t
h
si
d
e
s
ne
e
d
to
ha
v
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
be
t
t
e
r
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
wi
t
h
gr
e
e
n
pa
i
n
t
.
Se
c
t
i
o
n
be
t
w
e
e
n
Fw
y
to
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
is
ve
r
y
narrow. Had several close calls due to
mo
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
no
t
pa
y
i
n
g
at
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
.
Sh
o
r
t
st
r
e
t
c
h
fr
o
m
68
0
EB
to
Vi
a
He
r
m
o
s
a
es
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
as
no
bi
k
e
la
n
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
an
d
yo
u
ha
v
e
2 la
n
e
s
merging to one for cars. survival of the
fi
t
t
e
s
t
he
r
e
LineString
1
0
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
22:31
50
Da
n
Ma
h
o
n
e
y
Ro
u
t
e
Na
r
r
o
w
ro
a
d
,
no
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
,
hi
g
h
tr
a
f
f
i
c
,
no
go
o
d
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
7:21
15
2
Di
c
k
Wa
r
d
Ro
u
t
e
Ne
e
d
ac
c
e
s
s
fr
o
m
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Pa
r
k
an
d
Ri
d
e
to
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
fr
o
m
ba
c
k
of
pa
r
k
i
n
g
ar
e
a
fo
r
sa
f
e
t
y
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:47
32
Jo
h
n
Na
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ro
u
t
e
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Bl
v
d
LineString
0
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
21:20
20
7
He
a
t
h
e
r
Pl
u
m
b
Ro
u
t
e
Ne
e
d
bi
k
e
ov
e
r
p
a
s
s
ov
e
r
68
0
on
Di
a
b
l
o
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
0
/
2
0
2
0
8:02
28
6
Jo
h
n
Nq
s
s
t
r
o
m
Ro
u
t
e
Ne
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
se
n
s
o
r
to
de
t
e
c
t
bi
k
e
s
An
d
ch
a
n
g
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
to
gr
e
e
n
LineString
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
0:03
80
Jo
n
a
t
h
a
n
Mi
l
e
l
l
i
Ro
u
t
e
Ne
e
d
s
a bi
k
e
sp
a
n
to
cr
o
s
s
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
.
It
'
s
un
s
a
f
e
LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
15:54
12
7
Ja
m
e
s
Fo
s
t
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
ne
e
d
s
wo
r
k
LineString
0
0
7
/
7
/
2
0
2
0
20:16
21
4
Jo
h
n
Ro
u
t
e
No
bi
k
e
la
n
e
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
0
15:35
11
8
An
d
r
e
w
Bo
d
i
s
c
o
Ro
u
t
e
No
bi
k
e
la
n
e
or
Sh
a
r
e
th
e
ro
a
d
pa
i
n
t
i
n
g
on
Ra
i
l
r
o
a
d
.
A he
a
v
i
l
y
tr
a
v
e
l
e
d
bi
k
e
th
o
r
o
u
g
h
f
a
r
e
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:56
27
8
Br
u
c
e
Mu
i
r
h
e
a
d
Ro
u
t
e
No
r
t
h
of
th
e
Cr
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
En
t
r
a
n
c
e
an
d
bi
k
i
n
g
no
r
t
h
on
El
Ca
p
i
t
a
n
,
th
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
li
t
e
r
a
l
l
y
di
s
a
p
p
e
a
r
s
.
I ca
n
se
n
d
pi
c
t
u
r
e
s
bu
t
it
do
e
s
n
'
t
lo
o
k
like I can attach them.LineString
0
0
1
2
/
9
/
2
0
2
0
20:32
97
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
St
e
i
n
b
r
e
c
h
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
No
w
th
a
t
th
e
to
w
n
ha
s
gr
e
e
n
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
th
e
ab
y
s
m
a
l
Ma
g
e
e
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
it
ne
e
d
s
to
be
g
i
n
th
e
pr
o
m
i
s
e
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
to
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
an
d
the magical bike path that is supposed to
be
th
e
so
l
u
t
i
o
n
to
on
e
of
th
e
mo
s
t
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
ro
a
d
s
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
in
Co
n
t
r
a
Co
s
t
a
Co
u
n
t
y
.
No
mo
r
e
de
l
a
y
s
,
no
mo
r
e
ex
c
u
s
e
s
,
no
mo
r
e
wh
i
n
i
n
g
about the challenges, no more broken
pr
o
m
i
s
e
s
.
Ge
t
it
do
n
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
11:44
76
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ro
u
t
e
On
e
of
th
e
mo
s
t
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
bi
k
e
ro
u
t
e
s
du
e
to
ex
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
sp
e
e
d
an
d
vo
l
u
m
e
of
ca
r
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:58
75
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ro
u
t
e
On
e
of
,
if
no
t
TH
E
MO
S
T
,
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
ro
a
d
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
16:56
19
4
An
o
n
y
m
o
u
s
Ro
u
t
e
Re
a
l
l
y
ha
r
d
to
ma
k
e
a le
f
t
ha
n
d
tu
r
n
at
th
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
Di
a
b
l
o
an
d
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
in
ea
c
h
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Th
e
ro
a
d
is
re
a
l
l
y
ti
g
h
t
an
d
as
yo
u
cross under the freeway its dark and cars
ca
n
'
t
se
e
yo
u
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
11:29
65
Da
n
i
e
l
Ka
n
a
a
n
Ro
u
t
e
Ro
u
t
e
fr
o
m
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
to
Di
a
b
l
o
So
u
t
h
Ga
t
e
LineString
9
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
14:08
29
7
Li
s
a
Ha
m
m
i
l
l
Ro
u
t
e
Sa
f
e
ac
c
e
s
s
fr
o
m
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
at
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
to
th
e
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Li
v
e
r
y
an
d
en
v
i
r
o
n
s
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
9
/
2
0
2
1
18:26 9
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
11
6
An
t
h
o
n
y
Mo
y
Ro
u
t
e
Sa
m
e
pr
o
b
l
e
m
as
Br
o
o
k
s
i
d
e
:
th
e
li
g
h
t
at
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
do
e
s
n
'
t
se
n
s
e
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
6
/
2
0
2
0
18:39
12
3
j jl
i
t
Ro
u
t
e
Sc
a
r
y
na
r
r
o
w
ro
a
d
wi
t
h
fa
s
t
ca
r
s
.
