HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-38RESOLUTION NO. 91-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
DENYING LUP 91-19 DANVILLE MOTORS
WHERF~S, Jim Peterson of Danville Motors has requested approval of a Land Use Permit
for outdoor storage/display/sale of automobiles on a .11 acre site; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is located at 151 E. prospect and the Danville Motors sales
office is located at 137 #D E. Prospect and the parcel is identified as Assessor's Parcel
Number 208-022-042 & 017; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville Downtown Business District Ordinance requires
approval of a Land Use Permit for outdoor storage/display/sale of merchandise in Area
1; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville Downtown Business District Ordinance does not allow
auto sales in Area 1; and
WHEREAS, in November 1990, Mr. Peterson applied for a Zoning Compliance Certificate
for an auto sales office at 137 #D E. Prospect and was approved; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Compliance Certificate specified that the office was a point-of-sale
office and that storage of vehicles for sale was not permitted on-site; and
WHEREAS, on April 29, 1991 the Town of Danville notified Mr. Peterson in writing that
he was in violation of the Zoning Compliance Certificate by storing for sale vehicles on-
site; and
WHEREAS, on June 14, 1991 Mr. Peterson applied for a Land Use Permit to
store/display/sell automobiles at 137 #D and 151 E. Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the project at a noticed public hearing
on August 13, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, a staff report was submitted recommending that Planning Commission deny
the request; and
WHE~AS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports,
recommendations, and testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing;
PAGE 1 OF RESOLUTION 91-38
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission of the Town of
Danville deny the request for a Land Use Permit and makes the following findings in
support of the denial:
1. The proposed project is inconsistent with the Danville 2005 General Plan.
0
o
o
The proposed project is inconsistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Master Plan.
The proposed project is inconsistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Business District Ordinance.
Establishment of this use at this location would be precedent setting.
The proposed land use will be detrimental to the to the health, safety, and general
welfare of the Town.
The proposed land use will adversely affect the orderly development of property
within the Town.
The land use will adversely affect the preservation of property values and the
protection of the tax base within the Town.
The land use will create a nuisance and\or enforcement problem within the
neighborhood or community.
The land use will encourage marginal development within the neighborhood.
APPROVED by the Danville Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting on August 13,
1991 by the following vote:
AYES: Arnerich, Hughes, Hunt, Murphy, Osborn, Wright
NOES:
AB STAI NED: Vi Ih au er C h
Chief of Planning
pcmcmll
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C~ty Attorney
PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION 91-38