HomeMy WebLinkAbout127-89 RESOLUTION NO. 127-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR MS 88-5
WHEREAS, the Subdivider of that subdivision known as MS 88-5,
in the form on file with the City Clerk, has requested Town Council
to approve said Subdivision Map; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivider has complied with all Conditions of
Approval established by the Town Planning Commission for the
subject subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision Map complies with standards set forth
in the California Subdivision Map Act and Danville Town Ordinances;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Town Council of the Town of Danville
hereby resolves as follows:
1. This Subdivision Map is hereby determined to be
consistent with the Town's General and Specific Plans.
2. This Subdivision Map is hereby approved and the City
Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and directed to
execute the same on behalf of the Town.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of September
i9 8~ by the following vote:
AYES: GREENBERG, JAGGER, LANE, RITCHEY, SCHLENDORF
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C I ~[YJC L~K ' C I TY
-':? / / , ,; . / ~ ....~ ~_ -.. /, -.. :.d.:~, f: \/' -. ..- ~ ~ :
'~ 'I / ?' ~" "--. /.'.. x ~ / '~ ....... .~' i,~' i ~ ': ~
:' K~/' ~-. '.... -' '~</ ' ¥ ' ' ,i / ~.~ ~ "~ .. / . _->q ~ .: -
,'. :;/.Z ~-?' ~.-~:~ //~:-:..'3~...:' d.,' ': ~ 5~. '~ / ~, :- :' ..' ~'~,:"' ",, ,~----~ I
· ~ .... ..:' .--. '-. '~"- ~'- .... ,.' ~, >'<' ~-' ' ~' \ <' ' ~ ~. >": .... I -
,- ~ ' . , .." .' < ~ - ' - . .?: : it / . " --- ~'~.~ .
.. ~. :.- . ..~- · . , , .,> ~> .~ ,. ~ , ', .. ~ -~. . / . ....
· ..... ~ . ' - , . . ,.~-.:-..~ ~:~:,'':;:,, ~.~. "~ t~-~...--:: IIi -f ..- 1
... ,> . ?' .. ./ . . , ~ ~,. ~A, ~,. .- \~, , '~w - , .: I
,T/
EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
.MS 88-5 VAR 88-13
FINDINGS
The Town of Danville hereby finds as follows in support of the
Tentative Minor Subdivision request:
1. The proposed Minor Subdivision is consistent with the
Town of Danville General Plan.
2. The design of the proposed Minor Subdivision is in
substantial conformance with the R-20 Zoning Regulations.
3. The proposed site is physically suitable for a three-lot
subdivision as it contains three appropriate building
sites.
4. The proposed site is physically suitable for the proposed
density.
5. The design of the proposed Minor Subdivision and the
proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or subsequently injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat since this property is in an
area where residential development has occurred
previously.
6. The design of the proposed Minor Subdivision and proposed
improvements are not likely to cause public health
problems because water and sanitary facilities services
will be available to the proposed parcels.
7. The design of the proposed Minor Subdivision and proposed
improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired
by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision.
The Town of Danville further finds as follows in support of the
Variance request;
1. The variance to allow construction of a carport with a
five foot sideyard encroachment for Parcel A does not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
the limitations of other properties in the vicinity and
the respective land use district in which the property is
located.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the
~ubjaet Droparty, due %o %ha pra=anea of an irregularly
configured residence and a pool, which are surrounded by
lC
I
large areas of pavement and dense foliage, a vast portion
of the site is effectively unavailable for placement of
the proposed carport structure. The street application
of the zoning requirements would deprive the subject
property of rights enjoyed by the properties in the
vicinity.
3. The Variance substantially meets the intent and purpose
of the R-20 Zoning District in which the property is
located.
CONDITIONS
A. General
1. Except as may be modified by the following conditions,
development shall be substantially as shown on the
project drawings labeled MS 88-5 Revised Submittal,
as prepared by DeBolt Civil Engineering and dated
received July 20, 1988, by the Planning Department.
2. The developer shall pay any and all Town and other
related fees that the property may be subject to. These
fees shall be based on the current fee schedule in effect
at the time the relevant permit is secured. Notice
should be taken specifically of the City's Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) fee and the drainage acreage
fee as established by the Contra County Flood Control
District. The Drainage Area 10 Fee ($1,000 per acre)
shall be paid at the issuance of a building permit (or
verification submitted that the fee has previously been
paid).
