HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 CO-2/
COUNCIL ORDER NO. 2 /
A COUNCIL ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~'
OF THE CITY OF DANVILLE
The City Council of Danville on behalf of the City of Danville,
concurred with The San Ramon Valley Unified School District's Board
of Education RESOLUTION No. 84/81-82, and by this Council Order,
hereby adopts the Resolution as though it were passed by the City
Council
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July. 1982
by the following vote:
AYES: Lane, May, Oftenhartz, Schlendorf
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mc Neely
w. 5/
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 84/81-82
WHEREAS, The San Ramon Valley Unified School District's Board of Education
has determined that conditions of overcrowding presently exist within the School
District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, all reasonable methods of mitigating said conditions of
overcrowding have been evaluated, and no feasible method for reducing such
conditions presently exists; and
WHEREAS, the above findings and determinations are set forth in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE SOLVED that the Secretary of the Board be, and he-~
is hereby authorized to submit the School District s Notice of i-indings / ./j~
(Exhibit "A") and infomation set forth therein to the City Council of / ~v [/'~
Danville for concurrence. ~ f~/~ /
PASSED AHD ADOPTED by the Board of Education of the San Ramon Valley
Unified School District of Contra Costa County, California, on June 30, 1982,
by the following vote:
AYES: BEST, ERICKSON, McCOY, McNEELY, STEPPER
HOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly
introduced and adopted by the members of the Board of Education of the San
Ramon Valley Unified School District of Contra Costa County, California at the
public meeting of said Board held on June 30, 1982.
A1 tan d.~e'rsdort
Secretary of the Board of Education of the
San Ramon Val!ev Unified School 9istrict
of Contra Costa County, State of California
1899A
San Ramon Valley Unified School District
699 Old Orchard Drive, Danville, California 94526
t ~ June 30, 1982
EXHIBIT "A"
The San Ramon Valley Unified School District has experienced continuous growth
which has caused a severe impact on the ability of the District to house its
students. Basic statistics on historical enrollment and the number of new
schools created in five-year increments over the past fifteen years and prior
to that time reveals the extent of the housing problem:
Multi-Year Increase in Number of Schools
Periods Enrollment Constructed or Established
Prior to 67-68 7,195 11
67-68 to 72-73 3,745 3
72-73 to 77-78 2,572 6
77-78 to 82-83 903 2
Totals 14,415 22
Growth is expected to occur, causing a continuing impact on the District. At
the present time, 9,281 housing units are under construction or planned for
development, and there is potential for 5,000+ additional housing units within
the currently defined General Plan for the Valley. By applying the current
pupil yield rate of 0.685 to the 9,281 planned housing units, there is therefore
the potential for an additional 6,357 students. Even assuming a reduced pupil
yield rate, the number of additional students to be generated will exceed the
existing capacity of the District's schools.
Future growth alone does not reveal a complete picture of the extent of the
District's school housing problems: the District also has a documented school
construction backlog of $15 million. This backlog is due to the need to replace
Twin Creeks Elementary School, Charlotte Wood Intermediate School, and numerous
portable buildings located throughout the District. Further, with a total
facilities inventory of 1.1 million square feet valued at $125 million and an
assumed 40-year life span, there is an estimated additional average need for
$3 million annually to renovate or replace existing facilities.
To alleviate the overcrowded conditions that have resulted from residential
dew~lopment, the District has explored a number of financing methods:
Bond Elections
The District has attempted to pass bond issues to provide construction money
for new schools. In March of 1974, a general obligation bond issue was defeated.
Again in November of 1974, a bond issue failed. Funds from a successful bond
issue under the lease/lease purchase program in May of 1975 have been used to
build Pine Valley Intermediate School and for additions to California High School
and additions and renovation at San Ramon High School. In May, 1977, a bond
issue failed by a margin of 2 to 1, leaving the District with no funds for the
construction of permanent facilities.
Exhibit "A" page 2
r
, Since the passage of Proposition 13 in June, 1978, it is of questionable legality
to ask voters to approve bond issues (previously requiring a two-thirds vote) or
lease-purchase issues (previously requiring a simple majority vote).
