Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-03Planning Commission ResolutJ A RESOLUTION OF THE DANVILLE PLANNING COMM] DEVELOPMENT PLAN PUD 87-3 FOR LOT 64 OF SD WHOLESALE); AND, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPOR9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PURSUANT TO THE CALIFf QUALITY ACT. WHEREAS, Sections 65350 et seq. of the the State of California prescribe the procE amending the Town's General Plan; and WHEREAS, a study of the Fostoria Way A~ the Town of Danville in 1985 in order to st alternatives which might exist for the stud purpose of amending the Town's General Plat ordinance, if necessary, to reflect the mos uses for the Fostoria Way Area; and WHEREAS, an environmental impact report Study General Plan Amendment (the "EIR") wa Town of Danville pursuant to the Californi~ Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Town of Danville approved on March 17, 1986, certifying review and cc Final EIR, making findings with respect to and establishing mitigation measures to all the significant environmental effects that amendment of the general plan for the Fost¢ and the construction of individual projects the General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Town Council approved Res¢ 17, 1986, adopting a general plan amendment initiating rezoning of the 66.6 acre Fosto~ permit the development of single and multi~ housing, commercial uses (including destina retail and hotel/motel uses), and general ¢ WHEREAS, following the adoption of Resc 21-86 by the Town of Danville, the City of legal challenge in Contra Costa County Supe adequacy of the EIR and to the validity of Ramon Litigation"); and WHEREAS, the Town of Danville, the City of the real parties in interest to the laws Ramon/Danville Settlement Agreement" and "T Shilo Agreement" on December 19, 1986 in or %he ~an Ramon Li%i~a%ion wi%h respec% %0 an the EIR, the General Plan Amendment, or pro .on 88-3 iSSION APPROVING FINAL 6806 (COSTCO ' OF THE FINAL .RNIA ENVIRONMENTAL Government Code of ~dure for adoDtina and 'ea was initiated by .udy land use .y area and with the and zoning appropriate land for the Fostoria Way s prepared by the Environmental Resolution No. 20-86 nsideration of a significant impacts, eviate or minimize might arise from ria Way Study Area in accordance with lution 21-86 on March (GPA 85-2) and ia Way Study Area to le family residential tion and service pen space; and lutions 20-86 and San Ramon initiated a rior Court to the GPA 85-2 (the "San of San Ramon and all uit executed the "San he Danville-Castle- der to fully settle y legal challenge %0 jects undertaken in the Fostoria Way Area in accordance with t! and WHEREAS, the San Ramon/Danville Settlel in pertinent part, at paragraph 8 on page required, amendment of G.P.A. 85-2 shall b, delete paragraph 5 on page 2 thereof conce] for future traffic studies with regard to in the Fostoria Way General Plan Area and modifications, if any, as may be required the Shilo/Castle and Danville agreements"; WHEREAS, in light of the traffic mitig~ Fostoria Way Area required by the San Ramo! Agreement and Resolution 20-86, which suff adverse circulation impacts of individual ] developed within the Fostoria Way Area, thl no need for further traffic studies on spec development projects within the Fostoria W~ WHEREAS, the Danville Town Council app] on February 18, 1988, amending GPA 85-2 by le EIR and GPA 85-2; lent Agreement states, , "To the extent recommended to ning the requirement [evelopment projects ~o provide for other ~y this Agreement and and ~'~ Ltion measures for the L/Danville Settlement .ciently eliminate ,rojects to be ~re presently exists ~ific individual Ly Study Area; and · oved Resolution 13-88 deleting paragraph 5 on page 2 thereof, in accordance with the gan Ramon/Danville Settlement Agreement and based upon presen~ conditions and needs; and ' / WHEREAS, in accordance with the Fostoria Way General Plan Amendment, the Town Council adopted Ordinar 1987 rezoning the 66.6 acre Fostoria Way St A-3, C-S2 and P-1 to P-l; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 118 designated a spE Destination Commercial uses which could oc¢ designated Commercial areas of the site in¢ catalogue showroom, large scale off price outlets for the general public, department dealerships, and specialty stores of a regJ approved a Preliminary Development Plan fo~ WHEREAS, the Danville Planning Commiss Tentative Map for SD 6806 on May 28, 1987, commercial site known as lot 64 of SD 6806 WHEREAS, an application for Final Deve 87-3) was properly filed by Fostoria Assoc with the rules and regulations governing tk applications; and ~ce 118 on May 18, ~udy Area from A-2, ~cific range of :ur within the :luding: hotel, motel, .tores or wholesale store, automobile onal nature, and PUD 87-3; and on approved a creating a 15.77 acre and opment Plan (PUD ates Ltd. in accord e filing of such WHEREAS, the application was filed to ~ a 127.074 square foot Costco Wholesale stol 9.9 acre site on the north side of Fostori~ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has c¢ noticed public hearing to consider the Fine February 22 and April 11, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Town staff has presented information regarding the proposed Final De WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has c¢ testimony and information presented during regarding the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has rE the Environmental Impact Report prepared fE ~llow construction of ~e on an approximately Way on Lot 64; and nducted a duly Development Plan on ~ubstantial factual ~velopment Plan; and ~nsidered all public the public hearing ~viewed and considered the Fostoria Way Study Area General Plan Amendment (G.P.A. f15-2) and has found and determined that the EIR is adequate to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and to serve as a "Program EIR" whose scop~ includes the proposed project. ~ · NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 