3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer
shall submit written documentation that all requirements
of the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District and the
San Ramon Valley Unified School District have been, or
will be, met. The Fire District shall also review the
Final Parcel Map and Improvement Plans prior to the
recordation of the of the Final Parcel Map.
4. If archeological materials are uncovered during any
construction or pre-construction activities on the site,
all earthwork within 100 feet of these materials shall be
stopped, the Town Planning Department notified, and a
professional archeologist certified by the Society of
California Archeology shall also be notified. Site work
in this area shall not occur until the archaeologist
and/or the society of Professional Archeology has had an
opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and
to suggest appropriate mitigation measures, if they are
deemed necessary.
2C
{ 5. Construction and grading operations shall be limited to
weekdays (Mondays through Fridays) during the hours from
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., unless otherwise approved in
writing by the City Engineer. If determined necessary by
the City Engineer, the project developer shall provide
security fencing around the entire site during
construction of the project.
6. In accordance with Section 92-2.006 of the Town Ordinance
Code, this project shall conform to the provisions of the
Town Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9). Any exceptions
therefrom must be specifically listed in the Conditional
Approval Statement, attached to the Revised Tentative
Map.
B. Site Planninq
1. Development on the three parcels created by this
subdivision shall be consistent with the minimum
dimensional requirements for the R-20 Zoning District.
2. Access to all three parcels created by this minor
subdivision shall be served by a 20' wide paved private
road within a 25' private roadway easement which may
narrow to a 20 foot easement with 16 feet of paving
beyond the hammerhead as generally shown on the Revised
Tentative Map cited in item A.1. The hammerhead
turnaround shall meet the design requirements of the San
Ramon Valley Fire Protection District.
3. The building envelope for Parcel C is specified by this
entitlement. It is approximately 5,600 sq. ft. in size,
with a location and configuration substantially as shown
on the Staff Study of June, 1988.
4. The residence on Parcel C shall be designed with a side
entry garage accessed from the proposed roadway
easement. The setback for this garage from the private
easement shall be a minimum of 15 feet.
5. This entitlement specifies defined yards and the building
envelope for Parcel B, which shall be substantially as
shown on Staff Study of June, 1988.
6. Minimum setback requirements of the R-20 Zoning District
must be met when positioning the easement in relationship
to the existing residence.
7. Th~ existing creek traversing Parcel C and a Dortion of
Parcel B shall remain in a natural state. The developer
is advised that the setback requirements for unimproved
channels less than 20' deep is determined by measuring
from the top of slope a distance of 2.5:1 times
3C
the channel depth, plus 30 feet. Modification to the
channel (i.e. installation of a culvert) may occur only
if, upon completion of a hydraulic study, it is deemed
necessary to insure safe building sites.
8. No channel improvements shall occur prior to preparation
of a horticultural report addressing impacts to the
adjacent 40 inch diameter oak tree. The report shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Planning
department. Any mitigation measure established in the
report shall be followed during site construction.
9. This entitlement permits construction of a 600± square
foot detached carport structure encroaching 5 feet into
the required 15 foot sideyard as reflected on the Revised
Tentative Map. Detailed plans for the structure shall be
submitted to the Planning Department cited in item A.1.
for review and approval prior to building permit
issuance.
C. Landscaping
1. Existing trees on the site shall be preserved to the
greatest extent practicable. Removal will be allowed
only upon receipt of written approvalof the Planning
Department. The trees slated for removal within the
proposed easement (as detailed on the revised tentative
map July 7, 1988, 18" Pine and 20" Pine) are authorized
by this entitlement for removal. The easement shall be
positioned as necessary to save the existing 36" Pine.
D. Architecture
1. The street numbers of the buildings shall be posted so as
to be easily seen from the street at all times, day and
night.
2. Architectural plans for the future dwelling on Parcel B
and C shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval prior to building permit issuance for
that parcel. The residence shall be designed with a
one-story character but is not necessarily restricted to
a single story element. Unless otherwise approved
through the cited review process, the height of the
structure shall not exceed amaximum of 25 feet.
