Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout117-89 TOWN OF DANVILLE RESOLUTION 117-89 A RESOLUTION APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT DANVILLE STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1983-1 RESOLVED, by the Town Council of the Town of Danville, County of Contra Costa California, that WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. -89, A Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for the Danville Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District 1983-1, (the "District"), this Council designated Santina & Thompson, Inc., as Engineer and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by this Council, was found to be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that said report should stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesaid resolution, and that August 7, 1989, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., in the regular meeting place of this Council, 699 Old Orchard Drive, Danville, California, were appointed as the time and place for a hearing by this Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was duly and regularly published; and WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place said hearing was duly and regularly held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to said levy were fully heard and considered by this Council, and all oral statements and all written protest or communications were duly heard, considered and overruled, and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order said levy and the confirmation of the diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said Engineer to pay the costs and expenses as modified thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND DETERMINED AND ORDERED, that: 1. The property owners owning more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of assessable lands within the District had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filed written protests against the said proposed levy, as a whole or as to any part thereof, or against the said District or the extent thereof to be assessed for the costs and expenses, as modified, of said levy as a whole, or as to any part thereof, or against the Engineer's estimate of costs and expenses, in whole or part, or against the maps and description, in whole or in part, or against the diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof, in whole or in part. 2. The public interest, convenience and necessity require that said levy be made. 3. The district benefited by said improvement and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto. 4. Said Engineer's report as a whole and each part thereof, to wit: (a) the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith: (b) the diagram showing the assessment district, plans and specifications for the improvements to be maintenance and the boundaries and dimension of the respective lots and parcels of land within said district; and (c) the assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto, are finally approved incidental thereto; 5. Final adoption and approval of the Engineer's Report as a whole, and of the plans and specifications, estimate of the costs and expenses, as modified the diagram and the assessment, as contained in said report, a hereinabove determined and ordered, is intended to and shall refer and apply to said report, or any portion thereof, as amended, modified, or revised or corrected by, or pursuant to and in accordance with, any resolution or order, if any, heretofore duly adopted or made by this Council. 6. Said assessment to pay the costs and expenses of the maintenance of said improvements is hereby levied. For further particulars pursuant to the provisions of said Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, reference is hereby made to said Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report. 7. Based on the oral and documentary evidence, including said Engineer's Report, as modified offered and received at said hearing, this Council expressly finds and determines (a) that each of said several lots and parcels of land will specially benefited by the maintenance of said improvements at least in the amount, if not more than the amount, of the assessment apportioned against said lots and parcels of land, respectively, and (b) that there is substantial evidence to support, and the weight of said evidence preponderates in favor of, the aforesaid finding and determination as to special benefits. 8. Immediately upon the adoption of this resolution, but in no event later than the third Monday in August following such adoption, the City Clerk shall file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment and a certified copy of this resolution with the Auditor of the County of Contra Costa. Upon such filing, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessment thereupon as shown in the assessment. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. After collection by the County of Contra Costa the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any compensation due the County for collection, shall be paid to the Finance Director of this Town. 9. Upon receipt of moneys representing assessments collected by the County, the Finance Director of the Town of Danville shall deposit the moneys in the Town Treasury to the credit of an improvement fund, which improvement fund the Finance Director of the Town is hereby directed to establish under the distinctive designation of said District. Moneys in said improvement fund shall be expended only for the maintenance and installation of said improvements. I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Council of the Town of Danville, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7st day of August, 1989 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: GREENBERG, RITCHEY, SCHLENDORF NOES: NONE ABSENT: JAGGER, LANE ~ Ma/~Y° r~~ ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FOR~. City Attorney ' ~/ ~ity Clerk Town of Danville Contra Costa County, California ENGINEERrS REPORT ON THE DANVITJ~ STREET LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 1983-1 AND THE _ LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE 1989/90 FISCAL YEAR Prepared By Santina & Thompson, Inc. 1355 Willow Way Suite 280 Concord, CA 94520 July, 1989 DANVILLE STREET LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1983-1 CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1989/1990 The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the Town Council. DATED: ~~ /~ 198 ~ Michael J. Middleton, Engineer of Work I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed En s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of , 198 . George Sipel, City Clerk, Town of Danville, Contra Costa County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the Town Council of the Town of Danville, California, on the day of 198 George Sipel, City Clerk, Town of Danville, Contra Costa County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was file with the County Auditor of the County of Contra Costa on the day of , 198 . Michael J. Middleton, Engineer of Work ..... By i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................... 1 II. Description of Improvement ............. 1 III. Estimate of Cost .................. 3 IV. District Boundaries and Benefit Zones ....... 5 V. Method of Assessment ................ 5 Exhibit A - Benefit Units Benefit Zone A (Landscaping) Benefit Zone B (Landscaping) Benefit Zone C (Lighting) Exhibit B - Assessment Roll Exhibit C - Assessment Diagram ii I. INTRODUCTION Michael Jo Middleton, Engineer of Work for Assessment District No. 1983-1, Town of Danville, Contra Costa County, California, makes this report, as directed by the Town Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). The Danville Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District is intended to provide for the levy and collection of assess- ments sufficient to pay for the installation and maintenance of landscape and lighting improvements within the district. The Assessment District includes all lands within the incor- porated limits of the Town of Danville. The purpose of this report is to determine the annual assess- ment to be levied in the current fiscal year. II. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The improvements to be provided by the Assessment District generally consist of the installation, maintenance and servic- ing of landscaping and lighting facilities within the public rights-of-way. LANDSCAPING: The Town of Danville's landscape amenities consist primarily of streetscapes and feature areas as follows: Streetscapes: Diablo Road Danville Boulevard San Ramon Valley Boulevard Camino Tassajara Sycamore Valley Road E1 Cerro Boulevard Camino Ramon Greenbrook Drive E1 Capitan Drive Old Orchard Road The Historic Downtown Area 1 Feature Areas: Creek Edge Treatment Bret Hart Median Freeway Interchanges Entries Intersections Medians All landscape treatment is in conformance with the "City of Danville Streetscape Beautification Guidelines" dated April 1986. Such beautification is achieved mainly through the planting of street and median trees. Additionally, special paving materials, landscape walls, and street furnishings such as pots, bollards, and tree grates are used in special areas. STREET LIGHTING: Public lighting facilities consist exclusively of pole mounted street lights in order to provide safety, security, and con- venience for occupants, pedestrians and travelers. Lighted areas consist of all those portions of former Contra Costa County Service Area L-42, M-6, M-21 and M-22 to the extent they fall within the incoporated limits of the Town of Danville; except as modified to include recently subdivided lands having public lighting facilities. 