Wo
u
l
d
lo
v
e
to
se
e
a co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
Cl
a
s
s
1 pa
t
h
th
a
t
en
d
s
at
Ca
l
l
e
Ar
r
o
y
o
.
Th
a
t
ro
a
d
fo
r
c
e
s
us
in
t
o
Di
a
b
l
o
County Club.LineString
0
0
7
/
7
/
2
0
2
0
10:23
27
4
Ch
a
r
l
i
e
Go
k
b
a
y
r
a
k
Ro
u
t
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
ro
u
t
e
LineString
0
0
9
/
2
7
/
2
0
2
0
20:31
26
4
Ed
SO
R
I
A
Ro
u
t
e
Se
c
t
i
o
n
of
Di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
mo
s
t
l
y
fr
o
m
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
to
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Rd
is
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
an
d
ca
r
s
.
I be
l
i
e
v
e
th
e
ne
w
ho
u
s
i
n
g
pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
supposed to address this but not sure
ho
w
so
o
n
or
ho
w
.
LineString
0
0
9
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
21:49
16
2
St
e
p
h
e
n
Pa
u
l
s
o
n
Ro
u
t
e
St
r
o
n
g
Pr
o
m
i
s
e
s
we
r
e
ma
d
e
ab
o
u
t
sa
f
e
r
cy
c
l
i
n
g
al
o
n
g
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
/
B
l
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Rd
.
Ge
t
bu
s
y
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
0
19:16
15
1
Ra
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
Ro
u
t
e
Th
e
bi
k
e
la
n
e
in
bo
t
h
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
is
su
b
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
an
d
at
on
e
po
i
n
t
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
ar
e
fo
r
c
e
d
in
t
o
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
I ha
v
e
be
e
n
in
v
o
l
v
e
d
in
a ne
a
r
mi
s
s
ac
c
i
d
e
n
t
as cars trying to pass, had to slam on
br
e
a
k
s
,
mo
v
e
ba
c
k
in
t
o
la
n
e
as
th
e
y
al
m
o
s
t
hi
t
an
on
c
o
m
i
n
g
ca
r
.
Sh
a
r
‐ar
r
o
w
s
do
no
t
h
i
n
g
.
Dr
i
v
e
r
s
do
n
'
t
se
e
th
e
m
an
d
/
o
r
ge
t
im
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
wi
t
h
bikes in lane.LineString
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
12:38
20
9
St
a
c
y
Mc
M
i
l
l
a
n
Ro
u
t
e
Th
e
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
is
ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
2
0
/
2
0
2
0
14:16
30
3
Jo
s
h
Pe
t
e
r
m
a
n
Ro
u
t
e
Th
e
tr
a
i
l
is
gr
e
a
t
.
Bu
t
at
le
a
s
t
a fe
w
ti
m
e
s
a ye
a
r
,
an
d
fo
r
th
e
pa
s
t
se
v
e
r
a
l
mo
n
t
h
s
,
th
e
so
f
f
i
t
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
on
th
e
un
d
e
r
s
i
d
e
of
th
e
68
0
br
i
d
g
e
is
ei
t
h
e
r
malfunctioning or is not working at
al
l
.
Wo
u
l
d
be
ni
c
e
to
ge
t
th
a
t
ch
e
c
k
e
d
an
d
fi
x
e
d
mo
r
e
fr
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
.
LineString
0
0
1
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
1
21:59
19
7
Bo
b
Gr
i
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Th
e
r
e
is
no
bi
k
e
la
n
e
fr
o
m
68
0
to
Ha
r
t
z
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
17:28
99
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
St
e
i
n
b
r
e
c
h
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Th
e
r
e
ne
e
d
s
to
be
a ma
r
k
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
wi
t
h
3 fo
o
t
bu
f
f
e
r
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
on
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
Li
v
e
r
p
o
o
l
St
r
e
e
t
an
d
th
e
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
Road/Crow Canyon Road
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
4
/
2
0
2
0
11:50
38
Ma
r
k
De
d
o
n
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
be
c
a
u
s
e
ca
r
s
an
d
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
do
n
’
t
se
e
m
to
no
t
i
c
e
th
e
st
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
s
.