3. Site plan and architectural elevations for the proposed
residences on Parcel B and C are subject to review and
approval by the Design Review Board prior to map
recordation.
4C
/
4. All abutting property owners and all property owners on
( Whispering Tree Lane shall receive notice ten days in
advance of the Design Review Board meeting regarding
development review on Parcels B and C.
5. If the architectural design and siting plans do not
receive approval of the Design Review Board, the
entitlement shall be referred back to the Planning
Commission for a public hearing to consider a two lot
subdivision.
E. Grading
1. Any grading on adjacent properties will require written
approval of those property owners affected.
2. Areas undergoing grading, and all other construction
activities shall be watered, or treated with other dust
control measures to prevent dust. These measures shall
be approved by the Chief Building Official and employed
at all times as conditions warrant.
F. Streets
1. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from
the Engineering Department prior to commencing any
construction activities within any public right-of-way or
easement.
2. The developer shall keep adjoining public streets free
and clean of project dirt, mud, materials and debris
during the construction period, as isfound necessary by
the City Engineer.
3. Any damage to street improvements now existing or done
during construction on or adjacent to the subject
property shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer at full expense to the developer.
G. Infrastructure
1. Water supply service shall be provided by the East Bay
Municipal Utility District in accordance with the
requirements of the District.
2. Sewer disposal service shall be provided by the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District in accordance with the
requirements of the District.
5C
3. A hydraulic study shall be prepared which addresses the
collection of building-site and impervious area runoff
(for existing as well as proposed roof and impervious
areas) and shall be submitted for the review of the City
Engineer. The study shall also check the adequacy of the
existing drainage systems and recommend necessary
improvements. The recommendations of the study and/or
the requirements of the City Engineer shall be
incorporated into the Improvement Plans for this
project. The Final Parcel Map shall include private
storm-drainage easements as necessary.
4. Prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Map, the
developer shall make the erosion repairs along the creek
determined necessary by the City Engineer.
5. Drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and/or the Chief
Engineer of the Contra Costa County Flood Control
District.
6. All storm water run-off shall be collected and conducted
via an approved drainage method to the nearest approved
downstream facility.
7. Off-site drainage flows shall be intercepted at the
project boundary via an approved storm drain facility, or
as approved by the City.
8. Roof drains shall empty onto paved areas, concrete
swales, other approved dissipating devices, or into a
pipe.
9. Concentrated drainage flows shall not be permitted to
cross sidewalks or driveways.
10. Any portion of the drainage system that conveys runoff
from public streets shall be installed within a dedicated
drainage easement, or public street.
11. If a storm drain must cross a lot, or be in an easement
between lots, the easement shall be equal to or at least
double the depth of the storm drain.
12. The developer shall comply with all relevant requirements
of the Contra Costa County Flood Control District and the
Department of Fish and Game. An existing creek crosses
this site. The developer and/or his representtires shall
notify the Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 47,
Yountville, CA 94599, of any proposed or existing
construction project within the subdivision that may
6C
affect streams in accordance with Section 1601 and 1602
of the Fish and Game Code. The developer or his
representative shall submit with the project Improvement
Plans, a copy of their letter from the Department of Fish
and Game which indicates either the Department's
requirements or lack of requirements. Requirements by
the Fish and Game Department shall be noted or shown on
the construction plans and shall be submitted to the Town
for review and approval. Such review and approval shall
be obtained form the Town prior to the filing of the
Final Parcel Map.
13. The developer shall furnish proof to the City Engineer of
the acquisition of all necessary rights of entry, permits
and/or easements for the construction of off-site
temporary or permanent road and drainage improvements.
14. All utilities required to serve the development shall be
installed underground.
15. All public improvement plans shall be prepared by a
licensed civil engineer.
16. The requirements of the County Ordinance Code and the
Town shall be met in regard to showing setback lines and
offering development rights for dedication along the
creek of this subdivision. If the developer is permitted
to pipe a portion of creek, then a storm drainage
easement and a vehicular access easement, if necessary,
shall be offered to the Town and the public as required
by the City Engineer.
17. The developer shall mitigate the impact of additional
stormwater runoff from this development on the San Ramon
Creek watershed by either of the following methods:
a. Removing 1 cubic yard of channel excavation material
from the inadequate portion of San Ramon
Creek near Chaney Road for each 50 square feet of
new impervious surface area created by the
development. All excavated material shall be
disposed of offsite by the developer at his Cost,
The site selection, land rights, and construction
staking will be determined by the Flood Control
District.
