HomeMy WebLinkAbout099-93RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 93
DIRECTING THE MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE TO CERTIFY THE
1993 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) has the responsibility of ensuring
local jurisdiction compliance with the Congestion Management Program; and
WHEREAS, Interstate 680 through Danville is operating within its Congestion Management
Program Level of Service standard and no Deficiency Plans are required; and
WHEREAS, the Town has adopted a Transportation Demand Management ordinance; and
WH~, the Town has evaluated the impact of land use decisions on the transportation system;
and
WHEREAS, the Town has prepared traffic studies consistent with CCTA Technical Procedures;
and
WHEREAS, the Town has satisfied all requirements necessary to be found in compliance with the
Congestion Management Program; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Danville authorizes the Mayor to certify the
1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist, indicating the
Town's compliance with the Congestion Management Program.
APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Danville at a Special Meeting held on Tuesday,
August 24, 1993 by the following vote:
AYES: SHIMANSKY,
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
RITCHEY, DOYLE,
GREENBERG, LANE
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~qTY ATTORNEY
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Congestion Management Program
Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist
Jurisdiction
.
To be filled out and submitted by local jurisdictions
Participation in Multijurisdictional Planning
Year
1-a.
Over the past year, has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation
Planning Committee (RTPC) or other forums established by CCTA, including, as needed, amendment of Action
Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans?
YES NO
ffi O
e
Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards
-ao
Has the CCTA identified, through its measurement of levels of service onthe CMP network, violations of
adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdictions?
YES NO
[3 [3
No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.)
[]
2-b.
If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments
satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction?
YES NO
D [3
No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.)
[3
If the answer is no, or no Deficiency Plan is required, go to Question 3.
-Co
If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency
Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action Plan
amendment) for those segments consistent with Governmere Code Section 65089.3(b)? If yes, list segments for
which Deficiency Plans have been adopted.
YES NO
D O
^:~CMPCnECK. April 12, 1993
Page 2
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Coagestlon Management Program Local Jurisdlcation Compliance Checkfist
Jurisdiction Year
2-do
If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction, that identify
actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the
past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans.
-eo
If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub-
area that identify actions that the jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has
taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans.
,
3-a.
Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance
Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in
the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program)
YES NO
[]
Date Adopted [ I/06/~ i
Resolution # qt.- Za/
Cl
.
4-a.
Land Use / Transportation Evaluation Program
Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation, adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of
Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth
Management Program?
YES NO
El
~'CMVCHECK. April 12, 1993
Page 3
Jurlsdlctlon
Year
Contra Costa Transportation Authorlty
Congestion Management Program Local Jurlsdlcatlon CompUance CbeckUst
t>A ~'" lie..
,~q~
4-b.
Over the past year, have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been
conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate, more ~an
100 peak-hour vehicle trips?
YES
00
NO
D
4-c.
.over the past year, has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation
system been estimated, consistent with procedures described in the CMP, relevant Action Plans for Routes of
Regional Significance, and other materials published by the CCTA?
YES
Iil
NO
D
5.
Other Considerations
If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with
the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCT A.
6.
Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting
This checklist was prepared for submittal by:
(Name)
o.e~ll:'p~
SC.V'VlCLS Mtn'\ ecr
(Title)
10 V" I A.... t. w~k:.l.1
820 -108D
(Phone)
The council/board of DccV)wl/e.. has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the
policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the
Contra Costa Congestion Management Program.
Certifie<t 7jMK. ~ ~
Title: . MIU( &> V'
Attest: (;)a~~
c" (fown! ounty Clerk
Date: ~.SI)/CjC;.5
A:ICMPCHI!CK.
April 12, 1993