HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-19RESOLUTION NO. 91-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
DENYING A REZONING AND MINOR SUBDMSION REQUEST TO REZONE
THE PROPERTY FROM P-l; PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
TO R-40; SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND TO
SUBDMDE THE PROPERTY INTO 2 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
WHERF. a~, Elden & Janet Radmall have requested approval of a Rezoning and
Minor Subdivision request to Rezone the property from P-l; Planned Unit Development
District to R-40; Single Family Residential District and to Subdivide the property into 2
single family lots on a 2.04 acre site; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is located at 899 E1 Pintado Road and is identified as
Assessor's Parcel Number 200-020-024; and
WHE~, the Town of Danville Subdivision Ordinance requires approval of a
Tentative Subdivision Map prior to creation of a new lot; and
WHEREAS, the item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May
14, 1991, at the request of the applicant; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the project at a noticed public
hearing on May 28, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by
law; and
WHEREAS, a staff report was s~bmitted recommending that Planning Commission
deny the request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports,
recommendations, and testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission of the Town
of Danville denies the Rezoning and Minor Subdivision request per the findings contained
herein:
The proposed development is not compatible with, or complementary to, the
existing rural residential development pattern in the area.
o
The proposed lot sizes are inappropriate Country Estate lots due to the sites
average slope greater than 15 percent, as specified within the General Plan.
The proposed development is not consistent with the previously approved
development plan for the area.
PAGE I OF RESOLUTION 91-19
Due to the limitations on buildable area and use of the property created by slopes
and required setbacks, the proposed development is not consistent with rural
estate lots as specified in the General Plan.
DENIED by the Danville Planning Commission at a Regular Meeting on May 28, 1991,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
Arnerich, Hughes, Hunt, Murphy, Osborn, Wright
Vilhauer
~h~~of~Planning
ity Attorney
ms852-91/pdcz18
PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION 91-19