OR, AT THE OPTION OF THE DEVELOPER,
b. Contribute to the County Deficiency Development Fee
Trust (Fund No. 812100-0800) a drainage fee of $0.10
per square foot of new impervious surface area
{ 7c
J
created by the development. Within 12 months
of receipt of the contribution, the Flood Control
District will use the monies to implement the
subject improvements. The added impervious surface
area created by the development will be based on the
Flood Control District's standard impervious surface
area ordinance.
I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. A 25' access easement serving all three parcels shall be
reflected on the Final Parcel Map.
2. Prior to recordation of a Final Parcel Map, the developer
shall submit a road maintenance agreement for review and
approval by the Planning department and the City
Attorney. This agreement must be executed prior to map
recordation.
APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
PLANNING ~OMMISSION ON July 25, 1988
Kevin G~, Principal Planner Date
ppmp 16-m
8C
t
__.,.ATE., PARCEL MAP Cl. ,.iKS·R', .AW=.
LI T · I ~ O~I~No
WlA B~f, DO ·lURE ComRilrr ~3 l~lR KUI~ ~ ItCOlI~,TR~ OF ~R la4~.
SUBDZVTS]'ON NS 88-5
lUUlRmC]~r 1N lOT DtDIcATID D&~J
Tll AJU~ NAItlID IfilVAT· ACCZRN AJO trBILITY ·
for UII II T11R Glmll~lt~ I~JILICo I1~ II IPO· T·· U·· Off TRR Otto·R· Of ITZVlm C. LMUI i.C.l. )II?l
PAReRR 'A', -.-, ue 'C' Or sumo[vxRlOU ~ ifs fOR, eu.r DO~ LI.I~tO BEING PARCEL 'A* {~c MS $t7-69. cRrf emzmum
'to, ACC~R, imcmT;~i, pJUtKIRG, U'rJUTZU, DbIJU~,Z, BY, GUAm UD FTLED APRIL 29, t970 (t2 PH 32)
IGJ4~i. IreSBlUes ~C. ]Iv lgDR
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDS
TH· At!A ·AIRieR ~P.I.D.N.* SI A PR1VA?B STOA4 D~IKAC~ BASIf~lrr /~O IR
m)T D·DICAT~D frO· use eY ~!~ G~E~ ~·LIC, ~ IR fort ~q~ U·R OE ~N
IONlOVi~U OW RUBOIV1RICql KS IR-S BOa DJU. IWAG· HD&IPOSr41.
TOWN OF DANVILLE cIw cL,=', ,TATHm~,
,,o,,,:',~. ,~. ~ -~- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA =~-~ of ~,-~ ~O.A ~ ,,
L IMICY O~rENBLAD. Cll~ CLZRJ AMO IX--OI~ECIO ClUEiRK OP 11m
CIIR'IF~ 'rlqAt I~tE ' · ' - ·
Ac~ue,..z,~.,e 0CT06ER 1988 ~m~ AT S,,ID K~ING, ARPDOVE ~AJD N~f A~D DID ~OT ACCR~ C~ BrJUUJ
~'TAEB RE CJLLIPOWIA) Gr THE PtmLlC AXE OF ~IB ·I'RLrTH. BO&GI, &rUral OI E~SnSmlTS Samm
coulrry OP colffaA CODPAlNI !lllJUtOII AJ DBOICATED IT) ·OlLie DLI.
ON w,, ,,,, ,.,, ~ .,. . i,. , RN.,,RN RN, .,,, ~.N- .usTE,', STATE.THE , TO....AW ~. AA,. ,,.,. ~ =~,,,~= ,~,.~%, =,~..~. ,=
SICMID A N~ARy I*~JHLIC I· AND PON SA?D CO~"--'-~ BEAT·, P·RSONALLT TII~ UNDERSIGNED, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE DEED OP THUST RECORDED AUCUS~ WITlIB H~ IAVl~ BKEM AJ'pBOVlCO I
=,%AND O~O~V=~S~ ................... E', 19" IN BO~ 1'$~m or OFFICIAL RECORDS AT RAGE 76& DOES HEREBY I~II.lJ AJ~D ,IJ*ED I. k'f O ....