LineString
0
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
23:27
15
3
Di
a
n
a
Lo
w
e
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
is
a ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
ro
a
d
bu
t
th
e
on
l
y
wa
y
to
ge
t
to
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
fr
o
m
we
s
t
si
d
e
of
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
Ne
e
d
s
a de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
pa
t
h
al
l
th
e
wa
y
or
th
r
o
u
g
h
the Diablo neighborhood LineString
0
0
7
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
13:22
17
4
St
e
v
e
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
is
ou
r
ma
i
n
cy
c
l
i
n
g
ro
u
t
e
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
da
n
v
i
l
l
e
fr
o
m
ea
s
t
si
d
e
.
It
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
if
th
e
r
e
wa
s
a ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
fo
o
t
p
a
t
h
/
t
r
a
i
l
/
a
c
c
e
s
s
tu
n
n
e
l
th
a
t
crosses the freeway between east and
we
s
t
th
a
t
is
in
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
to
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
Ad
m
i
t
t
e
d
l
y
,
th
i
s
wo
u
l
d
be
ex
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
so
an
y
me
a
n
s
to
im
p
r
o
v
e
th
e
wa
y
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
ca
n
na
v
i
g
a
t
e
di
a
b
l
o
ro
a
d
underpass would be great.LineString
1
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
7:43
25
9
Th
o
m
a
s
Go
l
d
e
n
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
is
th
e
cr
i
t
i
c
a
l
pa
r
t
of
my
re
g
u
l
a
r
ro
u
t
e
up
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Al
a
m
e
d
a
Di
a
b
l
o
is
th
e
on
l
y
sa
f
e
‐is
h
ro
u
t
e
,
as
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
to
Mt
.
Di
a
b
l
o
sc
e
n
i
c
is
to
o
dangerous. The part of this route on Mt.
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
is
ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
,
as
th
e
ro
a
d
is
mu
c
h
to
o
na
r
r
o
w
fo
r
th
e
bl
i
n
d
co
r
n
e
r
s
(a
s
ev
i
d
e
n
c
e
d
by
th
e
de
a
t
h
s
th
a
t
ha
v
e
oc
c
u
r
r
e
d
he
r
e
)
.
LineString
0
0
8
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
17:08
61
Er
i
c
Sh
a
w
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
pa
r
t
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
do
e
s
no
t
ha
v
e
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
an
d
is
ve
r
y
cu
r
v
y
wi
t
h
po
o
r
si
g
h
t
li
n
e
s
ah
e
a
d
.
Dr
i
v
e
r
s
ge
t
ve
r
y
fr
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
bi
k
e
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
here. A very small group of Diablo
Co
u
n
t
r
y
Cl
u
b
me
m
b
e
r
s
do
no
t
wa
n
t
bi
k
e
s
ri
d
i
n
g
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
i
r
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
al
t
h
o
u
g
h
it
it
th
e
sa
f
e
s
t
wa
y
to
ge
t
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
.
Pl
e
a
s
e
ma
k
e
this road a priority for adding bike
la
n
e
s
in
bo
t
h
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Th
a
n
k
yo
u
fo
r
yo
u
r
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
in
ma
k
i
n
g
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
a mo
r
e
fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
bi
k
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
12:22
27
2
De
v
a
n
Ro
s
d
a
h
l
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
ro
u
t
e
is
ta
k
e
n
by
ma
n
y
ki
d
s
an
d
fa
m
i
l
i
e
s
he
a
d
i
n
g
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
an
d
it
do
e
s
fe
e
l
un
s
a
f
e
an
d
un
m
a
r
k
e
d
un
d
e
r
th
e
fr
e
e
w
a
y
an
d
ar
o
u
n
d
th
e
on and off ‐ramps. anything we can do to
he
l
p
ma
k
e
th
i
s
sa
f
e
r
an
d
mo
r
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
an
d
bi
k
e
fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
wo
u
l
d
im
p
a
c
t
us
an
d
ma
n
y
ot
h
e
r
s
!
LineString
0
0
9
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
15:06
19
5
Hu
g
h
We
s
t
e
r
m
e
y
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
se
c
t
i
o
n
of
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
.
is
a us
e
d
ca
r
lo
t
on
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
.
Th
i
s
ca
u
s
e
s
a lo
t
of
di
s
t
r
a
c
t
e
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
an
d
di
s
t
r
a
c
t
e
d
dr
i
v
e
r
s
th
a
t
cr
e
a
t
e
a ha
z
a
r
d
for cyclists (and for the pedestrians,
as
we
l
l
)
.
I wo
u
l
d
su
g
g
e
s
t
th
a
t
th
i
s
be
ch
a
n
g
e
d
to
a "2
ho
u
r
"
pa
r
k
i
n
g
(o
r
si
m
i
l
a
r
)
on
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
to
av
o
i
d
th
i
s
.
Po
s
s
i
b
l
y
,
th
e
hi
g
h
sc
h
o
o
l
pa
r
k
i
n
g
lot could be instead used for this purpose
to
cr
e
a
t
e
a sa
f
e
r
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
fo
r
ev
e
r
y
o
n
e
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
14:54
30
6
Ro
b
e
r
t
Ib
a
r
r
a
Ro
u
t
e
Th
i
s
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
is
ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
ca
r
s
an
d
bi
k
e
s
to
sh
a
r
e
.
Ca
n
we
co
m
e
up
wi
t
h
an
o
t
h
e
r
so
l
u
t
i
o
n
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
?
LineString
0
0
1
/
1
2
/
2
0
2
1
13:30
88
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
Bo
n
a
d
i
o
Ro
u
t
e
Tw
o
la
n
e
cu
r
v
e
d
ro
a
d
wi
t
h
un
h
a
p
p
y
dr
i
v
e
r
s
ov
e
r
t
a
k
i
n
g
bi
k
e
s
un
s
a
f
e
l
y
.
