HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-09
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-09
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUEST DP 2006-12 AND VARIANCE
REQUEST V AR 2007-07 ALLOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF 1,227 +/- SQUARE
FOOT SECOND DWELLING UNIT WITH AN ATTACHED 688 +/- SQUARE FOOT
GARAGE, WHICH A PORTION OF THE HOME WOULD ENCROACH FIVE FEET
INTO THE REQUIRED 25-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK, RESULTING IN A 20-
FOOT MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK
(APN: 200-020-052 - So)
WHEREAS, Ming & Jenny So (OWNER/APPLICANT) have requested approval of a
Development Plan (DP 2006-12) to allow the construction of a 1,227 + / - square foot second
dwelling unit with a 688 + / - square foot attached garage; and
WHEREAS, a Variance has also been requested to allow the structure to encroach five feet
into the minimum 20 foot front yard setback; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is located at 915 EI Pintado Road and is further identified as
Assessor's Parcel Number 200-020-052; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Danville Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance requires approval of a
Development Plan for a Second Dwelling Unit that does not comply with the ministerial
provisions in the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the project at a noticed public hearing on
May 8, 2007; and
WHEREAS, this project has been found to be Categorically Exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under section 15303, new
construction; and
WHEREAS, the public notice of this action was given in all respects as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, a staff report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission
approve the request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all reports, recommendations,
and testimony submitted in writing and presented at the hearing; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the Town of Danville approves
Development Plan request DP 2006-12 and a Variance request V AR 2007-09 per the
conditions contained herein, and makes the following findings in support of this action:
FINDINGS
Development Plan
1. The proposed Second Dwelling Unit is ancillary in size to the main home and is in
scale with the receiving property and is not larger than the main residence.
Variance
1. This variance does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties in the area and the R-65 Single Family Residential
District in which the subject property is located.
2. Because of the following special circumstances applicable to this specific property,
strict application of the applicable zoning regulations would deprive the subject
property of rights enjoyed by others in the general vicinity and! or located in the
same zoning district:
a. Given the parcel topography is greater than 30% in grade on the majority of
the parcel and a scenic easement encumbers 75% of the parcel, development
is limited to the flat portion of the site adjacent to EI Pintado Road. The
granting of this variance would allow for reasonable development of the
property and allow rights to the property owner that are enjoyed by others in
the general vicinity and same zoning district.
3. This variance is in substantial conformance with the intent and purpose of the R-65
Single Family Residential District in which the subject property is located since the
variance would allow the
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditions of approval with an asterisk ("*") in the left-hand column are standard project
conditions of approval.
Unless otherwise specified, the following conditions shall be complied with prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the project. Each item is subject to review and approval
by the Planning Division unless otherwise specified.
PAGE 2 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2007-09
A. GENERAL
1. This approval is for a Development Plan (DP 2006-12) and Variance (V AR
2007-07) to allow the construction of a 1,227 + / - square foot second dwelling
unit with an attached 688 + / - square foot garage. A Variance is approved to
allow this structure to encroach five feet into the required 25 foot frpnt yard
setback, resulting in a 20 foot side yard setback. The site is located at 915 EI
Pintado Road. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project
drawings as follows, except as may be modified by conditions contained
herein;
a. Architectural floor plans, elevations, and details labeled liThe So New
In-Law residence" as prepared by Chia-Ching Line, dated received by
the Planning Division on April 30, 2007.
2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall reimburse the
Town for notifying surrounding neighboring residents of the public hearing.
The fee shall be $105.00 (140 notices X $0.75 per notice x 1 notices).
3. The paint color, and roof material and color shall match the existing
residence.
4. External lighting shall be down directed and shielded as to not create glare
towards adjacent properties.
5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of the second
dwelling unit, the applicant shall submit written documentation that all
requirements of the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District and the San
Ramon Valley Unified School District have been met to the satisfaction of
these respective agencies.
6. The property owner shall occupy either the principal or the secondary
residential unit. If neither unit is owner-occupied, then the use of the
property shall revert to a single family occupancy. Nothing in this section
shall be construed to prohibit one or both of the units remaining vacant.
PAGE 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2007-09
7. Before obtaining a Building Permit for a second dwelling unit, the property
owner shall file with the County Recorder a declaration or an agreement of
restrictions, which has been approved by the City Attorney as to its form and
content, and stating that:
a. The second dwelling unit shall not be sold separately and may not be
subdivided off from the principal residential unit.
b. The second dwelling unit is restricted to the approved size.
c. The restrictions shall be binding upon any successor in ownership or
the property and lack of compliance shall result in proceedings to
revoke the approval for the second dwelling unit.
d. The approval allowing the second dwelling unit shall be in effect only
so long as either the primary residence or the second dwelling unit is
occupied by the owner of record of the property.
8. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the Planning Division which
outlines the landscaping for the front yard area. The front yard landscaping
shall be installed prior to final inspection of the second dwelling unit.
9. The project shall be constructed as approved. Minor modifications in the
design, but not the use, may be approved by Staff. Any other change will
require Planning Commission approval through the Development Plan
reVIew process.
APPROVED by the Danville Planning Commission at a regular meeting on May 8, 2007, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~/5 .~
City Attorney
~.
Chairman
~annin~
PAGE 4 OF RESOLUTION NO. 2007-09