2 III. ESTIMATE OF COST A. OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE COSTS: 1. Landscaping (Benefit Zone A) $368,500 2. Landscaping (Benefit Zone B) $238,000 3. Landscaping (Sycamore Valley Road Benefit Zone A & B) $ 50,000 4. Street Lighting (Benefit Zone C) $279,000 SUBTOTAL $935,500 B. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES: 1. Assessment Engineering $ 15,000 2. Data Processing $ 4,000 3. County Collection Fees $ 13,000 4. Administrative Overhead $ 50,000 SUBTOTAL $1,017,500 10% CONTINGENCIES $100,000 TOTAL $1,117,500 LESS CASH RESERVES ($489,500) AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $628,000 3 C. APPORTIONMENT 1. Benefit Zone A: Operation and Maintenance Cost $368,500 50% Sycamore Valley Road Cost $ 25,000 Incidental Costs $ 34,000 SUBTOTAL $427,500 10% Contingency $ 43,000 Less Cash Reserves ($219,000) AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED TO BENEFIT ZONE A $251,500 2. Benefit Zone B: Operation and Maintenance Cost $238,000 50% Sycamore Valley Road Cost $ 25,000 Incidental Costs $ 23,000 SUBTOTAL $286,000 10% Contingency $ 28,000 Less Cash Reserves ($139,000) AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED TO BENEFIT ZONE B $175,000 3. Benefit Zone C: Operation and Maintenance Cost $279,000 Incidental Costs $ 25,000 SUBTOTAL $304,000 10% Contingency $ 29,000 Less Cash Reserve ($131,500) AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED TO BENEFIT ZONE C $201,500 TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $ 628,000 4 IV. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND BENEFIT ZONES The Danville Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District includes all parcels of land within the incorporated limits of the Town of Danville. The Assessment District boundaries are therefore coincident with the Danville Town Limits, as indi- cated on the attached Assessment Diagram (Exhibit C). All included parcels are identified by the Contra Costa County Assessor's Parcel Numbers, for the current fiscal year, on the attached Assessor's Roll (Exhibit B). Detailed description of lines and dimensions for various lots or parcels within the district are incorporated by reference to maps on file at the Contra Costa County Assessor's Office. The Assessment District has been portioned into three distinct Benefit Zones described as follows: BENEFIT ZONE A: This zone represents parcels which recieve the benefit of average intensity landscaping, and includes all parcels within the incorporated limits of the Town of Danville, which are not included in Benefit Zone B. BENEFIT ZONE B: This zone represents parcels which recieve the benefit of higher intensity landscaping by virtue of inclusion in the Sycamore Valley Specific Plan Area. Zone B includes all parcels contained in the Sycamore Valley Assessment District 1985-1. BENEFIT ZONE C: This zone represents parcels which benefit from street lighting facilities. This zone includes all parcels contained within former Contra Costa County Service Areas L-42, M-6, M-21 and M-22, to the extent they fall within the incor- porated limits of the Town of Danville, except as modified to include recently subdivided lands having public lighting facilities. Benefit Zones A, B and C are indicated on the attached Assessment Diagram (Exhibit C). V. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The total assessment (as described in Section III) has been apportioned among the parcels of land liable therefore and benefited thereby, as represented on the attached Assessment Roll (Exhibit B). The assessment numbers correspond to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the equalized assessment roll for the current fiscal year. 5 The assessment has been made upon each parcel of land in the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be recieved by that parcel, from the improvements described in Section II. There are three distinct zones of similar benefit as described in Section IV. Costs associated with each zone are determined separately and apportioned among the parcels of that particular zone. COSTS LANDSCAPING: Landscaping costs are assigned to Benefit Zones A and B as follows: BENEFIT ZONE A: Costs associated with all landscape improvements located geographically within this zone plus 50% of landscaping costs associated with Sycamore Valley Road. BENEFIT ZONE B: costs associated with all landscape improvements located geographically within this zone (Sycamore Valley Specific Plan Area) plus 50% of _ landscaping costs associated with Sycamore Valley Road. STREET LIGHTS: BENEFIT ZONE C: all costs associated with public lighting facilities located geographically within this zone. APPORTIONMENT LANDSCAPING: Costs associated with landscaping for Benefit Zones A and B are spread on the basis of parcel benefit. Single family residential parcels are considered as the unit of benefit. Parcels of differing uses are factored on the basis of equivilent single family residential units. The factor for non-residential parcels