HomeMy WebLinkAbout084-99RESOLUTION NO. 84-99
ACCEPTING CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATION OF THE
CITIZEN'S ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC PLANNING (CAPP)
INITIATIVE PETITION; DIRECTING TOWN STAFF TO PREPARE
A REPORT ON THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED INITIATIVE; AND
SUBMITTING THE ORDINANCE TO THE VOTERS AT THE
NEXT REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION IN NOVEMBER, 2000
WHEREAS, on February 23, 1999 the proponents of the Citizen' s Alliance for Public Planning
Initiative (CAPP) filed an intent to circulate a petition in the Town of Danville; and
WHEREAS, the initiative petition was submitted to the Danville City Clerk on May 3, 1999; and
WHEREAS, on May 7, 1999 the County Clerk certified that 3,824 valid signatures were
obtained (Exhibit 1); and
WHEREAS, to qualify for the November 2000 ballot, no less than 2,616 valid signatures must
be obtained; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Danville Town Council hereby accepts the certification by the County
Clerk of the CAPP Initiative submitted to the Town of Danville on Monday, May 3, 1999; and,
be it further
RESOLVED, that the Danville Town Council directs Town staff to retum to the Town Council
within 30 days with a detailed report, including the fiscal impact and effect on the intemal
consistency of the Town' s general and specific plans; and, be it further
RESOLVED, that the Danville Town Council shall submit the ordinance to the voters at the next
regular municipal election in November 2000.
APPROVED by the Danville Town Council at a regular meeting on May 18, 1999, by the
following vote:
AYES: Arnerich,
NOES: None
ABSTAINED: None
ABSENT: None
Greenberg, Doyle,
Shimansky, Waldo
APPROVED Ag TO FORhi:
CITY ATTORNEY
ATTEgT:
CITY CLERK
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE TO INITIATIVE PETITION
I, Stephen L. Weir, County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify:
That the Danvilie Public Planning Initiative
initiative measure
has
(has/has not)
been filed this office on May 3, 1999
That said petition consists of: 247
(date)
sections;
That each section contains signatures purporting to be the signatures of qualified electors of this
county;
That attached to this petition at the time it was filed was an affidavit purporting to be the affidavit of
the person who solicited the signatures, and containing the dates between which the purported
qualified electors signed this petition.
That the aftant stated his or her own qualification, that he or she had solicited the signatures .upon
that section, that all of the signatures were made in his or her presence, and that to the best of his
or her knowledge and the belief, each signature to that section was the genuine signature of the
person whose name it purports to be;
That after the proponent filed this petition, I verified the required number of signatures by
examining the records of registration in this county, current and in effect at the respective
purportive dates of such signing, to determine what number of qualified electors signed the petition
and from that examination, I have determined the following facts regarding this petition;
1. The number of unveri~ed signatures filed by the proponent (raw count): 4,567
2. The number of signatures verified: 4,567
a. The number of signatures found SUFFICIENT: 3,824
b. The number of signatures found NOT SUFFICIENT: 743
1. NOT SUFFICIENT because of DUPLICATE:
52
IN WITNESS WHEREOF: I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this:
7th day of May , 1999
%:P,r%W~rk
Deputy
pet-cert 1/15/99
EXHIBIT 1 TO RESOLUTION NO. 84-99
PAGE 1
C3
0
oo
I
Created: 5/07/99 @ 12:00 AM Contra Costa County Page: 1
Job ID: PCS.JOB.040 STATUS OF PETITION SIGNATURE CHECKING Report IO: PCS-510
Petition ID: DANLAND DANVILLE LAND USE INIATIVE
Pages: ALL
Number of Signature Entries ............. /rSfg
Number to be Checked .................... 4566 100,0%
Number Checked .......................... 4566 100.0%
Number not Checked ...................... 0 0,0%
Number Valid ............................ 3823
Number Invalid .......................... 743 16,3%
GOOD GOOD .......................... 3823 83.7%
NREG NOT REGISTERED ................ 304 6.7%
OUT OUT OF DISTRICT ............... 273 6.0%
DUP SIGNED MORE THAN ONCE ......... 52 1.1%
WDRN WITHDRAWN ..................... 0 0.0%
RLAT REGISTERED LATE ............... 14 0.3%
STM SIGNED FOR MORE CANDIDATES THA 0 0.0%
PTY Party Different ............... 0 0.0%
PRSG PRINTED SIGNATURE ............. 4 0.1%
ADDR ADDRESS CHANGE ................ 88 1.9%
NS NOT SUFFICIENT ADDRESS ........ 4 0.1%
NPRN NO PRINTED NAME ............... 0 0.0%
NVS NOT VOTER'S SIGNATURE ......... 4 0.1%
NOSG NO SIGNATURE .................. 0 0.0%
NPSG NO PRINTED SIGNATURE .......... 0 0.0%