To
o
ma
n
y
bi
k
e
r
s
ha
v
e
be
e
n
ki
l
l
e
d
on
th
i
s
sm
a
l
l
se
c
t
i
o
n
of
ro
a
d
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:15
19
1
Pr
e
s
t
o
n
Sm
a
l
l
e
y
Ro
u
t
e
Un
d
e
r
68
0
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
al
o
n
g
cr
e
e
k
to
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
1
7
/
2
0
2
0
9:07
45
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
s
RA
Ro
u
t
e
Un
s
a
f
e
se
c
t
i
o
n
of
bi
k
e
la
n
e
,
ba
r
r
i
c
a
d
e
fo
r
c
e
s
ri
d
e
r
s
in
t
o
tr
a
f
f
i
c
,
ca
r
s
ei
t
h
e
r
mu
s
t
br
a
k
e
ra
p
i
d
l
y
or
cr
o
s
s
do
u
b
l
e
ye
l
l
o
w
li
n
e
.
Ha
v
e
ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
d
near misses more than once. Suggest
re
m
o
v
i
n
g
tr
a
f
f
i
c
po
s
t
s
th
a
t
fo
r
c
e
cy
c
l
i
s
t
in
t
o
tr
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
/
o
r
to
we
a
v
e
to
ge
t
ba
c
k
in
t
o
su
b
‐st
a
n
d
a
r
d
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
“l
a
n
e
”
.
Al
s
o
,
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
pl
a
n
t
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
which hangs over into bike path LineString
1
0
6
/
2
4
/
2
0
2
0
20:53
30
0
Su
s
a
n
St
r
i
c
k
l
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
fo
r
bi
k
e
r
s
an
d
dr
i
v
e
r
s
LineString
0
0
1
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
1
18:57
26
0
Th
o
m
a
s
Go
l
d
e
n
Ro
u
t
e
Ve
r
y
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
,
to
o
‐na
r
r
o
w
,
st
e
e
p
ro
a
d
wi
t
h
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
bl
i
n
d
co
r
n
e
r
s
LineString
0
0
8
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
0
17:10
89
Er
i
n
Co
x
Ro
u
t
e
WB
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
bi
k
e
la
n
e
en
d
s
in
th
e
la
s
t
bl
o
c
k
be
f
o
r
e
th
e
Bl
a
c
k
h
a
w
k
/
C
r
o
w
Ca
n
y
o
n
rd
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Al
t
h
o
u
g
h
th
e
r
e
ar
e
sh
a
r
r
o
w
s
,
ev
e
r
y
time I ride here I've been dangerously
bu
z
z
e
d
by
ca
r
s
in
th
i
s
la
n
e
.
Fe
e
l
s
ve
r
y
un
s
a
f
e
.
Th
i
s
is
a he
a
v
i
l
y
us
e
d
cy
c
l
i
n
g
ro
u
t
e
an
d
I th
i
n
k
th
i
s
bl
o
c
k
ne
e
d
s
a de
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
.
LineString
1
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:16
36
Iv
a
n
Le
e
Ro
u
t
e
We
s
t
bo
u
n
d
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Bl
v
d
an
d
tu
r
n
i
n
g
le
f
t
on
t
o
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
ca
n
be
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
gi
v
e
n
th
e
am
o
u
n
t
of
hi
g
h
sp
e
e
d
ca
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
Al
s
o
bi
k
e
se
n
s
o
r
on right is often covered by
bu
s
h
/
t
r
e
e
ov
e
r
g
r
o
w
t
h
an
d
do
e
s
n
’
t
ac
t
i
v
a
t
e
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
l
y
. If
a sa
f
e
r
wa
y
to
tu
r
n
le
f
t
ca
n
be
se
t
u
p
it
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
l
y
ap
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
e
d
LineString
1
0
6
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
0
22:30
10
2
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ro
u
t
e
We
s
t
b
b
o
u
n
d
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
is
de
a
d
l
y
fo
r
bi
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
wi
t
h
no
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
an
d
fa
s
t
mo
v
i
n
g
ca
r
s
on
th
i
s
cu
r
v
y
ro
a
d
.
Ne
e
d
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
he
r
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:18
10
3
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ro
u
t
e
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
Di
a
b
l
o
Ro
a
d
to
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
Gr
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
‐
ne
e
d
a be
t
t
e
r
tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
.
Lo
t
s
of
ca
r
s
at
th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
ma
k
e
s
th
i
s
a tough turn using the really small ramp
th
a
t
'
s
th
e
r
e
no
w
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:20
10
4
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ro
u
t
e
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
St
o
n
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
to
so
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bl
v
d
‐
th
i
s
is
a ve
r
y
to
u
g
h
tu
r
n
.
Bi
k
e
s
ha
v
e
to
cr
o
s
s
in
fr
o
n
t
of
mo
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
l
i
n
g
st
r
a
i
g
h
t
through this intersection. Need to
ma
k
e
ey
e
co
n
t
a
c
t
wi
t
h
dr
i
v
e
r
s
to
ma
k
e
su
r
e
th
e
y
kn
o
w
yo
u
ar
e
tu
r
n
i
n
g
le
f
t
he
r
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:22
53
Da
v
i
d
Sw
a
f
f
o
r
d
Ro
u
t
e
Wh
e
n
he
a
d
i
n
g
to
w
a
r
d
s
Mt
Di
a
b
l
o
fr
o
m
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
,
th
e
r
e
is
a mu
l
t
i
‐us
e
pa
t
h
on
th
e
op
p
o
s
i
t
e
si
d
e
.