State Aid
In the past, the District utilized the State Aid Program as a means of constructing
schools. The last school constructed under that program was Greenbrook Elementary
School in 1976. This program is no longer available for use, however, for two
reasons: 1) to qualify, a school district must be bonded to capacity, and 2) the
State Aid Program is out of money. The District is not bonded to capacity, and
cannot be since Proposition 13 because such bonding is illegal, and therefore
cannot qualify for State Aid funds, even if funds were available.
Portable Classroom Buildings
At the present time, the District has 110 portable buildings which are being used
for classrooms and related facilities to meet the growth in the District. In the
past, many of these portables were financed out of the General Fund, which is the
primary operating fund from which educational programs, supplies, etc., must be
budgeted. With the imposition of revenue limits in 1973 and reduced funding levels
since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, General Fund monies are insufficient
to meet operational and building needs. This source of funds for facilities has
therefore been essentially eliminated.
State Lease-Purchase Program
In place of the older State Aid Program, the State has created a Lease-Purchase
Z-'
Program under which a school district may apply for funds. Unlike the State Aid
Program, which was a loan of funds which a school district had to repay, most of
the cost under the Lease-Purchase Program is absorbed by the State. The District
has submitted applications under this program to replace Twin Creeks and Charlotte
Wood Schools, and has received approval for Phase I (feasibility design) and
Phase II (complete plans and specifications) for Twin Creeks and approval for
Phase I for Charlotte Wood. While approval of these phases is encouraging, the
State has recently eliminated most school construction monies as a means of
balancing its budget, and furtherapprovals are therefore uncertain. It appears
unlikely that Phase II for Charlotte Wood will be approved. Phase III (construction)
of a new Twin Creeks School will not be acted upon by the State unless Phase II is
completed (estimated for December, 1982).
State Emergency Classroom Act
This is a relatively new State program under which school districts may apply
for portable classrooms for unhoused students. The District is pursuing the
possibility of replacing existing non-conforming portables under this program.
As is the case with the State Lease-Purchase Program, funds under the State Emer-
gency Classroom Act are limited and qualifying is difficult.
Year Round Schools
Year round schools have been studied by the District since October, 1971. A recent
report, "Options in Education (June 1982)" which discusses such housing alternatives
as year round schools and magnet mchoolg hag been prepared and will be publicly dis-
cussed by the Board of Education in June, 1982. At this time, the District has no
plans to implement alternative school housing approaches.
Exhibit "A" ~ page 3
Surplus Property
The only unused school site owned by the District is a vacant intermediate school
site which is intended as a replacement site for Charlotte Wood Intermediate School.
A one-acre parcel of land located along the west side of the Montair Elementary
School is surplus and is being considered for sale. Four other school sites have
been reserved by developers on behalf of the District, but are not now owned by
the District. One of these sites, located at the corner of Bollinger Canyon and
Alcosta, is being considered for release for its equivalent market value. All
other surplus sites have been disposed of.
Developer Impact Fees
On January 21, 1974, the District's Board of Education adopted a policy on the
availability of schools (revised March 22, 1977). That policy required a contri-
bution of $288 for each bedroom excluding the first from developers constructing
residences within the District.
On January 31, 1978, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance
No. 78-10 on School Facility Dedication (copy attached), which affected every
housing unit to be constructed within the District. The fee approach established
in the Ordinance was similar to that set in the District's policy - initially $300
per bedroom in excess of one bedroom. Subsequent increases have raised the fee
per bedroom to $400.
In addition to the County Ordinance, the County set special conditions regarding
developers' contributions to the District for the Sycamore Valley Plan area
because of secondary school impacts. The ultimate amount of additional contri-
butions to be made are dependent upon the amount of money that the District may
obtain from the State.
Developer impact fees are currently the primary source of funds for school
construction in the District. These funds were used to construct an all-portable
Montevideo Elementary School in 1977 and an all-portable Bollinger Canyon School
in 1980. In addition, numerous portable classrooms throughout the District are
leased using developer impact fees. Anticipated future developer impact fees
have been budgeted as the means to pay for the construction of Bollinger Canyon
School over the next two years, as well as the ongoing lease payments of portables
at seven other schools.
While the developer impact fees collected to date have helped to alleviate school
housing problems, the estimated $500,000 to be collected annually has not been
adequate to fully resolve student housing problems.
