Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-10 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE APPROVING DP 93-3 TO AMEND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DP 89-16 FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVISIONS FOR A PORTION OF SD 7135 - CASTLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. WHEREAS, Castle Construction, Inc. has requested approval of a Development Plan for revisions to the previously approved architectural plans (DP 89-16) for the remaining 59 lots in Stone Creek subdivision (SD 7135); and XVHE~S, the subject site is located in a portion of SD 7135, in the southeast portion of Tassajara Ranch and is identified as Assessor's Parcel Number's 206-390-010 thru 025 & 030, 206-401-001 thru 003, 206-402-002, 206-404-001 thru 014; and WHEREAS, the Town of Danville P-l; Planned Unit Development District Ordinance requires approval of a Development Plan for architectural modifications; and WHERF~S, the Planning Commission did review the project at a noticed public hearing on March 15, 1993; and WHEREAS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a staff report was submitted recommending that Planning Commission approve the request; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission of the Town of Danville approves DP 93-3 per the conditions contained herein, and makes the following findings in support of the Development Plan: The proposed architectural design changes are consistent with the approved P-l; Planned Unit Development District covering the subject property, with Danville's residential Standards, and with the Danville 2005 General Plan. The proposed architectural design changes will result in the development of new single family dwellings which are compatible with existing and planned surrounding residential development. PAGE 1 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 The planned residential development will constitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and community. The previously certified EIR prepared for the Dougherty Road General Plan Amendment fully discussed potential impacts associated with development of this site, satisfying the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The specific proposal to modify the approved architecture/design is categorically exempt from the provision of CEQA. There is no evidence before the Town that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Note: * Indicates standard project Conditions of Approval) Unless otherwise specified, the following Conditions shall be complied with prior to issuance of building permits for the project. Each item is subject to review and approval by the Planning Division unless otherwise specified. A. GENERAL This approval is for development of 59 single family lots identified as Lots 10-12 & 14, Lots 31-51, Lots 56-70, and Lots 85-103 of SD 7135. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project drawings as follows, except as may be modified by conditions contained herein; b0 Co do "Park Ridge Estates - Castle Construction, Inc.", including Plans 1 thru 5 with building details, as prepared by Hollman Bologna & Associates, consisting of 19 sheets and dated received March 1, 1993 by the Danville Planning Division. These plans include five unit plans, each with three different elevations. "Subdivision 7135 Park Ridge Estates" as prepared by Castle Construction, Inc., consisting of one sheet and dated received March 1, 1993 by the Danville Planning Division. "Driveway Design - Park Ridge Estates", consisting of 5 sheets and dated received March 1, 1993 by the Danville Planning Division. "Park Ridge Estates Landscape Format", as prepared by Castle PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 0 Construction, consisting of two sheets and dated received March 1, 1993 by the Danville Planning Division. "Typical Two House Mailbox", as prepared by Caste Construction, consisting of one sheet and dated received March l, 1993 by the Danville Planning Division. The developer shall pay any and all Town and other related fees that the property may be subject to. These fees shall be based on the current fee schedule in effect at the time the relevant permits are secured. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the developer shall submit written documentation that all requirements of the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District and the San Ramon Valley Unified School District have been or will be, met to the satisfaction of these respective agencies. The applicant shall submit to the Town of Danville fees required to file a Notice of Determination for this project as required by AB 3185. The fee shall be $1,300 unless the project is found to be De Minimus (the project has no potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends), in which case the fee shall be $25.00. All construction and grading operations, including delivery of materials and warming up of machinery, shall be limited to weekdays during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and weekends and holidays from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Engineer. If determined necessary by the City Engineer, the project developer shall provide security fencing around the entire site during construction of the project. Any building construction activity, delivery of construction supplies, or use of pneumatic tools, shall be limited to weekdays during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and weekends and holidays from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. unless