If
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
a bi
k
e
la
n
e
on
th
i
s
si
d
e
wo
u
l
d
be
very helpful through the windy stretch.
La
n
e
s
ar
e
na
r
r
o
w
an
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
is
ve
r
y
fa
s
t
th
r
o
u
g
h
he
r
e
.
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
/
2
0
2
0
8:56
85
Er
i
n
Co
x
Ro
u
t
e
Wh
e
n
ri
d
i
n
g
we
s
t
al
o
n
g
Ca
m
i
n
o
Ta
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
,
th
e
li
g
h
t
to
tu
r
n
le
f
t
on
t
o
Di
a
b
l
o
Bl
v
d
.
do
e
s
no
t
ch
a
n
g
e
fo
r
a cy
c
l
i
s
t
‐
‐
it
ta
k
e
s
a ca
r
to
tr
i
g
g
e
r
it
.
Ne
e
d
s
improvement.LineString
0
0
7
/
3
/
2
0
2
0
16:13 10
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 1
ID
Na
m
e
Ty
p
e
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Geometry
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
S
u
b
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
time
21
1
To
m
m
y
Sc
h
r
o
d
e
r
Ro
u
t
e
Wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
ir
o
n
tr
a
i
l
to
ha
v
e
up
g
r
a
d
e
:
* ad
d
i
Ɵ on
a
l
la
n
e
s
to
su
p
p
o
r
t
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
sc
o
o
t
e
r
s
* La
m
p
o
s
t
s
to
su
p
p
o
r
t
ea
r
l
y
ev
e
n
i
n
g
/
p
o
s
t
di
n
n
e
r
tr
a
v
e
l
(u
n
t
i
l
10
p
m
)
LineString
0
0
7
/
2
2
/
2
0
2
0
9:06
10
7
Br
u
c
e
Wi
l
k
e
Ro
u
t
e
Wo
u
l
d
n
'
t
is
be
gr
e
a
t
to
se
e
a pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
br
i
d
g
e
ov
e
r
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd
at
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
?
?
?
Th
i
s
is
my
#1
to
p
pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
fo
r
im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
bicycling in Danville.LineString
0
0
7
/
5
/
2
0
2
0
9:29 11
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 2
ID
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
Ty
p
e
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
(C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Na
m
e
(
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Te
x
t
(Comments) Submission Time
14
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
6
0
0
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
Th
i
s
is
a tr
e
a
c
h
e
r
o
u
s
st
r
e
t
c
h
of
ro
a
d
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Ve
r
y
li
t
t
l
e
ro
o
m
fo
r
bo
t
h
ca
r
s
an
d
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Cl
a
s
s
I do
e
s
n
'
t
seem to provide much protection for cyclists. Better
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
wo
u
l
d
be
ni
c
e
4/1/2021 9:06
14
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
3
0
14
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
3
1
0
14
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
2
0
14
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
2
2
0
14
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
3
0
0
14
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
1
0
14
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
3
3
0
14
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
4
3
0
15
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
3
1
0
15
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
2
0
15
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
6
0
15
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
3
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
S
a
m
e
co
m
m
e
n
t
ab
o
u
t
a pa
t
h
al
o
n
g
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Cr
e
e
k
.
I am
a hu
g
e
fa
n
!
3/11/2021 21:24
15
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
4
3
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
I
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
ac
c
e
s
s
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
St
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
is
a hu
g
e
is
s
u
e
an
d
wi
l
l
be
ve
r
y
we
l
c
o
m
e
d
by
th
e
cy
c
l
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
and maybe even Diablo residents!3/11/2021 21:42
‐
De
b
o
r
a
h
We
c
h
s
l
e
r
S
O
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
to
ke
e
p
bi
c
y
l
i
s
t
s
sa
f
e
l
y
of
f
of
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Bl
v
d
an
d
le
s
s
tr
a
f
f
i
c
th
r
o
u
g
h
Di
a
b
l
o
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
3/26/2021 14:29
15
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
I ‐
Sh
a
r
e
d
‐us
e
Pa
t
h
0
0
15
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
2
8
0
12
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 2
ID
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
Ty
p
e
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
(C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Na
m
e
(
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Te
x
t
(Comments) Submission Time
15
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
3
8
0
15
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
1
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
Bi
k
e
la
n
e
s
ar
e
go
o
d
,
bu
t
th
e
r
e
is
a li
m
i
t
e
d
si
g
h
t
li
n
e
fo
r
dr
i
v
e
r
s
he
a
d
i
n
g
ea
s
t
on
St
o
n
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd
be
f
o
r
e
th
e
intersection (i.e., driveway) with the paved trail. SRV and
MV
mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
us
e
th
i
s
tr
a
i
l
to
ac
c
e
s
s
Ma
c
e
d
o
Ra
n
c
h
tr
a
i
l
h
e
a
d
,
so
th
e
y
cr
o
s
s
tw
o
la
n
e
s
to
th
e
le
f
t
turn lane at the stop sign on Green Valley Rd. Could you add
a PH
B
at
th
e
to
p
of
th
e
hi
l
l
to
wa
r
n
dr
i
v
e
r
s
th
e
r
e
ar
e
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
en
t
e
r
i
n
g
th
e
st
r
e
e
t
?