· . ....... ~.
· , ......... '' ,' ~ ',o'" '"'~~"".t ;' ".
· ....-; · -.,., ~,.
, .:_. ........ -,:.:,.V:!i.r.] ~-.~',
...... .. - . ':.:. . .. ... ' ?.:;., ?-i
· : ?. .~ ""- v- .
· ORDI.X,'A/'~CE NO. 78- 10
ion School Fac%!it:..' Dedzcation)
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows
(omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of ~%;. ·
· he enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code):
· SECTION I. Division 812 is added to the County Ordinance Code,
to e[fecuuate the provisions of Chapter 4.7(S~65970 ff.) of the ......
Goverr-~ent Code (as enacted by Stats. 1977 Chap. 955: SB-201),
to provide for the dedication of land and/or fees for interL~
· school facilities, to read:
DIVISION 812 School Facility Dedications
'CHAPTER 812-2 General Provisions ' . .
812-2.202' Title and Purpose. This Division shall be known
as the "Sc~ooi Facilities Dedication Ordinance of Contra Costa
County." The purpose of this Division is to provide a method
for financing interim school facilities necessitated by new
residential developments causing conditions of overcrowding. ' ":
(Ord. 78- 10 .) e!
81'2-2.204 Authority and Conflict. This Division is enacted
pursuant to Chapter 4oY (Goverm~ent Code ~65970 fl.) and con-
stitutes the ordinance referred to in 5565972 and 65974 of Chapter -- - 7_
4.7. In the case of any conflict between the provisions of t.~is
Division and those of Chapter 4.7, the latter shall ~revai!;
(Ord. 78- 10 .) . .... ...... .
812-2.206 General Plan. The County's General Plan provides for
. tike location of public sc! °.ls. Interim school facilities to be ..
constructed from fees or la.~d neouired to be dedicated, or both, . .
- . . .
shall be consistent wi~k the General· Plan.
(¢rd. 78- 10 .) ?
. 812-2.208 Regulations. The board may from time to time, by
resolution, issue regulations to establish administration, pro-
cendures, interpretation and policy direction for this Division.
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
· .. · ..
CHAPTER 812-4 Definitions.
812-4.202 Generally. Unless otherwise specifically provided,
or required by the context, the follo%~ing terms have the meanings
set forth in this Chapter for the purposes of this Division.
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
ORDI';AI':CE NO. 78- 10 ..
'~ '" ' '"~ ' CkaD2-'2. u . , ,
8_.=-.? .... ',.7. ' "Cb. a2ter 4 7" r. eans Ckapt2r ".7 (ccm-
/ mpnc'_n~f '¥~th ~uJ~,0} o2 Division t of Title 7 of the Government
Code as added by Chapter 955 of the Statutes of !977 and any sub-. - -
sequent am..an-~nts thereto.
(Ord. 73- !0 .)
'812-.I.206 - '~ ....
Ce..dl~_o..o of Overcrowdinc. "Conditions of overcrowding"
means =nau t~ne toca! unrollmerit or a school, including enrollment
from proposed development, exceeds the cauacit;, of such school as
· determined by the governing body of ti~e district...~.:..~,~.i?,:;/,.:...4...-?>j,i..:.'
(Ord. 78- 10 .) .-
81=-n.208 Dweltins Unit. "Dwel'ling unit" m~ans a building or
a peruion thereo~, or a r~obi!e home, designed for residential
occupancy by one person or a group of two or more persons living :-.~ -
together as a domestic unit.
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
... 812-4.210 Reasonable Methods For Mitigating Conditions of
Overcrowcin~. "Reasonable methods /or m~tigating conCi~lons of ..
overcrowalng" shall include, but are not limited to, agreements
bet:caen a subdivider and the affected school district whereby ..
temporary-use buildings will be leased to the school ·district or
temporary-use buildings Owned by the school district will be
used.
(Ord. 78- !0 .)
.. 812-4.212 Offher Methods For Mitiqatinc Conditions of Overcrowdinc.
"Other methods for mitigating cond~-tions of overcrowding" may
include, but are not limited· to the following: -
,'. ,.
.: (a) The use of available annual revenue limit and bond
.... revenues. : .
f . .'