otherwise approved in writing by the Chief Building Official. If the developer intends to construct the project in phases, then the first submittal for building permits shall be accompanied by an overall phasing plan. This plan shall address off-site improvements to be installed in conjunction with each phase, erosion control for undeveloped portions of the site, timing of delivery of emergency vehicle access connections, and phasing of project grading. The phasing plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Chief of Planning. PAGE 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 Except as specifically modified by these Conditions of Approval, development shall conform with the Conditions of Approval established for Final Development Plan PUD 86-3 and SD 7135. LANDSCAPING The applicant shall diligently pursue rights to install landscaping in the open space access areas located between Lots 40 & 41 and Lots 47 & 48. Landscaping for the open space access areas shall be maintained by Tassajara Ranch Homeowners Association subject to their review and approval, and shall be submitted to the Town for review and approval prior to installation. If the applicant does not receive permission to landscape open space access areas between Lots 40 & 41 and Lots 47 & 48, the property owner of such open space areas is responsible for installation of drought resistant landscaping, subject to review and approval of Planning staff. Landscaping for the open space access areas (between Lots 40 & 41, Lots 47 & 48) shall be drought resistant, and designed to accommodate pedestrian access and fire apparatus (subject to the review and approval of the Fire Protection District). Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans for the open space areas (with planting shown at 1"= 20' scale) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Board (DRB). The plan shall include common names of all plant materials and shall indicate the size that various plant materials will achieve within a five year period of time. All plant material shall be served by an automatic underground irrigation system. All trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallon container size and properly staked. Shrubs not used as ground cover shall be a minimum of 5 gallons is size. A final street tree program shall be established for the proposed units. It shall include a minimum of two trees per lot and three trees for all corner lots. The species of street trees shall be subject to the review and approval of the DRB. Street trees shall be planted no further than four feet back of sidewalk and no closer than three feet from back of sidewalk. Occupancy of the last home of each 'phase shall be released only after street trees for the respective phase are installed. 6. As part of this review process, plans and specifications for project fencing PAGE 4 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 shall be provided to match existing Lusk fencing. Front yard fencing shall be redwood with lattice, and side yard fencing shall be six foot high redwood fencing consistent with existing fencing on previously developed lots. 'Wiew" fencing shall be installed on the rear property line of Lots 31 - 41, 47, 48, 50, and 56. The developer shall be responsible for the installation of all project fencing. Developer-installed project landscaping and fencing for the respective lots in this project shall be installed prior to occupancy of the affected units in the project. Developer-installed retaining walls utilized in the project shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division in regards to height, location, design and materials. ARCHITECTURE Exterior final colors and materials shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division. The Design Review Board preliminarily approved these colors and materials at their February 24, 1993 meeting. The roof materials and colors shall match the existing roof materials (size, shape and colors) of the existing 34 residential units. 2. Tile roof materials and colors shall be interspersed throughout the project. No two building plans shall be located adjacent to each other or across the street from one another. If temporary signing for the development is desired, a comprehensive sign program shall be submitted to the Town for consideration under a separate application. Plan lB shall be eliminated or revised subject to review and approval of the DRB. Wood trim on side and rear elevations of stucco homes shall be painted an accent color compatible with the building body color. All residential units shall have white anodized aluminum windows with white grids mounted to the outside of the windows. 8. Plan 4B is approved for Lot #56. The residence shall not be painted white PAGE 5 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 1(). 