4/3/2021 12:13
15
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
0
0
16
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
B
‐
Bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
5
8
0
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
T
h
i
s
is
a hi
g
h
l
y
us
e
d
cy
c
l
i
n
g
ro
u
t
e
wi
t
h
lo
t
s
of
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
A sa
f
e
bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
bi
k
e
la
n
e
wo
u
l
d
be
ex
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
.
4/1/2021 8:47
16
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
B
‐
Bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
5
1
0
‐
Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
He
n
t
z
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
to
th
e
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Ro
a
d
/
6
8
0
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
ar
e
ne
e
d
e
d
.
It
'
s
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
i
n
g
to
na
v
i
g
a
t
e
th
e
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
crossing without extreme confusion and danger.
Th
e
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
of
f
r
a
m
p
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
is
re
q
u
i
r
e
s
sp
e
e
d
i
n
g
ca
r
s
to
in
t
e
r
a
c
t
wi
t
h
bi
k
e
s
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
th
e
i
r
la
n
e
wh
i
l
e
they continue to turn and get ready to merge. Most families
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
on
th
e
IH
T
to
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
to
av
o
i
d
th
i
s
.
Bi
k
i
n
g
to
th
e
Li
v
e
r
y
,
CV
S
or
La
s
Tr
a
m
p
a
s
vi
a
Re
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
is
not an option from east of 680 without going around.
Th
a
n
k
s
,
Ch
r
i
s
3/17/2021 8:57
16
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
B
‐
Bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
5
1
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
S
R
V
B
is
a ma
j
o
r
bi
k
e
w
a
y
tr
a
v
e
l
e
d
by
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
if
no
t
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
pe
r
we
e
k
.
Th
i
s
is
mo
n
e
y
we
l
l
spent!3/11/2021 21:13
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
T
h
i
s
is
a hi
g
h
l
y
tr
a
v
e
l
e
d
bi
k
e
ro
u
t
e
wi
t
h
lo
t
s
of
ca
r
s
.
A bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
bi
k
e
ro
u
t
e
wo
u
l
d
be
ex
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
.
4/1/2021 8:53
16
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
B
‐
Bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
5
0
0
16
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
B
‐
Bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
5
6
0
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
A
hi
g
h
l
y
tr
a
v
e
l
e
d
ro
u
t
e
by
bo
t
h
bi
k
e
s
an
d
ca
r
s
.
A bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
bi
k
e
ro
u
t
e
wo
u
l
d
be
gr
e
a
t
.
4/1/2021 9:03
16
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
B
‐
Bu
f
f
e
r
e
d
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
La
n
e
5
5
0
16
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
4
3
0
13
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 2
ID
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
Ty
p
e
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
(C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Na
m
e
(
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Te
x
t
(Comments) Submission Time
16
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
2
8
0
16
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
2
0
16
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
3
0
0
17
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
1
0
17
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
1
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
I
ro
d
e
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
Rd
to
d
a
y
!
It
is
a gr
e
a
t
sh
o
r
t
c
u
t
ov
e
r
to
Ja
p
o
n
i
c
a
an
d
Bo
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
Cy
n
Rd
.
3/11/2021 21:41
17
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
2
7
0
17
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
2
5
0
17
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
2
6
0
17
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
0
0
17
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
3
0
0
17
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
2
6
0
17
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Ro
u
t
e
4
2
0
17
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
B
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
5
1
0
18
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
B
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
2
2
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
I us
e
th
i
s
al
l
th
e
ti
m
e
to
ju
m
p
on
th
e
IH
T
wh
e
n
ri
d
i
n
g
so
u
t
h
to
w
a
r
d
ho
m
e
.
Tu
r
n
i
n
g
le
f
t
on
t
o
th
e
IH
T
is
of
t
e
n
a little awkward with car traffic in both directions, and
on
l
y
a na
r
r
o
w
op
e
n
i
n
g
fo
r
wa
l
k
e
r
s
an
d
bi
k
e
s
.
3/11/2021 21:29
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
W
o
o
t
!
Th
e
so
o
n
e
r
th
e
be
t
t
e
r
.
Gr
a
v
e
l
bi
k
e
r
s
wi
l
l
en
j
o
y
th
i
s
.
3/11/2021 21:32 14
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 2
ID
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
Ty
p
e
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
(C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Na
m
e
(
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Te
x
t
(Comments) Submission Time
18
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
B
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
5
2
0
‐
Ch
r
i
s
t
o
p
h
e
r
He
n
t
z
P
a
r
a
i
s
o
is
sh
o
w
n
as
an
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
bi
k
e
ro
u
t
e
,
bu
t
th
e
st
r
i
p
i
n
g
an
d
si
g
n
a
g
e
do
e
s
n
'
t
ex
i
s
t
.
It
wa
s
pa
v
e
d
over and not restored. New markings are needed.3/17/2021 9:02
18
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Cl
a
s
s
II
I
B
‐
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
5
0
0
18
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Un
p
a
v
e
d
Tr
a
i
l
4
9
1
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
I
ri
d
e
a ro
a
d
bi
k
e
an
d
I do
n
'
t
ri
d
e
on
un
p
a
v
e
d
tr
a
i
l
s
,
so
I ha
v
e
no
co
m
m
e
n
t
.