'.. ...,
' (b) The use of funds which could be available from the ....
· isale of surplus school district real property and
..... . ''-'' fmnds available from any other sources. "'"~
:.:. (Ord. 78- 10 . )
-' , : , . . -.
· . '. ... ,~
· 812-4.214 Residential Deve!o~ment. '"Residential ' ' z:,, , : \
· · . develou~.en~ . - .. ~.
....... means a project containing residentia! dwellings, including mobile-~ ' _
homes, of one or more units or a subdivision of land for t~he purpose
.. of constructing one or more res~.d~ntia! dwelling units.. Residential
..... t'~-development includes, but is'nob limited to, a preliminary or final i~-i.."~
'/ .development plan, a subdivision tentative or'final map, a.parcel .
map, conditional use permit, a building permit, and any ot2~.er dis-
cretior. iry permit for new residential use. ' ' .- ..
(Ord. 78- 10 ..) . . .. ! . .':' '>
. '- . - .:. ... . - '.
o
.- t. . C}~APTER 812-6. Overcrowded Attendance Areas.
.... · . ..-'
812-6.202 Findings and Notice. Pursuant to Chapter 4.7 the
governing body of a school district may make findings supported by
clear and convincing evidence that: (1) conditions of overcrowd-
ing exist in one or more attendance areas within the district which
will impair the normal functioning of educational programs including
the 'reason for such conditions existing; (2) all reasonable methods
of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated; and
(3) no feasible method for reducing such conditions exist. Upon
making these findings the school district must provide the County
with notice of its findings.
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
ORD_..A..C~ NO. 78- !0
' t - ' .' - -
· , --2- · . .'~ ....'.:...? ....:---~ :..'
.... . . , . }'' :..,; -. :.-. -'L::';.~{i .i, " ..:,.,,~..... . ., . ..-'~' .
". - . - ',. , t ':" ' ' ''V'-",.'"-: L'~.i.. ','" ....... ; ,.t. ' -:.. : .. 2.
· -._. = . , ', ,.
.>
',. . .
/ 8._-~.2G4 Notice o2 Ftndln~s' ~ ........
f!n~i::g~ ~e::u uy a sc~:uo~ d~ur~c: uo ~ne County shall ~pecify: ..
(a) The findings listed in 5312-6.202.
· ,.e miti=ation measures and
-. . mu,.,o~j, lnc~d_..g
- ' -"'.listed in ~S12-4.210 and 812-4.212, considered by the ~-.---
school district and any determination made concerning .
~%em by ~he district ' :'
(C)A'description of ~e qeo¢~raphic boundaries of the over- .'' -.
crowded attendance area or areas.
(d)Such other information as may be required by board
regulation. .......... ~,. :...-~. d,., ..... ... ...... ~:k v .-'...~{,> :~ '~.7.,~:..~ ~,.-~'~; ...... :,.~-
(Ord. 78-_10 ,)
'812-6.206 County Concurrence. After the receipt of any notice of
findings complying with the requirement of 5812-6.204, ~he board
shall determine whether it concurs in such school district findings~
The board shall schedule and hold a public hearing on the matter of
its proposed concurrence prior to m~king its deter,mination by
resolution .............
(Ord. 78-. !0 .)
812-6'.'208 Findines for Development Approval. Within an attendance -'
area where the boara has concurred in a school district's notice of ' ......
findings that conditions of overcrowding exist,-the County's planning ---/--
agency shall not approve an.ordinance rezoning property to a resi-
dential use, grant a discretionary permit for residential use, or
--<: approve a tentative subdivision map for residential purposes, within
~'~ . .such area, unless the planning agency makes one of the following
· . findings: .. -
- - (a) That ~his Division is an ordinance adopted pursuant
:''-,~:.<':':. 'i .': .- : to ~65974 of Chapter 4.7. ..
:' , '.. , · .
'"i '""-"' >' (b) .That there are specific overriding fiscal, economic,
· social, or environmental factors which in the judgment
... . ........ of the .planning agency would benefit the county, . .
' :" .' :.- thereby justifying the approval of a residenta! develop-. '
.... ment oth£~gise subject to the interim school facilities
-". .. dedication provisions of this Division. . - --~.... -'
.:~- (Ord. 78- 10 o) .