I ml THE BASIN OP SATISF&CTOIE EVIDR~CE) ~O OR
· HR PRISONS ~UO Rx~Ct~ED THE roK~ii~ R?ATE~ZMrr,AMO AC·~·D ~O JOl· IN AND CO·SENT TO TNR EIECUTIO· OF THE FOREGOING O~m£a'S R~
Pat 3~LAT TiEr t/ACtrrtD TlfR It~ STATENEST A·O TO ERR PREPARATION AHD RECORDATION OF THIS NAP AND ALL IN lfi1~r·Ri~ r 1 UVI II~ ~ Mir it~ Wills ~ C~
· DEDICATIONS THEREON. * --'
1~ --~J'~ ~K~A~' I ~R~P .UITABLE D,,D CONPANT, A CALIFOR#1A CORPORAElD#. ~ ORTE~RLAD ,
".~' .... "'~ I ~) · ,~ FOR THE cou~rrE oP //~'~ cl~ CLZ. ~D u-OYFICZO"C~u o~ tee
~Ka,,~,,ccu,~ COY'JENA COSTA, RT&YE Or CJ~IROAMIA ~ COAn~IL Off DAMVIM.I. 3TATH O~
NY CO~a~SRIOU RXP~Z·, ~ULy 27, .m NY~ )~//~ Y~5-... DE: CJ~ZTOUIA
ALEX O VQ~CKA BP:
C~TY CONTRA COSTA czlr~t CtJ[IU~
TIUSTg~' S ACNNOt~L~DGENENT
STATE Of CALIFORNIA ) CLINK OF ~ BORIC0 OF SUPERVISOR· STA~'~2CEIIT
TIIDSTEE'E STATEHERE COUNTY OF C.,v!rNA cear,zA)SS
.~ I IrfATH, Jul C·ECrd~ BR.t,OM. 111ATi
THE UNDHRSIONED, AS TEUSTEE UNORN THE DYED OF THUST NECORD~D #AICR 2A ON THIS DAY Or 3'uP~ 19~, B~FORE HE THE ONDERSI~ED, A
1NIl, IN ~ &2Jl OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 265 DOES NEaRlY JOIN NOTARY PUBLIC I· AND ~O~SAID COUNTY ~D STATE, PERSONALLY APPRAII£D I I A TAX eK~ ASSU·I·G PA!lq~ OY ALL TAJUIS I~IICl ad~ BOW A LIES,
1· AND CONStNT TO THE EXECUTION or THE POIEGOI#O MENS' STATE·ENT OAe*/O~T~$~Arf AND ~.~CA~¢L~ , PERSONALLY KNORR TO HE ON I~ NOT THE PAEU~Z, ~ l~ lU~C·IVEJP AHI) rILZJ3 #ITH TILB IC~
AND TO THE PILP&tATIOM AiD lENtRATION Of THIS NAP AiD ALL DEDICATIONS PROVED NE ON TEE ARIS SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE OF RUPERVISOU OF CON'ERA ColErA Coulrrlr, NEATH O4* CALIrO·IIEA.
TREeERR. V/(f~y4~/~MANU k~r4~ /~(4~' Or THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE
¥GRECOI·¢ STATESEN1, AND ALSO ENOl,~# TO NR TO SE THE PERSONS WHO I I JbLL TAX~I DOll HAY1· iR,I~ ~AID, AN clr.~lrZNO IT ~ COClerr
~liO~ CONVEFAKI~ CORPORATION, A CALIPONM1A COIPObTION RXECUTRO IT ON HENALP Or SUCH CORPORATION, AND ACRNO~HUGEO TO ·E THAT TION orrlct·.
SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED WE SAJ4R.
EATI~: PHIL BATe·ELD·
mY, /'~'; -C-' . IT, (.;/. - "" Y.,I ....
