Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-12 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO 94-12 A RESOLUqlON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF DANVII.LE APPROVING A REVISED FINAL DEWELOPMENT PLAN DP 94-01 FOR SUP, DMSIONS 7132 & 7133- GREYSTONE AT TASSAJARA WHER 'EAS, Greystone Homes has requested approval of a revised Final Development Plan fl~r SI) 7132 and SD 7133 including revised architecture and landscaping for the remaining 131 of the original 174 single family lots in these two subdivisions: and WHI~IIEAS, the subject site is located on the northeast Corner of Crow Canyon Road and Tassajara Ranch Drive, being further identified as subdivisions SD 7132 and SI) 7133; and WHEREAS, the Town of Danville P-l; Planned Unit Development District Ordinance requires approval of a revised Final Development Plan to allow the modification of any provisions approved as part of the previously approved Final Development Plan including architecture and landscaping; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the project at a noticed public hearing on April 26, 1994; and WHERFdkS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by law: and WHEREAS, a staffreport was submitted recommending that Planning Commission approve the request; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning'Commission of the Town of Danville approves revised Final Development Plan request DP 94-01 per the conditions contained herein, and makes the following findings in support of this action: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the Danville 2005 General Plan. The revisions proposed in the Revised to the Final Development Plan request are compatible with the existing development within the Planned Unit Development PAGE 1 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 District, with development within surrounding districts, and with Danviile's Residential Development Standards. Thc revisions proposed in the Revised Final Development Plan request will result in the development of new single family dwellings which are compatible with existing and planned surrounding development. The revisions proposed in the Revised Final Development Plan request will yield a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability. There is no evidence befi'~re the Town that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The previously prepared Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Dougherty Road Area General Plan Amendment fully discussed potential impacts associated with development of this site, satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The specific proposal m modify the approved unit architecture is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the CEQA. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAl, Conditions of approval with an asterisk ("*") in the left-hand column are standard project conditions of approval. Unless otherwise specified, the following conditions shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Each item is subject to review and approval by the Planning Division unless otherwise specified. A. GENE1Lad. This approval is fi)r a revised Final Development Plan (DP 94-01) fi)r the remaining 131 of the original 174 single family lots of subdivisions SI) 7132 & SD 7133. The revisions include new architecture and front yard landscaping. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project drawings as follows, except as may be modified by conditions contained herein; Preliminary Architectural Plans and Floor Plans, consisting of 'i5 sheets, as prepared by Shleppey Hezmalhalch Associates and dated PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 received by the Planning Division on April 22, 1994. Conceptual Frontyard Landscape Plans, as prepared by Isaacson, Wood & Associates, dated received by the Planning Division on March 4, 1994. The applicant shall submit to the Town of Danville fees required to file a Notice of Determination for this project as required by AB 3185. The fee shall be $25.00, Construction activity shall be restricted to thc period between the weekday hours of 7:3(} a.m. to 5:3¢) p.m. (Mondays through Fridays), unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Engineer for general construction activity and the Chief Building Official for building construction activity,. The applicant shall provide security fencing, to the satisfaction of the City, Engineer and/or the Chief Building Official, around the site during, construction of the proiect. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition, and to locate stationary noise-generating equipment as far away from existing residences as feasible. A watering program which incorporates the use of a dust suppressant, and which complies with Regulation 2 of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District shall be established and implemented for all on and off-site construction activities. Equipment and human resources for watering all exposed or disturbed soil surfaces shall be supplied on weekends and holidays as well as work days. Dust-producing activities shall be. discontinued during high wind periods. If the applicant ,intends to construct the project in phases, then the first submittal for building permits shall be accompanied by an overall phasing plan. This plan shall address: off-site improvements to be installed in conjunction with each phase; erosion control for undeveloped portions of the site: timing of delivery of emergency vehicle access connections; and phasing of project grading. The phasing plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Chief of Planning. PAGE 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 Except as specifically modified by these Conditions of Approval, development shall conform with the previously established Conditions of Approval for Preliminary Development Plan PUD 96-3 and Vesting Tentative. Map 6878. The conditions of approval for the previously approved revised architecture for the project (SD 7132 Revised Architecture H.R. Remmington Properties) approved by the Planning Commission on May 22. 