,. .'
, : · ., ; " ..
812-6.210 School District Schedule~" Following the'concurrence
an= ~eclsion by the Counuy ~o require the dedication of land or the
payment of fees, or both, for an attendance area, the governing
· body of the involved school district shall submit a schedule speci-
fying how it will use the land or fees, or bo~h, to solve the
conditions of overcrowding. The schedule shall include the school
sites to be used, the classroom facilities to be made available,
and the times when such facilities will be available. In the
event the governing body of the school district cannot meet ~%e
schedule, it shall submi~ modifications to the board of super-
.- visors and the reasons for the modification ....... . . .... -
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
ORDII:A2:CE NO. 78- 10
--3--
.., ..;.. . . ,,
. . .' .- ' . . .% . ·
.-..... .
......... . .
·..
C"AP.-.AR S:2-8 r .... ~,~-~,-- '. '' ' · -
?
$12-,~1.202 ..._s_der.~_al Deve!onr. ant. In an attendance area where
t:l:~ ~o,tr~ i1~ concu.~rn~ as pro%'~u~ in Chap:or 312-6 t-he cwner of
a oro~osed residential de%elou ...... ~ as a condition of ,,-' '
- - appro.-~ or tna
obtaining 0f:a building permit shall dedicate land, pay fees in lieu
thereof, or do a combination of both,. for classroom and related
facilities for ele~.entary. and/or high: schools including all mandated
educational programs. . :.'-,.~-,.,..'.,,,,'..:..~.:.:~.~.~. ;~:, ~.,...,......,q.,.. ..,,:.:j,.. -.: .;,:.~.: _.. .
,~-~ ~o.. 1O ~
812-$.204 Subdi':ision Fee Limit. Only the payment of fees is
required for the approval of a subdivision map containing fifty (50)
parcels or less.
(Ord. 78-.110 . )
812-8.206 Exemptions. Residential developments shall be e:~em~t
from., the requirements of this Divison when they consist only of L~e
following:
(a) Ahy m.,odifi'cation or remodel of an existing legally
established dwelling unit t_hat does not create an
additional dwelling unit.
(b) A condomini,~i~, project converting an existing apart.~.ent -'
building into a condominium where no new dwelling
units are added.
(c) Any rebuilding of a legally established dwelling unit
'-"" destroyed or damaged by fire, explosion, act of God
. or other accident or catastrophe.
.: (d) Any-~ebuilding of an historichi building recognized,
acknowledged and designated as suck by the planning
- ~ .- ": . agency·
"· (Ord. 78-10' ) ..~"" .. ;i ,'.... :.?... ~ '.... .- .--.
· .'. .. --
" 812-8.208 Prior Agreements. Any agreement existing prior to
between a school district and a developer._ ' :
pertaining to the dedication of land and/or payment of fees for -
'' school facilities shall be recognize0. by the planhing agency.' ''
and shall be considered by it as satisfying this Division's
· requirements. -
(Ord. 78- 10 _.) . . · ' :,:'- -:.- '
-.. .
CH33TER 812-10 Standards For Land and Fees.
812-10.202 General Standard. The location and amount of land to
be dedicated or the amount of fees to be paid, or both, shall bear
a reasonable relationship and will be limited to the needs of the
co,~,unity for interim elementary and/or high school facilities
including all mandated educational programs and shall be reasonably
related and limited to the need for schools caused by the develop-
ment.
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
ORDI::32;CE NO. 78-10
. . ..- . .. .
o .
o.
/. .- ~.. ~".' A-our. t of r.~'-d T.~ tote~. lar. d a_~ea r ..... :~.~ by ',hi~
' -~' ' ~ least
Dl%'i'-'lon 5o ba cueLie%us ~,a~ be at equal in :.nnetar..' value
to the fees ¥;.~tich %:ould otherwise be required by 53!2-10.206. The
planning au .... ~ shall determine and establish the n.onetary value of
o.-..~ area for the purueses of this Division.
(Ore!. 73- !'3 .)
812-10.206 ;%-..ount of Fee. When fees are required by this Division
to be pale in lieu o" lane dedication or as a co.-.~ination of both,
such fees shall be, and paid, as fol!o'ws: ..'..:.::....~.:..~.:...{;~:~::..i: :.i.i._...'