· ~ . . !~//~ COO~r~ AD4qI#IRTBATON Of COIr~RA COSEA
-- · ' ~I .~,r.~.~,,~. :~ ,,~,, ' OOUlb'TY, STATE or C&LIPO·IlIA
-- - , ' ;,)~'"4 ..-m ~}~ NOTARY PUBLIC lB AND FOR [HE COUNII or
"'~"'~w~"'~ CONTRA COSTA, STATE or CALIFORNIA
BY CONNISSIOII EXPIRES: ~'/~/~ iE:D%I~3~'/ C~JCR·
.~ TRUSTEE' S ACKNOIU. EDGEHRNT
STATS or CALIFOKNIA )
COU·YT OF ) SS
ON THIS DAY or dB I P~l , 11) , B~roRE IG THE UNDRNEIGNED, A
ROYALE P~I~:'~C IN AIIO ~rO· SAID COUNTY ~110 STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARRED RNGINRE·'S STATEMENT
· - ' ' AND ~ · ~ -' * , PIrRSONALLP KNM TO R~R OR
t~O'v[u}O '·1[ 011 TH~ 'BASIS OJ~ SAEISFACTORY tYROFEE TO THE WCmCUAORR'S STATRHEWT
~Ni· HAp WAS PJUEPARL~ lit KS OR UNDER NY DSREC~I'ION ~ IR ~·RD OI~N A
{ ~ /; ~ .... ddAD .' : ~, '.OP T~E CORPORATION THAT ERRCOTED THr FIHLD RUNTEE IN CONFOPJAAIfCE #IT· THR /LEOUI·KAE#TS Or WE SURDIVIRI~41 iiM~iifi~S
THll DAY OF ID , AT . .
lr(~L~-~TATEFIK'I~, AND AL~ K·OkN TO HE TO BA THR PERSONS bl40 ·Ap ACT ARD LOCAL OP~OINAKH AT YI(· ~ODEST or HOP·IS ·gAGE·E· IR PIId~D ~'"~A~CRL N~S, AT pAGJI~ AT'~i· R~AHL~ O~
EXECUTED IT ON BEHALF OF S0~N CORPORATION,AND &CR·ONLRDGED TO N~ THAT IICOK
hlm& DOVE~KBE·.IRIS. I RE·ERE STATE THAT T·IS pARCEL JqAeRUBSTAJdTIJULLp
SUCH CORPORATION RIECUTED THE R&NR. CopromA~ TO T~R APPROVED OR CO#OITIONALLE APBROVT. D TENTATIVE NAil, IF
ARE.
, ACTING COUNTY lU!CODOR· ~11 ~ ro! TI~
~at ~ . , ~ '? , )' ,*, .. I rdRTRRR STATR THAT THD SUBPRY IR T11UB AND 1414. 'WA?
~ DONUKJENT· OP TH· C·ARACTER SHORN ON ~AR PARCEL IN SUC·
~KJIART FUBLIC IN AND r THE C~Uwz% OF ' TOSITIONS 044 OR BEFORE JANUARY, 1990, AND NIL EHABLIE COU~ OF COmTRA COSTA, NEATH OF
GILL I pOlUd Z~
CONTRA COSTA, STATE OR CALIFORNIA TRB SU·VKY TO ~· RETILftCBD.
.,c.,,,,...,,..,, "'
· ' ' · t~vE, ~'~-f~ t---.~ ;t Dr. Ptrrr cometY RNGOK)Rm
4P N !99-140-015 JR·NO 88111 ~E~T I C~ ~ S~f~T~
ILL]I]HS ][ ~10 Z ]L.]]HI[Illllll 'ON ~rllO-0tl'-t~l'li'd'V
,~ ~:,-=-~,-~_~.~'/:~C'~ :. I~ WJ ~l ~ .'~
.£L..94, oll
~314 N3'~fl ~ .4SZSS'Z2
7 i'v4vdl~ a' ~) I
tGGn~ ,~I~A ~ '13 D~Yd
,CeGP.~ .ff
Jt f(,?,~11,I
:~,~
ON39J? ~
JS IP~r~ I]N
I ,I/
':~/ ~., '%\ ~3~a /. '"~
~!N l~l~ll*3 'lll,mq]
/~
3'rlXANVO JO NMOJ. .. T~.._ J/,~ ',? ~, ~..~.~ \ ,~
(I£ Nd ~l) 0L61I '15~. "lZ~dV O:JIXJ
'b'g-£11l ~ :10 .V. ~d l~11[~!l
q-88 5N NOXSTAX0gI'IS
dVH q33UVd ~ ,.~. ~r