1989, are hereby repealed and replaced by these conditions of approval. SITE PLANNING 1. Units shall bc developed in conformance with the Town's R-6: Single Family Residential District standards as follows: Frontyard Setback Sideyard Setback Rearyard Setback 20 feet 5 foot minimum, 15 foot total - not including unusable steep slope areas 20 feet - not including unusable steep slope areas Where determined necessary to accommodate the plotting of Plan 4, thc front porch column may encroach a maximum of 6 inches into the required 1 $ fi)ot aggregate sideyard setback. In this situation, the minimum sideyard setback shall be 7 feet, with an aggregate sideyard setback of 14.5 feet. The appropriateness of this encroachment shall be subject to review and approval by the Chief of Planning and will only be allowed where it is determined necessary to provide a sufficient variety of unit types otherwise not possible in a specific area of the project. Rearyard setbacks may be reduced to 19.5 feet fi)r lots 71-77 of SI) 7132, where Plan 4 is utilized, where determined necessary by the Chief of Planning to provide a sufficient variety of unit types otherwise not possible on this stretch of lots. A minimum of 10 percent of the lots in both SI) 7132 & 7133 shall be developed with single story units (Plan 1). This results in a requirement a minimum of nine additional single story units within SD 7132 and a minimum of five single story units within SD 7133. Single story units shall be interspersed appropriately throughout the project to provide variety in the streetscape. PAGE 4 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 7. On opposing corner lots, a minimum of one unit shall be single story (Plan 1). Single story units are encouraged on corner lots to the greatest extent possible. In order to maximize the usable yard area on the porch side elevations of the units, building to building setbacks may be reduced to 10 feet where adjacent unit floor plans are reversed so that garage side elevations are opposite each other and where front porch side elevations of adjacent units face each other. This will result in a minimum 20 foot building separation on the porch side elevations. Developer installed front yard landscaping shall be designed to maYamize the use and openness of these areas. Thc same unit plan or elevation shall not be located next to or directly across the street from each other. 8. All driveways shall be constructed of washed aggregate. 9. A detailed fence plan for all corner lots shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Design Review Boards final review of the project. LANDSCAPING 1, Proposed developer installed lawn areas within the project shall comply with the Town's Landscape Ordinance. A minimum of one street tree and one accent tree per lot (with additional tree plantings for corner lots) shall be incorporated into the final landscape and irrigation plan for the project. The developer shall install frontyard landscaping for all new development in this subdivision consistent with the preliminary landscape plan referenced by Condition of Approval A.l.b. above. Frontyard landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy of the unit, or as determined appropriate by the Chief of Planning, at the earliest opportunity after occupancy of the unit. D. ARCHITECTURE 1.' The street numbers for each structure in the project shall be posted so as tt) be easily seen from the street at all times, day and night. PAGE 5 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 ¸2. Samples of final materials and the proposed color pallet shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of building permits fi~r the project. Final architectural elevations, details and revisions shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of building permits for the project. Ali unit plans shall utilize a fascia board with separate gutter fl~r added detail. Frtmty, ard setbacks, and rear-yard setbacks for units which back up to public streets, shall be varied to the greatest extent possible. For Plan 4, the stucco trim detail on the front elevation shall be wrapped around to the porch garage side elevation ali the way to the wall of the front entry' wail. This shall be required on at least two of the three Plan 4 alternatives. Elevation A of Plan 4 shall be modified by separating one of the three garage doors from the remaining two similar to the designs for elevations B and C. Final design shall be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board. INFRASTRUCTURE A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared as part of the preparation of project improvement plans to assure prevention of construction related silt and pollutants from leaving the site and polluting the downstream water courses. The SWPPP shall supplement the erosion control plan prepared for the project. MISCELLANEOUS The project shall be constructed as approved. Minor modifications in the design, but not the use. may be approved by Staff. Any other change will require Planning Commission approval through the Development Plan review process. 2. Pursuant to Government Code section 66474.9, the applicant (including the PAGE 6 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94--12 applicant or any agent thereof) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town of Danville and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim. action, or proceeding against the Town or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the Town's approval concerning this application, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37. The Town will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense. APPROVED by the Danville Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting on April 26, 1994. by the fifliowing w)te: AYES: Arnerich, Hunt, NOES: ABSTAINED: Bowlby ABSENT: Osborn APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jameson, Murphy, Vilhauer Chief of Pl.' pdcz63 PAGE 7 OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-12