is considered to be proportioned to the parcel's size in acres. The value for a single unit of landscaped benefit is determined separatly for Benefit Zones A and B, and is established by dividing the total assessment for the appropriate zone by the sum of all benefit units assigned to the parcels within that z one. The assessment for landscaping for each parcel within Benefit Zones A and B is determined by multiplying the number of benefit units assigned to each parcel by the single unit value established for that zone. Benefit units are assigned to parcels in Benefit Zones A and B as indicated on Exhibit A. STREET LIGHTS: Costs associated with public lighting facilities for Benefit Zone C are spread on the basis of parcel benefit. The degree of benefit is determined by the use of each individual parcel, the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated by the land use, and the enhanced security during hours of darkness. It is assumed that similar land uses will recieve similar benefits. Single family residential parcels are considered as the unit of benefit. The value of a single unit of street lighting benefit is established by dividing the total assessment for Benefit Zone C by the sum of the benefit units assigned to parcels within the zone. The assessment for street lighting for each parcel in Benefit Zone C is determined by multiplying the number of benefit units _ assigned to each parcel by the single unit value. Benefit units are assigned to parcels in Benefit Zone C as indicated on Exhibit A. ASSESSMENT: The total assessment for each parcel in the Danville Street Lighting and Landscape Assessment District is determined by adding the value of its landscape assessment (Benefit Zone A or B, but not both), and its street light assessment (Benefit Zone C, or no benefit). The total assessment for each parcel in the Assessment District is indicated on the Assessment Roll (Exhibit B). 7 EXHIBIT A BENEFIT UNIT APPORTIONMENT BY PROPERTY CLASS BENEFIT ZONE A I~DSCAPING EQUIVALENT TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS CIASS USE CODE RESIDENTIAL UNITS (FACTOR) 1. Single Dwelling Unit A. Single Family Homes 11,12,13, i/Parcel 1.00 14,19,61 i/Parcel 1.00 B. Condominium 29 i/Parcel 1.00 2. Multiple Dwelling Units A. Two 21 2/Parcel 2.00 B. Three 22,24 3/Parcel 3.00 C. Four 23 4/Parcel 4.00 D. 5 to 12 25 5/Parcel 5.00 E. 13 to 24 26 6/Parcel 6.00 F. 25 to 59 27 7/Parcel 7.00 G. 60 or more 28 8/Parcel 8.00 3. Commercial A. Commercial Stores 31 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre B. Small Grocery 32 " " C. Office Building 33 " " D. Medical, Dental 34 " " E. Service Stations 35 " " F. Garages 36 " " G. Recreational Clubs 37 " " H. Golf Courses 38 " " I. Bowling Alleys 39 " " J. Boat Harbors 40 " " K. Supermarkets 41 " " L. Shopping Centers 42 " " M. Financial Buildings 43 " " N. Motels & Mobile Home Parks 44 " " O. Theaters 45 " " P. Drive-In Restaurants 46 " " Q. Walk-In Restaurants 47 " " R. Multiple Commercial 48 " " S. Auto Agency 49 " " 4. Industrial A. Industrial 51,52 5.5/Acre 5.5/Acre B. Heavy Industrial 53,56 " " 54 " " C. Mini Warehouses 55 " " EQUIVALENT TOTAL ~ SINGLE FAMILY UNITS CIASS USE CODE RESIDENTIAL UNITS (FACTOR) 5. Institutional A. Convalescent Hospitals 70 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre B. Churches 71 " " C. Schools 72 " " D. Hospitals 73 " " E. Cemetary, Mortuary 74 " " F. Fraternal & Service Organizations 75 " " G. Retirement Housing 76 " " H. Cultural Uses 77 O/Parcel 0.00 I. Parks & Playgrounds 78 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre J. Government Owned 79 O/Parcel 0.00 6. Miscellaneous Property A. Vacant Land 10,15,16-18, 0.5/Parcel 0.50 20,30,50,60 " " 62-69 " " B. Mineral Rights 80 O/Parcel 0.00 _ C. Private Roads 81 0.5/Parcel 0.50 D. Pipe Lines & Canals 82 O/Parcel 0.50 E. State Board Assessed Parcels 83 " " F. Utilities 84 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre G. Public Parking 85 " " H. Taxable Municipally Owned Properties 86 O/Parcel 0.00 I. Common Area 87 " " J. Mobile Homes 88 0.00 0.00 K. Other; Split Parcels in Different Tax Zones 89 i/Parcel 1.00 BENEFIT ZONE B L~DSCAPING EQUIVALENT TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS CIASS USE CODE RESIDENTIAL UNITS (FACTOR) 1. Single Dwelling Unit A. Single Family Homes 11,12,13, i/Parcel 1.00 14,19,61 i/Parcel 1.00 B. Condominium 29 I/Parcel 1.00 2. Multiple Dwelling Units A. Two 21 2/Parcel 2.00 B. Three 22,24 3/Parcel 3.00 C. Four 23 4/Parcel 4.00 D. 5 to ]2 25 5/Parcel 5.00 E. 13 to 24 26 6/Parcel 6.00 F. 25 to 59 27 7/Parcel 7.00 G. 60 or more 28 8/Parcel 8.00 3. Commercial _ A. Commercial Stores 31 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre B. Small Grocery 32 " " C. Office Building 33 " " D. Medical, Dental 34 " " E. Service Stations 35 " " F. Garages 36 " " G. Recreational Clubs 37 " " H. Golf Courses 38 " " I. Bowling Alleys 39 " " J. Boat Harbors 40 " " K. Supermarkets 