HomeMy WebLinkAbout032-97RESOLUTION NO. 32-97
DENYING THE APPEAL BY CAROL PELINO OF PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL FORA LAND USE PERMIT (LUP 96-39), PERMITTING THE OPERATION
OF A MAXIMUM 12 CHILD DAY CARE HOME AT 310 TUSCANY COURT
WHEREAS, Jahangir and Guity Bozorgmanesh have requested approval of a Land Use
Permit to allow a maximum 12 child day care home at 310 Tuscany' Court; and
WHEREAS, under State law, local review and approval of large family day care homes has
largely been preempted; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville Municipal Code requires approval of a Land Use Permit
for a Large Family Day Care home consisting of seven to 12 children; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and approve the subject request at a
noticed public hearing on January 28, 1997; and
WHEREAS, Carol Pelino appealed the Planning Commission decision by way of her appeal
letter dated February 7, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council did review the appeal of the Planning Commission action at
a noticed public hearing on March 4, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, a staff report was submitted recommending that the Town Council deny the
appeal and reaffirm the Planning Commission action to approve the project; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council did hear and consider all reports, recommendations, and
testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing; now therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Council hereby denies the appeal and approves the Land Use
Permit (LUP 96-39) per the conditions contained herein, and makes the following findings
in support of the Land Use Permit:
.
The proposed land use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general
welfare of the Town.
PAGE 1 OF RESOLUTION NO. 32-97
.
The land use will not adversely affect the orderly development of property within the
Town.
.
The land use will not adversely affect the preservation of property values and the
protection of the tax base within the Town.
4. The land use will not adversely affect the policy and goals as set by the General Plan.
.
The land use will not create a nuisance and/or enforcement problem within the
neighborhood or community.
6. The land use will not encourage marginal development within the neighborhood.
7~
The specific location and unique characteristics of the subject property and its
location and surroundings will result in a child care home which will not adversely
affect the enjoyment of surrounding residential properties.
.
The land use is consistent with General Plan Policy 7.12 which directs the Town to
consider child care and preschool facilities to be appropriate in residential
neighborhoods where safe vehicular access and effective buffering of neighboring
residences can be achieved.
.
The land use is consistent with the requirements of State law which considers Large
Family Day Care facilities to be appropriate in residential areas unless a significant
impact is identified as a result of the spacing and concentration large family day care
facilities, traffic control, parking, or noise.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
.
This Land Use Permit authorizes the operation of a large family day care home at 310
Tuscany Court. Development of the home shall be substantially as shown on the
project site plan dated received by the Planning Division on October 25, 1996, on file
with the Planning Division.
.
The maximum number of children on the premises at any one time shall be limited
to twelve during any one day. Drop-off and pick-up shall conform to these hours.
.
Hours of operation of the day care home shall be limited to Mondays through
Fridays during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION NO. 32-97
4. Outside play activities shall not occur prior to 8:00 a.m.
.
Day care noise shall be controlled so as not to create a nuisance to the adjoining
residential neighborhood.
.
The existing driveway shall be kept clear to accommodate vehicles dropping off and
picking up children attending the home. Day care providers shall park in the garage
during the hours of operation. The applicants shall include in their Client/Care
Provider Contract the following language:
"To minimize potential traffic impacts generated by the operation of the day care
home on the neighborhood, the client agrees to use the driveway area in front of the
home exclusively for pick-up and drop-off purposes during the hours of operation."
.
The day care operator shall make arrangements with the clients of the home to
stagger the arrival and departure times of the users. The operator shall work with
the clients of the home to develop a schedule for the staggered arrival and departure
times. The schedule shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning
Division within 30 days of approval of this permit.
.
Prior to operation of the home, the applicant shall submit evidence to the Planning
Division that the appropriate licenses and permits to operate a large family day care
home have been obtained from the State Department of Social Services and the San
Ramon Valley Fire Protection District.
9. The home shall comply with all pertinent building code requirements.
10. No signs advertising the day care shall be installed on the property.
11.
Within 10 days of the approval of a Land Use Permit for the operation of a maximum
12 child day care home, the applicants shall notify all existing clients of the pick-up
and drop-off parking restrictions and obtain a signed agreement. Future clients will
be required to sign the agreement prior to using the day care home. The agreement
shall be substantially as set forth in Letter No. 5 of Attachment D.
12.
Within 15 days of the approval of a Land Use Permit for the operation of a maximum
12 child day care home, the applicant shall submit to the Town a Client/Care
Provider Contract which includes the language described in Condition No. 6.
PAGE 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 32-97
13. This permit shall not be transferable, as agreed by the applicant.
14.
Any continued and substantial violation of the conditions set forth in this resolution
or of the requirements of any other licensing agency, after repeated notice of the
violations, shall subject the Land Use Permit to review by the Town to consider its
revokationo
APPROVED by the Danville Town Council at a Regular Meeting on March 4, 1997, by the
following vote:
AYES: Doyle,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
Waldo, Arnerich, Greenberg, Shimansky
?
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
r2
/ c& /2
CITY ATTORNEY
&,
CITY CLERK
c:\williams\permits\lup\lup96_39\reso_asr.rev
PAGE 4 OF RESOLUTION NO. 32-97