The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About236-89 RESOLUTION NO. 236 - 89 ADOPTING THE INTERIM APPLICATION OF LEVEL OF SERVICE ~.STANDARDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF MEASURE "C" WHEREAS, the Town of Danville adopted a resolution of intent to comply with the Growth Management Program for all new development applications as of January 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Town of Danville has initiated a planning program to comply with the Growth Management Program; and WHEREAS, Measure "C" has established acceptable levels of service for rural, semi- rural, suburban, urban, and central business district land use designations; NOW, THEREFORE the Town Council of the Town of Danville does hereby take the following actions applicable to the obligations established under Measure "C", which are in addition to existing development review and mitigation/fee programs: 1. Adopt the traffic level of service standards in the Transpo:lnation Improvement and Growth Management Program attached as Exhibit A, modifying the "Urban" definition to mean mid-range Level of Service D, with a corresponding V/C ratio range of 0..83 to 0.87. 2. Apply the traffic level of service standards to the street E~pes within the Town as shown on the map of areas subject to the levels of service attached as Exhibit B. 3. The Town shall require traffic impact analysis for an.y project which is estimated to generate 100 or more a.m or p.m. peak hour trips based upon the trip generation rates as presented in Trip Generation, 4th Edition, (Institute of Transportation Engine~:rs, 1987). 4. Require that during the review of development proposals, the traffic impact analysis shall determine whether a project could cause a signalized intersection o~1: freeway ramp to exceed the applicable interim standard and shall identify mitigation measures and/or fees so that the intersection of ramp will operate in conformance with applicable standards. Development proposals shall be required to comply with identified mitigations and/or legs. 5. Require that the interim list of routes of regional significance, and/or locations subject to findings of special circumstances listed in Exhibit C attached, are exempt from interim level of service standards, but require mitigation measures and/or fees from p~iiects that adversely affect the existing level of service, and for which traffic impact analysis is requ~lred. 6. Require that the calculation methodology for the application of traffic level of service standards is the "Planning Applications" methodology, using "Operations and Design Method" vehicles per lane per hour capacities (or other appropriate saturation flow rates), described in Transportation Research Circular Number 212, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity (Transportation Research Board, 1980). PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1 atb day of r)o.c. , 1989, by the following vote: AYES: GREENBERG, LANE, RITCHEY, SCHLENDORF, SHIMANSKY NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE ~~ _.7~/~/~_/~~ --" /~" MAYOR ATTEST: CITY ATTORNEY 3-A Traffic Level of Service Standards - Rural--LOS 1ow-C (70 w 74) Volume to Capacity (V/C) - ~emi-Rural--LOS high-C (75 to 79) V/C - Suburban--LOS 1ow-D (80 to 84) V/C - Urban--LOSJlj'gh/D/(t$lo/gf0/V/,C/ mid-range-D (83 to 87) V/C - Central Business District--LOS 1ow-E (90 to 94) V/C Based on the categories established above, each jurisdiction shall determine how the Traffic Service standards are to be applied to their General Plan land use and circulation elements, and the land areas to be defined as Rural, Semi-Rural, Suburban, Urban, and Central Business District (as suggested in the Guidelines in Appendix A). Each jurisdiction sh;~tll comply with the adopted stan- dards. Jurisdictions may adopt more stringent standards without penalty. Level of Service (LOS) would be measured by Circular 212 or the method described in the most commonly used version of the Highway Capacity Manual. Any issues with respect to the application of the Highway Capacity Manual or measurement of level of service shall be referred to the Authority's Technical Coordinating Committee for review and recommendation to the Authority. In the event that an intersection(s) exceeds the applicable Traffic Service standard, the Authority shall, jointly with local jurisdictions, establish appropriate mitigation measutres or determine that a given intersection is subject to a finding of special circumstances. Any intersection that presently exceeds the Traffic Service