9'HE TOWN OF DANVILLE HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND RESOLVES AS F(~LLOWS: ae Be Ce The EIR prepared for the Fostoria Way ~ Plan Amendment was certified by the To% March 17, 1986. The Town of Danville adopted findings through adoption of Town Council Resol~ resolution is incorporated herein by t~ including mitigation measures. In Resolution 20-86, the Town adopted ~ Overriding Consideration pursuant to s~ State CEQA Guidelines, finding that im~ project may have the following signifi¢ unavoidable: loss of agricultural land urban pollutants to storm flow, a perm~ visual quality from a rural setting to structures, increased traffic, increas~ demand for expansion of the urban serv~ Town determined that it was in the publ to allow these impacts to occur due to benefits: 1) The Project is in a hig~ where agricultural enterprise is no lo~ compatible use of property; 2) all su have been removed from agricultural pre dnvnloDm~nt of ~hn P~ojoe~ will eon~i~ of the community through provision at s itudy Area General 'n of Danville on 'egarding the EIR .tion No. 20-86 (which .is reference) Statement of ction 15093 of the .lementation of the ant impacts which are , introduction of nent change in the one of urban type d noise levels, and ces network. The ic's best interests the following ly urbanized area ger an appropriate or rrounding properties duction; 3) ervices and revenues De E® Fo Ge to the Town; and 4) development of re: particularly multiple family residenti~ property will assist the Town in provi¢ stock partially satisfying goals of the The Planning Commission has determined Overriding Considerations contained in remains applicable and that, since the benefits of the project outweigh its ur environmental effects in that the locat Wholesale store on Lot 64 will provide services, utilize the land in a manner surrounding area, and enhance Town reve environmental impacts of the project az Further technical studies, including (1 Way Traffic Impact Study, (2) an evalua Costco Sales on existing Retail Stores Danville and San Ramon and (3) a Lique~ Costco Building have been prepared accc professional standards in order to dete substantial changes in the project or i under which the project is undertaken h certification of the EIR. All of these made available to the public. In consideration of the further technic above, together with all of the public the project and the extensive analysis the Planning Commission determines purs of the CEQA Guidelines, that no substa~ project or in the circumstances under ~ undertaken will occur which will eithex significant environmental impacts or wh important revisions to the EIR; Consideration of the EIR prepared for t Area General Plan Amendment as a "Progr applicable to this project pursuant to Section 15168 is appropriate based on t findings: feasible mitigation measures and a in the EIR for the Fostoria Way Ar Amendment have been incorporated i changes in the project subsequent the EIR do not require important r since they will not generate poten environmental effects that have no :idential, ~1, uses on the ling needed housing Housing Element. that the Statement of Resolution 20-86 above-enumerated avoidable adverse ion of a Costco important c6~munity compatible with the nues, the unavoidable e acceptable. ) the Costco Fostoria tion of the Impact of in the cities of action Review for the rding to accepted rmine whether or not n the circumstances ave occurred since studies have been al studies cited testimony concerning conducted by staff, ~ant to section 15162 ~ial changes in the nich the project is generate new ich will require ne Fostoria Way Study · m EIR" that is ~EQA Guidelines ne following lternatives developed ~a General Plan nto the project; to certification of ~visions of the EIR rial significant been mitigated; there have not been substantial c] the circumstances under which the which require important revisions and, no new information of substantial project has become available whic] additional or supplemental EIR. The Planning Commission of the Town of with incorporation of mitigation measu] Town Council Resolution No. 20-86 and measures specified in Exhibit A - Cond that the requirements of CEQA have bee regard to the approval of the Final De' Costco Wholesale project. In light of the foregoing, the Plannin¢ Town of Danville finds and determines of the Final Development Plan (PUD 87-~ The proposed planned unit developi with the Danville General Plan an( Development Plan approved by the 18, 1987 through adoption of Ordi The commercial development will pi environment of sustained desirabi] that will be in harmony with the surrounding community and will gel environmental impacts that other permitted pursuant to GPA 85-2. The traffic mitigation measures i Ramon/Danville Settlement Agreeme~ contribution of the Shilo propert5 the first $300,000 in Commercial 9 collected from development on the Way General Plan Amendment Area, mitigation measures incorporated will eliminate or sufficiently mi adverse impacts of the project on circulation system, and 5 langes with respect to project is undertaken of the prior EIR; importance to the would require an Danville finds that ~es as speci~ied in ldditional mitigation ~tions of Approval, satisfied with ,elopment Plan for the ; Commission of the Ls follows in support )- ent is consistent [ the Preliminary ~own Council on May Lance 118. ~oduce a commercial .ity and stability, :haracter of the ~erate fewer potential :ommercial projects [entified in the San ~t including and contribution of .I.P. fees actually site to the Fostoria ~ogether with the .n Resolution 20-86, ~imize potential the traffic The approval of Final Development the public interest. PASSED, AND ADOPTED THIS the following vote: llth day of AYES: NOES: Commissioners Commissioners Hirsch, Hendric! Plan PUD 87-3 is in April , 1988 by ~s, Frost, Vilhauer, Wright ABSTENTION: Commissioners Harvey ABSENT: Commissioners ~~ ~ lairman  jp9 6