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. in color. The developer shall provide five special driveway treatments, each treatment to be utilized on 10% of the lots. Two additional rows of stamped concrete banding shall be added to the proposed side-loaded driveway that includes "basket weave" stamped concrete subject to review and approval by the DRB. Stamped concrete banding shall be brick in color and shall be compatible with the color/material scheme of the applicable home. Mailboxes shall be "Peacock" brick located equidistant between driveways. The proposed mailbox design shall be revised to include a soldier course or revised brick design subject to DRB review and approval. A one story unit shall be constructed on Lot 85 subject to DRB review and approval. The garage shall be front loaded with access from Dunhill Court. Plan 2's on Lots 12 & 103 shall have different elevations. The street numbers of the buildings shall be posted so as to be easily seen from the street at all times, day and night. Natural wood siding shall be utilized within the development. Use of hardboard, pressboard or equivalent exterior siding is expressly prohibited. When wood siding is utilized, wood siding shall be applied to all elevations. Minimum dimensions for wood window trim shall be 2 X 4 inches. The following requirements shall apply to construction of the proposed units: a0 Compliance with the R-6 requirements of the Zoning Ordinance except that a minimum of fifteen feet shall be provided between adjacent dwelling units. A minimum of 20 feet of usable rear yard area shall be provided for each lot. This 20 feet shall not include areas within slopes. If the side slope between adjacent lots exceeds five feet in height (based on building pad elevation) the setback from the bottom of the slope shall be five feet, and the setback from the top of the slope PAGE 6 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 D. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. shall be 10 feet. d. Maximum building height is 28 feet. Prior to issuance of building permits for each phase of the development, a composite unit siting plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division. The front setback of each unit shall be offset from adjacent units by a minimum of 3+ feet. The Planning Division shall have the authority to vary this minimum when it can be demonstrated that another unit cannot be utilized on the lot. All masonry shall return to the fence line. The garage door design shall be compatible with the design of each residence. Gutter trim detail located under the gutter shall be 2 X 2. Front door color shall match trim colors. Both street elevations of corner units shall be given additional architectural treatments similar to front elevations. Proposed Plan 1 on lot 10 shall be reversed so that the garage is located on the east side of the lot. GRADING Any grading on adjacent properties will require written approval of those property owners affected. Areas undergoing grading, and all other construction activities shall be watered, or treated with other dust control measures to prevent dust. These measures shall be approved by the Chief Building Official and employed at all times as conditions warrant. Development shall be completed in compliance with a detailed soils report and the construction grading plans prepared for this project. The soils report shall contain specific reeornmendafiong for foundation degign of the building. The engineering recommendations outlined in the project specific PAGE 7 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 Eo soils report shall be incorporated into the design of this project. Where soils or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil report, a revised soils report shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Engineer. It shall be accompanied by an engineering and geological opinion as to the safety of the site from settlement and seismic activity. STREETS The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Engineering Department prior to commencing any construction activities within any public right-of-way or easement. Street signing shall be installed by the developer as may be required by the City Engineer. Traffic signs and parking restriction signs which may be required to be installed shall be subject to review and approval by the Police Department. o The developer shall keep adjoining public streets free and clean of project dirt, mud, materials and debris during the construction period, as is found necessary by the City Engineer. Any damage to street improvements, now, existing or done during construction on or adjacent to the subject property shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer at full expense to the developer. This shall include slurry seal, overlay or street reconstruction if deemed warranted by the City Engineer. MISCELLANEOUS The project shall be constructed as approved. Minor modifications in the design, but not the use, may be approved by Staff. Any other change will require Planning Commission approval through the Development Plan review process. Approval of the subject application is conditioned upon the applicant submitting documentation to the Town of Danville, in a form deemed acceptable by the City Attorney, that the existing private agreements pertaining to single family projects located within Tassajara Ranch (originally created by PUD gg-6/$D 6978) (addressing the creation, ownership and ongoing maintenance of common open space facilities, PAGE 8 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10 recreation facilities, drainage facilities, project signage and creek improvements) have been, or will be, fulfilled to the Town's satisfaction. All construction traffic associated with this development shall access the project via Tassajara Ranch Road and the west end of Dunhill [)rive. Construction traffic shall not enter other subdivisions in the vicinity. The developer shall cooperate with Tassajara Homeowners Association in developing a plan that minimizes impacts to existing Tassajara Ranch residents. APPROVED by the Danville Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting on March 15, 1993 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Hunt, Jameson, Murphy, Osborn, Vilhauer, Arnerich pdpz36 PAGE 9 OF RESOLUTION NO. 93-10