standard and which will be brought into compliance in the most current Five Year Capital Improvement Program (see section 6) shall be considered to be in compliance with the applicable standard: The Authority, jointly, with affected local jurisdictions, shall determine and periodically review the application of Traffic Service Standards on routes of regional significance. The review will take into account traffic originating outside of the county or jurisdiction, and environmental and financial considerations. Local jurisdictions, through the forum provided by the Authority, shall jointly determine the appropriate measures and programs for mitigation of regional traffic impacts. (See Section 5) Capital projects necessary to meet and/or maintain the Traffic Service standards are to be included in the required Five Year Capital improvement Program. (see Section 6) Source: Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Progra~ (Adopted August 3, 1988) :XF ] T 3 LEGEND ALAMO A11 roads are ,,.,.E~,,,, ...Ts,.ETAc.~ ~o~ ~4~~ .~ RURAL RESIDENTIAL ., 5 ACRE LOT MINIMUM hereby designated :~:~ COUNTRY ESTATES ...................... , a s "Urban" .... ~ SINGLE FAMILY-LOWDENSITY .......... 1-3 ( ~ (LOS mid-range D; ~ ...... SINGLE FAMILY-MEDIUM DENSITY ...... 3-5 '- I ;i~, ~ SINGLE,MULTIP~EEAMILY ..............,, ' ' O. 83 tO 0 · 87 V/C) ~ MULTIPLE FAMILY-LOW DENSITY ....... 7-12 · ~ ' ~ ~ COMMERCIAL I e.~ MIXED USE LIMITED OFFICE . , ~ CONTROLLED MANUFACTURING j :' I'C" ~' F'. '~' , ~ SPECIALIZED COMMERCIAL / i:' "':'.'.-"-'i mm ~WNTOWN M^STER~LAN " f' '" ",~"'~, / i J'~uc,*FE,,sJ'*C, '~. :..:....% .~,.,, .... .~...~, ..,~...: ., ',,,,/"- . --'? ' i ~ ~" ~ [ , · ~ PUBLIC AND SEMI PUBLIC .. b.,.,,,,,:.?t 7 ~: ~.NERA~O~EN~P^CE ... ' -,' , . lr ,~.,,,.. ,Ol.~: .~, j......,_~,1~ I~ AGRICULTURAL ,( r,,, :,j~' ..'J"~. r 1"~ ,~...,., l ~, .' , · . . . · ,':~ .:;,~ , . · - ,,~%~-~ :, , , ' ~, L~. .... , PARKS AND RECREATION - -:.! ,,..~ .... ..: .. -! ]: ..... : · """ ' BLACKHAWK s r;',m,,~ .~,' '. ,. i % -:- - :.'-C' '.: ·-. '-_.a.k\\X..i. '.~d~, ii/ ~'..~"~{'~:.,::'"'~ .... --~'----,,:~'"~,,x~,~,~, ,,/%.'...,.~,'.~i'.~{,,,.'. ". %% ,,,;','~i:!~\ . ~ ' '~' ':4:,",].. ~.,'.~.': . ,,' :,.~....,.. , , ..~.~::~; ;.,", '~ i:',', ........ -.0,,--. "'""---':' %r-- =:~=,~,~,~VAy 2 LANE ARTERIAL :-.,~ · ..,'- ___--~ ~OUJ"~O'~I~ICRIG"TO~ ~AY SAN aarON ........,P.EREOFINFLUENCE 0 ~~ LAND USE 0 15~ ' 3000' 1 MILE '... -X" 3,T I ,3 ,% ALANIO Danvi 1 le BlVde / .ES,DE.,,,, UNITS/NET ACRE Hartz Ave./San Ramor_ .~ RURAL RESIDENTIAL .. 5 ACRE LOT MINIMUM Valley Blvd and :~ COUNTRY ESTATES ...................... 1 · '~'~"' "~SINGLE FA MI LY-LOW DENSITY ..........1-3 ( i Crow Canyon Rd. are ...... ~ SINGLE FAMILY-MEDIUM DENSITY ...... 3-5 '" '-i: ~ ["~"e~i~:~:~*~J hereby designated -~ SINGLEIMULTIPLEFAMILY .............. 4-7 I ~ "Routes of Regional ~ MULTIPLE FAMILY-LOW DENSITY ....... 7-12 · - ..... DI. ! It I ( ) c.,..c,,, = I ' ' ' ~ COMMERCIAL '; ~-:.. -'~ MIXED use ~l LIMITED OFFICE i ~ CONTROLLED MANUFA~URING i \ · '.- \ ,~- 1 SPECIAL,ZEDCOMMEROAL /-'-..-':"-':'iDOWNTOWN MAS,ER P ^N ' '" I ,,,, .' ,b."' '- ' ' '"-' "'"'"' ""1 PWtU£ A OPEJ/SPACE ','~ ...... : ~ .., ', m~ -" ~ ' ' ~ GENERAL OPEN SPACE ] ' '", ~C':;',:::!~:~' k ..-.._.. s,, y_~____^GR,CULT~RAL ' '.'..": . k~'%~'""~;~ '~.~'' · .~'~.~%.. ,.)'. ~., ........~] PARKS AND RECREATION ,:.,..,, .... ~ .... =,- '"'~ ':' ": v, .... ' '" ~ i BLACKHAWK ( :;"'"" ....... , , ', · ); %. :;, .. . , I %q I ; i. · .;: · , :: · : ',: : ~.,,, % .-.,, ..:~ ; · /...) ... : -....... ~ ,. ,, ,~....~J (./ '""'" i! WOADS & BOUNDARIES ~-~ INTERSTATE FREEWAY "Intersections Subject to l:'ivdings , 4LANE ARTERIAL q' 2 LANE ARTERIAL of Special Circumstances" are l.i st(~c~ '' -- SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ~0~.=.~. TOWN BOUNDRY on attached sheet. SAN RAMON ........ SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LAND USE , . ,: 0 k~)O' 3000' 1 MILE .~: ..,~:_. ::~ ._~. ' EXHIBIT C (continued) INTERSECTIONS SUBJECT TO FINDINGS OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES (Anticipated to operate at Level of Service D, V/C ratio of 0.88 or 0.89) 1. Blackhawk Road/Crow Canyon Road at Camino Tassajara 2. San Ramon Valley Blvd. at Sycamore Valley Road 3. Diablo Road at 1-680 northbound ramps 4. Diablo Road at 1-680 southbound ramps 5. Green Valley Road at Diablo Road 6. Diablo Road at E1 Cerro Boulevard 7. Diablo Road at Camino Tassajara 8. San Ramon Valley Boulevard at Greenbrook Drive 9. Camino Ramon at Greenbrook Drive 10. Camino Ramon/Crow Canyon Place at Fostoria Way