4/1/2021 9:07
18
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Un
p
a
v
e
d
Tr
a
i
l
4
5
0
18
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Un
p
a
v
e
d
Tr
a
i
l
3
0
18
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
2
1
18
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
6
2
18
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
5
1
18
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
0
0
19
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
5
3
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
G
r
e
a
t
id
e
a
.
Th
i
s
wo
u
l
d
ma
k
e
a di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
an
d
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
a lo
t
ea
s
i
e
r
to
ne
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
.
3/11/2021 21:19
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:28
‐
Cl
i
n
t
Co
p
e
l
a
n
Bi
k
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
br
i
d
g
e
at
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd
/
I
r
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
wo
u
l
d
he
l
p
sa
v
e
li
v
e
s
.
Th
e
tr
a
n
s
i
t
ce
n
t
e
r
is
a busy place in the morning and I have had close calls with
ca
r
s
tu
r
n
i
n
g
ri
g
h
t
an
d
no
t
lo
o
k
i
n
g
fo
r
bi
k
e
s
en
t
e
r
i
n
g
th
e
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
.
A bi
k
e
br
i
d
g
e
wo
u
l
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
fl
o
w
and allow bikes, walkers to have a safe passage across
th
e
wi
d
e
st
r
e
e
t
.
3/16/2021 11:37
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
I us
e
th
i
s
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
of
t
e
n
.
I th
i
n
k
it
is
sa
f
e
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
si
n
c
e
th
e
r
e
is
a tr
a
f
f
i
c
li
g
h
t
an
d
a pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
signal today. A bridge over ‐crossing might help car traffic,
bu
t
I do
n
'
t
kn
o
w
if
th
e
ex
p
e
n
s
e
is
wo
r
t
h
it
.
4/1/2021 8:59
19
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
6
0
19
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
2
0
19
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
8
1
19
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
8
3
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
I'
v
e
pe
r
s
o
n
a
l
l
y
pr
e
v
e
n
t
e
d
tw
o
pe
o
p
l
e
fr
o
m
be
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
k
by
ca
r
s
in
th
i
s
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
wh
e
n
th
e
wa
l
k
si
g
n
wa
s
on. Anything you can do to help drivers recognize there is a
st
o
p
l
i
g
h
t
he
r
e
wi
l
l
he
l
p
.
3/11/2021 21:21
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:29 15
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 2
ID
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
Ty
p
e
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
(C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Na
m
e
(
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Te
x
t
(Comments) Submission Time
‐
Ca
r
i
n
a
As
a pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I’
v
e
al
m
o
s
t
be
e
n
hi
t
by
ca
r
s
go
i
n
g
th
r
u
th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
se
v
e
r
a
l
ti
m
e
s
.
As
a dr
i
v
e
r
,
I ad
m
i
t
that for some reason it’s easy to misunderstand what’s
go
i
n
g
on
in
th
i
s
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
A mo
r
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
so
u
n
d
s
li
k
e
a gr
e
a
t
pl
a
n
.
I’
d
lo
v
e
to
kn
o
w
mo
r
e
about what kind of protection this is talking about.3/19/2021 9:23
19
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
6
0
19
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
9
1
19
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
4
1
0
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:25
19
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
4
8
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
S
l
o
w
i
n
g
tr
a
f
f
i
c
on
cr
o
s
s
‐st
r
e
e
t
s
of
th
e
IH
T
is
ve
r
y
we
l
c
o
m
e
,
es
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
ne
a
r
sc
h
o
o
l
s
.
3/11/2021 21:15
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
G
r
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
is
an
o
t
h
e
r
ma
j
o
r
bi
k
e
w
a
y
in
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
.
En
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
sa
f
e
t
y
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
of
al
l
ag
e
s
wi
l
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
it
s
utility.3/11/2021 21:16
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
I wa
l
k
my
do
g
th
r
o
u
g
h
Os
a
g
e
Pa
r
k
al
l
th
e
ti
m
e
.
A pa
t
h
al
o
n
g
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Cr
e
e
k
wo
u
l
d
be
a be
a
u
t
i
f
u
l
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
to enjoying Danville's green spaces. I'd give the several
li
k
e
s
if
I co
u
l
d
.
3/11/2021 21:18
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:27
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
I ha
v
e
be
e
n
us
i
n
g
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
fr
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
du
r
i
n
g
th
e
pa
s
t
mo
n
t
h
wh
i
l
e
re
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
fr
o
m
hi
p
su
r
g
e
r
y
.
The Flashing Rectangular Beacons are an excellent
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
It
br
i
n
g
s
ad
d
e
d
at
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
to
th
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
.
Th
e
ra
i
s
e
d
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
wo
u
l
d
be
an
o
t
h
e
r
go
o
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
4/1/2021 8:56
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
I ha
v
e
be
e
n
us
i
n
g
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
fr
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
du
r
i
n
g
th
e
pa
s
t
mo
n
t
h
wh
i
l
e
re
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
fr
o
m
hi
p
su
r
g
e
r
y
.
The Flashing Rectangular Beacons are an excellent
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
It
br
i
n
g
s
ad
d
e
d
at
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
to
th
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
.
Th
e
ra
i
s
e
d
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
wo
u
l
d
be
an
o
t
h
e
r
go
o
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
4/1/2021 8:56
19
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
4
0
20
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
0
0
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:31
‐
JO
N
RU
G
G
I
E
R
O
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
ad
d
i
n
g
st
o
p
si
g
n
s
fo
r
ca
r
s
he
r
e
.
