HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-11RESOLUTION NO. 96-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
DENYING THE APPF2kL OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SECURITY GATE AT THE ENTRY TO PETERS RANCH
ESTATES SUBDIVISION (SD 5718)
WHEREAS, Peters Ranch Estates has requested approval of a Development Plan (DP
93-17) to allow construction of a temporary security gate for purposes of controlling
vehicular access into the development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission previously denied a request to install a
permanent security gate at the entrance of Peters Ranch Estates Subdivision on March
28, 1995; and
WHERF2~S, the applicant requested administrative approval of a temporary steel
construction gate at the entrance to Peters Ranch Estates Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the request for administrative approval of the temporary steel construction
gate at the entrance to the subdivision was denied October 18, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the applicant appealed the administrative decision to deny the gate
proposal on December 20, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the appeal at a noticed public hearing
on February 27, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, a staff report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission
deny the appeal of the administrative action, with this action upholding the
administrative action to deny authorization to install the proposed temporary steel
construction gate; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports,
recommendations, and testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing;
now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the Town of Danville adopts Resolution
No. 96-11 denying the appeal of the administrative action to deny authorization to
install the proposed temporary steel construction gate and makes the following
findings in support of the denial:
PAGE NO. 1 OF RESOLUTION 96-11
FINDINGS
The proposed security gate is inconsistent with the Danville 2005 General Plan
Private Street Policy that discourages gated entries into subdivisions.
The proposed "temporary" security gate cannot be considered temporary in
nature due to its decorative design and the time period that the gate is expected
to remain at the proposed location.
APPROVED by the Danville Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting on February
27, 1996 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
Bowlby, Combs, Hunt, Moran, Osborn, Murphy
Jameson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Chief of P[an~
pdpz86
PAGE NO. 2 OF RESOLUTION 96-11