41 " " L. Shopping Centers 42 " " M. Financial Buildings 43 " " N. Motels & Mobile Home Parks 44 " " O. Theaters 45 " " P. Drive-In Restaurants 46 " " Q. Walk-In Restaurants 47 " " R. Multiple Commercial 48 " " S. Auto Agency 49 " " 4. Industrial A. Industrial 51,52 5.5/Acre 5.5/Acre B. Heavy Industrial 53,56 " " 54 " " C. Mini Warehouses 55 " " EQUIVALENT TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS CIASS USE CODE RESIDENTIAL UNITS (FACTOR) 5. Institutional A. Convalescent Hospitals 70 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre B. Churches 71 " " C. Schools 72 " " D. Hospitals 73 " " E. Cemetary, Mortuary 74 " " F. Fraternal & Service Organizations 75 " " G. Retirement Housing 76 " " H. Cultural Uses 77 O/Parcel 0.00 I. Parks & Playgrounds 78 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre J. Government Owned 79 O/Parcel 0.00 6. Miscellaneous Property A. Vacant Land 10,15,16-18, 0.5/Parcel 0.50 20,30,50,60 " " 62-69 0.6/Acre 0.6/Acre B. Mineral Rights 80 O/Parcel 0.00 _ C. Private Roads 81 0.5/Parcel 0.50 D. Pipe Lines & Canals 82 O/Parcel 0.50 E. State Board Assessed Parcels 83 " " F. Utilities 84 5.5/Acre 5.50/Acre G. Public Parking 85 " " H. Taxable Municipally Owned Properties 86 O/Parcel 0.00 I. Common Area 87 " " J. Mobile Homes 88 0 0 K. Other; Split Parcels in Different Tax Zones 89 I/Parcel 1.00 BENEFIT ZONE C LIGHTING TOTAL UNITS CIASS USE CODE INTENSITY PED. SEC. (FACTOR) 1. Single Dwelling Unit A. Single Family Home 11,12,13, 0.25 0.50 0.25 1.00 14,19,61 B. Condominium 29 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.50 2. Multiple Dwelling Units A. Two 21 0.25 1.00 0.50 1.75 B. Three 22,24 0.25 2.25 0.50 3.00 C. Four 23 0.50 2.25 0.50 3.25 D. 5 to 12 25 0.50 3.50 1.00 5.00 E. 13 to 24 26 0.75 4.00 1.25 6.00 F. 25 to 59 27 0.75 4.50 1.75 7.00 G. 60 or more 28 1.00 5.00 2.00 8.00 3. Commercial A. Commercial Stores 31 1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 B. Small Grocery 32 1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 C. Office Building 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 D. Medical, Dental 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 E. Service Stations 35 1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 F. Garages 36 1.00 0.50 1.00 2.50 G. Recreational Clubs 37 1.00 4.00 1.00 6.00 H. Golf Courses 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 I. Bowling Alleys 39 1.00 4.00 1.00 6.00 J. Boat Harbors 40 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 K. Supermarkets 41 1.00 6.00 1.00 8.00 L. Shopping Centers 42 5.00 10.00 5.00 20.00 M. Financial Buildings 43 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 N. Motels & Mobile Home Parks 44 2.00 5.00 2.00 9.00 O. Theaters 45 2.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 P. Drive-In Restaurants 46 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 Q. Walk-In Restaurants 47 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 R. Multiple Commercial 48 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 S. Auto Agency 49 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 4. Industrial A. Industrial 51,52 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 B. Heavy Industrial 53156 5.00 10.00 5.00 20.00 54 C. Mini Warehouses 55 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 TOTAL UNITS CIASS USE CODE INTENSITY PED. SEC. (FACTOR) 5. Institutional A. Convalescent Hospitals 70 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 B. Churches 71 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 C. Schools 72 0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00 D. Hospitals 73 2.50 5.00 2.50 10.00 E. Cemetary, Mortuary 74 0.25 0.50 0.25 1.00 F. Fraternal & Service Organizations 75 1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 G. Retirement Housing 76 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 H. Cultural Uses 77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I. Parks & Playgrounds 78 2.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 J. Government Owned 79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6. Miscellaneous Property A. Vacant Land 10,15,16-18, 20,30,50,60 62-69 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 B. Mineral Rights 80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ C. Private Roads 81 0.125 0.25 0.125 0.50 D. Pipe Lines & Canals 82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E. State Board Assessed Parcels 83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 F. Utilities 84 1.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 G. Public Parking 85 0.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 H. Taxable Municipally Owned Properties 86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I. Common Area 87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 J. Mobile Homes 88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 K. Other; Split Parcels in Different Tax Zones 89 0.25 0.50 0.25 1.00