Ev
e
n
th
o
u
g
h
th
e
st
o
p
is
on
ir
o
n
ho
r
s
e
to
d
a
y
I st
o
p
ev
e
r
y
ti
m
e
I cross. Just make car traffic stop here permanently.3/13/2021 9:00
20
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
9
1
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:31
20
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
3
0
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:32
20
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
0
0
20
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
5
1
0
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:27
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
I ha
v
e
be
e
n
us
i
n
g
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
fr
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y
du
r
i
n
g
th
e
pa
s
t
mo
n
t
h
wh
i
l
e
re
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
fr
o
m
hi
p
su
r
g
e
r
y
.
The Flashing Rectangular Beacons are an excellent
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
It
br
i
n
g
s
ad
d
e
d
at
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
to
th
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
.
Th
e
ra
i
s
e
d
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
wo
u
l
d
be
an
o
t
h
e
r
go
o
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
4/1/2021 8:57
20
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
5
0
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:32
20
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
2
0
16
Da
n
v
i
l
l
e
Bi
k
e
Pl
a
n
‐
We
b
m
a
p
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Phase 2
ID
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
Ty
p
e
L
i
k
e
s
D
i
s
l
i
k
e
s
(C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Na
m
e
(
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
)
Co
m
m
e
n
t
Te
x
t
(Comments) Submission Time
‐
AL
A
N
KA
L
I
N
Th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
tr
a
i
l
is
us
e
d
by
th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
of
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
jo
g
g
e
r
s
,
do
g
wa
l
k
e
r
an
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
ea
c
h
ye
a
r
!
Th
e
r
e
have been 17 Bike vs Vehicle Collisions (Injuries) at Danville
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
!
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
us
e
th
e
Ir
o
n
Ho
r
s
e
Tr
a
i
l
to
ri
d
e
to
/
f
r
o
m
:
Gr
e
e
n
b
r
o
o
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
,
John Baldwin Elementary School, Chariotte Wood Middle
Sc
h
o
o
l
an
d
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
.
On
we
e
k
e
n
d
s
,
hu
n
d
r
e
d
s
of
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
/
n
o
n
‐re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
tr
a
v
e
l
to
/
f
r
o
m
Danville on the Iron Horse Trail! PLEASE MAKE THESE
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
S
SA
F
E
R
!
3/12/2021 6:30
20
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
8
0
20
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
9
0
20
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
7
0
21
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
9
2
21
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
2
0
21
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
4
0
21
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
6
0
21
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
5
0
‐
St
e
v
e
Be
c
k
Th
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
vid
e
o
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
de
v
i
c
e
s
wo
r
k
we
l
l
an
d
sh
o
u
l
d
be
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
at
al
l
si
g
n
a
l
li
g
h
t
s
th
a
t
do
no
t
cycle through the entire signal routine when traffic is not
ot
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
de
t
e
c
t
e
d
,
pa
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
at
hi
g
h
e
r
tr
a
f
f
i
c
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
3/31/2021 21:14
21
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
8
0
21
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
8
0
21
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
5
0
21
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
6
0
‐
Di
a
n
n
e
Th
o
m
p
s
o
n
A bi
k
e
bo
x
is
go
o
d
,
bu
t
no
t
en
o
u
g
h
.
We
ne
e
d
a sa
f
e
wa
y
fo
r
cy
c
l
i
s
t
s
to
tr
a
v
e
l
on
Di
a
b
l
o
Rd
to
Di
a
b
l
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
Blvd. This is a route used to access Mt. Diablo and it is not
sa
f
e
to
d
a
y
.
4/1/2021 8:45
21
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
5
0
22
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
3
0
22
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
4
1
22
2
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
4
0
22
3
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
4
0
22
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
3
0
22
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
7
0
22
6
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
3
8
0
22
7
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
6
0
22
8
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
7
1
22
9
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
4
0
23
0
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
2
6
0
23
1
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Sp
o
t
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
1
9
0
‐
Br
u
c
e
Bi
l
o
d
e
a
u
Th
e
Sa
n
Ra
m
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Bi
k
e
Cl
u
b
st
a
g
e
s
ri
d
e
s
fr
o
m
Ro
l
l
i
n
g
Hi
l
l
s
Ch
u
r
c
h
an
d
Lo
s
Ce
r
r
o
s
Mi
d
d
l
e
School. We use this intersection to get over onto Cameo
Dr
i
v
e
to
ri
d
e
to
Mo
u
n
t
Di
a
b
l
o
St
a
t
e
Pa
r
k
.
We
ha
v
e
to
pu
s
h
th
e
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
bu
t
t
o
n
bo
t
h
he
r
e
(G
r
e
e
n
Va
l
l
e
y
Rd & Blemer) and on our return at Cameo and Green Valley
Ro
a
d
.
Bo
t
h
in
v
o
l
v
e
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
th
e
on
c
o
m
i
n
g
la
n
e
to
pu
s
h
th
e
bu
t
t
o
n
,
wh
i
c
h
is
da
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
.
3/11/2021 21:36
‐
De
b
o
r
a
h
We
c
h
s
l
e
r
V
e
r
y
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
fo
r
bi
c
y
c
l
e
sa
f
e
t
y
es
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
yo
u
t
h
cy
c
l
i
n
g
4/1/2021 21:45 17