(a) $300 per bedroom in excess of one ~ed-~oom per dwelling
unit not exceeding $9'00. An,.' room designed for sleep-
ing which has a closet is a bedroom for the purposes of
this Division. .. :-~: - :.,.: t..'' .'~.'~....:. - ..~ :?,_~-~ .,:,,; ...~-.:i,,i. :, .... ..-
(b) $300 for each dwelling unit space or lot in a mobile-
home park.
(Ord. 78- 10 .)
CHAPTER 812-12 Procedures.
812-12.202 Apol'ication Filina. At the time of filing an application
for une issuance oi a buiiding'permit or for the aperoyal'of a pro-
posed residential development (rezoning, tentative subdivision map "
or discretionary permit) located in an attendance area where the
board has concurred as provided in Chapter 812-6, the applicant shall,
as part of such filing, indicate whether he prefers to dedicate land
for interim. school facilities or to pay a fee in lieu thereof, or do
: a combination of these. If the applicant prefers to dedicate land,
/--'· ' ....' he shall suggest the specific land. · ....
:' '. (Ord. 18- 10' .)
':%.' 812-12.204 Decision Factors. At the time of initial residential
development or bullelna permit approval, the planning agency shall
determine whether to require a dedication of land within the .~
.... development, payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a co,uLbination of
both. In making this determination, the agency shall consider ~he
..... .. following factors: . .. . '.'- '
(a)Whether lands offered-fo:: dedication will be con- --
sistent with the General Plan; .. -
(b~ · The topography, soils, soil stability, drainage, . .
access, location and general utility of'land in ~he :
development available for dedication; ·.
(c) Whether the location and amount of lands proposed
to be dedicated or the amount of fees to be paid,
or both, will bear a reasonable relationship and
"will be limited to the needs of the community for
interim elementary and/or high school facilities
including all mandated educational programs and
will be reasonably related and limited to the need
for schools caused by the development.
(d) Any recom~endations made by affected school districts
concerning the location and amount of lands to be
dedicated,... ?.~ :::...:~ : .:~' ~,:.: ~.. '..~; i.~..:.
(e) If only a subdivision is proposed, whether it will
contain fL£~y (50) ~arcc!s Or less.
(Ord. 78- ]0
ORD .... ~:.CE ~'~O 78- ~0 .
--5--
, . .... .o
J.
8!£-!?..2~3 Land D-?.~_ication. When l:and to be dedicated, i~
/' shall o:TM. cf-or.2c ro~ ue~Icgulcn in - ~-~"'' ~" '
~%LD~__~.~_n=_~ the same .T~r. ner as
prescribed in the County.'s Subdivision. Ordinance for sureets and
pu~_~ easer. eats ......
COrd. 7S- !0 .) ; "
1 ~ . . a ..'/. -.~t. t~ ..
8_.-12 20S Fee n ,, ~ ~f ..~ .payment of a fee is required,
sue;: paymen~- sn-~,_l be made at the time the building permit is ...:.
approved and issued. ....
(f%rd.. 7 ,q-- 1. O . } :.
' 812-12.210 Trust Land and Fees. Land and fees shall be held in
truss by the Ccunty ~nti! ~ransferred to the school district oper-
ating schools in the attendance area from which the land or fees
were collected.
(Ord. 78- !0 .)
812-12.212 County Refunds.
'. %
Ca) If a final subdivision map, a parcel map, conditional
.......... use perm. it, development plan, or building permit is
vacated or voided and if the county still retains the
land and/or fees collected for it, and if the applicant
so requests, the board shall order return to hLn such
land and/or fees.
(b) If a final subdivision map, a parcel map, conditional
use per~..,it, devel'opment plan, or building permit is
cancelled or voided, and if the affected school ~ ~-:-~
· :? - ' :. ~ still retains the land and/or fees transferred to it by
'. " the co~ty, and if the applicant so requests, ~he
.' . school district shall return to him such land and/or
.' . : fees. . . . ...-...~ '. - · · · - .'. ..
· COrd. 78- 10 .)
· . . .'
