HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-08 RESOLUTION NO. 88-8
A Resolution of the Danville Plannil
Denying Minor Subdivision Request
and Variance request VAR 8.
WHEREAS, Gary Stadtler (Applicant) an~
(Owners) have requested approval of a
resubdivide Parcel C of MS 85-68 (current
Family Residential District) into two
respectively at 20,030 ± net square feet a~
feet; and
WHEREAS, the project proponents cone
Variance request to allow deviation from th
width standards set forth in the R-20 Dis
proposed 120' minimum average lot width requ
WHEREAS, the State of California Subdi~
adopted Town of Danville Subdivision Regula
real property may be divided into two or mo~
purposes of sale, lease or financing unles
acted upon a Final Map is approved consisten~
Map Act, and the Town of Danville Subdivisic
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did rev
public hearings, beginning with a noticed pub
20, 1988, and concluding with a public hes
1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of this reque
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to State environmenta
Negative Declaration of Environmental Sign
for the projects; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did k
reports, and public testimony and informatio~
public hearing regarding the projects; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ide]
development of the site related to compatibi
neighborhood, potential impact of additional~
Drive, and non-conforming lot depth dimensio
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLAN~
TOWN OF DANVILLE HEREBY DENIES MS 854-88 AN]
THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF THIS AC
.Page 1 of 2 - Res
3g Commission
3~9854-88
Frank & Edward Hom
£inor Subdivision to
zoned R-20; Single
parcels, proposed
22,350 ± f~t square
~rrently submitted a
~ minimum average lot
trict (116' and 104'
ired); and
ision Map Act and the
Lions require that no
e parcels or lots for
s a Tentative Map is
~ with the Subdivision
n Regulations; and
iew the project at two
Lic hearing on October
ring on November 14,
st was given in all
regulations, a Draft
.ficance was prepared
.ear and consider all
presented during the
Ltified concerns for
lity with surrounding
~raffic on San Andreas
ns.
ING COMMISSION OF THE
) VAR 88-19 AND MAKES
~ION:
olution 88-8
2)
3)
4)
private roadway and could potenl
roadway.
That Policy 1.12 (page 25) and ]
Danville 2005 General Plan protect
areas from intrusion of incompati
land use compatibility. The rural
Andreas neighborhood would be comp~
than one acre. Parcels of
inconsistent with the size and
surrounding immediate neighborhood
parcels where the keeping of liw
rural influences are encouraged.
WHEREAS, Goal 3 of the General P1
that new developments be inte
functionally in a manner compati!
character and desired image of the
That the request for lot width
supported as this is a flat recta
special circumstances to suppo~
granting of a variance.
Therefore, the proposed tentative subdivisiol
the intent of the general plan and zoning o2
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 14 day of F
following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners: Hirsch, Hendric~
ABSENT:
Commissioner:
ATTEST:
~ially overburden the
.13 (page 26) of the
~ existing residential
ble uses and promotes
· character of the San
'omised by lots smaller
this size would be
orientation of the
which contai'hs 1+ acre
~stock is allowed and
an (page 28) requires
grated visually and
~le with the physical
Community; and
reduction can not be
ngular parcel with no
't findings for the
~ is inconsistent with
~dinance.
~bruary, 1988 by the
~s, Vilhauer, Hunt,
Fro~t, Wright
Harvey ~
Chair~(an
Page 2 of
2 - Resolution 88-8