· 'C~APTER 81'2-14 Use and LL~.its. ·
812J!4.202 Use of Land and Fees. All land or fees', or both, '"
coliecuea pursuanu to this Division and transferred to a school~ -
district shall be used only for the purpose of providing interL~ "
elementary or high school classroom and related facilities. '
~nciudfn~ all mandated educational programs. - ',
COrd. 78-' IO '7) .. · -
. . %, . .
812-~.20,, Agreement For Fee Distribution. Where two separate
school Qistricus operaue schools in an atuendance area where the
board concurs that overcrowding conditions exist for both school
districts, the Board will enter into an agreement with ~he
governing body of each school district for the purpose of deter-
mining the distribution of revenues from the fees levied pursuant
to this Division.
'COrd. 78- 10 .)
812-14.206 Fee Fund and Land Records and Reports. Any school
district recelvlng ~unds or land pursuant to ~his Division shall
maintain a separate account for any fees paid and disposition of
land received and shall file a report with the board on the balance
in Lha account at the end of the previous fiscal year and the
facilities leased, purchased, or constructed ~ ~;"
cu .... g ~he previous
fiscal 'y~
u=r. In additLon, the report shall ~D~cif? which attendance
OPDI~CE NO. 73- 10
--6--
areas %zi!l continue to be ovurcro~;ded when the fall term beqins and
/
where - -~: ~' -" of ....
co ..... lo..~ cvercro~¢din$ will no lcn~er e. xi~t. Such report
shall be filed by Augugt ! of each year and shall ke filed more
frequent!':' az the reql:ast of the board.
(Ord. 72- 10 .)
812-14.20S Terminntion of Dedication Recuirements. ~'lhen it is
d.;~ ........ a the overcro-;ding con~uicions no longer u~ist in an
attendance area, the County shall cease' lev~fin%' any fee or'requir-
ing Lh~ dedicauion of any land pursuant to uhzs Division tot the
area.
. (Ord. 78- 10 .)
SECTION II. EFFECTI%~ DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30
days a£uer passage, an~ w~uhin 15 days of passage shall be published
'once with the n~m. es of supervisors voting for and against it in the
CONTRA COSTA TIMES a newspaper published in this
Counuy.
PASSED on January R! , 1978, by the following vote:
AYEs:.'· Supervisors - J. 'P. Kenny, No :C. Fahden, W. N. Boggoss,
E. H. Hassettine,
NOES: Supervisors - None.
ABSENT: Supervisors - E% t. Schroder.
--- ATTEST: J.R.OLSSON,-County Clerk -. [.. '
& ex officio Clerk of the Board. . ////~/~
·; ~ ~ ' ~ ~ '"; ~Y}~an of the Board
Helen C. Marshall, Deputy ." ....
· .~ ,~,.~:~' . (SEAL) · , .
VJ%~: j
Draft ':
11-6-77
12-19-77
1-20-78
02Di::A'..CE NO. 78- 10
--7--
f~
? ,
June 24, 1982 :~
Board of Supervisors
Administration Building
651 Pine Street
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Members of the Board:
On June 17, 1982, at its regular monthly meeting, the Alamo-Danville
P-2 Advisory Committee passed the following recommendation.
"The Alamo-Danville P-2 Advisory Committee strongly recommends to
the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors that the P-2 County
Service Area be continued at its present level of activity for the
Fiscal Year 1982-1983. It further recommends that the present rate
schedule be maintained."
It is our understanding that the new Town of Danville will most
probably use existing levels of service as provided ~ the County.
Unless P-2 continues, the level of police services would obviously
decline. The citizens of the area recognized the need for supple-
mental services as evidenced by the overwhelming vote last year.
In addition, the recent June primary study showed the public's attitude
towards law and order.
Regarding the rate, it is too early to veri~ the various funding
that the Service Area will receive over and above the P-2 Tax. However
after discussing this matter with Reed McDonald at the Sheriffs office,
we feel it best to maintain the present rate. This gives both the
residents of Alamo and the new Danville Town Council time to make any
adjustments if a short fall should occur.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
George Filic~, ~airman (!~ ~ / ~-- i~:'"~ .....
Alamo-Danville P-2 Service Area
GF:ag
cc: County Supervisors
Reed McDonald, Sheriffs office
Danville Town Council members